-
Bigger is not Always Better: The Effect of Context Size on Speech Pre-Training
Authors:
Sean Robertson,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
It has been generally assumed in the automatic speech recognition (ASR) literature that it is better for models to have access to wider context windows. Yet, many of the potential reasons this might be true in the supervised setting do not necessarily transfer over to the case of unsupervised learning. We investigate how much context is necessary to achieve high-quality pre-trained acoustic models…
▽ More
It has been generally assumed in the automatic speech recognition (ASR) literature that it is better for models to have access to wider context windows. Yet, many of the potential reasons this might be true in the supervised setting do not necessarily transfer over to the case of unsupervised learning. We investigate how much context is necessary to achieve high-quality pre-trained acoustic models using self-supervised learning. We principally investigate contrastive predictive coding (CPC), which we adapt to be able to precisely control the amount of context visible to the model during training and inference. We find that phone discriminability in the resulting model representations peaks at around 40~ms of preceding context, and that having too much context (beyond around 320 ms) substantially degrades the quality of the representations. Surprisingly, we find that this pattern also transfers to supervised ASR when the pre-trained representations are used as frozen input features. Our results point to potential changes in the design of current upstream architectures to better facilitate a variety of downstream tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Zero Resource Code-switched Speech Benchmark Using Speech Utterance Pairs For Multiple Spoken Languages
Authors:
Kuan-Po Huang,
Chih-Kai Yang,
Yu-Kuan Fu,
Ewan Dunbar,
Hung-yi Lee
Abstract:
We introduce a new zero resource code-switched speech benchmark designed to directly assess the code-switching capabilities of self-supervised speech encoders. We showcase a baseline system of language modeling on discrete units to demonstrate how the code-switching abilities of speech encoders can be assessed in a zero-resource manner. Our experiments encompass a variety of well-known speech enco…
▽ More
We introduce a new zero resource code-switched speech benchmark designed to directly assess the code-switching capabilities of self-supervised speech encoders. We showcase a baseline system of language modeling on discrete units to demonstrate how the code-switching abilities of speech encoders can be assessed in a zero-resource manner. Our experiments encompass a variety of well-known speech encoders, including Wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT, XLSR, etc. We examine the impact of pre-training languages and model size on benchmark performance. Notably, though our results demonstrate that speech encoders with multilingual pre-training, exemplified by XLSR, outperform monolingual variants (Wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT) in code-switching scenarios, there is still substantial room for improvement in their code-switching linguistic abilities.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2024; v1 submitted 4 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Evaluating context-invariance in unsupervised speech representations
Authors:
Mark Hallap,
Emmanuel Dupoux,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
Unsupervised speech representations have taken off, with benchmarks (SUPERB, ZeroSpeech) demonstrating major progress on semi-supervised speech recognition, speech synthesis, and speech-only language modelling. Inspiration comes from the promise of ``discovering the phonemes'' of a language or a similar low-bitrate encoding. However, one of the critical properties of phoneme transcriptions is cont…
▽ More
Unsupervised speech representations have taken off, with benchmarks (SUPERB, ZeroSpeech) demonstrating major progress on semi-supervised speech recognition, speech synthesis, and speech-only language modelling. Inspiration comes from the promise of ``discovering the phonemes'' of a language or a similar low-bitrate encoding. However, one of the critical properties of phoneme transcriptions is context-invariance: the phonetic context of a speech sound can have massive influence on the way it is pronounced, while the text remains stable. This is what allows tokens of the same word to have the same transcriptions -- key to language understanding. Current benchmarks do not measure context-invariance. We develop a new version of the ZeroSpeech ABX benchmark that measures context-invariance, and apply it to recent self-supervised representations. We demonstrate that the context-independence of representations is predictive of the stability of word-level representations. We suggest research concentrate on improving context-independence of self-supervised and unsupervised representations.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2023; v1 submitted 27 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Self-supervised language learning from raw audio: Lessons from the Zero Resource Speech Challenge
Authors:
Ewan Dunbar,
Nicolas Hamilakis,
Emmanuel Dupoux
Abstract:
Recent progress in self-supervised or unsupervised machine learning has opened the possibility of building a full speech processing system from raw audio without using any textual representations or expert labels such as phonemes, dictionaries or parse trees. The contribution of the Zero Resource Speech Challenge series since 2015 has been to break down this long-term objective into four well-defi…
▽ More
Recent progress in self-supervised or unsupervised machine learning has opened the possibility of building a full speech processing system from raw audio without using any textual representations or expert labels such as phonemes, dictionaries or parse trees. The contribution of the Zero Resource Speech Challenge series since 2015 has been to break down this long-term objective into four well-defined tasks -- Acoustic Unit Discovery, Spoken Term Discovery, Discrete Resynthesis, and Spoken Language Modeling -- and introduce associated metrics and benchmarks enabling model comparison and cumulative progress. We present an overview of the six editions of this challenge series since 2015, discuss the lessons learned, and outline the areas which need more work or give puzzling results.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Predicting non-native speech perception using the Perceptual Assimilation Model and state-of-the-art acoustic models
Authors:
Juliette Millet,
Ioana Chitoran,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
Our native language influences the way we perceive speech sounds, affecting our ability to discriminate non-native sounds. We compare two ideas about the influence of the native language on speech perception: the Perceptual Assimilation Model, which appeals to a mental classification of sounds into native phoneme categories, versus the idea that rich, fine-grained phonetic representations tuned to…
▽ More
Our native language influences the way we perceive speech sounds, affecting our ability to discriminate non-native sounds. We compare two ideas about the influence of the native language on speech perception: the Perceptual Assimilation Model, which appeals to a mental classification of sounds into native phoneme categories, versus the idea that rich, fine-grained phonetic representations tuned to the statistics of the native language, are sufficient. We operationalize this idea using representations from two state-of-the-art speech models, a Dirichlet process Gaussian mixture model and the more recent wav2vec 2.0 model. We present a new, open dataset of French- and English-speaking participants' speech perception behaviour for 61 vowel sounds from six languages. We show that phoneme assimilation is a better predictor than fine-grained phonetic modelling, both for the discrimination behaviour as a whole, and for predicting differences in discriminability associated with differences in native language background. We also show that wav2vec 2.0, while not good at capturing the effects of native language on speech perception, is complementary to information about native phoneme assimilation, and provides a good model of low-level phonetic representations, supporting the idea that both categorical and fine-grained perception are used during speech perception.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Do self-supervised speech models develop human-like perception biases?
Authors:
Juliette Millet,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
Self-supervised models for speech processing form representational spaces without using any external labels. Increasingly, they appear to be a feasible way of at least partially eliminating costly manual annotations, a problem of particular concern for low-resource languages. But what kind of representational spaces do these models construct? Human perception specializes to the sounds of listeners…
▽ More
Self-supervised models for speech processing form representational spaces without using any external labels. Increasingly, they appear to be a feasible way of at least partially eliminating costly manual annotations, a problem of particular concern for low-resource languages. But what kind of representational spaces do these models construct? Human perception specializes to the sounds of listeners' native languages. Does the same thing happen in self-supervised models? We examine the representational spaces of three kinds of state-of-the-art self-supervised models: wav2vec 2.0, HuBERT and contrastive predictive coding (CPC), and compare them with the perceptual spaces of French-speaking and English-speaking human listeners, both globally and taking account of the behavioural differences between the two language groups. We show that the CPC model shows a small native language effect, but that wav2vec 2.0 and HuBERT seem to develop a universal speech perception space which is not language specific. A comparison against the predictions of supervised phone recognisers suggests that all three self-supervised models capture relatively fine-grained perceptual phenomena, while supervised models are better at capturing coarser, phone-level, effects of listeners' native language, on perception.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
The Zero Resource Speech Benchmark 2021: Metrics and baselines for unsupervised spoken language modeling
Authors:
Tu Anh Nguyen,
Maureen de Seyssel,
Patricia Rozé,
Morgane Rivière,
Evgeny Kharitonov,
Alexei Baevski,
Ewan Dunbar,
Emmanuel Dupoux
Abstract:
We introduce a new unsupervised task, spoken language modeling: the learning of linguistic representations from raw audio signals without any labels, along with the Zero Resource Speech Benchmark 2021: a suite of 4 black-box, zero-shot metrics probing for the quality of the learned models at 4 linguistic levels: phonetics, lexicon, syntax and semantics. We present the results and analyses of a com…
▽ More
We introduce a new unsupervised task, spoken language modeling: the learning of linguistic representations from raw audio signals without any labels, along with the Zero Resource Speech Benchmark 2021: a suite of 4 black-box, zero-shot metrics probing for the quality of the learned models at 4 linguistic levels: phonetics, lexicon, syntax and semantics. We present the results and analyses of a composite baseline made of the concatenation of three unsupervised systems: self-supervised contrastive representation learning (CPC), clustering (k-means) and language modeling (LSTM or BERT). The language models learn on the basis of the pseudo-text derived from clustering the learned representations. This simple pipeline shows better than chance performance on all four metrics, demonstrating the feasibility of spoken language modeling from raw speech. It also yields worse performance compared to text-based 'topline' systems trained on the same data, delineating the space to be explored by more sophisticated end-to-end models.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2020; v1 submitted 23 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
The Perceptimatic English Benchmark for Speech Perception Models
Authors:
Juliette Millet,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
We present the Perceptimatic English Benchmark, an open experimental benchmark for evaluating quantitative models of speech perception in English. The benchmark consists of ABX stimuli along with the responses of 91 American English-speaking listeners. The stimuli test discrimination of a large number of English and French phonemic contrasts. They are extracted directly from corpora of read speech…
▽ More
We present the Perceptimatic English Benchmark, an open experimental benchmark for evaluating quantitative models of speech perception in English. The benchmark consists of ABX stimuli along with the responses of 91 American English-speaking listeners. The stimuli test discrimination of a large number of English and French phonemic contrasts. They are extracted directly from corpora of read speech, making them appropriate for evaluating statistical acoustic models (such as those used in automatic speech recognition) trained on typical speech data sets. We show that phone discrimination is correlated with several types of models, and give recommendations for researchers seeking easily calculated norms of acoustic distance on experimental stimuli. We show that DeepSpeech, a standard English speech recognizer, is more specialized on English phoneme discrimination than English listeners, and is poorly correlated with their behaviour, even though it yields a low error on the decision task given to humans.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Independent and automatic evaluation of acoustic-to-articulatory inversion models
Authors:
Maud Parrot,
Juliette Millet,
Ewan Dunbar
Abstract:
Reconstruction of articulatory trajectories from the acoustic speech signal has been proposed for improving speech recognition and text-to-speech synthesis. However, to be useful in these settings, articulatory reconstruction must be speaker independent. Furthermore, as most research focuses on single, small datasets with few speakers, robust articulatory reconstrucion could profit from combining…
▽ More
Reconstruction of articulatory trajectories from the acoustic speech signal has been proposed for improving speech recognition and text-to-speech synthesis. However, to be useful in these settings, articulatory reconstruction must be speaker independent. Furthermore, as most research focuses on single, small datasets with few speakers, robust articulatory reconstrucion could profit from combining datasets. Standard evaluation measures such as root mean square error and Pearson correlation are inappropriate for evaluating the speaker-independence of models or the usefulness of combining datasets. We present a new evaluation for articulatory reconstruction which is independent of the articulatory data set used for training: the phone discrimination ABX task. We use the ABX measure to evaluate a Bi-LSTM based model trained on 3 datasets (14 speakers), and show that it gives information complementary to the standard measures, and enables us to evaluate the effects of dataset merging, as well as the speaker independence of the model.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
The Zero Resource Speech Challenge 2019: TTS without T
Authors:
Ewan Dunbar,
Robin Algayres,
Julien Karadayi,
Mathieu Bernard,
Juan Benjumea,
Xuan-Nga Cao,
Lucie Miskic,
Charlotte Dugrain,
Lucas Ondel,
Alan W. Black,
Laurent Besacier,
Sakriani Sakti,
Emmanuel Dupoux
Abstract:
We present the Zero Resource Speech Challenge 2019, which proposes to build a speech synthesizer without any text or phonetic labels: hence, TTS without T (text-to-speech without text). We provide raw audio for a target voice in an unknown language (the Voice dataset), but no alignment, text or labels. Participants must discover subword units in an unsupervised way (using the Unit Discovery datase…
▽ More
We present the Zero Resource Speech Challenge 2019, which proposes to build a speech synthesizer without any text or phonetic labels: hence, TTS without T (text-to-speech without text). We provide raw audio for a target voice in an unknown language (the Voice dataset), but no alignment, text or labels. Participants must discover subword units in an unsupervised way (using the Unit Discovery dataset) and align them to the voice recordings in a way that works best for the purpose of synthesizing novel utterances from novel speakers, similar to the target speaker's voice. We describe the metrics used for evaluation, a baseline system consisting of unsupervised subword unit discovery plus a standard TTS system, and a topline TTS using gold phoneme transcriptions. We present an overview of the 19 submitted systems from 10 teams and discuss the main results.
△ Less
Submitted 7 July, 2019; v1 submitted 25 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
