-
Re-Interpreting the Step-Response Probability Curve to Extract Fundamental Physical Parameters of Event-based Vision Sensors
Authors:
Brian McReynolds,
Rui Graca,
Lucas Kulesza,
Peter McMahon-Crabtree
Abstract:
Biologically inspired event-based vision sensors (EVS) are growing in popularity due to performance benefits including ultra-low power consumption, high dynamic range, data sparsity, and fast temporal response. They efficiently encode dynamic information from a visual scene through pixels that respond autonomously and asynchronously when the per-pixel illumination level changes by a user-selectabl…
▽ More
Biologically inspired event-based vision sensors (EVS) are growing in popularity due to performance benefits including ultra-low power consumption, high dynamic range, data sparsity, and fast temporal response. They efficiently encode dynamic information from a visual scene through pixels that respond autonomously and asynchronously when the per-pixel illumination level changes by a user-selectable contrast threshold ratio, $θ$. Due to their unique sensing paradigm and complex analog pixel circuitry, characterizing Event-based Vision Sensor (EVS) is non-trivial. The step-response probability curve (S-curve) is a key measurement technique that has emerged as the standard for measuring $θ$. In this work, we detail the method for generating accurate S-curves by applying an appropriate stimulus and sensor configuration to decouple 2nd-order effects from the parameter being studied. We use an EVS pixel simulation to demonstrate how noise and other physical constraints can lead to error in the measurement, and develop two techniques that are robust enough to obtain accurate estimates. We then apply best practices derived from our simulation to generate S-curves for the latest generation Sony IMX636 and interpret the resulting family of curves to correct the apparent anomalous result of previous reports suggesting that $θ$ changes with illumination. Further, we demonstrate that with correct interpretation, fundamental physical parameters such as dark current and RMS noise can be accurately inferred from a collection of S-curves, leading to more accurate parameterization for high-fidelity EVS simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Shining light on the DVS pixel: A tutorial and discussion about biasing and optimization
Authors:
Rui Graça,
Brian McReynolds,
Tobi Delbruck
Abstract:
The operation of the DVS event camera is controlled by the user through adjusting different bias parameters. These biases affect the response of the camera by controlling - among other parameters - the bandwidth, sensitivity, and maximum firing rate of the pixels. Besides determining the response of the camera to input signals, biases significantly impact its noise performance. Bias optimization i…
▽ More
The operation of the DVS event camera is controlled by the user through adjusting different bias parameters. These biases affect the response of the camera by controlling - among other parameters - the bandwidth, sensitivity, and maximum firing rate of the pixels. Besides determining the response of the camera to input signals, biases significantly impact its noise performance. Bias optimization is a multivariate process depending on the task and the scene, to which the user's knowledge about pixel design and non-idealities can be of great importance.
In this paper, we go step-by-step along the signal pathway of the DVS pixel, shining light on its low-level operation and non-idealities, comparing pixel level measurements with array level measurements, and discussing and how biasing and illumination affect the pixel's behavior. With the results and discussion presented, we aim to help DVS users achieve more hardware-aware camera utilization and modelling.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2023; v1 submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Optimal biasing and physical limits of DVS event noise
Authors:
Rui Graca,
Brian McReynolds,
Tobi Delbruck
Abstract:
Under dim lighting conditions, the output of Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS) event cameras is strongly affected by noise. Photon and electron shot-noise cause a high rate of non-informative events that reduce Signal to Noise ratio. DVS noise performance depends not only on the scene illumination, but also on the user-controllable biasing of the camera. In this paper, we explore the physical limits of…
▽ More
Under dim lighting conditions, the output of Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS) event cameras is strongly affected by noise. Photon and electron shot-noise cause a high rate of non-informative events that reduce Signal to Noise ratio. DVS noise performance depends not only on the scene illumination, but also on the user-controllable biasing of the camera. In this paper, we explore the physical limits of DVS noise, showing that the DVS photoreceptor is limited to a theoretical minimum of 2x photon shot noise, and we discuss how biasing the DVS with high photoreceptor bias and adequate source-follower bias approaches optimal noise performance. We support our conclusions with pixel-level measurements of a DAVIS346 and analysis of a theoretical pixel model.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2023; v1 submitted 8 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Exploiting Alternating DVS Shot Noise Event Pair Statistics to Reduce Background Activity
Authors:
Brian McReynolds,
Rui Graca,
Tobi Delbruck
Abstract:
Dynamic Vision Sensors (DVS) record "events" corresponding to pixel-level brightness changes, resulting in data-efficient representation of a dynamic visual scene. As DVS expand into increasingly diverse applications, non-ideal behaviors in their output under extreme sensing conditions are important to consider. Under low illumination (below ~10 lux) their output begins to be dominated by shot noi…
▽ More
Dynamic Vision Sensors (DVS) record "events" corresponding to pixel-level brightness changes, resulting in data-efficient representation of a dynamic visual scene. As DVS expand into increasingly diverse applications, non-ideal behaviors in their output under extreme sensing conditions are important to consider. Under low illumination (below ~10 lux) their output begins to be dominated by shot noise events (SNEs) which increase the data output and obscure true signal. SNE rates can be controlled to some degree by tuning circuit parameters to reduce sensitivity or temporal response bandwidth at the cost of signal loss. Alternatively, an improved understanding of SNE statistics can be leveraged to develop novel techniques for minimizing uninformative sensor output. We first explain a fundamental observation about sequential pairing of opposite polarity SNEs based on pixel circuit logic and validate our theory using DVS recordings and simulations. Finally, we derive a practical result from this new understanding and demonstrate two novel biasing techniques to reduce SNEs by 50% and 80% respectively while still retaining sensitivity and/or temporal resolution.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2023; v1 submitted 7 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
