-
Confidence intervals for performance estimates in 3D medical image segmentation
Authors:
R. El Jurdi,
G. Varoquaux,
O. Colliot
Abstract:
Medical segmentation models are evaluated empirically. As such an evaluation is based on a limited set of example images, it is unavoidably noisy. Beyond a mean performance measure, reporting confidence intervals is thus crucial. However, this is rarely done in medical image segmentation. The width of the confidence interval depends on the test set size and on the spread of the performance measure…
▽ More
Medical segmentation models are evaluated empirically. As such an evaluation is based on a limited set of example images, it is unavoidably noisy. Beyond a mean performance measure, reporting confidence intervals is thus crucial. However, this is rarely done in medical image segmentation. The width of the confidence interval depends on the test set size and on the spread of the performance measure (its standard-deviation across of the test set). For classification, many test images are needed to avoid wide confidence intervals. Segmentation, however, has not been studied, and it differs by the amount of information brought by a given test image. In this paper, we study the typical confidence intervals in medical image segmentation. We carry experiments on 3D image segmentation using the standard nnU-net framework, two datasets from the Medical Decathlon challenge and two performance measures: the Dice accuracy and the Hausdorff distance. We show that the parametric confidence intervals are reasonable approximations of the bootstrap estimates for varying test set sizes and spread of the performance metric. Importantly, we show that the test size needed to achieve a given precision is often much lower than for classification tasks. Typically, a 1% wide confidence interval requires about 100-200 test samples when the spread is low (standard-deviation around 3%). More difficult segmentation tasks may lead to higher spreads and require over 1000 samples.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2023; v1 submitted 20 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Fourier Disentangled Multimodal Prior Knowledge Fusion for Red Nucleus Segmentation in Brain MRI
Authors:
Guanghui Fu,
Gabriel Jimenez,
Sophie Loizillon,
Rosana El Jurdi,
Lydia Chougar,
Didier Dormont,
Romain Valabregue,
Ninon Burgos,
Stéphane Lehéricy,
Daniel Racoceanu,
Olivier Colliot,
the ICEBERG Study Group
Abstract:
Early and accurate diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes is critical to provide appropriate care to patients and for inclusion in therapeutic trials. The red nucleus is a structure of the midbrain that plays an important role in these disorders. It can be visualized using iron-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Different iron-sensitive contrasts can be produced with MRI. Combining…
▽ More
Early and accurate diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes is critical to provide appropriate care to patients and for inclusion in therapeutic trials. The red nucleus is a structure of the midbrain that plays an important role in these disorders. It can be visualized using iron-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. Different iron-sensitive contrasts can be produced with MRI. Combining such multimodal data has the potential to improve segmentation of the red nucleus. Current multimodal segmentation algorithms are computationally consuming, cannot deal with missing modalities and need annotations for all modalities. In this paper, we propose a new model that integrates prior knowledge from different contrasts for red nucleus segmentation. The method consists of three main stages. First, it disentangles the image into high-level information representing the brain structure, and low-frequency information representing the contrast. The high-frequency information is then fed into a network to learn anatomical features, while the list of multimodal low-frequency information is processed by another module. Finally, feature fusion is performed to complete the segmentation task. The proposed method was used with several iron-sensitive contrasts (iMag, QSM, R2*, SWI). Experiments demonstrate that our proposed model substantially outperforms a baseline UNet model when the training set size is very small.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Effect of Prior-based Losses on Segmentation Performance: A Benchmark
Authors:
Rosana El Jurdi,
Caroline Petitjean,
Veronika Cheplygina,
Paul Honeine,
Fahed Abdallah
Abstract:
Today, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance for medical image segmentation, on various imaging modalities and tasks. Despite early success, segmentation networks may still generate anatomically aberrant segmentations, with holes or inaccuracies near the object boundaries. To enforce anatomical plausibility, recent research studies have focused on…
▽ More
Today, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance for medical image segmentation, on various imaging modalities and tasks. Despite early success, segmentation networks may still generate anatomically aberrant segmentations, with holes or inaccuracies near the object boundaries. To enforce anatomical plausibility, recent research studies have focused on incorporating prior knowledge such as object shape or boundary, as constraints in the loss function. Prior integrated could be low-level referring to reformulated representations extracted from the ground-truth segmentations, or high-level representing external medical information such as the organ's shape or size. Over the past few years, prior-based losses exhibited a rising interest in the research field since they allow integration of expert knowledge while still being architecture-agnostic. However, given the diversity of prior-based losses on different medical imaging challenges and tasks, it has become hard to identify what loss works best for which dataset. In this paper, we establish a benchmark of recent prior-based losses for medical image segmentation. The main objective is to provide intuition onto which losses to choose given a particular task or dataset. To this end, four low-level and high-level prior-based losses are selected. The considered losses are validated on 8 different datasets from a variety of medical image segmentation challenges including the Decathlon, the ISLES and the WMH challenge. Results show that whereas low-level prior-based losses can guarantee an increase in performance over the Dice loss baseline regardless of the dataset characteristics, high-level prior-based losses can increase anatomical plausibility as per data characteristics.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2022; v1 submitted 7 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
