Penalized PET/CT Reconstruction Algorithms with Automatic Realignment for Anatomical Priors
Authors:
Yu-Jung Tsai,
Alexandre Bousse,
Simon Arridge,
Charles W. Stearns,
Brian F. Hutton,
Kris Thielemans
Abstract:
Two algorithms for solving misalignment issues in penalized PET/CT reconstruction using anatomical priors are proposed. Both approaches are based on a recently published joint motion estimation and image reconstruction method. The first approach deforms the anatomical image to align it with the functional one while the second approach deforms both images to align them with the measured data. Our c…
▽ More
Two algorithms for solving misalignment issues in penalized PET/CT reconstruction using anatomical priors are proposed. Both approaches are based on a recently published joint motion estimation and image reconstruction method. The first approach deforms the anatomical image to align it with the functional one while the second approach deforms both images to align them with the measured data. Our current implementation alternates between image reconstruction and alignment estimation. To evaluate the potential of these approaches, we have chosen Parallel Level Sets (PLS) as a representative anatomical penalty, incorporating a spatially-variant penalty strength to achieve uniform local contrast. The performance was evaluated using simulated non-TOF data generated with an XCAT phantom in the thorax region. We used the attenuation image in the anatomical prior. The results demonstrated that both methods can estimate the misalignment and deform the anatomical image accordingly. However, the performance of the first approach depends highly on the workflow of the alternating process. The second approach shows a faster convergence rate to the correct alignment and is less sensitive to the workflow. Interestingly, the presence of anatomical information can improve the convergence rate of misalignment estimation for the second approach but slow it down for the first approach.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2020; v1 submitted 18 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
Improved MR to CT synthesis for PET/MR attenuation correction using Imitation Learning
Authors:
Kerstin Kläser,
Thomas Varsavsky,
Pawel Markiewicz,
Tom Vercauteren,
David Atkinson,
Kris Thielemans,
Brian Hutton,
M Jorge Cardoso,
Sebastien Ourselin
Abstract:
The ability to synthesise Computed Tomography images - commonly known as pseudo CT, or pCT - from MRI input data is commonly assessed using an intensity-wise similarity, such as an L2-norm between the ground truth CT and the pCT. However, given that the ultimate purpose is often to use the pCT as an attenuation map ($μ$-map) in Positron Emission Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI), min…
▽ More
The ability to synthesise Computed Tomography images - commonly known as pseudo CT, or pCT - from MRI input data is commonly assessed using an intensity-wise similarity, such as an L2-norm between the ground truth CT and the pCT. However, given that the ultimate purpose is often to use the pCT as an attenuation map ($μ$-map) in Positron Emission Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI), minimising the error between pCT and CT is not necessarily optimal. The main objective should be to predict a pCT that, when used as $μ$-map, reconstructs a pseudo PET (pPET) which is as close as possible to the gold standard PET. To this end, we propose a novel multi-hypothesis deep learning framework that generates pCTs by minimising a combination of the pixel-wise error between pCT and CT and a proposed metric-loss that itself is represented by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and aims to minimise subsequent PET residuals. The model is trained on a database of 400 paired MR/CT/PET image slices. Quantitative results show that the network generates pCTs that seem less accurate when evaluating the Mean Absolute Error on the pCT (69.68HU) compared to a baseline CNN (66.25HU), but lead to significant improvement in the PET reconstruction - 115a.u. compared to baseline 140a.u.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2019; v1 submitted 21 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
