-
Deep Learning compatible Differentiable X-ray Projections for Inverse Rendering
Authors:
Karthik Shetty,
Annette Birkhold,
Norbert Strobel,
Bernhard Egger,
Srikrishna Jaganathan,
Markus Kowarschik,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Many minimally invasive interventional procedures still rely on 2D fluoroscopic imaging. Generating a patient-specific 3D model from these X-ray projection data would allow to improve the procedural workflow, e.g. by providing assistance functions such as automatic positioning. To accomplish this, two things are required. First, a statistical human shape model of the human anatomy and second, a di…
▽ More
Many minimally invasive interventional procedures still rely on 2D fluoroscopic imaging. Generating a patient-specific 3D model from these X-ray projection data would allow to improve the procedural workflow, e.g. by providing assistance functions such as automatic positioning. To accomplish this, two things are required. First, a statistical human shape model of the human anatomy and second, a differentiable X-ray renderer. In this work, we propose a differentiable renderer by deriving the distance travelled by a ray inside mesh structures to generate a distance map. To demonstrate its functioning, we use it for simulating X-ray images from human shape models. Then we show its application by solving the inverse problem, namely reconstructing 3D models from real 2D fluoroscopy images of the pelvis, which is an ideal anatomical structure for patient registration. This is accomplished by an iterative optimization strategy using gradient descent. With the majority of the pelvis being in the fluoroscopic field of view, we achieve a mean Hausdorff distance of 30 mm between the reconstructed model and the ground truth segmentation.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Simultaneous Estimation of X-ray Back-Scatter and Forward-Scatter using Multi-Task Learning
Authors:
Philipp Roser,
Xia Zhong,
Annette Birkhold,
Alexander Preuhs,
Christopher Syben,
Elisabeth Hoppe,
Norbert Strobel,
Markus Kowarschik,
Rebecca Fahrig,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Scattered radiation is a major concern impacting X-ray image-guided procedures in two ways. First, back-scatter significantly contributes to patient (skin) dose during complicated interventions. Second, forward-scattered radiation reduces contrast in projection images and introduces artifacts in 3-D reconstructions. While conventionally employed anti-scatter grids improve image quality by blocking…
▽ More
Scattered radiation is a major concern impacting X-ray image-guided procedures in two ways. First, back-scatter significantly contributes to patient (skin) dose during complicated interventions. Second, forward-scattered radiation reduces contrast in projection images and introduces artifacts in 3-D reconstructions. While conventionally employed anti-scatter grids improve image quality by blocking X-rays, the additional attenuation due to the anti-scatter grid at the detector needs to be compensated for by a higher patient entrance dose. This also increases the room dose affecting the staff caring for the patient. For skin dose quantification, back-scatter is usually accounted for by applying pre-determined scalar back-scatter factors or linear point spread functions to a primary kerma forward projection onto a patient surface point. However, as patients come in different shapes, the generalization of conventional methods is limited. Here, we propose a novel approach combining conventional techniques with learning-based methods to simultaneously estimate the forward-scatter reaching the detector as well as the back-scatter affecting the patient skin dose. Knowing the forward-scatter, we can correct X-ray projections, while a good estimate of the back-scatter component facilitates an improved skin dose assessment. To simultaneously estimate forward-scatter as well as back-scatter, we propose a multi-task approach for joint back- and forward-scatter estimation by combining X-ray physics with neural networks. We show that, in theory, highly accurate scatter estimation in both cases is possible. In addition, we identify research directions for our multi-task framework and learning-based scatter estimation in general.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Appearance Learning for Image-based Motion Estimation in Tomography
Authors:
Alexander Preuhs,
Michael Manhart,
Philipp Roser,
Elisabeth Hoppe,
Yixing Huang,
Marios Psychogios,
Markus Kowarschik,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
In tomographic imaging, anatomical structures are reconstructed by applying a pseudo-inverse forward model to acquired signals. Geometric information within this process is usually depending on the system setting only, i. e., the scanner position or readout direction. Patient motion therefore corrupts the geometry alignment in the reconstruction process resulting in motion artifacts. We propose an…
▽ More
In tomographic imaging, anatomical structures are reconstructed by applying a pseudo-inverse forward model to acquired signals. Geometric information within this process is usually depending on the system setting only, i. e., the scanner position or readout direction. Patient motion therefore corrupts the geometry alignment in the reconstruction process resulting in motion artifacts. We propose an appearance learning approach recognizing the structures of rigid motion independently from the scanned object. To this end, we train a siamese triplet network to predict the reprojection error (RPE) for the complete acquisition as well as an approximate distribution of the RPE along the single views from the reconstructed volume in a multi-task learning approach. The RPE measures the motioninduced geometric deviations independent of the object based on virtual marker positions, which are available during training. We train our network using 27 patients and deploy a 21-4-2 split for training, validation and testing. In average, we achieve a residual mean RPE of 0.013mm with an inter-patient standard deviation of 0.022 mm. This is twice the accuracy compared to previously published results. In a motion estimation benchmark the proposed approach achieves superior results in comparison with two state-of-the-art measures in nine out of twelve experiments. The clinical applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated on a motion-affected clinical dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Fully-automatic CT data preparation for interventional X-ray skin dose simulation
Authors:
Philipp Roser,
Annette Birkhold,
Alexander Preuhs,
Bernhard Stimpel,
Christopher Syben,
Norbert Strobel,
Markus Kowarschik,
Rebecca Fahrig,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Recently, deep learning (DL) found its way to interventional X-ray skin dose estimation. While its performance was found to be acceptable, even more accurate results could be achieved if more data sets were available for training. One possibility is to turn to computed tomography (CT) data sets. Typically, computed tomography (CT) scans can be mapped to tissue labels and mass densities to obtain t…
▽ More
Recently, deep learning (DL) found its way to interventional X-ray skin dose estimation. While its performance was found to be acceptable, even more accurate results could be achieved if more data sets were available for training. One possibility is to turn to computed tomography (CT) data sets. Typically, computed tomography (CT) scans can be mapped to tissue labels and mass densities to obtain training data. However, care has to be taken to make sure that the different clinical settings are properly accounted for. First, the interventional environment is characterized by wide variety of table setups that are significantly different from the typical patient tables used in conventional CT. This cannot be ignored, since tables play a crucial role in sound skin dose estimation in an interventional setup, e. g., when the X-ray source is directly underneath a patient (posterior-anterior view). Second, due to interpolation errors, most CT scans do not facilitate a clean segmentation of the skin border. As a solution to these problems, we applied connected component labeling (CCL) and Canny edge detection to (a) robustly separate the patient from the table and (b) to identify the outermost skin layer. Our results show that these extensions enable fully-automatic, generalized pre-processing of CT scans for further simulation of both skin dose and corresponding X-ray projections.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Deep autofocus with cone-beam CT consistency constraint
Authors:
Alexander Preuhs,
Michael Manhart,
Philipp Roser,
Bernhard Stimpel,
Christopher Syben,
Marios Psychogios,
Markus Kowarschik,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
High quality reconstruction with interventional C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) requires exact geometry information. If the geometry information is corrupted, e. g., by unexpected patient or system movement, the measured signal is misplaced in the backprojection operation. With prolonged acquisition times of interventional C-arm CBCT the likelihood of rigid patient motion increases. To…
▽ More
High quality reconstruction with interventional C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) requires exact geometry information. If the geometry information is corrupted, e. g., by unexpected patient or system movement, the measured signal is misplaced in the backprojection operation. With prolonged acquisition times of interventional C-arm CBCT the likelihood of rigid patient motion increases. To adapt the backprojection operation accordingly, a motion estimation strategy is necessary. Recently, a novel learning-based approach was proposed, capable of compensating motions within the acquisition plane. We extend this method by a CBCT consistency constraint, which was proven to be efficient for motions perpendicular to the acquisition plane. By the synergistic combination of these two measures, in and out-plane motion is well detectable, achieving an average artifact suppression of 93 [percent]. This outperforms the entropy-based state-of-the-art autofocus measure which achieves on average an artifact suppression of 54 [percent].
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2019; v1 submitted 29 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Image Quality Assessment for Rigid Motion Compensation
Authors:
Alexander Preuhs,
Michael Manhart,
Philipp Roser,
Bernhard Stimpel,
Christopher Syben,
Marios Psychogios,
Markus Kowarschik,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Diagnostic stroke imaging with C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables reduction of time-to-therapy for endovascular procedures. However, the prolonged acquisition time compared to helical CT increases the likelihood of rigid patient motion. Rigid motion corrupts the geometry alignment assumed during reconstruction, resulting in image blurring or streaking artifacts. To reestablish the…
▽ More
Diagnostic stroke imaging with C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables reduction of time-to-therapy for endovascular procedures. However, the prolonged acquisition time compared to helical CT increases the likelihood of rigid patient motion. Rigid motion corrupts the geometry alignment assumed during reconstruction, resulting in image blurring or streaking artifacts. To reestablish the geometry, we estimate the motion trajectory by an autofocus method guided by a neural network, which was trained to regress the reprojection error, based on the image information of a reconstructed slice. The network was trained with CBCT scans from 19 patients and evaluated using an additional test patient. It adapts well to unseen motion amplitudes and achieves superior results in a motion estimation benchmark compared to the commonly used entropy-based method.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2019; v1 submitted 9 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
A Semi-Automated Usability Evaluation Framework for Interactive Image Segmentation Systems
Authors:
Mario Amrehn,
Stefan Steidl,
Reinier Kortekaas,
Maddalena Strumia,
Markus Weingarten,
Markus Kowarschik,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
For complex segmentation tasks, the achievable accuracy of fully automated systems is inherently limited. Specifically, when a precise segmentation result is desired for a small amount of given data sets, semi-automatic methods exhibit a clear benefit for the user. The optimization of human computer interaction (HCI) is an essential part of interactive image segmentation. Nevertheless, publication…
▽ More
For complex segmentation tasks, the achievable accuracy of fully automated systems is inherently limited. Specifically, when a precise segmentation result is desired for a small amount of given data sets, semi-automatic methods exhibit a clear benefit for the user. The optimization of human computer interaction (HCI) is an essential part of interactive image segmentation. Nevertheless, publications introducing novel interactive segmentation systems (ISS) often lack an objective comparison of HCI aspects. It is demonstrated, that even when the underlying segmentation algorithm is the same throughout interactive prototypes, their user experience may vary substantially. As a result, users prefer simple interfaces as well as a considerable degree of freedom to control each iterative step of the segmentation. In this article, an objective method for the comparison of ISS is proposed, based on extensive user studies. A summative qualitative content analysis is conducted via abstraction of visual and verbal feedback given by the participants. A direct assessment of the segmentation system is executed by the users via the system usability scale (SUS) and AttrakDiff-2 questionnaires. Furthermore, an approximation of the findings regarding usability aspects in those studies is introduced, conducted solely from the system-measurable user actions during their usage of interactive segmentation prototypes. The prediction of all questionnaire results has an average relative error of 8.9%, which is close to the expected precision of the questionnaire results themselves. This automated evaluation scheme may significantly reduce the resources necessary to investigate each variation of a prototype's user interface (UI) features and segmentation methodologies.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
