Implementation of Firm-Dispatchable Generation in South Africa
Authors:
Stephen R. Clark,
Craig McGregor
Abstract:
South Africa is currently facing a critical situation in its power generation landscape, which is plagued by frequent power outages and the need to move from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. This period emphasizes the importance of having firm-dispatchable power to balance out the intermittent nature of wind and solar energy sources. The paper proposes to repurpose old coal-fired power pl…
▽ More
South Africa is currently facing a critical situation in its power generation landscape, which is plagued by frequent power outages and the need to move from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources. This period emphasizes the importance of having firm-dispatchable power to balance out the intermittent nature of wind and solar energy sources. The paper proposes to repurpose old coal-fired power plants to generate firm-dispatchable energy in line with the principles of a Just Transition. Eskom's coal plants are approaching the end of their economic life, and their declining energy availability factor is becoming a challenge in meeting the country's energy needs. The study suggests that a comprehensive strategy that integrates wind, solar, and firm-dispatchable power can be cost-effective and reliable compared to the traditional coal-based approach or the nuclear alternative. The study emphasizes the necessity of a 25-year plan that would invest in flexible and modular dispatchable generation. It also highlights the strategic location of this generating capacity, including repurposing decommissioned coal plant sites. The proposed model integrates private investment, adheres to established best practices, and emphasizes adaptability to changing demand dynamics. The study provides a roadmap for enabling firm-dispatchable capacity for South Africa's energy transition, emphasizing economic prudence, environmental sustainability, and alignment with the principles of the Just Transition program.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Firm-Dispatchable Power and its Requirement in a Power System based on Variable Generation
Authors:
Stephen R. Clark,
Craig McGregor
Abstract:
Many countries have commenced a transition from fossil fuel-based electricity generation systems to sustainable systems based on wind and solar generation. It is often noted that the least cost approach would involve a massive scale-up in the building of variable renewables, supported by battery storage and gas peaking plants. The required backup should be firm-dispatchable generation rather than…
▽ More
Many countries have commenced a transition from fossil fuel-based electricity generation systems to sustainable systems based on wind and solar generation. It is often noted that the least cost approach would involve a massive scale-up in the building of variable renewables, supported by battery storage and gas peaking plants. The required backup should be firm-dispatchable generation rather than peaking power. The wind and solar generation aspects for this system are clearly defined and understood, however, the term firm-dispatchable power is not defined and the specific requirements are poorly understood. This study seeks to define firm-dispatchable power in this context and its requirement in the sustainable generation system. The study compares 100% renewable generation scenarios from South Africa, Texas, and the UK to demonstrate the requirement for this firm-dispatchable generation. The results indicate that firm-dispatchable generation must be available to replace the renewable generation completely. The required installed capacity for this firm-dispatchable generation does not vary with the distinct demand profiles of the different locations or their comparative renewable generation profiles. It also does not change significantly with the use of energy storage. The usage for this firm-dispatchable generation will vary due to the comparative economics of its use, but the requirement for its installation does not change.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Systematic Misestimation of Machine Learning Performance in Neuroimaging Studies of Depression
Authors:
Claas Flint,
Micah Cearns,
Nils Opel,
Ronny Redlich,
David M. A. Mehler,
Daniel Emden,
Nils R. Winter,
Ramona Leenings,
Simon B. Eickhoff,
Tilo Kircher,
Axel Krug,
Igor Nenadic,
Volker Arolt,
Scott Clark,
Bernhard T. Baune,
Xiaoyi Jiang,
Udo Dannlowski,
Tim Hahn
Abstract:
We currently observe a disconcerting phenomenon in machine learning studies in psychiatry: While we would expect larger samples to yield better results due to the availability of more data, larger machine learning studies consistently show much weaker performance than the numerous small-scale studies. Here, we systematically investigated this effect focusing on one of the most heavily studied ques…
▽ More
We currently observe a disconcerting phenomenon in machine learning studies in psychiatry: While we would expect larger samples to yield better results due to the availability of more data, larger machine learning studies consistently show much weaker performance than the numerous small-scale studies. Here, we systematically investigated this effect focusing on one of the most heavily studied questions in the field, namely the classification of patients suffering from major depressive disorder (MDD) and healthy control (HC) based on neuroimaging data. Drawing upon structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from a balanced sample of $N = 1,868$ MDD patients and HC from our recent international Predictive Analytics Competition (PAC), we first trained and tested a classification model on the full dataset which yielded an accuracy of $61\,\%$. Next, we mimicked the process by which researchers would draw samples of various sizes ($N = 4$ to $N = 150$) from the population and showed a strong risk of misestimation. Specifically, for small sample sizes ($N = 20$), we observe accuracies of up to $95\,\%$. For medium sample sizes ($N = 100$) accuracies up to $75\,\%$ were found. Importantly, further investigation showed that sufficiently large test sets effectively protect against performance misestimation whereas larger datasets per se do not. While these results question the validity of a substantial part of the current literature, we outline the relatively low-cost remedy of larger test sets, which is readily available in most cases.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2021; v1 submitted 13 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
