-
A Max Pressure Algorithm for Traffic Signals Considering Pedestrian Queues
Authors:
Hao Liu,
Vikash V. Gayah,
Michael Levin
Abstract:
This paper proposes a novel max-pressure (MP) algorithm that incorporates pedestrian traffic into the MP control architecture. Pedestrians are modeled as being included in one of two groups: those walking on sidewalks and those queued at intersections waiting to cross. Traffic dynamics models for both groups are developed. Under the proposed control policy, the signal timings are determined based…
▽ More
This paper proposes a novel max-pressure (MP) algorithm that incorporates pedestrian traffic into the MP control architecture. Pedestrians are modeled as being included in one of two groups: those walking on sidewalks and those queued at intersections waiting to cross. Traffic dynamics models for both groups are developed. Under the proposed control policy, the signal timings are determined based on the queue length of both vehicles and pedestrians waiting to cross the intersection. The proposed algorithm maintains the decentralized control structure, and the paper proves that it also exhibits the maximum stability property for both vehicles and pedestrians. Microscopic traffic simulation results demonstrate that the proposed model can improve the overall operational efficiency -- i.e., reduce person travel delays -- under various vehicle demand levels compared to the original queue-based MP (Q-MP) algorithm and a recently developed rule-based MP algorithm considering pedestrians. The Q-MP ignores the yielding behavior of right-turn vehicles to conflicting pedestrian movements, which leads to high delay for vehicles. On the other hand, the delay incurred by pedestrians is high from the rule-based model since it imposes large waiting time tolerance to guarantee the operational efficiency of vehicles. The proposed algorithm outperforms both models since the states of both vehicles and pedestrians are taken into consideration to determine signal timings.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
SegmentAnyBone: A Universal Model that Segments Any Bone at Any Location on MRI
Authors:
Hanxue Gu,
Roy Colglazier,
Haoyu Dong,
Jikai Zhang,
Yaqian Chen,
Zafer Yildiz,
Yuwen Chen,
Lin Li,
Jichen Yang,
Jay Willhite,
Alex M. Meyer,
Brian Guo,
Yashvi Atul Shah,
Emily Luo,
Shipra Rajput,
Sally Kuehn,
Clark Bulleit,
Kevin A. Wu,
Jisoo Lee,
Brandon Ramirez,
Darui Lu,
Jay M. Levin,
Maciej A. Mazurowski
Abstract:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is pivotal in radiology, offering non-invasive and high-quality insights into the human body. Precise segmentation of MRIs into different organs and tissues would be highly beneficial since it would allow for a higher level of understanding of the image content and enable important measurements, which are essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment pla…
▽ More
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is pivotal in radiology, offering non-invasive and high-quality insights into the human body. Precise segmentation of MRIs into different organs and tissues would be highly beneficial since it would allow for a higher level of understanding of the image content and enable important measurements, which are essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment planning. Specifically, segmenting bones in MRI would allow for more quantitative assessments of musculoskeletal conditions, while such assessments are largely absent in current radiological practice. The difficulty of bone MRI segmentation is illustrated by the fact that limited algorithms are publicly available for use, and those contained in the literature typically address a specific anatomic area. In our study, we propose a versatile, publicly available deep-learning model for bone segmentation in MRI across multiple standard MRI locations. The proposed model can operate in two modes: fully automated segmentation and prompt-based segmentation. Our contributions include (1) collecting and annotating a new MRI dataset across various MRI protocols, encompassing over 300 annotated volumes and 8485 annotated slices across diverse anatomic regions; (2) investigating several standard network architectures and strategies for automated segmentation; (3) introducing SegmentAnyBone, an innovative foundational model-based approach that extends Segment Anything Model (SAM); (4) comparative analysis of our algorithm and previous approaches; and (5) generalization analysis of our algorithm across different anatomical locations and MRI sequences, as well as an external dataset. We publicly release our model at https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/SegmentAnyBone.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
A2D: Anywhere Anytime Drumming
Authors:
Harel Yadid,
Almog Algranti,
Mark Levin,
Ayal Taitler
Abstract:
The drum kit, which has only been around for around 100 years, is a popular instrument in many music genres such as pop, rock, and jazz. However, the road to owning a kit is expensive, both financially and space-wise. Also, drums are more difficult to move around compared to other instruments, as they do not fit into a single bag. We propose a no-drums approach that uses only two sticks and a smar…
▽ More
The drum kit, which has only been around for around 100 years, is a popular instrument in many music genres such as pop, rock, and jazz. However, the road to owning a kit is expensive, both financially and space-wise. Also, drums are more difficult to move around compared to other instruments, as they do not fit into a single bag. We propose a no-drums approach that uses only two sticks and a smartphone or a webcam to provide an air-drumming experience. The detection algorithm combines deep learning tools with tracking methods for an enhanced user experience. Based on both quantitative and qualitative testing with humans-in-the-loop, we show that our system has zero misses for beginner level play and negligible misses for advanced level play. Additionally, our limited human trials suggest potential directions for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2023; v1 submitted 4 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field
Authors:
D. Blackiston,
S. Kriegman,
J. Bongard,
M. Levin
Abstract:
Advances in science and engineering often reveal the limitations of classical approaches initially used to understand, predict, and control phenomena. With progress, conceptual categories must often be re-evaluated to better track recently discovered invariants across disciplines. It is essential to refine frameworks and resolve conflicting boundaries between disciplines such that they better faci…
▽ More
Advances in science and engineering often reveal the limitations of classical approaches initially used to understand, predict, and control phenomena. With progress, conceptual categories must often be re-evaluated to better track recently discovered invariants across disciplines. It is essential to refine frameworks and resolve conflicting boundaries between disciplines such that they better facilitate, not restrict, experimental approaches and capabilities. In this essay, we discuss issues at the intersection of developmental biology, computer science, and robotics. In the context of biological robots, we explore changes across concepts and previously distinct fields that are driven by recent advances in materials, information, and life sciences. Herein, each author provides their own perspective on the subject, framed by their own disciplinary training. We argue that as with computation, certain aspects of developmental biology and robotics are not tied to specific materials; rather, the consilience of these fields can help to shed light on issues of multi-scale control, self-assembly, and relationships between form and function. We hope new fields can emerge as boundaries arising from technological limitations are overcome, furthering practical applications from regenerative medicine to useful synthetic living machines.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Combinatorial framework for planning in geological exploration
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper describes combinatorial framework for planning of geological exploration for oil-gas fields. The suggested scheme of the geological exploration involves the following stages: (1) building of special 4-layer tree-like model (layer of geological exploration): productive layer, group of productive layers, oil-gas field, oil-gas region (or group of the fields); (2) generations of local desig…
▽ More
The paper describes combinatorial framework for planning of geological exploration for oil-gas fields. The suggested scheme of the geological exploration involves the following stages: (1) building of special 4-layer tree-like model (layer of geological exploration): productive layer, group of productive layers, oil-gas field, oil-gas region (or group of the fields); (2) generations of local design (exploration) alternatives for each low-layer geological objects: conservation, additional search, independent utilization, joint utilization; (3) multicriteria (i.e., multi-attribute) assessment of the design (exploration) alternatives and their interrelation (compatibility) and map** if the obtained vector estimates into integrated ordinal scale; (4) hierarchical design ('bottom-up') of composite exploration plans for each oil-gas field; (5) integration of the plans into region plans and (6) aggregation of the region plans into a general exploration plan. Stages 2, 3, 4, and 5 are based on hierarchical multicriteria morphological design (HMMD) method (assessment of ranking of alternatives, selection and composition of alternatives into composite alternatives). The composition problem is based on morphological clique model. Aggregation of the obtained modular alternatives (stage 6) is based on detection of a alternatives 'kernel' and its extension by addition of elements (multiple choice model). In addition, the usage of multiset estimates for alternatives is described as well. The alternative estimates are based on expert judgment. The suggested combinatorial planning methodology is illustrated by numerical examples for geological exploration of Yamal peninsula.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Towards Integrated Glance To Restructuring in Combinatorial Optimization
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper focuses on a new class of combinatorial problems which consists in restructuring of solutions (as sets/structures) in combinatorial optimization. Two main features of the restructuring process are examined: (i) a cost of the restructuring, (ii) a closeness to a goal solution. Three types of the restructuring problems are under study: (a) one-stage structuring, (b) multi-stage structuring…
▽ More
The paper focuses on a new class of combinatorial problems which consists in restructuring of solutions (as sets/structures) in combinatorial optimization. Two main features of the restructuring process are examined: (i) a cost of the restructuring, (ii) a closeness to a goal solution. Three types of the restructuring problems are under study: (a) one-stage structuring, (b) multi-stage structuring, and (c) structuring over changed element set. One-criterion and multicriteria problem formulations can be considered. The restructuring problems correspond to redesign (improvement, upgrade) of modular systems or solutions. The restructuring approach is described and illustrated (problem statements, solving schemes, examples) for the following combinatorial optimization problems: knapsack problem, multiple choice problem, assignment problem, spanning tree problems, clustering problem, multicriteria ranking (sorting) problem, morphological clique problem. Numerical examples illustrate the restructuring problems and solving schemes.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Discrete Route/Trajectory Decision Making Problems
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper focuses on composite multistage decision making problems which are targeted to design a route/trajectory from an initial decision situation (origin) to goal (destination) decision situation(s). Automobile routing problem is considered as a basic physical metaphor. The problems are based on a discrete (combinatorial) operations/states design/solving space (e.g., digraph). The described ty…
▽ More
The paper focuses on composite multistage decision making problems which are targeted to design a route/trajectory from an initial decision situation (origin) to goal (destination) decision situation(s). Automobile routing problem is considered as a basic physical metaphor. The problems are based on a discrete (combinatorial) operations/states design/solving space (e.g., digraph). The described types of discrete decision making problems can be considered as intelligent design of a route (trajectory, strategy) and can be used in many domains: (a) education (planning of student educational trajectory), (b) medicine (medical treatment), (c) economics (trajectory of start-up development). Several types of the route decision making problems are described: (i) basic route decision making, (ii) multi-goal route decision making, (iii) multi-route decision making, (iv) multi-route decision making with route/trajectory change(s), (v) composite multi-route decision making (solution is a composition of several routes/trajectories at several corresponding domains), and (vi) composite multi-route decision making with coordinated routes/trajectories. In addition, problems of modeling and building the design spaces are considered. Numerical examples illustrate the suggested approach. Three applications are considered: educational trajectory (orienteering problem), plan of start-up company (modular three-stage design), and plan of medical treatment (planning over digraph with two-component vertices).
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Towards combinatorial clustering: preliminary research survey
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper describes clustering problems from the combinatorial viewpoint. A brief systemic survey is presented including the following: (i) basic clustering problems (e.g., classification, clustering, sorting, clustering with an order over cluster), (ii) basic approaches to assessment of objects and object proximities (i.e., scales, comparison, aggregation issues), (iii) basic approaches to evalua…
▽ More
The paper describes clustering problems from the combinatorial viewpoint. A brief systemic survey is presented including the following: (i) basic clustering problems (e.g., classification, clustering, sorting, clustering with an order over cluster), (ii) basic approaches to assessment of objects and object proximities (i.e., scales, comparison, aggregation issues), (iii) basic approaches to evaluation of local quality characteristics for clusters and total quality characteristics for clustering solutions, (iv) clustering as multicriteria optimization problem, (v) generalized modular clustering framework, (vi) basic clustering models/methods (e.g., hierarchical clustering, k-means clustering, minimum spanning tree based clustering, clustering as assignment, detection of clisue/quasi-clique based clustering, correlation clustering, network communities based clustering), Special attention is targeted to formulation of clustering as multicriteria optimization models. Combinatorial optimization models are used as auxiliary problems (e.g., assignment, partitioning, knapsack problem, multiple choice problem, morphological clique problem, searching for consensus/median for structures). Numerical examples illustrate problem formulations, solving methods, and applications. The material can be used as follows: (a) a research survey, (b) a fundamental for designing the structure/architecture of composite modular clustering software, (c) a bibliography reference collection, and (d) a tutorial.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
Towards Decision Support Technology Platform for Modular Systems
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The survey methodological paper addresses a glance to a general decision support platform technology for modular systems (modular/composite alterantives/solutions) in various applied domains. The decision support platform consists of seven basic combinatorial engineering frameworks (system synthesis, system modeling, evaluation, detection of bottleneck, improvement/extension, multistage design, co…
▽ More
The survey methodological paper addresses a glance to a general decision support platform technology for modular systems (modular/composite alterantives/solutions) in various applied domains. The decision support platform consists of seven basic combinatorial engineering frameworks (system synthesis, system modeling, evaluation, detection of bottleneck, improvement/extension, multistage design, combinatorial evolution and forecasting). The decision support platform is based on decision support procedures (e.g., multicriteria selection/sorting, clustering), combinatorial optimization problems (e.g., knapsack, multiple choice problem, clique, assignment/allocation, covering, spanning trees), and their combinations. The following is described: (1) general scheme of the decision support platform technology; (2) brief descriptions of modular (composite) systems (or composite alternatives); (3) trends in moving from chocie/selection of alternatives to processing of composite alternatives which correspond to hierarchical modular products/systems; (4) scheme of resource requirements (i.e., human, information-computer); and (5) basic combinatorial engineering frameworks and their applications in various domains.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
-
Towards Multistage Design of Modular Systems
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper describes multistage design of composite (modular) systems (i.e., design of a system trajectory). This design process consists of the following: (i) definition of a set of time/logical points; (ii) modular design of the system for each time/logical point (e.g., on the basis of combinatorial synthesis as hierarchical morphological design or multiple choice problem) to obtain several syste…
▽ More
The paper describes multistage design of composite (modular) systems (i.e., design of a system trajectory). This design process consists of the following: (i) definition of a set of time/logical points; (ii) modular design of the system for each time/logical point (e.g., on the basis of combinatorial synthesis as hierarchical morphological design or multiple choice problem) to obtain several system solutions; (iii) selection of the system solution for each time/logical point while taking into account their quality and the quality of compatibility between neighbor selected system solutions (here, combinatorial synthesis is used as well). Mainly, the examined time/logical points are based on a time chain. In addition, two complicated cases are considered: (a) the examined logical points are based on a tree-like structure, (b) the examined logical points are based on a digraph. Numerical examples illustrate the approach.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Towards Detection of Bottlenecks in Modular Systems
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper describes some basic approaches to detection of bottlenecks in composite (modular) systems. The following basic system bottlenecks detection problems are examined: (1) traditional quality management approaches (Pareto chart based method, multicriteria analysis as selection of Pareto-efficient points, and/or multicriteria ranking), (2) selection of critical system elements (critical compo…
▽ More
The paper describes some basic approaches to detection of bottlenecks in composite (modular) systems. The following basic system bottlenecks detection problems are examined: (1) traditional quality management approaches (Pareto chart based method, multicriteria analysis as selection of Pareto-efficient points, and/or multicriteria ranking), (2) selection of critical system elements (critical components/modules, critical component interconnection), (3) selection of interconnected system components as composite system faults (via clique-based fusion), (4) critical elements (e.g., nodes) in networks, and (5) predictive detection of system bottlenecks (detection of system components based on forecasting of their parameters). Here, heuristic solving schemes are used. Numerical examples illustrate the approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
-
Note on Evaluation of Hierarchical Modular Systems
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
This survey note describes a brief systemic view to approaches for evaluation of hierarchical composite (modular) systems. The list of considered issues involves the following: (i) basic assessment scales (quantitative scale, ordinal scale, multicriteria description, two kinds of poset-like scales), (ii) basic types of scale transformations problems, (iii) basic types of scale integration methods.…
▽ More
This survey note describes a brief systemic view to approaches for evaluation of hierarchical composite (modular) systems. The list of considered issues involves the following: (i) basic assessment scales (quantitative scale, ordinal scale, multicriteria description, two kinds of poset-like scales), (ii) basic types of scale transformations problems, (iii) basic types of scale integration methods. Evaluation of the modular systems is considered as assessment of system components (and their compatibility) and integration of the obtained local estimates into the total system estimate(s). This process is based on the above-mentioned problems (i.e., scale transformation and integration). Illustrations of the assessment problems and evaluation approaches are presented (including numerical examples).
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
Note on Combinatorial Engineering Frameworks for Hierarchical Modular Systems
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper briefly describes a basic set of special combinatorial engineering frameworks for solving complex problems in the field of hierarchical modular systems. The frameworks consist of combinatorial problems (and corresponding models), which are interconnected/linked (e.g., by preference relation). Mainly, hierarchical morphological system model is used. The list of basic standard combinatoria…
▽ More
The paper briefly describes a basic set of special combinatorial engineering frameworks for solving complex problems in the field of hierarchical modular systems. The frameworks consist of combinatorial problems (and corresponding models), which are interconnected/linked (e.g., by preference relation). Mainly, hierarchical morphological system model is used. The list of basic standard combinatorial engineering (technological) frameworks is the following: (1) design of system hierarchical model, (2) combinatorial synthesis ('bottom-up' process for system design), (3) system evaluation, (4) detection of system bottlenecks, (5) system improvement (re-design, upgrade), (6) multi-stage design (design of system trajectory), (7) combinatorial modeling of system evolution/development and system forecasting. The combinatorial engineering frameworks are targeted to maintenance of some system life cycle stages. The list of main underlaying combinatorial optimization problems involves the following: knapsack problem, multiple-choice problem, assignment problem, spanning trees, morphological clique problem.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
Towards Design of System Hierarchy (research survey)
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper addresses design/building frameworks for some kinds of tree-like and hierarchical structures of systems. The following approaches are examined: (1) expert-based procedures, (2) hierarchical clustering; (3) spanning problems (e.g., minimum spanning tree, minimum Steiner tree, maximum leaf spanning tree problem; (4) design of organizational 'optimal' hierarchies; (5) design of multi-layer…
▽ More
The paper addresses design/building frameworks for some kinds of tree-like and hierarchical structures of systems. The following approaches are examined: (1) expert-based procedures, (2) hierarchical clustering; (3) spanning problems (e.g., minimum spanning tree, minimum Steiner tree, maximum leaf spanning tree problem; (4) design of organizational 'optimal' hierarchies; (5) design of multi-layer (e.g., three-layer) k-connected network; (6) modification of hierarchies or networks: (i) modification of tree via condensing of neighbor nodes, (ii) hotlink assignment, (iii) transformation of tree into Steiner tree, (iv) restructuring as modification of an initial structural solution into a solution that is the most close to a goal solution while taking into account a cost of the modification. Combinatorial optimization problems are considered as basic ones (e.g., classification, knapsack problem, multiple choice problem, assignment problem). Some numerical examples illustrate the suggested problems and solving frameworks.
△ Less
Submitted 7 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
-
Composition of Modular Telemetry System with Interval Multiset Estimates
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper describes combinatorial synthesis approach with interval multset estimates of system elements for modeling, analysis, design, and improvement of a modular telemetry system. Morphological (modular) system design and improvement are considered as composition of the telemetry system elements (components) configuration. The solving process is based on Hierarchical Morphological Multicriteria…
▽ More
The paper describes combinatorial synthesis approach with interval multset estimates of system elements for modeling, analysis, design, and improvement of a modular telemetry system. Morphological (modular) system design and improvement are considered as composition of the telemetry system elements (components) configuration. The solving process is based on Hierarchical Morphological Multicriteria Design (HMMD): (i) multicriteria selection of alternatives for system components, (ii) synthesis of the selected alternatives into a resultant combination (while taking into account quality of the alternatives above and their compatibility). Interval multiset estimates are used for assessment of design alternatives for telemetry system elements. Two additional systems problems are examined: (a) improvement of the obtained solutions, (b) aggregation of the obtained solutions into a resultant system configuration. The improvement and aggregation processes are based on multiple choice problem with interval multiset estimates. Numerical examples for an on-board telemetry subsystem illustrate the design and improvement processes.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Multiset Estimates and Combinatorial Synthesis
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
The paper addresses an approach to ordinal assessment of alternatives based on assignment of elements into an ordinal scale. Basic versions of the assessment problems are formulated while taking into account the number of levels at a basic ordinal scale [1,2,...,l] and the number of assigned elements (e.g., 1,2,3). The obtained estimates are multisets (or bags) (cardinality of the multiset equals…
▽ More
The paper addresses an approach to ordinal assessment of alternatives based on assignment of elements into an ordinal scale. Basic versions of the assessment problems are formulated while taking into account the number of levels at a basic ordinal scale [1,2,...,l] and the number of assigned elements (e.g., 1,2,3). The obtained estimates are multisets (or bags) (cardinality of the multiset equals a constant). Scale-posets for the examined assessment problems are presented. 'Interval multiset estimates' are suggested. Further, operations over multiset estimates are examined: (a) integration of multiset estimates, (b) proximity for multiset estimates, (c) comparison of multiset estimates, (d) aggregation of multiset estimates, and (e) alignment of multiset estimates. Combinatorial synthesis based on morphological approach is examined including the modified version of the approach with multiset estimates of design alternatives. Knapsack-like problems with multiset estimates are briefly described as well. The assessment approach, multiset-estimates, and corresponding combinatorial problems are illustrated by numerical examples.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
-
Combinatorial Evolution and Forecasting of Communication Protocol ZigBee
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin,
Aliaksei Andrushevich,
Rolf Kistler,
Alexander Klapproth
Abstract:
The article addresses combinatorial evolution and forecasting of communication protocol for wireless sensor networks (ZigBee). Morphological tree structure (a version of and-or tree) is used as a hierarchical model for the protocol. Three generations of ZigBee protocol are examined. A set of protocol change operations is generated and described. The change operations are used as items for forecast…
▽ More
The article addresses combinatorial evolution and forecasting of communication protocol for wireless sensor networks (ZigBee). Morphological tree structure (a version of and-or tree) is used as a hierarchical model for the protocol. Three generations of ZigBee protocol are examined. A set of protocol change operations is generated and described. The change operations are used as items for forecasting based on combinatorial problems (e.g., clustering, knapsack problem, multiple choice knapsack problem). Two kinds of preliminary forecasts for the examined communication protocol are considered: (i) direct expert (expert judgment) based forecast, (ii) computation of the forecast(s) (usage of multicriteria decision making and combinatorial optimization problems). Finally, aggregation of the obtained preliminary forecasts is considered (two aggregation strategies are used).
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
Design of modular wireless sensor
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin,
Alexander V. Fimin
Abstract:
The paper addresses combinatorial approach to design of modular wireless sensor as composition of the sensor element from its component alternatives and aggregation of the obtained solutions into a resultant aggregated solution. A hierarchical model is used for the wireless sensor element. The solving process consists of three stages: (i) multicriteria ranking of design alternatives for system com…
▽ More
The paper addresses combinatorial approach to design of modular wireless sensor as composition of the sensor element from its component alternatives and aggregation of the obtained solutions into a resultant aggregated solution. A hierarchical model is used for the wireless sensor element. The solving process consists of three stages: (i) multicriteria ranking of design alternatives for system components/parts, (ii) composing the selected design alternatives into composite solution(s) while taking into account ordinal quality of the design alternatives above and their compatibility (this stage is based on Hierarchical Morphological Multicriteria Design - HMMD), and (iii) aggregation of the obtained composite solutions into a resultant aggregated solution(s). A numerical example describes the problem structuring and solving processes for modular alarm wireless sensor element.
△ Less
Submitted 9 March, 2012;
originally announced March 2012.
-
Towards Configuration of applied Web-based information system
Authors:
Mark Sh. Levin
Abstract:
In the paper, combinatorial synthesis of structure for applied Web-based systems is described. The problem is considered as a combination of selected design alternatives for system parts/components into a resultant composite decision (i.e., system configuration design). The solving framework is based on Hierarchical Morphological Multicriteria Design (HMMD) approach: (i) multicriteria selection of…
▽ More
In the paper, combinatorial synthesis of structure for applied Web-based systems is described. The problem is considered as a combination of selected design alternatives for system parts/components into a resultant composite decision (i.e., system configuration design). The solving framework is based on Hierarchical Morphological Multicriteria Design (HMMD) approach: (i) multicriteria selection of alternatives for system parts, (ii) composing the selected alternatives into a resultant combination (while taking into account ordinal quality of the alternatives above and their compatibility). A lattice-based discrete space is used to evaluate (to integrate) quality of the resultant combinations (i.e., composite system decisions or system configurations). In addition, a simplified solving framework based on multicriteria multiple choice problem is considered. A multistage design process to obtain a system trajectory is described as well. The basic applied example is targeted to an applied Web-based system for a communication service provider. Two other applications are briefly described (corporate system and information system for academic application).
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
