Overcoming challenges of translating deep-learning models for glioblastoma: the ZGBM consortium
Authors:
Haris Shuaib,
Gareth J Barker,
Peter Sasieni,
Enrico De Vita,
Alysha Chelliah,
Roman Andrei,
Keyoumars Ashkan,
Erica Beaumont,
Lucy Brazil,
Chris Rowland-Hill,
Yue Hui Lau,
Aysha Luis,
James Powell,
Angela Swampillai,
Sean Tenant,
Stefanie C Thust,
Stephen Wastling,
Tom Young,
Thomas C Booth
Abstract:
Objective: To report imaging protocol and scheduling variance in routine care of glioblastoma patients in order to demonstrate challenges of integrating deep-learning models in glioblastoma care pathways. Additionally, to understand the most common imaging studies and image contrasts to inform the development of potentially robust deep-learning models. Methods: MR imaging data were analysed from a…
▽ More
Objective: To report imaging protocol and scheduling variance in routine care of glioblastoma patients in order to demonstrate challenges of integrating deep-learning models in glioblastoma care pathways. Additionally, to understand the most common imaging studies and image contrasts to inform the development of potentially robust deep-learning models. Methods: MR imaging data were analysed from a random sample of five patients from the prospective cohort across five participating sites of the ZGBM consortium. Reported clinical and treatment data alongside DICOM header information were analysed to understand treatment pathway imaging schedules. Results: All sites perform all structural imaging at every stage in the pathway except for the presurgical study, where in some sites only contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging is performed. Diffusion MRI is the most common non-structural imaging type, performed at every site. Conclusion: The imaging protocol and scheduling varies across the UK, making it challenging to develop machine-learning models that could perform robustly at other centres. Structural imaging is performed most consistently across all centres. Advances in knowledge: Successful translation of deep-learning models will likely be based on structural post-treatment imaging unless there is significant effort made to standardise non-structural or peri-operative imaging protocols and schedules.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Motion-corrected and high-resolution anatomically-assisted (MOCHA) reconstruction of arterial spin labelling MRI
Authors:
Abolfazl Mehranian,
Colm J. McGinnity,
Radhouene Neji,
Claudia Prieto,
Alexander Hammers,
Enrico De Vita,
Andrew J. Reader
Abstract:
A model-based reconstruction framework is proposed for MOtion-Corrected and High-resolution anatomically-Assisted (MOCHA) reconstruction of ASL data. In this framework, all low-resolution ASL control-label pairs are used to reconstruct a single high-resolution cerebral blood flow (CBF) map, corrected for rigid motion, point-spread-function (PSF) blurring and partial-volume effect (PVE).Six volunte…
▽ More
A model-based reconstruction framework is proposed for MOtion-Corrected and High-resolution anatomically-Assisted (MOCHA) reconstruction of ASL data. In this framework, all low-resolution ASL control-label pairs are used to reconstruct a single high-resolution cerebral blood flow (CBF) map, corrected for rigid motion, point-spread-function (PSF) blurring and partial-volume effect (PVE).Six volunteers were recruited for CBF imaging using PCASL labelling, 2-shot 3D-GRASE sequences and high-resolution T1-weighted MRI. For two volunteers, high-resolution scans with double and triple resolution in the partition direction were additionally collected. Simulations were designed for evaluations against a high-resolution ground-truth CBF map, including a simulated hyper-perfused lesion and hyper/hypo-perfusion abnormalities. MOCHA was compared to standard reconstruction and a 3D linear regression (3DLR) PVE correction method and was further evaluated for acquisitions with reduced control-label pairs and k-space undersampling. MOCHA reconstructions of low-resolution ASL data showed enhanced image quality particularly in the partition direction. In simulations, both MOCHA and 3DLR provided more accurate CBF maps than the standard reconstruction, however MOCHA resulted in the lowest errors and well delineated the abnormalities. MOCHA reconstruction of standard-resolution in-vivo data showed good agreement with higher-resolution scans requiring 4x and 9x longer acquisitions. MOCHA was found to be robust for 4x-accelerated ASL acquisitions, achieved by reduced control-label pairs or k-space undersampling. Conclusion: MOCHA reconstruction reduces PVE by direct reconstruction of CBF maps in the high-resolution space of the corresponding anatomical image, incorporating motion correction and PSF modelling. Following further evaluation, MOCHA should promote the clinical application of ASL.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
