Comparative Validation of AI and non-AI Methods in MRI Volumetry to Diagnose Parkinsonian Syndromes
Authors:
Joomee Song,
Juyoung Hahm,
Jisoo Lee,
Chae Yeon Lim,
Myung ** Chung,
**young Youn,
** Whan Cho,
Jong Hyeon Ahn,
Kyung-Su Kim
Abstract:
Automated segmentation and volumetry of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are essential for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Parkinson's plus syndromes (P-plus). To enhance the diagnostic performance, we adopt deep learning (DL) models in brain segmentation and compared their performance with the gold-standard non-DL method. We collected brain MRI scans of healthy controls…
▽ More
Automated segmentation and volumetry of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are essential for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Parkinson's plus syndromes (P-plus). To enhance the diagnostic performance, we adopt deep learning (DL) models in brain segmentation and compared their performance with the gold-standard non-DL method. We collected brain MRI scans of healthy controls (n=105) and patients with PD (n=105), multiple systemic atrophy (n=132), and progressive supranuclear palsy (n=69) at Samsung Medical Center from January 2017 to December 2020. Using the gold-standard non-DL model, FreeSurfer (FS), we segmented six brain structures: midbrain, pons, caudate, putamen, pallidum, and third ventricle, and considered them as annotating data for DL models, the representative V-Net and UNETR. The Dice scores and area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating normal, PD, and P-plus cases were calculated. The segmentation times of V-Net and UNETR for the six brain structures per patient were 3.48 +- 0.17 and 48.14 +- 0.97 s, respectively, being at least 300 times faster than FS (15,735 +- 1.07 s). Dice scores of both DL models were sufficiently high (>0.85), and their AUCs for disease classification were superior to that of FS. For classification of normal vs. P-plus and PD vs. multiple systemic atrophy (cerebellar type), the DL models and FS showed AUCs above 0.8. DL significantly reduces the analysis time without compromising the performance of brain segmentation and differential diagnosis. Our findings may contribute to the adoption of DL brain MRI segmentation in clinical settings and advance brain research.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
Mixing-AdaSIN: Constructing a De-biased Dataset using Adaptive Structural Instance Normalization and Texture Mixing
Authors:
Myeongkyun Kang,
Philip Chikontwe,
Miguel Luna,
Kyung Soo Hong,
June Hong Ahn,
Sang Hyun Park
Abstract:
Following the pandemic outbreak, several works have proposed to diagnose COVID-19 with deep learning in computed tomography (CT); reporting performance on-par with experts. However, models trained/tested on the same in-distribution data may rely on the inherent data biases for successful prediction, failing to generalize on out-of-distribution samples or CT with different scanning protocols. Early…
▽ More
Following the pandemic outbreak, several works have proposed to diagnose COVID-19 with deep learning in computed tomography (CT); reporting performance on-par with experts. However, models trained/tested on the same in-distribution data may rely on the inherent data biases for successful prediction, failing to generalize on out-of-distribution samples or CT with different scanning protocols. Early attempts have partly addressed bias-mitigation and generalization through augmentation or re-sampling, but are still limited by collection costs and the difficulty of quantifying bias in medical images. In this work, we propose Mixing-AdaSIN; a bias mitigation method that uses a generative model to generate de-biased images by mixing texture information between different labeled CT scans with semantically similar features. Here, we use Adaptive Structural Instance Normalization (AdaSIN) to enhance de-biasing generation quality and guarantee structural consistency. Following, a classifier trained with the generated images learns to correctly predict the label without bias and generalizes better. To demonstrate the efficacy of our method, we construct a biased COVID-19 vs. bacterial pneumonia dataset based on CT protocols and compare with existing state-of-the-art de-biasing methods. Our experiments show that classifiers trained with de-biased generated images report improved in-distribution performance and generalization on an external COVID-19 dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2021; v1 submitted 26 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.