-
Harder or Different? Understanding Generalization of Audio Deepfake Detection
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Nicholas Evans,
Hemlata Tak,
Philip Sperl,
Konstantin Böttinger
Abstract:
Recent research has highlighted a key issue in speech deepfake detection: models trained on one set of deepfakes perform poorly on others. The question arises: is this due to the continuously improving quality of Text-to-Speech (TTS) models, i.e., are newer DeepFakes just 'harder' to detect? Or, is it because deepfakes generated with one model are fundamentally different to those generated using a…
▽ More
Recent research has highlighted a key issue in speech deepfake detection: models trained on one set of deepfakes perform poorly on others. The question arises: is this due to the continuously improving quality of Text-to-Speech (TTS) models, i.e., are newer DeepFakes just 'harder' to detect? Or, is it because deepfakes generated with one model are fundamentally different to those generated using another model? We answer this question by decomposing the performance gap between in-domain and out-of-domain test data into 'hardness' and 'difference' components. Experiments performed using ASVspoof databases indicate that the hardness component is practically negligible, with the performance gap being attributed primarily to the difference component. This has direct implications for real-world deepfake detection, highlighting that merely increasing model capacity, the currently-dominant research trend, may not effectively address the generalization challenge.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2024; v1 submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
A New Approach to Voice Authenticity
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Piotr Kawa,
Shen Hu,
Matthias Neu,
Jennifer Williams,
Philip Sperl,
Konstantin Böttinger
Abstract:
Voice faking, driven primarily by recent advances in text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis technology, poses significant societal challenges. Currently, the prevailing assumption is that unaltered human speech can be considered genuine, while fake speech comes from TTS synthesis. We argue that this binary distinction is oversimplified. For instance, altered playback speeds can be used for malicious purpo…
▽ More
Voice faking, driven primarily by recent advances in text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis technology, poses significant societal challenges. Currently, the prevailing assumption is that unaltered human speech can be considered genuine, while fake speech comes from TTS synthesis. We argue that this binary distinction is oversimplified. For instance, altered playback speeds can be used for malicious purposes, like in the 'Drunken Nancy Pelosi' incident. Similarly, editing of audio clips can be done ethically, e.g., for brevity or summarization in news reporting or podcasts, but editing can also create misleading narratives. In this paper, we propose a conceptual shift away from the binary paradigm of audio being either 'fake' or 'real'. Instead, our focus is on pinpointing 'voice edits', which encompass traditional modifications like filters and cuts, as well as TTS synthesis and VC systems. We delineate 6 categories and curate a new challenge dataset rooted in the M-AILABS corpus, for which we present baseline detection systems. And most importantly, we argue that merely categorizing audio as fake or real is a dangerous over-simplification that will fail to move the field of speech technology forward.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
MLAAD: The Multi-Language Audio Anti-Spoofing Dataset
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Piotr Kawa,
Wei Herng Choong,
Edresson Casanova,
Eren Gölge,
Thorsten Müller,
Piotr Syga,
Philip Sperl,
Konstantin Böttinger
Abstract:
Text-to-Speech (TTS) technology brings significant advantages, such as giving a voice to those with speech impairments, but also enables audio deepfakes and spoofs. The former mislead individuals and may propagate misinformation, while the latter undermine voice biometric security systems. AI-based detection can help to address these challenges by automatically differentiating between genuine and…
▽ More
Text-to-Speech (TTS) technology brings significant advantages, such as giving a voice to those with speech impairments, but also enables audio deepfakes and spoofs. The former mislead individuals and may propagate misinformation, while the latter undermine voice biometric security systems. AI-based detection can help to address these challenges by automatically differentiating between genuine and fabricated voice recordings. However, these models are only as good as their training data, which currently is severely limited due to an overwhelming concentration on English and Chinese audio in anti-spoofing databases, thus restricting its worldwide effectiveness. In response, this paper presents the Multi-Language Audio Anti-Spoof Dataset (MLAAD), created using 54 TTS models, comprising 21 different architectures, to generate 163.9 hours of synthetic voice in 23 different languages. We train and evaluate three state-of-the-art deepfake detection models with MLAAD, and observe that MLAAD demonstrates superior performance over comparable datasets like InTheWild or FakeOrReal when used as a training resource. Furthermore, in comparison with the renowned ASVspoof 2019 dataset, MLAAD proves to be a complementary resource. In tests across eight datasets, MLAAD and ASVspoof 2019 alternately outperformed each other, both excelling on four datasets. By publishing MLAAD and making trained models accessible via an interactive webserver , we aim to democratize antispoofing technology, making it accessible beyond the realm of specialists, thus contributing to global efforts against audio spoofing and deepfakes.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2024; v1 submitted 17 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Complex-valued neural networks for voice anti-spoofing
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Philip Sperl,
Konstantin Böttinger
Abstract:
Current anti-spoofing and audio deepfake detection systems use either magnitude spectrogram-based features (such as CQT or Melspectrograms) or raw audio processed through convolution or sinc-layers. Both methods have drawbacks: magnitude spectrograms discard phase information, which affects audio naturalness, and raw-feature-based models cannot use traditional explainable AI methods. This paper pr…
▽ More
Current anti-spoofing and audio deepfake detection systems use either magnitude spectrogram-based features (such as CQT or Melspectrograms) or raw audio processed through convolution or sinc-layers. Both methods have drawbacks: magnitude spectrograms discard phase information, which affects audio naturalness, and raw-feature-based models cannot use traditional explainable AI methods. This paper proposes a new approach that combines the benefits of both methods by using complex-valued neural networks to process the complex-valued, CQT frequency-domain representation of the input audio. This method retains phase information and allows for explainable AI methods. Results show that this approach outperforms previous methods on the "In-the-Wild" anti-spoofing dataset and enables interpretation of the results through explainable AI. Ablation studies confirm that the model has learned to use phase information to detect voice spoofing.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Localized Shortcut Removal
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Jochen Jacobs,
Jennifer Williams,
Konstantin Böttinger
Abstract:
Machine learning is a data-driven field, and the quality of the underlying datasets plays a crucial role in learning success. However, high performance on held-out test data does not necessarily indicate that a model generalizes or learns anything meaningful. This is often due to the existence of machine learning shortcuts - features in the data that are predictive but unrelated to the problem at…
▽ More
Machine learning is a data-driven field, and the quality of the underlying datasets plays a crucial role in learning success. However, high performance on held-out test data does not necessarily indicate that a model generalizes or learns anything meaningful. This is often due to the existence of machine learning shortcuts - features in the data that are predictive but unrelated to the problem at hand. To address this issue for datasets where the shortcuts are smaller and more localized than true features, we propose a novel approach to detect and remove them. We use an adversarially trained lens to detect and eliminate highly predictive but semantically unconnected clues in images. In our experiments on both synthetic and real-world data, we show that our proposed approach reliably identifies and neutralizes such shortcuts without causing degradation of model performance on clean data. We believe that our approach can lead to more meaningful and generalizable machine learning models, especially in scenarios where the quality of the underlying datasets is crucial.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2023; v1 submitted 24 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Pavel Czempin,
Franziska Dieckmann,
Adam Froghyar,
Konstantin Böttinger
Abstract:
Current text-to-speech algorithms produce realistic fakes of human voices, making deepfake detection a much-needed area of research. While researchers have presented various techniques for detecting audio spoofs, it is often unclear exactly why these architectures are successful: Preprocessing steps, hyperparameter settings, and the degree of fine-tuning are not consistent across related work. Whi…
▽ More
Current text-to-speech algorithms produce realistic fakes of human voices, making deepfake detection a much-needed area of research. While researchers have presented various techniques for detecting audio spoofs, it is often unclear exactly why these architectures are successful: Preprocessing steps, hyperparameter settings, and the degree of fine-tuning are not consistent across related work. Which factors contribute to success, and which are accidental? In this work, we address this problem: We systematize audio spoofing detection by re-implementing and uniformly evaluating architectures from related work. We identify overarching features for successful audio deepfake detection, such as using cqtspec or logspec features instead of melspec features, which improves performance by 37% EER on average, all other factors constant. Additionally, we evaluate generalization capabilities: We collect and publish a new dataset consisting of 37.9 hours of found audio recordings of celebrities and politicians, of which 17.2 hours are deepfakes. We find that related work performs poorly on such real-world data (performance degradation of up to one thousand percent). This may suggest that the community has tailored its solutions too closely to the prevailing ASVSpoof benchmark and that deepfakes are much harder to detect outside the lab than previously thought.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2022; v1 submitted 30 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Human Perception of Audio Deepfakes
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Karla Pizzi,
Jennifer Williams
Abstract:
The recent emergence of deepfakes has brought manipulated and generated content to the forefront of machine learning research. Automatic detection of deepfakes has seen many new machine learning techniques, however, human detection capabilities are far less explored. In this paper, we present results from comparing the abilities of humans and machines for detecting audio deepfakes used to imitate…
▽ More
The recent emergence of deepfakes has brought manipulated and generated content to the forefront of machine learning research. Automatic detection of deepfakes has seen many new machine learning techniques, however, human detection capabilities are far less explored. In this paper, we present results from comparing the abilities of humans and machines for detecting audio deepfakes used to imitate someone's voice. For this, we use a web-based application framework formulated as a game. Participants were asked to distinguish between real and fake audio samples. In our experiment, 472 unique users competed against a state-of-the-art AI deepfake detection algorithm for 14912 total of rounds of the game. We find that humans and deepfake detection algorithms share similar strengths and weaknesses, both struggling to detect certain types of attacks. This is in contrast to the superhuman performance of AI in many application areas such as object detection or face recognition. Concerning human success factors, we find that IT professionals have no advantage over non-professionals but native speakers have an advantage over non-native speakers. Additionally, we find that older participants tend to be more susceptible than younger ones. These insights may be helpful when designing future cybersecurity training for humans as well as develo** better detection algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2022; v1 submitted 20 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Speech is Silver, Silence is Golden: What do ASVspoof-trained Models Really Learn?
Authors:
Nicolas M. Müller,
Franziska Dieckmann,
Pavel Czempin,
Roman Canals,
Konstantin Böttinger,
Jennifer Williams
Abstract:
We present our analysis of a significant data artifact in the official 2019/2021 ASVspoof Challenge Dataset. We identify an uneven distribution of silence duration in the training and test splits, which tends to correlate with the target prediction label. Bonafide instances tend to have significantly longer leading and trailing silences than spoofed instances. In this paper, we explore this phenom…
▽ More
We present our analysis of a significant data artifact in the official 2019/2021 ASVspoof Challenge Dataset. We identify an uneven distribution of silence duration in the training and test splits, which tends to correlate with the target prediction label. Bonafide instances tend to have significantly longer leading and trailing silences than spoofed instances. In this paper, we explore this phenomenon and its impact in depth. We compare several types of models trained on a) only the duration of the leading silence and b) only on the duration of leading and trailing silence. Results show that models trained on only the duration of the leading silence perform particularly well, and achieve up to 85% percent accuracy and an equal error rate (EER) of 15.1%. At the same time, we observe that trimming silence during pre-processing and then training established antispoofing models using signal-based features leads to comparatively worse performance. In that case, EER increases from 3.6% (with silence) to 15.5% (trimmed silence). Our findings suggest that previous work may, in part, have inadvertently learned thespoof/bonafide distinction by relying on the duration of silence as it appears in the official challenge dataset. We discuss the potential consequences that this has for interpreting system scores in the challenge and discuss how the ASV community may further consider this issue.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2021; v1 submitted 23 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
SC-GlowTTS: an Efficient Zero-Shot Multi-Speaker Text-To-Speech Model
Authors:
Edresson Casanova,
Christopher Shulby,
Eren Gölge,
Nicolas Michael Müller,
Frederico Santos de Oliveira,
Arnaldo Candido Junior,
Anderson da Silva Soares,
Sandra Maria Aluisio,
Moacir Antonelli Ponti
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose SC-GlowTTS: an efficient zero-shot multi-speaker text-to-speech model that improves similarity for speakers unseen during training. We propose a speaker-conditional architecture that explores a flow-based decoder that works in a zero-shot scenario. As text encoders, we explore a dilated residual convolutional-based encoder, gated convolutional-based encoder, and transform…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose SC-GlowTTS: an efficient zero-shot multi-speaker text-to-speech model that improves similarity for speakers unseen during training. We propose a speaker-conditional architecture that explores a flow-based decoder that works in a zero-shot scenario. As text encoders, we explore a dilated residual convolutional-based encoder, gated convolutional-based encoder, and transformer-based encoder. Additionally, we have shown that adjusting a GAN-based vocoder for the spectrograms predicted by the TTS model on the training dataset can significantly improve the similarity and speech quality for new speakers. Our model converges using only 11 speakers, reaching state-of-the-art results for similarity with new speakers, as well as high speech quality.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2021; v1 submitted 2 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Towards Resistant Audio Adversarial Examples
Authors:
Tom Dörr,
Karla Markert,
Nicolas M. Müller,
Konstantin Böttinger
Abstract:
Adversarial examples tremendously threaten the availability and integrity of machine learning-based systems. While the feasibility of such attacks has been observed first in the domain of image processing, recent research shows that speech recognition is also susceptible to adversarial attacks. However, reliably bridging the air gap (i.e., making the adversarial examples work when recorded via a m…
▽ More
Adversarial examples tremendously threaten the availability and integrity of machine learning-based systems. While the feasibility of such attacks has been observed first in the domain of image processing, recent research shows that speech recognition is also susceptible to adversarial attacks. However, reliably bridging the air gap (i.e., making the adversarial examples work when recorded via a microphone) has so far eluded researchers. We find that due to flaws in the generation process, state-of-the-art adversarial example generation methods cause overfitting because of the binning operation in the target speech recognition system (e.g., Mozilla Deepspeech). We devise an approach to mitigate this flaw and find that our method improves generation of adversarial examples with varying offsets. We confirm the significant improvement with our approach by empirical comparison of the edit distance in a realistic over-the-air setting. Our approach states a significant step towards over-the-air attacks. We publish the code and an applicable implementation of our approach.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
