-
DMLR: Data-centric Machine Learning Research -- Past, Present and Future
Authors:
Luis Oala,
Manil Maskey,
Lilith Bat-Leah,
Alicia Parrish,
Nezihe Merve Gürel,
Tzu-Sheng Kuo,
Yang Liu,
Rotem Dror,
Danilo Brajovic,
Xiaozhe Yao,
Max Bartolo,
William A Gaviria Rojas,
Ryan Hileman,
Rainier Aliment,
Michael W. Mahoney,
Meg Risdal,
Matthew Lease,
Wojciech Samek,
Debojyoti Dutta,
Curtis G Northcutt,
Cody Coleman,
Braden Hancock,
Bernard Koch,
Girmaw Abebe Tadesse,
Bojan Karlaš
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Drawing from discussions at the inaugural DMLR workshop at ICML 2023 and meetings prior, in this report we outline the relevance of community engagement and infrastructure development for the creation of next-generation public datasets that will advance machine learning science. We chart a path forward as a collective effort to sustain the creation and maintenance of these datasets and methods tow…
▽ More
Drawing from discussions at the inaugural DMLR workshop at ICML 2023 and meetings prior, in this report we outline the relevance of community engagement and infrastructure development for the creation of next-generation public datasets that will advance machine learning science. We chart a path forward as a collective effort to sustain the creation and maintenance of these datasets and methods towards positive scientific, societal and business impact.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2024; v1 submitted 21 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Observer-Feedback-Feedforward Controller Structures in Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Ruoqi Zhang,
Per Mattson,
Torbjörn Wigren
Abstract:
The paper proposes the use of structured neural networks for reinforcement learning based nonlinear adaptive control. The focus is on partially observable systems, with separate neural networks for the state and feedforward observer and the state feedback and feedforward controller. The observer dynamics are modelled by recurrent neural networks while a standard network is used for the controller.…
▽ More
The paper proposes the use of structured neural networks for reinforcement learning based nonlinear adaptive control. The focus is on partially observable systems, with separate neural networks for the state and feedforward observer and the state feedback and feedforward controller. The observer dynamics are modelled by recurrent neural networks while a standard network is used for the controller. As discussed in the paper, this leads to a separation of the observer dynamics to the recurrent neural network part, and the state feedback to the feedback and feedforward network. The structured approach reduces the computational complexity and gives the reinforcement learning based controller an {\em understandable} structure as compared to when one single neural network is used. As shown by simulation the proposed structure has the additional and main advantage that the training becomes significantly faster. Two ways to include feedforward structure are presented, one related to state feedback control and one related to classical feedforward control. The latter method introduces further structure with a separate recurrent neural network that processes only the measured disturbance. When evaluated with simulation on a nonlinear cascaded double tank process, the method with most structure performs the best, with excellent feedforward disturbance rejection gains.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story
Authors:
Annika Reinke,
Minu D. Tizabi,
Carole H. Sudre,
Matthias Eisenmann,
Tim Rädsch,
Michael Baumgartner,
Laura Acion,
Michela Antonelli,
Tal Arbel,
Spyridon Bakas,
Peter Bankhead,
Arriel Benis,
Matthew Blaschko,
Florian Buettner,
M. Jorge Cardoso,
Jianxu Chen,
Veronika Cheplygina,
Evangelia Christodoulou,
Beth Cimini,
Gary S. Collins,
Sandy Engelhardt,
Keyvan Farahani,
Luciana Ferrer,
Adrian Galdran,
Bram van Ginneken
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using spe…
▽ More
While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using specific metrics for a given image analysis task. These are typically related to (1) the disregard of inherent metric properties, such as the behaviour in the presence of class imbalance or small target structures, (2) the disregard of inherent data set properties, such as the non-independence of the test cases, and (3) the disregard of the actual biomedical domain interest that the metrics should reflect. This living dynamically document has the purpose to illustrate important limitations of performance metrics commonly applied in the field of image analysis. In this context, it focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 12 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
