-
Validation of a new, minimally-invasive, software smartphone device to predict sleep apnea and its severity: transversal study
Authors:
Justine Frija,
Juliette Millet,
Emilie Bequignon,
Ala Covali,
Guillaume Cathelain,
Josselin Houenou,
Helene Benzaquen,
Pierre Alexis Geoffroy,
Emmanuel Bacry,
Mathieu Grajoszex,
Marie-Pia d Ortho
Abstract:
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is frequent and responsible for cardiovascular complications and excessive daytime sleepiness. It is underdiagnosed due to the difficulty to access the gold standard for diagnosis, polysomnography (PSG). Alternative methods using smartphone sensors could be useful to increase diagnosis. The objective is to assess the performances of Apneal, an application that records…
▽ More
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is frequent and responsible for cardiovascular complications and excessive daytime sleepiness. It is underdiagnosed due to the difficulty to access the gold standard for diagnosis, polysomnography (PSG). Alternative methods using smartphone sensors could be useful to increase diagnosis. The objective is to assess the performances of Apneal, an application that records the sound using a smartphone's microphone and movements thanks to a smartphone's accelerometer and gyroscope, to estimate patients' AHI. In this article, we perform a monocentric proof-of-concept study with a first manual scoring step, and then an automatic detection of respiratory events from the recorded signals using a sequential deep-learning model which was released internally at Apneal at the end of 2022 (version 0.1 of Apneal automatic scoring of respiratory events), in adult patients during in-hospital polysomnography.46 patients (women 34 per cent, mean BMI 28.7 kg per m2) were included. For AHI superior to 15, sensitivity of manual scoring was 0.91, and positive predictive value (PPV) 0.89. For AHI superior to 30, sensitivity was 0.85, PPV 0.94. We obtained an AUC-ROC of 0.85 and an AUC-PR of 0.94 for the identification of AHI superior to 15, and AUC-ROC of 0.95 and AUC-PR of 0.93 for AHI superior to 30. Promising results are obtained for the automatic annotations of events.This article shows that manual scoring of smartphone-based signals is possible and accurate compared to PSG-based scorings. Automatic scoring method based on a deep learning model provides promising results. A larger multicentric validation study, involving subjects with different SAHS severity is required to confirm these results.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Predicting non-native speech perception using the Perceptual Assimilation Model and state-of-the-art acoustic models
Authors:
Juliette Millet,
Ioana Chitoran,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
Our native language influences the way we perceive speech sounds, affecting our ability to discriminate non-native sounds. We compare two ideas about the influence of the native language on speech perception: the Perceptual Assimilation Model, which appeals to a mental classification of sounds into native phoneme categories, versus the idea that rich, fine-grained phonetic representations tuned to…
▽ More
Our native language influences the way we perceive speech sounds, affecting our ability to discriminate non-native sounds. We compare two ideas about the influence of the native language on speech perception: the Perceptual Assimilation Model, which appeals to a mental classification of sounds into native phoneme categories, versus the idea that rich, fine-grained phonetic representations tuned to the statistics of the native language, are sufficient. We operationalize this idea using representations from two state-of-the-art speech models, a Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture model and the more recent wav2vec 2.0 model. We present a new, open dataset of French- and English-speaking participants' speech perception behaviour for 61 vowel sounds from six languages. We show that phoneme assimilation is a better predictor than fine-grained phonetic modelling, both for the discrimination behaviour as a whole, and for predicting differences in discriminability associated with differences in native language background. We also show that wav2vec 2.0, while not good at capturing the effects of native language on speech perception, is complementary to information about native phoneme assimilation, and provides a good model of low-level phonetic representations, supporting the idea that both categorical and fine-grained perception are used during speech perception.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Do self-supervised speech models develop human-like perception biases?
Authors:
Juliette Millet,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
Self-supervised models for speech processing form representational spaces without using any external labels. Increasingly, they appear to be a feasible way of at least partially eliminating costly manual annotations, a problem of particular concern for low-resource languages. But what kind of representational spaces do these models construct? Human perception specializes to the sounds of listeners…
▽ More
Self-supervised models for speech processing form representational spaces without using any external labels. Increasingly, they appear to be a feasible way of at least partially eliminating costly manual annotations, a problem of particular concern for low-resource languages. But what kind of representational spaces do these models construct? Human perception specializes to the sounds of listeners' native languages. Does the same thing happen in self-supervised models? We examine the representational spaces of three kinds of state-of-the-art self-supervised models: wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT and contrastive predictive coding (CPC), and compare them with the perceptual spaces of French-speaking and English-speaking human listeners, both globally and taking account of the behavioural differences between the two language groups. We show that the CPC model shows a small native language effect, but that wav2vec 2.0 and HuBERT seem to develop a universal speech perception space which is not language specific. A comparison against the predictions of supervised phone recognisers suggests that all three self-supervised models capture relatively fine-grained perceptual phenomena, while supervised models are better at capturing coarser, phone-level, effects of listeners' native language, on perception.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Inductive biases, pretraining and fine-tuning jointly account for brain responses to speech
Authors:
Juliette Millet,
Jean-Remi King
Abstract:
Our ability to comprehend speech remains, to date, unrivaled by deep learning models. This feat could result from the brain's ability to fine-tune generic sound representations for speech-specific processes. To test this hypothesis, we compare i) five types of deep neural networks to ii) human brain responses elicited by spoken sentences and recorded in 102 Dutch subjects using functional Magnetic…
▽ More
Our ability to comprehend speech remains, to date, unrivaled by deep learning models. This feat could result from the brain's ability to fine-tune generic sound representations for speech-specific processes. To test this hypothesis, we compare i) five types of deep neural networks to ii) human brain responses elicited by spoken sentences and recorded in 102 Dutch subjects using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Each network was either trained on an acoustics scene classification, a speech-to-text task (based on Bengali, English, or Dutch), or not trained. The similarity between each model and the brain is assessed by correlating their respective activations after an optimal linear projection. The differences in brain-similarity across networks revealed three main results. First, speech representations in the brain can be accounted for by random deep networks. Second, learning to classify acoustic scenes leads deep nets to increase their brain similarity. Third, learning to process phonetically-related speech inputs (i.e., Dutch vs English) leads deep nets to reach higher levels of brain-similarity than learning to process phonetically-distant speech inputs (i.e. Dutch vs Bengali). Together, these results suggest that the human brain fine-tunes its heavily-trained auditory hierarchy to learn to process speech.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
The Perceptimatic English Benchmark for Speech Perception Models
Authors:
Juliette Millet,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
We present the Perceptimatic English Benchmark, an open experimental benchmark for evaluating quantitative models of speech perception in English. The benchmark consists of ABX stimuli along with the responses of 91 American English-speaking listeners. The stimuli test discrimination of a large number of English and French phonemic contrasts. They are extracted directly from corpora of read speech…
▽ More
We present the Perceptimatic English Benchmark, an open experimental benchmark for evaluating quantitative models of speech perception in English. The benchmark consists of ABX stimuli along with the responses of 91 American English-speaking listeners. The stimuli test discrimination of a large number of English and French phonemic contrasts. They are extracted directly from corpora of read speech, making them appropriate for evaluating statistical acoustic models (such as those used in automatic speech recognition) trained on typical speech data sets. We show that phone discrimination is correlated with several types of models, and give recommendations for researchers seeking easily calculated norms of acoustic distance on experimental stimuli. We show that DeepSpeech, a standard English speech recognizer, is more specialized on English phoneme discrimination than English listeners, and is poorly correlated with their behaviour, even though it yields a low error on the decision task given to humans.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Independent and automatic evaluation of acoustic-to-articulatory inversion models
Authors:
Maud Parrot,
Juliette Millet,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
Reconstruction of articulatory trajectories from the acoustic speech signal has been proposed for improving speech recognition and text-to-speech synthesis. However, to be useful in these settings, articulatory reconstruction must be speaker independent. Furthermore, as most research focuses on single, small datasets with few speakers, robust articulatory reconstrucion could profit from combining…
▽ More
Reconstruction of articulatory trajectories from the acoustic speech signal has been proposed for improving speech recognition and text-to-speech synthesis. However, to be useful in these settings, articulatory reconstruction must be speaker independent. Furthermore, as most research focuses on single, small datasets with few speakers, robust articulatory reconstrucion could profit from combining datasets. Standard evaluation measures such as root mean square error and Pearson correlation are inappropriate for evaluating the speaker-independence of models or the usefulness of combining datasets. We present a new evaluation for articulatory reconstruction which is independent of the articulatory data set used for training: the phone discrimination ABX task. We use the ABX measure to evaluate a Bi-LSTM based model trained on 3 datasets (14 speakers), and show that it gives information complementary to the standard measures, and enables us to evaluate the effects of dataset merging, as well as the speaker independence of the model.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
