A Quantitative Comparison of Epistemic Uncertainty Maps Applied to Multi-Class Segmentation
Authors:
Robin Camarasa,
Daniel Bos,
Jeroen Hendrikse,
Paul Nederkoorn,
M. Eline Kooi,
Aad van der Lugt,
Marleen de Bruijne
Abstract:
Uncertainty assessment has gained rapid interest in medical image analysis. A popular technique to compute epistemic uncertainty is the Monte-Carlo (MC) dropout technique. From a network with MC dropout and a single input, multiple outputs can be sampled. Various methods can be used to obtain epistemic uncertainty maps from those multiple outputs. In the case of multi-class segmentation, the numbe…
▽ More
Uncertainty assessment has gained rapid interest in medical image analysis. A popular technique to compute epistemic uncertainty is the Monte-Carlo (MC) dropout technique. From a network with MC dropout and a single input, multiple outputs can be sampled. Various methods can be used to obtain epistemic uncertainty maps from those multiple outputs. In the case of multi-class segmentation, the number of methods is even larger as epistemic uncertainty can be computed voxelwise per class or voxelwise per image. This paper highlights a systematic approach to define and quantitatively compare those methods in two different contexts: class-specific epistemic uncertainty maps (one value per image, voxel and class) and combined epistemic uncertainty maps (one value per image and voxel). We applied this quantitative analysis to a multi-class segmentation of the carotid artery lumen and vessel wall, on a multi-center, multi-scanner, multi-sequence dataset of (MR) images. We validated our analysis over 144 sets of hyperparameters of a model. Our main analysis considers the relationship between the order of the voxels sorted according to their epistemic uncertainty values and the misclassification of the prediction. Under this consideration, the comparison of combined uncertainty maps reveals that the multi-class entropy and the multi-class mutual information statistically out-perform the other combined uncertainty maps under study. In a class-specific scenario, the one-versus-all entropy statistically out-performs the class-wise entropy, the class-wise variance and the one versus all mutual information. The class-wise entropy statistically out-performs the other class-specific uncertainty maps in terms of calibration. We made a python package available to reproduce our analysis on different data and tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
Deep Learning methods for automatic evaluation of delayed enhancement-MRI. The results of the EMIDEC challenge
Authors:
Alain Lalande,
Zhihao Chen,
Thibaut Pommier,
Thomas Decourselle,
Abdul Qayyum,
Michel Salomon,
Dominique Ginhac,
Youssef Skandarani,
Arnaud Boucher,
Khawla Brahim,
Marleen de Bruijne,
Robin Camarasa,
Teresa M. Correia,
Xue Feng,
Kibrom B. Girum,
Anja Hennemuth,
Markus Huellebrand,
Raabid Hussain,
Matthias Ivantsits,
Jun Ma,
Craig Meyer,
Rishabh Sharma,
Jixi Shi,
Nikolaos V. Tsekos,
Marta Varela
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A key factor for assessing the state of the heart after myocardial infarction (MI) is to measure whether the myocardium segment is viable after reperfusion or revascularization therapy. Delayed enhancement-MRI or DE-MRI, which is performed several minutes after injection of the contrast agent, provides high contrast between viable and nonviable myocardium and is therefore a method of choice to eva…
▽ More
A key factor for assessing the state of the heart after myocardial infarction (MI) is to measure whether the myocardium segment is viable after reperfusion or revascularization therapy. Delayed enhancement-MRI or DE-MRI, which is performed several minutes after injection of the contrast agent, provides high contrast between viable and nonviable myocardium and is therefore a method of choice to evaluate the extent of MI. To automatically assess myocardial status, the results of the EMIDEC challenge that focused on this task are presented in this paper. The challenge's main objectives were twofold. First, to evaluate if deep learning methods can distinguish between normal and pathological cases. Second, to automatically calculate the extent of myocardial infarction. The publicly available database consists of 150 exams divided into 50 cases with normal MRI after injection of a contrast agent and 100 cases with myocardial infarction (and then with a hyperenhanced area on DE-MRI), whatever their inclusion in the cardiac emergency department. Along with MRI, clinical characteristics are also provided. The obtained results issued from several works show that the automatic classification of an exam is a reachable task (the best method providing an accuracy of 0.92), and the automatic segmentation of the myocardium is possible. However, the segmentation of the diseased area needs to be improved, mainly due to the small size of these areas and the lack of contrast with the surrounding structures.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2021; v1 submitted 9 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
