Comparative Evaluation Of Three Methods Of Automatic Segmentation Of Brain Structures Using 426 Cases
Authors:
Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini,
Esmaeil Davoodi,
Evangelia Bouzos,
Kost Elisevich,
Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Abstract:
Segmentation of brain structures in a large dataset of magnetic resonance images (MRI) necessitates automatic segmentation instead of manual tracing. Automatic segmentation methods provide a much-needed alternative to manual segmentation which is both labor intensive and time-consuming. Among brain structures, the hippocampus presents a challenging segmentation task due to its irregular shape, sma…
▽ More
Segmentation of brain structures in a large dataset of magnetic resonance images (MRI) necessitates automatic segmentation instead of manual tracing. Automatic segmentation methods provide a much-needed alternative to manual segmentation which is both labor intensive and time-consuming. Among brain structures, the hippocampus presents a challenging segmentation task due to its irregular shape, small size, and unclear edges. In this work, we use T1-weighted MRI of 426 subjects to validate the approach and compare three automatic segmentation methods: FreeSurfer, LocalInfo, and ABSS. Four evaluation measures are used to assess agreement between automatic and manual segmentation of the hippocampus. ABSS outperformed the others based on the Dice coefficient, precision, Hausdorff distance, ASSD, RMS, similarity, sensitivity, and volume agreement. Moreover, comparison of the segmentation results, acquired using 1.5T and 3T MRI systems, showed that ABSS is more sensitive than the others to the field inhomogeneity of 3T MRI.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
