-
Correlation and Spectral Density Functions in Mode-Stirred Reverberation -- II. Spectral Moments, Sampling, Noise, EMI and Understirring
Authors:
Luk R. Arnaut,
John M. Ladbury
Abstract:
In part I, spectral moments and kurtosis were established as parameters in analytic models of correlation and spectral density functions for dynamic reverberation fields. In this part II, several practical limitations affecting the accuracy of estimating these parameters from measured stir sweep data are investigated. For sampled fields, the contributions of finite differencing and aliasing are ev…
▽ More
In part I, spectral moments and kurtosis were established as parameters in analytic models of correlation and spectral density functions for dynamic reverberation fields. In this part II, several practical limitations affecting the accuracy of estimating these parameters from measured stir sweep data are investigated. For sampled fields, the contributions of finite differencing and aliasing are evaluated. Finite differencing results in a negative bias that depends, to leading order, quadratically on the product of the sampling time interval and the stir bandwidth. Numerical estimates of moments extracted directly from sampled stir sweeps show good agreement with values obtained by an autocovariance method. The effects of data decimation and noise-to-stir ratios of RMS amplitudes are determined and experimentally verified. In addition, the dependencies on the noise-to-stir-bandwidth ratio, EMI, and unstirred energy are characterized.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Are foundation models efficient for medical image segmentation?
Authors:
Danielle Ferreira,
Rima Arnaout
Abstract:
Foundation models are experiencing a surge in popularity. The Segment Anything model (SAM) asserts an ability to segment a wide spectrum of objects but required supervised training at unprecedented scale. We compared SAM's performance (against clinical ground truth) and resources (labeling time, compute) to a modality-specific, label-free self-supervised learning (SSL) method on 25 measurements fo…
▽ More
Foundation models are experiencing a surge in popularity. The Segment Anything model (SAM) asserts an ability to segment a wide spectrum of objects but required supervised training at unprecedented scale. We compared SAM's performance (against clinical ground truth) and resources (labeling time, compute) to a modality-specific, label-free self-supervised learning (SSL) method on 25 measurements for 100 cardiac ultrasounds. SAM performed poorly and required significantly more labeling and computing resources, demonstrating worse efficiency than SSL.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Label-free segmentation from cardiac ultrasound using self-supervised learning
Authors:
Danielle L. Ferreira,
Zaynaf Salaymang,
Rima Arnaout
Abstract:
Segmentation and measurement of cardiac chambers is critical in cardiac ultrasound but is laborious and poorly reproducible. Neural networks can assist, but supervised approaches require the same laborious manual annotations. We built a pipeline for self-supervised (no manual labels) segmentation combining computer vision, clinical domain knowledge, and deep learning. We trained on 450 echocardiog…
▽ More
Segmentation and measurement of cardiac chambers is critical in cardiac ultrasound but is laborious and poorly reproducible. Neural networks can assist, but supervised approaches require the same laborious manual annotations. We built a pipeline for self-supervised (no manual labels) segmentation combining computer vision, clinical domain knowledge, and deep learning. We trained on 450 echocardiograms (93,000 images) and tested on 8,393 echocardiograms (4,476,266 images; mean 61 years, 51% female), using the resulting segmentations to calculate biometrics. We also tested against external images from an additional 10,030 patients with available manual tracings of the left ventricle. r2 between clinically measured and pipeline-predicted measurements were similar to reported inter-clinician variation and comparable to supervised learning across several different measurements (r2 0.56-0.84). Average accuracy for detecting abnormal chamber size and function was 0.85 (range 0.71-0.97) compared to clinical measurements. A subset of test echocardiograms (n=553) had corresponding cardiac MRIs, where MRI is the gold standard. Correlation between pipeline and MRI measurements was similar to that between clinical echocardiogram and MRI. Finally, the pipeline accurately segments the left ventricle with an average Dice score of 0.89 (95% CI [0.89]) in the external, manually labeled dataset. Our results demonstrate a manual-label free, clinically valid, and highly scalable method for segmentation from ultrasound, a noisy but globally important imaging modality.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2023; v1 submitted 10 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
