-
Constrained Deep Reinforcement Learning for Fronthaul Compression Optimization
Authors:
Axel Grönland,
Alessio Russo,
Yassir Jedra,
Bleron Klaiqi,
Xavier Gelabert
Abstract:
In the Centralized-Radio Access Network (C-RAN) architecture, functions can be placed in the central or distributed locations. This architecture can offer higher capacity and cost savings but also puts strict requirements on the fronthaul (FH). Adaptive FH compression schemes that adapt the compression amount to varying FH traffic are promising approaches to deal with stringent FH requirements. In…
▽ More
In the Centralized-Radio Access Network (C-RAN) architecture, functions can be placed in the central or distributed locations. This architecture can offer higher capacity and cost savings but also puts strict requirements on the fronthaul (FH). Adaptive FH compression schemes that adapt the compression amount to varying FH traffic are promising approaches to deal with stringent FH requirements. In this work, we design such a compression scheme using a model-free off policy deep reinforcement learning algorithm which accounts for FH latency and packet loss constraints. Furthermore, this algorithm is designed for model transparency and interpretability which is crucial for AI trustworthiness in performance critical domains. We show that our algorithm can successfully choose an appropriate compression scheme while satisfying the constraints and exhibits a roughly 70\% increase in FH utilization compared to a reference scheme.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2023; v1 submitted 26 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identification
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Anastasios Tsiamis,
Bruce Lee,
Yassir Jedra,
Nikolai Matni,
George J. Pappas
Abstract:
This tutorial serves as an introduction to recently developed non-asymptotic methods in the theory of -- mainly linear -- system identification. We emphasize tools we deem particularly useful for a range of problems in this domain, such as the covering technique, the Hanson-Wright Inequality and the method of self-normalized martingales. We then employ these tools to give streamlined proofs of the…
▽ More
This tutorial serves as an introduction to recently developed non-asymptotic methods in the theory of -- mainly linear -- system identification. We emphasize tools we deem particularly useful for a range of problems in this domain, such as the covering technique, the Hanson-Wright Inequality and the method of self-normalized martingales. We then employ these tools to give streamlined proofs of the performance of various least-squares based estimators for identifying the parameters in autoregressive models. We conclude by sketching out how the ideas presented herein can be extended to certain nonlinear identification problems.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2024; v1 submitted 7 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Minimal Expected Regret in Linear Quadratic Control
Authors:
Yassir Jedra,
Alexandre Proutiere
Abstract:
We consider the problem of online learning in Linear Quadratic Control systems whose state transition and state-action transition matrices $A$ and $B$ may be initially unknown. We devise an online learning algorithm and provide guarantees on its expected regret. This regret at time $T$ is upper bounded (i) by $\widetilde{O}((d_u+d_x)\sqrt{d_xT})$ when $A$ and $B$ are unknown, (ii) by…
▽ More
We consider the problem of online learning in Linear Quadratic Control systems whose state transition and state-action transition matrices $A$ and $B$ may be initially unknown. We devise an online learning algorithm and provide guarantees on its expected regret. This regret at time $T$ is upper bounded (i) by $\widetilde{O}((d_u+d_x)\sqrt{d_xT})$ when $A$ and $B$ are unknown, (ii) by $\widetilde{O}(d_x^2\log(T))$ if only $A$ is unknown, and (iii) by $\widetilde{O}(d_x(d_u+d_x)\log(T))$ if only $B$ is unknown and under some mild non-degeneracy condition ($d_x$ and $d_u$ denote the dimensions of the state and of the control input, respectively). These regret scalings are minimal in $T$, $d_x$ and $d_u$ as they match existing lower bounds in scenario (i) when $d_x\le d_u$ [SF20], and in scenario (ii) [lai1986]. We conjecture that our upper bounds are also optimal in scenario (iii) (there is no known lower bound in this setting).
Existing online algorithms proceed in epochs of (typically exponentially) growing durations. The control policy is fixed within each epoch, which considerably simplifies the analysis of the estimation error on $A$ and $B$ and hence of the regret. Our algorithm departs from this design choice: it is a simple variant of certainty-equivalence regulators, where the estimates of $A$ and $B$ and the resulting control policy can be updated as frequently as we wish, possibly at every step. Quantifying the impact of such a constantly-varying control policy on the performance of these estimates and on the regret constitutes one of the technical challenges tackled in this paper.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Finite-time Identification of Stable Linear Systems: Optimality of the Least-Squares Estimator
Authors:
Yassir Jedra,
Alexandre Proutiere
Abstract:
We present a new finite-time analysis of the estimation error of the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimator for stable linear time-invariant systems. We characterize the number of observed samples (the length of the observed trajectory) sufficient for the OLS estimator to be $(\varepsilon,δ)$-PAC, i.e., to yield an estimation error less than $\varepsilon$ with probability at least $1-δ$. We show t…
▽ More
We present a new finite-time analysis of the estimation error of the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimator for stable linear time-invariant systems. We characterize the number of observed samples (the length of the observed trajectory) sufficient for the OLS estimator to be $(\varepsilon,δ)$-PAC, i.e., to yield an estimation error less than $\varepsilon$ with probability at least $1-δ$. We show that this number matches existing sample complexity lower bounds [1,2] up to universal multiplicative factors (independent of ($\varepsilon,δ)$ and of the system). This paper hence establishes the optimality of the OLS estimator for stable systems, a result conjectured in [1]. Our analysis of the performance of the OLS estimator is simpler, sharper, and easier to interpret than existing analyses. It relies on new concentration results for the covariates matrix.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2020; v1 submitted 17 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Sample Complexity Lower Bounds for Linear System Identification
Authors:
Yassir Jedra,
Alexandre Proutiere
Abstract:
This paper establishes problem-specific sample complexity lower bounds for linear system identification problems. The sample complexity is defined in the PAC framework: it corresponds to the time it takes to identify the system parameters with prescribed accuracy and confidence levels. By problem-specific, we mean that the lower bound explicitly depends on the system to be identified (which contra…
▽ More
This paper establishes problem-specific sample complexity lower bounds for linear system identification problems. The sample complexity is defined in the PAC framework: it corresponds to the time it takes to identify the system parameters with prescribed accuracy and confidence levels. By problem-specific, we mean that the lower bound explicitly depends on the system to be identified (which contrasts with minimax lower bounds), and hence really captures the identification hardness specific to the system. We consider both uncontrolled and controlled systems. For uncontrolled systems, the lower bounds are valid for any linear system, stable or not, and only depend of the system finite-time controllability gramian. A simplified lower bound depending on the spectrum of the system only is also derived. In view of recent finitetime analysis of classical estimation methods (e.g. ordinary least squares), our sample complexity lower bounds are tight for many systems. For controlled systems, our lower bounds are not as explicit as in the case of uncontrolled systems, but could well provide interesting insights into the design of control policy with minimal sample complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
