-
Denoising LM: Pushing the Limits of Error Correction Models for Speech Recognition
Authors:
Zi** Gu,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
He Bai,
Erik McDermott,
Ronan Collobert,
Navdeep Jaitly
Abstract:
Language models (LMs) have long been used to improve results of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems, but they are unaware of the errors that ASR systems make. Error correction models are designed to fix ASR errors, however, they showed little improvement over traditional LMs mainly due to the lack of supervised training data. In this paper, we present Denoising LM (DLM), which is a…
▽ More
Language models (LMs) have long been used to improve results of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems, but they are unaware of the errors that ASR systems make. Error correction models are designed to fix ASR errors, however, they showed little improvement over traditional LMs mainly due to the lack of supervised training data. In this paper, we present Denoising LM (DLM), which is a $\textit{scaled}$ error correction model trained with vast amounts of synthetic data, significantly exceeding prior attempts meanwhile achieving new state-of-the-art ASR performance. We use text-to-speech (TTS) systems to synthesize audio, which is fed into an ASR system to produce noisy hypotheses, which are then paired with the original texts to train the DLM. DLM has several $\textit{key ingredients}$: (i) up-scaled model and data; (ii) usage of multi-speaker TTS systems; (iii) combination of multiple noise augmentation strategies; and (iv) new decoding techniques. With a Transformer-CTC ASR, DLM achieves 1.5% word error rate (WER) on $\textit{test-clean}$ and 3.3% WER on $\textit{test-other}$ on Librispeech, which to our knowledge are the best reported numbers in the setting where no external audio data are used and even match self-supervised methods which use external audio data. Furthermore, a single DLM is applicable to different ASRs, and greatly surpassing the performance of conventional LM based beam-search rescoring. These results indicate that properly investigated error correction models have the potential to replace conventional LMs, holding the key to a new level of accuracy in ASR systems.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Can you Remove the Downstream Model for Speaker Recognition with Self-Supervised Speech Features?
Authors:
Zakaria Aldeneh,
Takuya Higuchi,
Jee-weon Jung,
Skyler Seto,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Stephen Shum,
Ahmed Hussen Abdelaziz,
Shinji Watanabe,
Barry-John Theobald
Abstract:
Self-supervised features are typically used in place of filter-bank features in speaker verification models. However, these models were originally designed to ingest filter-bank features as inputs, and thus, training them on top of self-supervised features assumes that both feature types require the same amount of learning for the task. In this work, we observe that pre-trained self-supervised spe…
▽ More
Self-supervised features are typically used in place of filter-bank features in speaker verification models. However, these models were originally designed to ingest filter-bank features as inputs, and thus, training them on top of self-supervised features assumes that both feature types require the same amount of learning for the task. In this work, we observe that pre-trained self-supervised speech features inherently include information required for downstream speaker verification task, and therefore, we can simplify the downstream model without sacrificing performance. To this end, we revisit the design of the downstream model for speaker verification using self-supervised features. We show that we can simplify the model to use 97.51% fewer parameters while achieving a 29.93% average improvement in performance on SUPERB. Consequently, we show that the simplified downstream model is more data efficient compared to baseline--it achieves better performance with only 60% of the training data.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2024; v1 submitted 1 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
AV-CPL: Continuous Pseudo-Labeling for Audio-Visual Speech Recognition
Authors:
Andrew Rouditchenko,
Ronan Collobert,
Tatiana Likhomanenko
Abstract:
Audio-visual speech contains synchronized audio and visual information that provides cross-modal supervision to learn representations for both automatic speech recognition (ASR) and visual speech recognition (VSR). We introduce continuous pseudo-labeling for audio-visual speech recognition (AV-CPL), a semi-supervised method to train an audio-visual speech recognition (AVSR) model on a combination…
▽ More
Audio-visual speech contains synchronized audio and visual information that provides cross-modal supervision to learn representations for both automatic speech recognition (ASR) and visual speech recognition (VSR). We introduce continuous pseudo-labeling for audio-visual speech recognition (AV-CPL), a semi-supervised method to train an audio-visual speech recognition (AVSR) model on a combination of labeled and unlabeled videos with continuously regenerated pseudo-labels. Our models are trained for speech recognition from audio-visual inputs and can perform speech recognition using both audio and visual modalities, or only one modality. Our method uses the same audio-visual model for both supervised training and pseudo-label generation, mitigating the need for external speech recognition models to generate pseudo-labels. AV-CPL obtains significant improvements in VSR performance on the LRS3 dataset while maintaining practical ASR and AVSR performance. Finally, using visual-only speech data, our method is able to leverage unlabeled visual speech to improve VSR.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Importance of Smoothness Induced by Optimizers in FL4ASR: Towards Understanding Federated Learning for End-to-End ASR
Authors:
Sheikh Shams Azam,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Martin Pelikan,
Jan "Honza" Silovsky
Abstract:
In this paper, we start by training End-to-End Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models using Federated Learning (FL) and examining the fundamental considerations that can be pivotal in minimizing the performance gap in terms of word error rate between models trained using FL versus their centralized counterpart. Specifically, we study the effect of (i) adaptive optimizers, (ii) loss characterist…
▽ More
In this paper, we start by training End-to-End Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models using Federated Learning (FL) and examining the fundamental considerations that can be pivotal in minimizing the performance gap in terms of word error rate between models trained using FL versus their centralized counterpart. Specifically, we study the effect of (i) adaptive optimizers, (ii) loss characteristics via altering Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) weight, (iii) model initialization through seed start, (iv) carrying over modeling setup from experiences in centralized training to FL, e.g., pre-layer or post-layer normalization, and (v) FL-specific hyperparameters, such as number of local epochs, client sampling size, and learning rate scheduler, specifically for ASR under heterogeneous data distribution. We shed light on how some optimizers work better than others via inducing smoothness. We also summarize the applicability of algorithms, trends, and propose best practices from prior works in FL (in general) toward End-to-End ASR models.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Unsupervised ASR via Cross-Lingual Pseudo-Labeling
Authors:
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Loren Lugosch,
Ronan Collobert
Abstract:
Recent work has shown that it is possible to train an $\textit{unsupervised}$ automatic speech recognition (ASR) system using only unpaired audio and text. Existing unsupervised ASR methods assume that no labeled data can be used for training. We argue that even if one does not have any labeled audio for a given language, there is $\textit{always}$ labeled data available for other languages. We sh…
▽ More
Recent work has shown that it is possible to train an $\textit{unsupervised}$ automatic speech recognition (ASR) system using only unpaired audio and text. Existing unsupervised ASR methods assume that no labeled data can be used for training. We argue that even if one does not have any labeled audio for a given language, there is $\textit{always}$ labeled data available for other languages. We show that it is possible to use character-level acoustic models (AMs) from other languages to bootstrap an $\textit{unsupervised}$ AM in a new language. Here, "unsupervised" means no labeled audio is available for the $\textit{target}$ language. Our approach is based on two key ingredients: (i) generating pseudo-labels (PLs) of the $\textit{target}$ language using some $\textit{other}$ language AM and (ii) constraining these PLs with a $\textit{target language model}$. Our approach is effective on Common Voice: e.g. transfer of English AM to Swahili achieves 18% WER. It also outperforms character-based wav2vec-U 2.0 by 15% absolute WER on LJSpeech with 800h of labeled German data instead of 60k hours of unlabeled English data.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024; v1 submitted 18 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Joint Speech Transcription and Translation: Pseudo-Labeling with Out-of-Distribution Data
Authors:
Mozhdeh Gheini,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Matthias Sperber,
Hendra Setiawan
Abstract:
Self-training has been shown to be helpful in addressing data scarcity for many domains, including vision, speech, and language. Specifically, self-training, or pseudo-labeling, labels unsupervised data and adds that to the training pool. In this work, we investigate and use pseudo-labeling for a recently proposed novel setup: joint transcription and translation of speech, which suffers from an ab…
▽ More
Self-training has been shown to be helpful in addressing data scarcity for many domains, including vision, speech, and language. Specifically, self-training, or pseudo-labeling, labels unsupervised data and adds that to the training pool. In this work, we investigate and use pseudo-labeling for a recently proposed novel setup: joint transcription and translation of speech, which suffers from an absence of sufficient data resources. We show that under such data-deficient circumstances, the unlabeled data can significantly vary in domain from the supervised data, which results in pseudo-label quality degradation. We investigate two categories of remedies that require no additional supervision and target the domain mismatch: pseudo-label filtering and data augmentation. We show that pseudo-label analysis and processing as such results in additional gains on top of the vanilla pseudo-labeling setup resulting in total improvements of up to 0.6% absolute WER and 2.2 BLEU points.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Continuous Soft Pseudo-Labeling in ASR
Authors:
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Ronan Collobert,
Navdeep Jaitly,
Samy Bengio
Abstract:
Continuous pseudo-labeling (PL) algorithms such as slimIPL have recently emerged as a powerful strategy for semi-supervised learning in speech recognition. In contrast with earlier strategies that alternated between training a model and generating pseudo-labels (PLs) with it, here PLs are generated in end-to-end manner as training proceeds, improving training speed and the accuracy of the final mo…
▽ More
Continuous pseudo-labeling (PL) algorithms such as slimIPL have recently emerged as a powerful strategy for semi-supervised learning in speech recognition. In contrast with earlier strategies that alternated between training a model and generating pseudo-labels (PLs) with it, here PLs are generated in end-to-end manner as training proceeds, improving training speed and the accuracy of the final model. PL shares a common theme with teacher-student models such as distillation in that a teacher model generates targets that need to be mimicked by the student model being trained. However, interestingly, PL strategies in general use hard-labels, whereas distillation uses the distribution over labels as the target to mimic. Inspired by distillation we expect that specifying the whole distribution (aka soft-labels) over sequences as the target for unlabeled data, instead of a single best pass pseudo-labeled transcript (hard-labels) should improve PL performance and convergence. Surprisingly and unexpectedly, we find that soft-labels targets can lead to training divergence, with the model collapsing to a degenerate token distribution per frame. We hypothesize that the reason this does not happen with hard-labels is that training loss on hard-labels imposes sequence-level consistency that keeps the model from collapsing to the degenerate solution. In this paper, we show several experiments that support this hypothesis, and experiment with several regularization approaches that can ameliorate the degenerate collapse when using soft-labels. These approaches can bring the accuracy of soft-labels closer to that of hard-labels, and while they are unable to outperform them yet, they serve as a useful framework for further improvements.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2023; v1 submitted 11 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
More Speaking or More Speakers?
Authors:
Dan Berrebbi,
Ronan Collobert,
Navdeep Jaitly,
Tatiana Likhomanenko
Abstract:
Self-training (ST) and self-supervised learning (SSL) methods have demonstrated strong improvements in automatic speech recognition (ASR). In spite of these advances, to the best of our knowledge, there is no analysis of how the composition of the labelled and unlabelled datasets used in these methods affects the results. In this work we aim to analyse the effect of number of speakers in the train…
▽ More
Self-training (ST) and self-supervised learning (SSL) methods have demonstrated strong improvements in automatic speech recognition (ASR). In spite of these advances, to the best of our knowledge, there is no analysis of how the composition of the labelled and unlabelled datasets used in these methods affects the results. In this work we aim to analyse the effect of number of speakers in the training data on a recent SSL algorithm (wav2vec 2.0), and a recent ST algorithm (slimIPL). We perform a systematic analysis on both labeled and unlabeled data by varying the number of speakers while kee** the number of hours fixed and vice versa. Our findings suggest that SSL requires a large amount of unlabeled data to produce high accuracy results, while ST requires a sufficient number of speakers in the labelled data, especially in the low-regime setting. In this manner these two approaches improve supervised learning in different regimes of data composition.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2023; v1 submitted 1 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Position Prediction as an Effective Pretraining Strategy
Authors:
Shuangfei Zhai,
Navdeep Jaitly,
Jason Ramapuram,
Dan Busbridge,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Joseph Yitan Cheng,
Walter Talbott,
Chen Huang,
Hanlin Goh,
Joshua Susskind
Abstract:
Transformers have gained increasing popularity in a wide range of applications, including Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computer Vision and Speech Recognition, because of their powerful representational capacity. However, harnessing this representational capacity effectively requires a large amount of data, strong regularization, or both, to mitigate overfitting. Recently, the power of the Tr…
▽ More
Transformers have gained increasing popularity in a wide range of applications, including Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computer Vision and Speech Recognition, because of their powerful representational capacity. However, harnessing this representational capacity effectively requires a large amount of data, strong regularization, or both, to mitigate overfitting. Recently, the power of the Transformer has been unlocked by self-supervised pretraining strategies based on masked autoencoders which rely on reconstructing masked inputs, directly, or contrastively from unmasked content. This pretraining strategy which has been used in BERT models in NLP, Wav2Vec models in Speech and, recently, in MAE models in Vision, forces the model to learn about relationships between the content in different parts of the input using autoencoding related objectives. In this paper, we propose a novel, but surprisingly simple alternative to content reconstruction~-- that of predicting locations from content, without providing positional information for it. Doing so requires the Transformer to understand the positional relationships between different parts of the input, from their content alone. This amounts to an efficient implementation where the pretext task is a classification problem among all possible positions for each input token. We experiment on both Vision and Speech benchmarks, where our approach brings improvements over strong supervised training baselines and is comparable to modern unsupervised/self-supervised pretraining methods. Our method also enables Transformers trained without position embeddings to outperform ones trained with full position information.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Pseudo-Labeling for Massively Multilingual Speech Recognition
Authors:
Loren Lugosch,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Ronan Collobert
Abstract:
Semi-supervised learning through pseudo-labeling has become a staple of state-of-the-art monolingual speech recognition systems. In this work, we extend pseudo-labeling to massively multilingual speech recognition with 60 languages. We propose a simple pseudo-labeling recipe that works well even with low-resource languages: train a supervised multilingual model, fine-tune it with semi-supervised l…
▽ More
Semi-supervised learning through pseudo-labeling has become a staple of state-of-the-art monolingual speech recognition systems. In this work, we extend pseudo-labeling to massively multilingual speech recognition with 60 languages. We propose a simple pseudo-labeling recipe that works well even with low-resource languages: train a supervised multilingual model, fine-tune it with semi-supervised learning on a target language, generate pseudo-labels for that language, and train a final model using pseudo-labels for all languages, either from scratch or by fine-tuning. Experiments on the labeled Common Voice and unlabeled VoxPopuli datasets show that our recipe can yield a model with better performance for many languages that also transfers well to LibriSpeech.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Word Order Does Not Matter For Speech Recognition
Authors:
Vineel Pratap,
Qiantong Xu,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Ronan Collobert
Abstract:
In this paper, we study training of automatic speech recognition system in a weakly supervised setting where the order of words in transcript labels of the audio training data is not known. We train a word-level acoustic model which aggregates the distribution of all output frames using LogSumExp operation and uses a cross-entropy loss to match with the ground-truth words distribution. Using the p…
▽ More
In this paper, we study training of automatic speech recognition system in a weakly supervised setting where the order of words in transcript labels of the audio training data is not known. We train a word-level acoustic model which aggregates the distribution of all output frames using LogSumExp operation and uses a cross-entropy loss to match with the ground-truth words distribution. Using the pseudo-labels generated from this model on the training set, we then train a letter-based acoustic model using Connectionist Temporal Classification loss. Our system achieves 2.3%/4.6% on test-clean/test-other subsets of LibriSpeech, which closely matches with the supervised baseline's performance.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2021; v1 submitted 12 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Kaizen: Continuously improving teacher using Exponential Moving Average for semi-supervised speech recognition
Authors:
Vimal Manohar,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Qiantong Xu,
Wei-Ning Hsu,
Ronan Collobert,
Yatharth Saraf,
Geoffrey Zweig,
Abdelrahman Mohamed
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce the Kaizen framework that uses a continuously improving teacher to generate pseudo-labels for semi-supervised speech recognition (ASR). The proposed approach uses a teacher model which is updated as the exponential moving average (EMA) of the student model parameters. We demonstrate that it is critical for EMA to be accumulated with full-precision floating point. The Ka…
▽ More
In this paper, we introduce the Kaizen framework that uses a continuously improving teacher to generate pseudo-labels for semi-supervised speech recognition (ASR). The proposed approach uses a teacher model which is updated as the exponential moving average (EMA) of the student model parameters. We demonstrate that it is critical for EMA to be accumulated with full-precision floating point. The Kaizen framework can be seen as a continuous version of the iterative pseudo-labeling approach for semi-supervised training. It is applicable for different training criteria, and in this paper we demonstrate its effectiveness for frame-level hybrid hidden Markov model-deep neural network (HMM-DNN) systems as well as sequence-level Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC) based models.
For large scale real-world unsupervised public videos in UK English and Italian languages the proposed approach i) shows more than 10% relative word error rate (WER) reduction over standard teacher-student training; ii) using just 10 hours of supervised data and a large amount of unsupervised data closes the gap to the upper-bound supervised ASR system that uses 650h or 2700h respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2021; v1 submitted 14 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Robust wav2vec 2.0: Analyzing Domain Shift in Self-Supervised Pre-Training
Authors:
Wei-Ning Hsu,
Anuroop Sriram,
Alexei Baevski,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Qiantong Xu,
Vineel Pratap,
Jacob Kahn,
Ann Lee,
Ronan Collobert,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Michael Auli
Abstract:
Self-supervised learning of speech representations has been a very active research area but most work is focused on a single domain such as read audio books for which there exist large quantities of labeled and unlabeled data. In this paper, we explore more general setups where the domain of the unlabeled data for pre-training data differs from the domain of the labeled data for fine-tuning, which…
▽ More
Self-supervised learning of speech representations has been a very active research area but most work is focused on a single domain such as read audio books for which there exist large quantities of labeled and unlabeled data. In this paper, we explore more general setups where the domain of the unlabeled data for pre-training data differs from the domain of the labeled data for fine-tuning, which in turn may differ from the test data domain. Our experiments show that using target domain data during pre-training leads to large performance improvements across a variety of setups. On a large-scale competitive setup, we show that pre-training on unlabeled in-domain data reduces the gap between models trained on in-domain and out-of-domain labeled data by 66%-73%. This has obvious practical implications since it is much easier to obtain unlabeled target domain data than labeled data. Moreover, we find that pre-training on multiple domains improves generalization performance on domains not seen during training. Code and models will be made available at https://github.com/pytorch/fairseq.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2021; v1 submitted 2 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Rethinking Evaluation in ASR: Are Our Models Robust Enough?
Authors:
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Qiantong Xu,
Vineel Pratap,
Paden Tomasello,
Jacob Kahn,
Gilad Avidov,
Ronan Collobert,
Gabriel Synnaeve
Abstract:
Is pushing numbers on a single benchmark valuable in automatic speech recognition? Research results in acoustic modeling are typically evaluated based on performance on a single dataset. While the research community has coalesced around various benchmarks, we set out to understand generalization performance in acoustic modeling across datasets - in particular, if models trained on a single dataset…
▽ More
Is pushing numbers on a single benchmark valuable in automatic speech recognition? Research results in acoustic modeling are typically evaluated based on performance on a single dataset. While the research community has coalesced around various benchmarks, we set out to understand generalization performance in acoustic modeling across datasets - in particular, if models trained on a single dataset transfer to other (possibly out-of-domain) datasets. We show that, in general, reverberative and additive noise augmentation improves generalization performance across domains. Further, we demonstrate that when a large enough set of benchmarks is used, average word error rate (WER) performance over them provides a good proxy for performance on real-world noisy data. Finally, we show that training a single acoustic model on the most widely-used datasets - combined - reaches competitive performance on both research and real-world benchmarks.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2021; v1 submitted 22 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Self-training and Pre-training are Complementary for Speech Recognition
Authors:
Qiantong Xu,
Alexei Baevski,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Paden Tomasello,
Alexis Conneau,
Ronan Collobert,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Michael Auli
Abstract:
Self-training and unsupervised pre-training have emerged as effective approaches to improve speech recognition systems using unlabeled data. However, it is not clear whether they learn similar patterns or if they can be effectively combined. In this paper, we show that pseudo-labeling and pre-training with wav2vec 2.0 are complementary in a variety of labeled data setups. Using just 10 minutes of…
▽ More
Self-training and unsupervised pre-training have emerged as effective approaches to improve speech recognition systems using unlabeled data. However, it is not clear whether they learn similar patterns or if they can be effectively combined. In this paper, we show that pseudo-labeling and pre-training with wav2vec 2.0 are complementary in a variety of labeled data setups. Using just 10 minutes of labeled data from Libri-light as well as 53k hours of unlabeled data from LibriVox achieves WERs of 3.0%/5.2% on the clean and other test sets of Librispeech - rivaling the best published systems trained on 960 hours of labeled data only a year ago. Training on all labeled data of Librispeech achieves WERs of 1.5%/3.1%.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Iterative Pseudo-Labeling for Speech Recognition
Authors:
Qiantong Xu,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Jacob Kahn,
Awni Hannun,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Ronan Collobert
Abstract:
Pseudo-labeling has recently shown promise in end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR). We study Iterative Pseudo-Labeling (IPL), a semi-supervised algorithm which efficiently performs multiple iterations of pseudo-labeling on unlabeled data as the acoustic model evolves. In particular, IPL fine-tunes an existing model at each iteration using both labeled data and a subset of unlabeled data.…
▽ More
Pseudo-labeling has recently shown promise in end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR). We study Iterative Pseudo-Labeling (IPL), a semi-supervised algorithm which efficiently performs multiple iterations of pseudo-labeling on unlabeled data as the acoustic model evolves. In particular, IPL fine-tunes an existing model at each iteration using both labeled data and a subset of unlabeled data. We study the main components of IPL: decoding with a language model and data augmentation. We then demonstrate the effectiveness of IPL by achieving state-of-the-art word-error rate on the Librispeech test sets in both standard and low-resource setting. We also study the effect of language models trained on different corpora to show IPL can effectively utilize additional text. Finally, we release a new large in-domain text corpus which does not overlap with the Librispeech training transcriptions to foster research in low-resource, semi-supervised ASR
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2020; v1 submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Scaling Up Online Speech Recognition Using ConvNets
Authors:
Vineel Pratap,
Qiantong Xu,
Jacob Kahn,
Gilad Avidov,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Awni Hannun,
Vitaliy Liptchinsky,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Ronan Collobert
Abstract:
We design an online end-to-end speech recognition system based on Time-Depth Separable (TDS) convolutions and Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC). We improve the core TDS architecture in order to limit the future context and hence reduce latency while maintaining accuracy. The system has almost three times the throughput of a well tuned hybrid ASR baseline while also having lower latency a…
▽ More
We design an online end-to-end speech recognition system based on Time-Depth Separable (TDS) convolutions and Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC). We improve the core TDS architecture in order to limit the future context and hence reduce latency while maintaining accuracy. The system has almost three times the throughput of a well tuned hybrid ASR baseline while also having lower latency and a better word error rate. Also important to the efficiency of the recognizer is our highly optimized beam search decoder. To show the impact of our design choices, we analyze throughput, latency, accuracy, and discuss how these metrics can be tuned based on the user requirements.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Libri-Light: A Benchmark for ASR with Limited or No Supervision
Authors:
Jacob Kahn,
Morgane Rivière,
Weiyi Zheng,
Evgeny Kharitonov,
Qiantong Xu,
Pierre-Emmanuel Mazaré,
Julien Karadayi,
Vitaliy Liptchinsky,
Ronan Collobert,
Christian Fuegen,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Armand Joulin,
Abdelrahman Mohamed,
Emmanuel Dupoux
Abstract:
We introduce a new collection of spoken English audio suitable for training speech recognition systems under limited or no supervision. It is derived from open-source audio books from the LibriVox project. It contains over 60K hours of audio, which is, to our knowledge, the largest freely-available corpus of speech. The audio has been segmented using voice activity detection and is tagged with SNR…
▽ More
We introduce a new collection of spoken English audio suitable for training speech recognition systems under limited or no supervision. It is derived from open-source audio books from the LibriVox project. It contains over 60K hours of audio, which is, to our knowledge, the largest freely-available corpus of speech. The audio has been segmented using voice activity detection and is tagged with SNR, speaker ID and genre descriptions. Additionally, we provide baseline systems and evaluation metrics working under three settings: (1) the zero resource/unsupervised setting (ABX), (2) the semi-supervised setting (PER, CER) and (3) the distant supervision setting (WER). Settings (2) and (3) use limited textual resources (10 minutes to 10 hours) aligned with the speech. Setting (3) uses large amounts of unaligned text. They are evaluated on the standard LibriSpeech dev and test sets for comparison with the supervised state-of-the-art.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
End-to-end ASR: from Supervised to Semi-Supervised Learning with Modern Architectures
Authors:
Gabriel Synnaeve,
Qiantong Xu,
Jacob Kahn,
Tatiana Likhomanenko,
Edouard Grave,
Vineel Pratap,
Anuroop Sriram,
Vitaliy Liptchinsky,
Ronan Collobert
Abstract:
We study pseudo-labeling for the semi-supervised training of ResNet, Time-Depth Separable ConvNets, and Transformers for speech recognition, with either CTC or Seq2Seq loss functions. We perform experiments on the standard LibriSpeech dataset, and leverage additional unlabeled data from LibriVox through pseudo-labeling. We show that while Transformer-based acoustic models have superior performance…
▽ More
We study pseudo-labeling for the semi-supervised training of ResNet, Time-Depth Separable ConvNets, and Transformers for speech recognition, with either CTC or Seq2Seq loss functions. We perform experiments on the standard LibriSpeech dataset, and leverage additional unlabeled data from LibriVox through pseudo-labeling. We show that while Transformer-based acoustic models have superior performance with the supervised dataset alone, semi-supervision improves all models across architectures and loss functions and bridges much of the performance gaps between them. In doing so, we reach a new state-of-the-art for end-to-end acoustic models decoded with an external language model in the standard supervised learning setting, and a new absolute state-of-the-art with semi-supervised training. Finally, we study the effect of leveraging different amounts of unlabeled audio, propose several ways of evaluating the characteristics of unlabeled audio which improve acoustic modeling, and show that acoustic models trained with more audio rely less on external language models.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2020; v1 submitted 19 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.