Showing 1–27 of 27 results for author: Whitmeyer, M

Comparative Patience

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We begin by formulating and characterizing a dominance criterion for prize sequences: $x$ dominates $y$ if any impatient agent prefers $x$ to $y$. With this in hand, we define a notion of comparative patience. Alice is more patient than Bob if Alice's normalized discounted utility gain by going from any $y$ to any dominating $x$ is less than Bob's discounted utility gain from such an improvement.… ▽ More We begin by formulating and characterizing a dominance criterion for prize sequences: $x$ dominates $y$ if any impatient agent prefers $x$ to $y$. With this in hand, we define a notion of comparative patience. Alice is more patient than Bob if Alice's normalized discounted utility gain by going from any $y$ to any dominating $x$ is less than Bob's discounted utility gain from such an improvement. We provide a full characterization of this relation in terms of the agents' discount rules. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comparisons of Sequential Experiments for Additively Separable Problems

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer, Cole Williams

Abstract: For three natural classes of dynamic decision problems; 1. additively separable problems, 2. discounted problems, and 3. discounted problems for a fixed discount factor; we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for one sequential experiment to dominate another in the sense that the dominant experiment is preferred to the other for any decision problem in the specified class. We use these res… ▽ More For three natural classes of dynamic decision problems; 1. additively separable problems, 2. discounted problems, and 3. discounted problems for a fixed discount factor; we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for one sequential experiment to dominate another in the sense that the dominant experiment is preferred to the other for any decision problem in the specified class. We use these results to study the timing of information arrival in additively separable problems. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

The Perils of Overreaction

Authors: Konstantin von Beringe, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: In order to study updating rules, we consider the problem of a malevolent principal screening an imperfectly Bayesian agent. We uncover a fundamental dichotomy between underreaction and overreaction to information. If an agent's posterior is farther away from the prior than it should be under Bayes' law, she can always be exploited by the principal to an unfettered degree: the agent's ex ante expe… ▽ More In order to study updating rules, we consider the problem of a malevolent principal screening an imperfectly Bayesian agent. We uncover a fundamental dichotomy between underreaction and overreaction to information. If an agent's posterior is farther away from the prior than it should be under Bayes' law, she can always be exploited by the principal to an unfettered degree: the agent's ex ante expected loss can be made arbitrarily large. In stark contrast, an agent who underreacts (whose posterior is closer to the prior than the Bayesian posterior) cannot be exploited at all. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Call the Dentist! A (Con-)Cavity in the Value of Information

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: A natural way of quantifying the ``amount of information'' in decision problems yields a globally concave value for information. Another (in contrast, adversarial) way almost never does. A natural way of quantifying the ``amount of information'' in decision problems yields a globally concave value for information. Another (in contrast, adversarial) way almost never does. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Can One Hear the Shape of a Decision Problem?

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We explore the connection between an agent's decision problem and her ranking of information structures. We find that a finite amount of ordinal data on the agent's ranking of experiments is enough to identify her (finite) set of undominated actions (up to relabeling and duplication) and the beliefs rendering each such action optimal. An additional smattering of cardinal data, comparing the relati… ▽ More We explore the connection between an agent's decision problem and her ranking of information structures. We find that a finite amount of ordinal data on the agent's ranking of experiments is enough to identify her (finite) set of undominated actions (up to relabeling and duplication) and the beliefs rendering each such action optimal. An additional smattering of cardinal data, comparing the relative value to the agent of finitely many pairs of experiments, identifies her utility function up to an action-independent payoff. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2024; v1 submitted 10 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Attraction Via Prices and Information

Authors: Pak Hung Au, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We study the ramifications of increased commitment power for information provision in an oligopolistic market with search frictions. Although prices are posted and, therefore, guide search, if firms cannot commit to information provision policies, there is no active search at equilibrium so consumers visit (and purchase from) at most one firm. If firms can guide search by both their prices and inf… ▽ More We study the ramifications of increased commitment power for information provision in an oligopolistic market with search frictions. Although prices are posted and, therefore, guide search, if firms cannot commit to information provision policies, there is no active search at equilibrium so consumers visit (and purchase from) at most one firm. If firms can guide search by both their prices and information policies, there exists a unique symmetric equilibrium exhibiting price dispersion and active search. Nevertheless, when the market is thin, consumers prefer the former case, which features intense price competition. Firms always prefer the latter. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Safety, in Numbers

Authors: Marilyn Pease, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We introduce a way to compare actions in decision problems. An action is safer than another if the set of beliefs at which the decision-maker prefers the safer action increases in size (in the set inclusion sense) as the decision-maker becomes more risk averse. We provide a full characterization of this relation and show that it is equivalent to a robust concept of single-crossing. We discuss appl… ▽ More We introduce a way to compare actions in decision problems. An action is safer than another if the set of beliefs at which the decision-maker prefers the safer action increases in size (in the set inclusion sense) as the decision-maker becomes more risk averse. We provide a full characterization of this relation and show that it is equivalent to a robust concept of single-crossing. We discuss applications to investment hedging, security design, and game theory. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2024; v1 submitted 26 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

A More Informed Sender Benefits the Receiver When the Sender Has Transparent Motives

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: A sender with state-independent preferences (i.e., transparent motives) privately observes a signal about the state of the world before sending a message to a receiver, who subsequently takes an action. Regardless of whether the receiver can mediate--and commit to a garbling of the sender's message--or delegate--commit to a stochastic decision rule as a function of the message--and understanding t… ▽ More A sender with state-independent preferences (i.e., transparent motives) privately observes a signal about the state of the world before sending a message to a receiver, who subsequently takes an action. Regardless of whether the receiver can mediate--and commit to a garbling of the sender's message--or delegate--commit to a stochastic decision rule as a function of the message--and understanding the statement ``the receiver is better off as a result of an improvement of the sender's information'' to mean that her maximal and minimal equilibrium payoffs (weakly) increase as the sender's signal improves (in a Blackwell sense), we find that if the sender is more informed, the receiver is better off. △ Less

Submitted 29 March, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Redeeming Falsifiability?

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer, Kun Zhang

Abstract: We revisit Popper's falsifiability criterion. A tester hires a potential expert to produce a theory, offering payments contingent on the observed performance of the theory. We argue that if the informed expert can acquire additional information, falsifiability does have the power to identify worthless theories. We revisit Popper's falsifiability criterion. A tester hires a potential expert to produce a theory, offering payments contingent on the observed performance of the theory. We argue that if the informed expert can acquire additional information, falsifiability does have the power to identify worthless theories. △ Less

Submitted 28 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Bayes = Blackwell, Almost

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: There are updating rules other than Bayes' law that render the value of information positive. I find all of them. There are updating rules other than Bayes' law that render the value of information positive. I find all of them. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2023; v1 submitted 27 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comparison Shop**: Learning Before Buying From Duopolists

Authors: Brian C. Albrecht, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We explore a model of duopolistic competition in which consumers learn about the fit of each competitor's product. In equilibrium, consumers comparison shop: they learn only about the relative values of the products. When information is cheap, increasing the cost of information decreases consumer welfare; but when information is expensive, this relationship flips. As information frictions vanish,… ▽ More We explore a model of duopolistic competition in which consumers learn about the fit of each competitor's product. In equilibrium, consumers comparison shop: they learn only about the relative values of the products. When information is cheap, increasing the cost of information decreases consumer welfare; but when information is expensive, this relationship flips. As information frictions vanish, there is a limiting equilibrium that is ex post efficient. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2023; v1 submitted 13 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Making Information More Valuable

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We study what changes to an agent's decision problem increase her value for information. We prove that information becomes more valuable if and only if the agent's reduced-form payoff in her belief becomes more convex. When the transformation corresponds to the addition of an action, the requisite increase in convexity occurs if and only if a simple geometric condition holds, which extends in a na… ▽ More We study what changes to an agent's decision problem increase her value for information. We prove that information becomes more valuable if and only if the agent's reduced-form payoff in her belief becomes more convex. When the transformation corresponds to the addition of an action, the requisite increase in convexity occurs if and only if a simple geometric condition holds, which extends in a natural way to the addition of multiple actions. We apply these findings to two scenarios: a monopolistic screening problem in which the good is information and delegation with information acquisition. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2024; v1 submitted 9 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: Formerly titled "Flexibility and Information.''

Costly Evidence and Discretionary Disclosure

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer, Kun Zhang

Abstract: A sender flexibly acquires evidence--which she may pay a third party to certify--to disclose to a receiver. When evidence acquisition is overt, the receiver observes the evidence gathering process irrespective of whether its outcome is certified. When acquisition is covert, the receiver does not. In contrast to the case with exogenous evidence, the receiver prefers a strictly positive certificatio… ▽ More A sender flexibly acquires evidence--which she may pay a third party to certify--to disclose to a receiver. When evidence acquisition is overt, the receiver observes the evidence gathering process irrespective of whether its outcome is certified. When acquisition is covert, the receiver does not. In contrast to the case with exogenous evidence, the receiver prefers a strictly positive certification cost. As acquisition costs vanish, equilibria converge to the Pareto-worst free-learning equilibrium. The receiver always prefers covert to overt evidence acquisition. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Buying Opinions

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer, Kun Zhang

Abstract: A principal hires an agent to acquire soft information about an unknown state. Even though neither how the agent learns nor what the agent discovers are contractible, we show the principal is unconstrained as to what information the agent can be induced to acquire and report honestly. When the agent is risk neutral, and a) is not asked to learn too much, b) can acquire information sufficiently che… ▽ More A principal hires an agent to acquire soft information about an unknown state. Even though neither how the agent learns nor what the agent discovers are contractible, we show the principal is unconstrained as to what information the agent can be induced to acquire and report honestly. When the agent is risk neutral, and a) is not asked to learn too much, b) can acquire information sufficiently cheaply, or c) can face sufficiently large penalties, the principal can attain the first-best outcome. We discuss the effect of risk aversion (on the part of the agent) and characterize the second-best contracts. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2023; v1 submitted 10 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Whose Bias?

Authors: Vasudha Jain, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: Law enforcement acquires costly evidence with the aim of securing the conviction of a defendant, who is convicted if a decision-maker's belief exceeds a certain threshold. Either law enforcement or the decision-maker is biased and is initially overconfident that the defendant is guilty. Although an innocent defendant always prefers an unbiased decision-maker, he may prefer that law enforcement hav… ▽ More Law enforcement acquires costly evidence with the aim of securing the conviction of a defendant, who is convicted if a decision-maker's belief exceeds a certain threshold. Either law enforcement or the decision-maker is biased and is initially overconfident that the defendant is guilty. Although an innocent defendant always prefers an unbiased decision-maker, he may prefer that law enforcement have some bias to none. Nevertheless, fixing the level of bias, an innocent defendant may prefer that the decision-maker, not law enforcement, is biased. △ Less

Submitted 19 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Submission Fees in Risk-Taking Contests

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: This paper investigates stochastic continuous time contests with a twist: the designer requires that contest participants incur some cost to submit their entries. When the designer wishes to maximize the (expected) performance of the top performer, a strictly positive submission fee is optimal. When the designer wishes to maximize total (expected) performance, either the highest submission fee or… ▽ More This paper investigates stochastic continuous time contests with a twist: the designer requires that contest participants incur some cost to submit their entries. When the designer wishes to maximize the (expected) performance of the top performer, a strictly positive submission fee is optimal. When the designer wishes to maximize total (expected) performance, either the highest submission fee or the lowest submission fee is optimal. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Search and Competition with Flexible Investigations

Authors: Vasudha Jain, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We modify the standard model of price competition with horizontally differentiated products, imperfect information, and search frictions by allowing consumers to flexibly acquire information about a product's match value during their visits. We characterize a consumer's optimal search and information acquisition protocol and analyze the pricing game between firms. Notably, we establish that in sea… ▽ More We modify the standard model of price competition with horizontally differentiated products, imperfect information, and search frictions by allowing consumers to flexibly acquire information about a product's match value during their visits. We characterize a consumer's optimal search and information acquisition protocol and analyze the pricing game between firms. Notably, we establish that in search markets there are fundamental differences between search frictions and information frictions, which affect market prices, profits, and consumer welfare in markedly different ways. Although higher search costs beget higher prices (and profits for firms), higher information acquisition costs lead to lower prices and may benefit consumers. We discuss implications of our findings for policies concerning disclosure rules and hidden fees. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Persuasion Produces the (Diamond) Paradox

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: This paper extends the sequential search model of Wolinsky (1986) by allowing firms to choose how much match value information to disclose to visiting consumers. This restores the Diamond paradox (Diamond 1971): there exist no symmetric equilibria in which consumers engage in active search, so consumers obtain zero surplus and firms obtain monopoly profits. Modifying the scenario to one in which p… ▽ More This paper extends the sequential search model of Wolinsky (1986) by allowing firms to choose how much match value information to disclose to visiting consumers. This restores the Diamond paradox (Diamond 1971): there exist no symmetric equilibria in which consumers engage in active search, so consumers obtain zero surplus and firms obtain monopoly profits. Modifying the scenario to one in which prices are advertised, we discover that the no-active-search result persists, although the resulting symmetric equilibria are ones in which firms price at marginal cost. △ Less

Submitted 3 April, 2021; v1 submitted 27 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: Update on 7 Dec 2020: fixed minor errors throughout, corrected the proofs of several lemmata in Section 2.1 (leaving the results unchanged), added in an example (Example 2.7), and removed the final proposition

In Simple Communication Games, When Does Ex Ante Fact-Finding Benefit the Receiver?

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: Always, if the number of states is equal to two; or if the number of receiver actions is equal to two and i. The number of states is three or fewer, or ii. The game is cheap talk, or ii. There are just two available messages for the sender. A counterexample is provided for each failure of these conditions. Always, if the number of states is equal to two; or if the number of receiver actions is equal to two and i. The number of states is three or fewer, or ii. The game is cheap talk, or ii. There are just two available messages for the sender. A counterexample is provided for each failure of these conditions. △ Less

Submitted 25 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Competing to Persuade a Rationally Inattentive Agent

Authors: Vasudha Jain, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: Firms strategically disclose product information in order to attract consumers, but recipients often find it costly to process all of it, especially when products have complex features. We study a model of competitive information disclosure by two senders, in which the receiver may garble each sender's experiment, subject to a cost increasing in the informativeness of the garbling. For a large cla… ▽ More Firms strategically disclose product information in order to attract consumers, but recipients often find it costly to process all of it, especially when products have complex features. We study a model of competitive information disclosure by two senders, in which the receiver may garble each sender's experiment, subject to a cost increasing in the informativeness of the garbling. For a large class of parameters, it is an equilibrium for the senders to provide the receiver's first best level of information - i.e. as much as she would learn if she herself controlled information provision. Information on one sender substitutes for information on the other, which nullifies the profitability of a unilateral provision of less information. Thus, we provide a novel channel through which competition with attention costs encourages information disclosure. △ Less

Submitted 3 February, 2020; v1 submitted 22 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Mixtures of Mean-Preserving Contractions

Authors: Joseph Whitmeyer, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: Given a purely atomic probability measure with support on n points, P, any mean-preserving contraction (mpc) of P, Q, with support on m > n points is a mixture of mpcs of P, each with support on most n points. We illustrate an application of this result in economics. Given a purely atomic probability measure with support on n points, P, any mean-preserving contraction (mpc) of P, Q, with support on m > n points is a mixture of mpcs of P, each with support on most n points. We illustrate an application of this result in economics. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2020; v1 submitted 13 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 14 pages

Bayesian Elicitation

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We study how a decision-maker can acquire more information from an agent by reducing her own ability to observe what the agent transmits. In a large class of binary-action games, opacity design is just as good as full commitment to actions and also guarantees that ex ante information acquisition always benefits the receiver, even though without opacity design this learning might actually lower the… ▽ More We study how a decision-maker can acquire more information from an agent by reducing her own ability to observe what the agent transmits. In a large class of binary-action games, opacity design is just as good as full commitment to actions and also guarantees that ex ante information acquisition always benefits the receiver, even though without opacity design this learning might actually lower the receiver's expected payoff. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2024; v1 submitted 3 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Dynamic Competitive Persuasion

Authors: Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: Two long-lived senders play a dynamic game of competitive persuasion. Each period, each provides information to a single short-lived receiver. When the senders also set prices, we unearth a folk theorem: if they are sufficiently patient, virtually any vector of feasible and individually rational payoffs can be sustained in a subgame perfect equilibrium. Without price-setting, there is a unique sub… ▽ More Two long-lived senders play a dynamic game of competitive persuasion. Each period, each provides information to a single short-lived receiver. When the senders also set prices, we unearth a folk theorem: if they are sufficiently patient, virtually any vector of feasible and individually rational payoffs can be sustained in a subgame perfect equilibrium. Without price-setting, there is a unique subgame perfect equilibrium. In it, patient senders provide less information--maximally patient ones none. △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2023; v1 submitted 28 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Some Nontrivial Properties of a Formula for Compound Interest

Authors: Isaac M. Sonin, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We analyze the classical model of compound interest with a constant per-period payment and interest rate. We examine the outstanding balance function as well as the periodic payment function and show that the outstanding balance function is not generally concave in the interest rate, but instead may be initially convex on its domain and then concave. We analyze the classical model of compound interest with a constant per-period payment and interest rate. We examine the outstanding balance function as well as the periodic payment function and show that the outstanding balance function is not generally concave in the interest rate, but instead may be initially convex on its domain and then concave. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Attraction versus Persuasion: Information Provision in Search Markets

Authors: Pak Hung Au, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We consider a model of oligopolistic competition in a market with search frictions, in which competing firms with products of unknown quality advertise how much information a consumer's visit will glean. In the unique symmetric equilibrium of this game, the countervailing incentives of attraction and persuasion yield a payoff function for each firm that is linear in the firm's realized effective v… ▽ More We consider a model of oligopolistic competition in a market with search frictions, in which competing firms with products of unknown quality advertise how much information a consumer's visit will glean. In the unique symmetric equilibrium of this game, the countervailing incentives of attraction and persuasion yield a payoff function for each firm that is linear in the firm's realized effective value. If the expected quality of the products is sufficiently high (or competition is sufficiently fierce), this corresponds to full information--firms provide the first-best level of information. If not, this corresponds to information dispersion--firms randomize over signals. △ Less

Submitted 25 May, 2022; v1 submitted 26 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

A Game of Random Variables

Authors: Artem Hulko, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: This paper analyzes a simple game with $n$ players. We fix a mean, $μ$, in the interval $[0, 1]$ and let each player choose any random variable distributed on that interval with the given mean. The winner of the zero-sum game is the player whose random variable has the highest realization. We show that the position of the mean within the interval is paramount. Remarkably, if the given mean is abov… ▽ More This paper analyzes a simple game with $n$ players. We fix a mean, $μ$, in the interval $[0, 1]$ and let each player choose any random variable distributed on that interval with the given mean. The winner of the zero-sum game is the player whose random variable has the highest realization. We show that the position of the mean within the interval is paramount. Remarkably, if the given mean is above a crucial threshold then the unique equilibrium must contain a point mass on $1$. The cutoff is strictly decreasing in the number of players, $n$; and for fixed $μ$, as the number of players is increased, each player places more weight on $1$ at equilibrium. We characterize the equilibrium as the number of players goes to infinity. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2018; v1 submitted 23 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

A Game of Nontransitive Dice

Authors: Artem Hulko, Mark Whitmeyer

Abstract: We consider a two player simultaneous-move game where the two players each select any permissible $n$-sided die for a fixed integer $n$. A player wins if the outcome of his roll is greater than that of his opponent. Remarkably, for $n>3$, there is a unique Nash Equilibrium in pure strategies. The unique Nash Equilibrium is for each player to throw the Standard $n$-sided die, where each side has a… ▽ More We consider a two player simultaneous-move game where the two players each select any permissible $n$-sided die for a fixed integer $n$. A player wins if the outcome of his roll is greater than that of his opponent. Remarkably, for $n>3$, there is a unique Nash Equilibrium in pure strategies. The unique Nash Equilibrium is for each player to throw the Standard $n$-sided die, where each side has a different number. Our proof of uniqueness is constructive. We introduce an algorithm with which, for any nonstandard die, we may generate another die that beats it. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2018; v1 submitted 2 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.