-
The impact of deep learning aid on the workload and interpretation accuracy of radiologists on chest computed tomography: a cross-over reader study
Authors:
Anvar Kurmukov,
Valeria Chernina,
Regina Gareeva,
Maria Dugova,
Ekaterina Petrash,
Olga Aleshina,
Maxim Pisov,
Boris Shirokikh,
Valentin Samokhin,
Vladislav Proskurov,
Stanislav Shimovolos,
Maria Basova,
Mikhail Goncahrov,
Eugenia Soboleva,
Maria Donskova,
Farukh Yaushev,
Alexey Shevtsov,
Alexey Zakharov,
Talgat Saparov,
Victor Gombolevskiy,
Mikhail Belyaev
Abstract:
Interpretation of chest computed tomography (CT) is time-consuming. Previous studies have measured the time-saving effect of using a deep-learning-based aid (DLA) for CT interpretation. We evaluated the joint impact of a multi-pathology DLA on the time and accuracy of radiologists' reading.
40 radiologists were randomly split into three experimental arms: control (10), who interpret studies with…
▽ More
Interpretation of chest computed tomography (CT) is time-consuming. Previous studies have measured the time-saving effect of using a deep-learning-based aid (DLA) for CT interpretation. We evaluated the joint impact of a multi-pathology DLA on the time and accuracy of radiologists' reading.
40 radiologists were randomly split into three experimental arms: control (10), who interpret studies without assistance; informed group (10), who were briefed about DLA pathologies, but performed readings without it; and the experimental group (20), who interpreted half studies with DLA, and half without. Every arm used the same 200 CT studies retrospectively collected from BIMCV-COVID19 dataset; each radiologist provided readings for 20 CT studies. We compared interpretation time, and accuracy of participants diagnostic report with respect to 12 pathological findings.
Mean reading time per study was 15.6 minutes [SD 8.5] in the control arm, 13.2 minutes [SD 8.7] in the informed arm, 14.4 [SD 10.3] in the experimental arm without DLA, and 11.4 minutes [SD 7.8] in the experimental arm with DLA. Mean sensitivity and specificity were 41.5 [SD 30.4], 86.8 [SD 28.3] in the control arm; 53.5 [SD 22.7], 92.3 [SD 9.4] in the informed non-assisted arm; 63.2 [SD 16.4], 92.3 [SD 8.2] in the experimental arm without DLA; and 91.6 [SD 7.2], 89.9 [SD 6.0] in the experimental arm with DLA. DLA speed up interpretation time per study by 2.9 minutes (CI95 [1.7, 4.3], p<0.0005), increased sensitivity by 28.4 (CI95 [23.4, 33.4], p<0.0005), and decreased specificity by 2.4 (CI95 [0.6, 4.3], p=0.13).
Of 20 radiologists in the experimental arm, 16 have improved reading time and sensitivity, two improved their time with a marginal drop in sensitivity, and two participants improved sensitivity with increased time. Overall, DLA introduction decreased reading time by 20.6%.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Hierarchical Loss And Geometric Mask Refinement For Multilabel Ribs Segmentation
Authors:
Aleksei Leonov,
Aleksei Zakharov,
Sergey Koshelev,
Maxim Pisov,
Anvar Kurmukov,
Mikhail Belyaev
Abstract:
Automatic ribs segmentation and numeration can increase computed tomography assessment speed and reduce radiologists mistakes. We introduce a model for multilabel ribs segmentation with hierarchical loss function, which enable to improve multilabel segmentation quality. Also we propose postprocessing technique to further increase labeling quality. Our model achieved new state-of-the-art 98.2% labe…
▽ More
Automatic ribs segmentation and numeration can increase computed tomography assessment speed and reduce radiologists mistakes. We introduce a model for multilabel ribs segmentation with hierarchical loss function, which enable to improve multilabel segmentation quality. Also we propose postprocessing technique to further increase labeling quality. Our model achieved new state-of-the-art 98.2% label accuracy on public RibSeg v2 dataset, surpassing previous result by 6.7%.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Negligible effect of brain MRI data preprocessing for tumor segmentation
Authors:
Ekaterina Kondrateva,
Polina Druzhinina,
Alexandra Dalechina,
Svetlana Zolotova,
Andrey Golanov,
Boris Shirokikh,
Mikhail Belyaev,
Anvar Kurmukov
Abstract:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is heterogeneous due to differences in device manufacturers, scanning protocols, and inter-subject variability. A conventional way to mitigate MR image heterogeneity is to apply preprocessing transformations such as anatomy alignment, voxel resampling, signal intensity equalization, image denoising, and localization of regions of interest. Although a preproces…
▽ More
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is heterogeneous due to differences in device manufacturers, scanning protocols, and inter-subject variability. A conventional way to mitigate MR image heterogeneity is to apply preprocessing transformations such as anatomy alignment, voxel resampling, signal intensity equalization, image denoising, and localization of regions of interest. Although a preprocessing pipeline standardizes image appearance, its influence on the quality of image segmentation and on other downstream tasks in deep neural networks has never been rigorously studied.
We conduct experiments on three publicly available datasets and evaluate the effect of different preprocessing steps in intra- and inter-dataset training scenarios. Our results demonstrate that most popular standardization steps add no value to the network performance; moreover, preprocessing can hamper model performance. We suggest that image intensity normalization approaches do not contribute to model accuracy because of the reduction of signal variance with image standardization. Finally, we show that the contribution of skull-strip** in data preprocessing is almost negligible if measured in terms of estimated tumor volume.
We show that the only essential transformation for accurate deep learning analysis is the unification of voxel spacing across the dataset. In contrast, inter-subjects anatomy alignment in the form of non-rigid atlas registration is not necessary and intensity equalization steps (denoising, bias-field correction and histogram matching) do not improve models' performance. The study code is accessible online https://github.com/MedImAIR/brain-mri-processing-pipeline
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2023; v1 submitted 11 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Zero-Shot Domain Adaptation in CT Segmentation by Filtered Back Projection Augmentation
Authors:
Talgat Saparov,
Anvar Kurmukov,
Boris Shirokikh,
Mikhail Belyaev
Abstract:
Domain shift is one of the most salient challenges in medical computer vision. Due to immense variability in scanners' parameters and imaging protocols, even images obtained from the same person and the same scanner could differ significantly. We address variability in computed tomography (CT) images caused by different convolution kernels used in the reconstruction process, the critical domain sh…
▽ More
Domain shift is one of the most salient challenges in medical computer vision. Due to immense variability in scanners' parameters and imaging protocols, even images obtained from the same person and the same scanner could differ significantly. We address variability in computed tomography (CT) images caused by different convolution kernels used in the reconstruction process, the critical domain shift factor in CT. The choice of a convolution kernel affects pixels' granularity, image smoothness, and noise level. We analyze a dataset of paired CT images, where smooth and sharp images were reconstructed from the same sinograms with different kernels, thus providing identical anatomy but different style. Though identical predictions are desired, we show that the consistency, measured as the average Dice between predictions on pairs, is just 0.54. We propose Filtered Back-Projection Augmentation (FBPAug), a simple and surprisingly efficient approach to augment CT images in sinogram space emulating reconstruction with different kernels. We apply the proposed method in a zero-shot domain adaptation setup and show that the consistency boosts from 0.54 to 0.92 outperforming other augmentation approaches. Neither specific preparation of source domain data nor target domain data is required, so our publicly released FBPAug can be used as a plug-and-play module for zero-shot domain adaptation in any CT-based task.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2022; v1 submitted 18 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Universal Loss Reweighting to Balance Lesion Size Inequality in 3D Medical Image Segmentation
Authors:
Boris Shirokikh,
Alexey Shevtsov,
Anvar Kurmukov,
Alexandra Dalechina,
Egor Krivov,
Valery Kostjuchenko,
Andrey Golanov,
Mikhail Belyaev
Abstract:
Target imbalance affects the performance of recent deep learning methods in many medical image segmentation tasks. It is a twofold problem: class imbalance - positive class (lesion) size compared to negative class (non-lesion) size; lesion size imbalance - large lesions overshadows small ones (in the case of multiple lesions per image). While the former was addressed in multiple works, the latter…
▽ More
Target imbalance affects the performance of recent deep learning methods in many medical image segmentation tasks. It is a twofold problem: class imbalance - positive class (lesion) size compared to negative class (non-lesion) size; lesion size imbalance - large lesions overshadows small ones (in the case of multiple lesions per image). While the former was addressed in multiple works, the latter lacks investigation. We propose a loss reweighting approach to increase the ability of the network to detect small lesions. During the learning process, we assign a weight to every image voxel. The assigned weights are inversely proportional to the lesion volume, thus smaller lesions get larger weights. We report the benefit from our method for well-known loss functions, including Dice Loss, Focal Loss, and Asymmetric Similarity Loss. Additionally, we compare our results with other reweighting techniques: Weighted Cross-Entropy and Generalized Dice Loss. Our experiments show that inverse weighting considerably increases the detection quality, while preserves the delineation quality on a state-of-the-art level. We publish a complete experimental pipeline for two publicly available datasets of CT images: LiTS and LUNA16 (https://github.com/neuro-ml/inverse_weighting). We also show results on a private database of MR images for the task of multiple brain metastases delineation.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
CT-based COVID-19 Triage: Deep Multitask Learning Improves Joint Identification and Severity Quantification
Authors:
Mikhail Goncharov,
Maxim Pisov,
Alexey Shevtsov,
Boris Shirokikh,
Anvar Kurmukov,
Ivan Blokhin,
Valeria Chernina,
Alexander Solovev,
Victor Gombolevskiy,
Sergey Morozov,
Mikhail Belyaev
Abstract:
The current COVID-19 pandemic overloads healthcare systems, including radiology departments. Though several deep learning approaches were developed to assist in CT analysis, nobody considered study triage directly as a computer science problem. We describe two basic setups: Identification of COVID-19 to prioritize studies of potentially infected patients to isolate them as early as possible; Sever…
▽ More
The current COVID-19 pandemic overloads healthcare systems, including radiology departments. Though several deep learning approaches were developed to assist in CT analysis, nobody considered study triage directly as a computer science problem. We describe two basic setups: Identification of COVID-19 to prioritize studies of potentially infected patients to isolate them as early as possible; Severity quantification to highlight studies of severe patients and direct them to a hospital or provide emergency medical care. We formalize these tasks as binary classification and estimation of affected lung percentage. Though similar problems were well-studied separately, we show that existing methods provide reasonable quality only for one of these setups. We employ a multitask approach to consolidate both triage approaches and propose a convolutional neural network to combine all available labels within a single model. In contrast with the most popular multitask approaches, we add classification layers to the most spatially detailed upper part of U-Net instead of the bottom, less detailed latent representation. We train our model on approximately 2000 publicly available CT studies and test it with a carefully designed set consisting of 32 COVID-19 studies, 30 cases with bacterial pneumonia, 31 healthy patients, and 30 patients with other lung pathologies to emulate a typical patient flow in an out-patient hospital. The proposed multitask model outperforms the latent-based one and achieves ROC AUC scores ranging from 0.87+-01 (bacterial pneumonia) to 0.97+-01 (healthy controls) for Identification of COVID-19 and 0.97+-01 Spearman Correlation for Severity quantification. We release all the code and create a public leaderboard, where other community members can test their models on our test dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2020; v1 submitted 2 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.