Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Nellikkath, R

Searching in archive eess. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2303.13228  [pdf, other

    cs.LG cs.AI eess.SY stat.ML

    Enriching Neural Network Training Dataset to Improve Worst-Case Performance Guarantees

    Authors: Rahul Nellikkath, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

    Abstract: Machine learning algorithms, especially Neural Networks (NNs), are a valuable tool used to approximate non-linear relationships, like the AC-Optimal Power Flow (AC-OPF), with considerable accuracy -- and achieving a speedup of several orders of magnitude when deployed for use. Often in power systems literature, the NNs are trained with a fixed dataset generated prior to the training process. In th… ▽ More

    Submitted 23 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

    Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2212.10930

  2. arXiv:2303.12116  [pdf, other

    eess.SY cs.AI

    Physics Informed Neural Networks for Phase Locked Loop Transient Stability Assessment

    Authors: Rahul Nellikkath, Andreas Venzke, Mohammad Kazem Bakhshizadeh, Ilgiz Murzakhanov, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

    Abstract: A significant increase in renewable energy production is necessary to achieve the UN's net-zero emission targets for 2050. Using power-electronic controllers, such as Phase Locked Loops (PLLs), to keep grid-tied renewable resources in synchronism with the grid can cause fast transient behavior during grid faults leading to instability. However, assessing all the probable scenarios is impractical,… ▽ More

    Submitted 21 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

  3. arXiv:2212.10930  [pdf, other

    cs.LG eess.SY

    Minimizing Worst-Case Violations of Neural Networks

    Authors: Rahul Nellikkath, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

    Abstract: Machine learning (ML) algorithms are remarkably good at approximating complex non-linear relationships. Most ML training processes, however, are designed to deliver ML tools with good average performance, but do not offer any guarantees about their worst-case estimation error. For safety-critical systems such as power systems, this places a major barrier for their adoption. So far, approaches coul… ▽ More

    Submitted 21 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

  4. arXiv:2209.05793  [pdf, other

    eess.SY

    Interpretable Machine Learning for Power Systems: Establishing Confidence in SHapley Additive exPlanations

    Authors: Robert I. Hamilton, Jochen Stiasny, Tabia Ahmad, Samuel Chevalier, Rahul Nellikkath, Ilgiz Murzakhanov, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis, Panagiotis N. Papadopoulos

    Abstract: Interpretable Machine Learning (IML) is expected to remove significant barriers for the application of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms in power systems. This letter first seeks to showcase the benefits of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for understanding the outcomes of ML models, which are increasingly being used. Second, we seek to demonstrate that SHAP explanations are able to capture the… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

  5. arXiv:2203.07505  [pdf, other

    eess.SY cs.LG

    Closing the Loop: A Framework for Trustworthy Machine Learning in Power Systems

    Authors: Jochen Stiasny, Samuel Chevalier, Rahul Nellikkath, Brynjar Sævarsson, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

    Abstract: Deep decarbonization of the energy sector will require massive penetration of stochastic renewable energy resources and an enormous amount of grid asset coordination; this represents a challenging paradigm for the power system operators who are tasked with maintaining grid stability and security in the face of such changes. With its ability to learn from complex datasets and provide predictive sol… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 July, 2022; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

    Comments: In proceedings of the 11th Bulk Power Systems Dynamics and Control Symposium (IREP 2022), July 25-30, 2022, Banff, Canada. 21 pages, 12 figures, 5 tables

    Report number: IREP2022-57

  6. arXiv:2110.05983  [pdf, other

    math.OC eess.SY

    Network-Aware Flexibility Requests for Distribution-Level Flexibility Markets

    Authors: Eléa Prat, Irena Dukovska, Lars Herre, Rahul Nellikkath, Malte Thoma, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

    Abstract: This paper proposes a method to design network-aware flexibility requests for local flexibility markets. These markets are becoming increasingly important for distribution system operators (DSOs) to ensure grid safety while minimizing costs and public opposition to new network investments. Despite extended recent literature on local flexibility markets, little attention has been paid to quantifyin… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 May, 2023; v1 submitted 12 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

  7. Physics-Informed Neural Networks for AC Optimal Power Flow

    Authors: Rahul Nellikkath, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

    Abstract: This paper introduces, for the first time to our knowledge, physics-informed neural networks to accurately estimate the AC-OPF result and delivers rigorous guarantees about their performance. Power system operators, along with several other actors, are increasingly using Optimal Power Flow (OPF) algorithms for a wide number of applications, including planning and real-time operations. However, in… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

  8. arXiv:2107.00465  [pdf, other

    eess.SY cs.LG

    Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Minimising Worst-Case Violations in DC Optimal Power Flow

    Authors: Rahul Nellikkath, Spyros Chatzivasileiadis

    Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks exploit the existing models of the underlying physical systems to generate higher accuracy results with fewer data. Such approaches can help drastically reduce the computation time and generate a good estimate of computationally intensive processes in power systems, such as dynamic security assessment or optimal power flow. Combined with the extraction of worst-cas… ▽ More

    Submitted 27 September, 2021; v1 submitted 28 June, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

    Comments: The code to reproduce all simulation results is available online in https://github.com/RahulNellikkath/Physics-Informed-Neural-Network-for-DC-OPF