Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Gichoya, J W

Multivariate Analysis on Performance Gaps of Artificial Intelligence Models in Screening Mammography

Authors: Linglin Zhang, Beatrice Brown-Mulry, Vineela Nalla, InChan Hwang, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Aimilia Gastounioti, Imon Banerjee, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, MinJae Woo, Hari Trivedi

Abstract: Although deep learning models for abnormality classification can perform well in screening mammography, the demographic, imaging, and clinical characteristics associated with increased risk of model failure remain unclear. This retrospective study uses the Emory BrEast Imaging Dataset(EMBED) containing mammograms from 115931 patients imaged at Emory Healthcare between 2013-2020, with BI-RADS asses… ▽ More Although deep learning models for abnormality classification can perform well in screening mammography, the demographic, imaging, and clinical characteristics associated with increased risk of model failure remain unclear. This retrospective study uses the Emory BrEast Imaging Dataset(EMBED) containing mammograms from 115931 patients imaged at Emory Healthcare between 2013-2020, with BI-RADS assessment, region of interest coordinates for abnormalities, imaging features, pathologic outcomes, and patient demographics. Multiple deep learning models were trained to distinguish between abnormal tissue patches and randomly selected normal tissue patches from screening mammograms. We assessed model performance by subgroups defined by age, race, pathologic outcome, tissue density, and imaging characteristics and investigated their associations with false negatives (FN) and false positives (FP). We also performed multivariate logistic regression to control for confounding between subgroups. The top-performing model, ResNet152V2, achieved accuracy of 92.6%(95%CI=92.0-93.2%), and AUC 0.975(95%CI=0.972-0.978). Before controlling for confounding, nearly all subgroups showed statistically significant differences in model performance. However, after controlling for confounding, we found lower FN risk associates with Other race(RR=0.828;p=.050), biopsy-proven benign lesions(RR=0.927;p=.011), and mass(RR=0.921;p=.010) or asymmetry(RR=0.854;p=.040); higher FN risk associates with architectural distortion (RR=1.037;p<.001). Higher FP risk associates to BI-RADS density C(RR=1.891;p<.001) and D(RR=2.486;p<.001). Our results demonstrate subgroup analysis is important in mammogram classifier performance evaluation, and controlling for confounding between subgroups elucidates the true associations between variables and model failure. These results can help guide develo** future breast cancer detection models. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2023; v1 submitted 7 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 29 pages, 6 tables, 7 figures, 2 supplemental tables

Report of the Medical Image De-Identification (MIDI) Task Group -- Best Practices and Recommendations

Authors: David A. Clunie, Adam Flanders, Adam Taylor, Brad Erickson, Brian Bialecki, David Brundage, David Gutman, Fred Prior, J Anthony Seibert, John Perry, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Justin Kirby, Katherine Andriole, Luke Geneslaw, Steve Moore, TJ Fitzgerald, Wyatt Tellis, Ying Xiao, Keyvan Farahani

Abstract: This report addresses the technical aspects of de-identification of medical images of human subjects and biospecimens, such that re-identification risk of ethical, moral, and legal concern is sufficiently reduced to allow unrestricted public sharing for any purpose, regardless of the jurisdiction of the source and distribution sites. All medical images, regardless of the mode of acquisition, are c… ▽ More This report addresses the technical aspects of de-identification of medical images of human subjects and biospecimens, such that re-identification risk of ethical, moral, and legal concern is sufficiently reduced to allow unrestricted public sharing for any purpose, regardless of the jurisdiction of the source and distribution sites. All medical images, regardless of the mode of acquisition, are considered, though the primary emphasis is on those with accompanying data elements, especially those encoded in formats in which the data elements are embedded, particularly Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). These images include image-like objects such as Segmentations, Parametric Maps, and Radiotherapy (RT) Dose objects. The scope also includes related non-image objects, such as RT Structure Sets, Plans and Dose Volume Histograms, Structured Reports, and Presentation States. Only de-identification of publicly released data is considered, and alternative approaches to privacy preservation, such as federated learning for artificial intelligence (AI) model development, are out of scope, as are issues of privacy leakage from AI model sharing. Only technical issues of public sharing are addressed. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2023; v1 submitted 18 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: 131 pages

Few-Shot Transfer Learning to improve Chest X-Ray pathology detection using limited triplets

Authors: Ananth Reddy Bhimireddy, John Lee Burns, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Judy Wawira Gichoya

Abstract: Deep learning approaches applied to medical imaging have reached near-human or better-than-human performance on many diagnostic tasks. For instance, the CheXpert competition on detecting pathologies in chest x-rays has shown excellent multi-class classification performance. However, training and validating deep learning models require extensive collections of images and still produce false inferen… ▽ More Deep learning approaches applied to medical imaging have reached near-human or better-than-human performance on many diagnostic tasks. For instance, the CheXpert competition on detecting pathologies in chest x-rays has shown excellent multi-class classification performance. However, training and validating deep learning models require extensive collections of images and still produce false inferences, as identified by a human-in-the-loop. In this paper, we introduce a practical approach to improve the predictions of a pre-trained model through Few-Shot Learning (FSL). After training and validating a model, a small number of false inference images are collected to retrain the model using \textbf{\textit{Image Triplets}} - a false positive or false negative, a true positive, and a true negative. The retrained FSL model produces considerable gains in performance with only a few epochs and few images. In addition, FSL opens rapid retraining opportunities for human-in-the-loop systems, where a radiologist can relabel false inferences, and the model can be quickly retrained. We compare our retrained model performance with existing FSL approaches in medical imaging that train and evaluate models at once. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Best Practices and Scoring System on Reviewing A.I. based Medical Imaging Papers: Part 1 Classification

Authors: Timothy L. Kline, Felipe Kitamura, Ian Pan, Amine M. Korchi, Neil Tenenholtz, Linda Moy, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Igor Santos, Steven Blumer, Misha Ysabel Hwang, Kim-Ann Git, Abishek Shroff, Elad Walach, George Shih, Steve Langer

Abstract: With the recent advances in A.I. methodologies and their application to medical imaging, there has been an explosion of related research programs utilizing these techniques to produce state-of-the-art classification performance. Ultimately, these research programs culminate in submission of their work for consideration in peer reviewed journals. To date, the criteria for acceptance vs. rejection i… ▽ More With the recent advances in A.I. methodologies and their application to medical imaging, there has been an explosion of related research programs utilizing these techniques to produce state-of-the-art classification performance. Ultimately, these research programs culminate in submission of their work for consideration in peer reviewed journals. To date, the criteria for acceptance vs. rejection is often subjective; however, reproducible science requires reproducible review. The Machine Learning Education Sub-Committee of SIIM has identified a knowledge gap and a serious need to establish guidelines for reviewing these studies. Although there have been several recent papers with this goal, this present work is written from the machine learning practitioners standpoint. In this series, the committee will address the best practices to be followed in an A.I.-based study and present the required sections in terms of examples and discussion of what should be included to make the studies cohesive, reproducible, accurate, and self-contained. This first entry in the series focuses on the task of image classification. Elements such as dataset curation, data pre-processing steps, defining an appropriate reference standard, data partitioning, model architecture and training are discussed. The sections are presented as they would be detailed in a typical manuscript, with content describing the necessary information that should be included to make sure the study is of sufficient quality to be considered for publication. The goal of this series is to provide resources to not only help improve the review process for A.I.-based medical imaging papers, but to facilitate a standard for the information that is presented within all components of the research study. We hope to provide quantitative metrics in what otherwise may be a qualitative review process. △ Less

Submitted 3 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

MedShift: identifying shift data for medical dataset curation

Authors: Xiaoyuan Guo, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Hari Trivedi, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Imon Banerjee

Abstract: To curate a high-quality dataset, identifying data variance between the internal and external sources is a fundamental and crucial step. However, methods to detect shift or variance in data have not been significantly researched. Challenges to this are the lack of effective approaches to learn dense representation of a dataset and difficulties of sharing private data across medical institutions. T… ▽ More To curate a high-quality dataset, identifying data variance between the internal and external sources is a fundamental and crucial step. However, methods to detect shift or variance in data have not been significantly researched. Challenges to this are the lack of effective approaches to learn dense representation of a dataset and difficulties of sharing private data across medical institutions. To overcome the problems, we propose a unified pipeline called MedShift to detect the top-level shift samples and thus facilitate the medical curation. Given an internal dataset A as the base source, we first train anomaly detectors for each class of dataset A to learn internal distributions in an unsupervised way. Second, without exchanging data across sources, we run the trained anomaly detectors on an external dataset B for each class. The data samples with high anomaly scores are identified as shift data. To quantify the shiftness of the external dataset, we cluster B's data into groups class-wise based on the obtained scores. We then train a multi-class classifier on A and measure the shiftness with the classifier's performance variance on B by gradually drop** the group with the largest anomaly score for each class. Additionally, we adapt a dataset quality metric to help inspect the distribution differences for multiple medical sources. We verify the efficacy of MedShift with musculoskeletal radiographs (MURA) and chest X-rays datasets from more than one external source. Experiments show our proposed shift data detection pipeline can be beneficial for medical centers to curate high-quality datasets more efficiently. An interface introduction video to visualize our results is available at https://youtu.be/V3BF0P1sxQE. △ Less

Submitted 27 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 35 pages, 28 figures, 2 tables

Two-step adversarial debiasing with partial learning -- medical image case-studies

Authors: Ramon Correa, Jiwoong Jason Jeong, Bhavik Patel, Hari Trivedi, Judy W. Gichoya, Imon Banerjee

Abstract: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has become a very active research area in the last few years. While significant progress has been made in image classification tasks, only a few AI methods are actually being deployed in hospitals. A major hurdle in actively using clinical AI models currently is the trustworthiness of these models. More often than not, these complex models are… ▽ More The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has become a very active research area in the last few years. While significant progress has been made in image classification tasks, only a few AI methods are actually being deployed in hospitals. A major hurdle in actively using clinical AI models currently is the trustworthiness of these models. More often than not, these complex models are black boxes in which promising results are generated. However, when scrutinized, these models begin to reveal implicit biases during the decision making, such as detecting race and having bias towards ethnic groups and subpopulations. In our ongoing study, we develop a two-step adversarial debiasing approach with partial learning that can reduce the racial disparity while preserving the performance of the targeted task. The methodology has been evaluated on two independent medical image case-studies - chest X-ray and mammograms, and showed promises in bias reduction while preserving the targeted performance. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

CVAD: A generic medical anomaly detector based on Cascade VAE

Authors: Xiaoyuan Guo, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Imon Banerjee

Abstract: Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples in medical imaging plays an important role for downstream medical diagnosis. However, existing OOD detectors are demonstrated on natural images composed of inter-classes and have difficulty generalizing to medical images. The key issue is the granularity of OOD data in the medical domain, where intra-class OOD samples are predominant. We focus on the gen… ▽ More Detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples in medical imaging plays an important role for downstream medical diagnosis. However, existing OOD detectors are demonstrated on natural images composed of inter-classes and have difficulty generalizing to medical images. The key issue is the granularity of OOD data in the medical domain, where intra-class OOD samples are predominant. We focus on the generalizability of OOD detection for medical images and propose a self-supervised Cascade Variational autoencoder-based Anomaly Detector (CVAD). We use a variational autoencoders' cascade architecture, which combines latent representation at multiple scales, before being fed to a discriminator to distinguish the OOD data from the in-distribution (ID) data. Finally, both the reconstruction error and the OOD probability predicted by the binary discriminator are used to determine the anomalies. We compare the performance with the state-of-the-art deep learning models to demonstrate our model's efficacy on various open-access medical imaging datasets for both intra- and inter-class OOD. Further extensive results on datasets including common natural datasets show our model's effectiveness and generalizability. The code is available at https://github.com/XiaoyuanGuo/CVAD. △ Less

Submitted 26 January, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 6 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables

Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Images

Authors: Imon Banerjee, Ananth Reddy Bhimireddy, John L. Burns, Leo Anthony Celi, Li-Ching Chen, Ramon Correa, Natalie Dullerud, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Shih-Cheng Huang, Po-Chih Kuo, Matthew P Lungren, Lyle Palmer, Brandon J Price, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Ayis Pyrros, Luke Oakden-Rayner, Chima Okechukwu, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, Hari Trivedi, Ryan Wang, Zachary Zaiman, Haoran Zhang, Judy W Gichoya

Abstract: Background: In medical imaging, prior studies have demonstrated disparate AI performance by race, yet there is no known correlation for race on medical imaging that would be obvious to the human expert interpreting the images. Methods: Using private and public datasets we evaluate: A) performance quantification of deep learning models to detect race from medical images, including the ability of… ▽ More Background: In medical imaging, prior studies have demonstrated disparate AI performance by race, yet there is no known correlation for race on medical imaging that would be obvious to the human expert interpreting the images. Methods: Using private and public datasets we evaluate: A) performance quantification of deep learning models to detect race from medical images, including the ability of these models to generalize to external environments and across multiple imaging modalities, B) assessment of possible confounding anatomic and phenotype population features, such as disease distribution and body habitus as predictors of race, and C) investigation into the underlying mechanism by which AI models can recognize race. Findings: Standard deep learning models can be trained to predict race from medical images with high performance across multiple imaging modalities. Our findings hold under external validation conditions, as well as when models are optimized to perform clinically motivated tasks. We demonstrate this detection is not due to trivial proxies or imaging-related surrogate covariates for race, such as underlying disease distribution. Finally, we show that performance persists over all anatomical regions and frequency spectrum of the images suggesting that mitigation efforts will be challenging and demand further study. Interpretation: We emphasize that model ability to predict self-reported race is itself not the issue of importance. However, our findings that AI can trivially predict self-reported race -- even from corrupted, cropped, and noised medical images -- in a setting where clinical experts cannot, creates an enormous risk for all model deployments in medical imaging: if an AI model secretly used its knowledge of self-reported race to misclassify all Black patients, radiologists would not be able to tell using the same data the model has access to. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

MSC Class: 68-XX ACM Class: I.2

A Prospective Observational Study to Investigate Performance of a Chest X-ray Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Support Tool Across 12 U.S. Hospitals

Authors: Ju Sun, Le Peng, Taihui Li, Dyah Adila, Zach Zaiman, Genevieve B. Melton, Nicholas Ingraham, Eric Murray, Daniel Boley, Sean Switzer, John L. Burns, Kun Huang, Tadashi Allen, Scott D. Steenburg, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Erich Kummerfeld, Christopher Tignanelli

Abstract: Importance: An artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict COVID-19 likelihood from chest x-ray (CXR) findings can serve as an important adjunct to accelerate immediate clinical decision making and improve clinical decision making. Despite significant efforts, many limitations and biases exist in previously developed AI diagnostic models for COVID-19. Utilizing a large set of local and int… ▽ More Importance: An artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict COVID-19 likelihood from chest x-ray (CXR) findings can serve as an important adjunct to accelerate immediate clinical decision making and improve clinical decision making. Despite significant efforts, many limitations and biases exist in previously developed AI diagnostic models for COVID-19. Utilizing a large set of local and international CXR images, we developed an AI model with high performance on temporal and external validation. Conclusions and Relevance: AI-based diagnostic tools may serve as an adjunct, but not replacement, for clinical decision support of COVID-19 diagnosis, which largely hinges on exposure history, signs, and symptoms. While AI-based tools have not yet reached full diagnostic potential in COVID-19, they may still offer valuable information to clinicians taken into consideration along with clinical signs and symptoms. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2021; v1 submitted 3 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: Check out the medRxiv version at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.04.21258316 for updates

Was there COVID-19 back in 2012? Challenge for AI in Diagnosis with Similar Indications

Authors: Imon Banerjee, Priyanshu Sinha, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Nazanin Mashhaditafreshi, Amara Tariq, Jiwoong Jeong, Hari Trivedi, Judy W. Gichoya

Abstract: Purpose: Since the recent COVID-19 outbreak, there has been an avalanche of research papers applying deep learning based image processing to chest radiographs for detection of the disease. To test the performance of the two top models for CXR COVID-19 diagnosis on external datasets to assess model generalizability. Methods: In this paper, we present our argument regarding the efficiency and applic… ▽ More Purpose: Since the recent COVID-19 outbreak, there has been an avalanche of research papers applying deep learning based image processing to chest radiographs for detection of the disease. To test the performance of the two top models for CXR COVID-19 diagnosis on external datasets to assess model generalizability. Methods: In this paper, we present our argument regarding the efficiency and applicability of existing deep learning models for COVID-19 diagnosis. We provide results from two popular models - COVID-Net and CoroNet evaluated on three publicly available datasets and an additional institutional dataset collected from EMORY Hospital between January and May 2020, containing patients tested for COVID-19 infection using RT-PCR. Results: There is a large false positive rate (FPR) for COVID-Net on both ChexPert (55.3%) and MIMIC-CXR (23.4%) dataset. On the EMORY Dataset, COVID-Net has 61.4% sensitivity, 0.54 F1-score and 0.49 precision value. The FPR of the CoroNet model is significantly lower across all the datasets as compared to COVID-Net - EMORY(9.1%), ChexPert (1.3%), ChestX-ray14 (0.02%), MIMIC-CXR (0.06%). Conclusion: The models reported good to excellent performance on their internal datasets, however we observed from our testing that their performance dramatically worsened on external data. This is likely from several causes including overfitting models due to lack of appropriate control patients and ground truth labels. The fourth institutional dataset was labeled using RT-PCR, which could be positive without radiographic findings and vice versa. Therefore, a fusion model of both clinical and radiographic data may have better performance and generalization. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

A DICOM Framework for Machine Learning Pipelines against Real-Time Radiology Images

Authors: Pradeeban Kathiravelu, Puneet Sharma, Ashish Sharma, Imon Banerjee, Hari Trivedi, Saptarshi Purkayastha, Priyanshu Sinha, Alexandre Cadrin-Chenevert, Nabile Safdar, Judy Wawira Gichoya

Abstract: Executing machine learning (ML) pipelines in real-time on radiology images is hard due to the limited computing resources in clinical environments and the lack of efficient data transfer capabilities to run them on research clusters. We propose Niffler, an integrated framework that enables the execution of ML pipelines at research clusters by efficiently querying and retrieving radiology images fr… ▽ More Executing machine learning (ML) pipelines in real-time on radiology images is hard due to the limited computing resources in clinical environments and the lack of efficient data transfer capabilities to run them on research clusters. We propose Niffler, an integrated framework that enables the execution of ML pipelines at research clusters by efficiently querying and retrieving radiology images from the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) of the hospitals. Niffler uses the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) protocol to fetch and store imaging data and provides metadata extraction capabilities and Application programming interfaces (APIs) to apply filters on the images. Niffler further enables the sharing of the outcomes from the ML pipelines in a de-identified manner. Niffler has been running stable for more than 19 months and has supported several research projects at the department. In this paper, we present its architecture and three of its use cases: an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter detection from the images in real-time, identification of scanner utilization, and scanner clock calibration. Evaluations on the Niffler prototype highlight its feasibility and efficiency in facilitating the ML pipelines on the images and metadata in real-time and retrospectively. △ Less

Submitted 5 August, 2020; v1 submitted 16 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: Preprint

Journal ref: Journal of Digital Imaging (JDI), 2021