-
Stable matching as transportation
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Joseph Root,
Fedor Sandomirskiy
Abstract:
We study matching markets with aligned preferences and establish a connection between common design objectives -- stability, efficiency, and fairness -- and the theory of optimal transport. Optimal transport gives new insights into the structural properties of matchings obtained from pursuing these objectives, and into the trade-offs between different objectives. Matching markets with aligned pref…
▽ More
We study matching markets with aligned preferences and establish a connection between common design objectives -- stability, efficiency, and fairness -- and the theory of optimal transport. Optimal transport gives new insights into the structural properties of matchings obtained from pursuing these objectives, and into the trade-offs between different objectives. Matching markets with aligned preferences provide a tractable stylized model capturing supply-demand imbalances in a range of settings such as partnership formation, school choice, organ donor exchange, and markets with transferable utility where bargaining over transfers happens after a match is formed.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Local Priority Mechanisms
Authors:
Joseph Root,
David S. Ahn
Abstract:
We introduce a novel family of mechanisms for constrained allocation problems which we call local priority mechanisms. These mechanisms are parameterized by a function which assigns a set of agents, the local compromisers, to every infeasible allocation. The mechanism then greedily attempts to match agents with their top choices. Whenever it reaches an infeasible allocation, the local compromisers…
▽ More
We introduce a novel family of mechanisms for constrained allocation problems which we call local priority mechanisms. These mechanisms are parameterized by a function which assigns a set of agents, the local compromisers, to every infeasible allocation. The mechanism then greedily attempts to match agents with their top choices. Whenever it reaches an infeasible allocation, the local compromisers move to their next favorite alternative. Local priority mechanisms exist for any constraint, so this provides a method of constructing new designs for any constrained allocation problem. We give axioms which characterize local priority mechanisms. Since constrained allocation includes many canonical problems as special constraints, we apply this characterization to show that several well-known mechanisms, including deferred acceptance for school choice, top trading cycles for house allocation, and serial dictatorship can be understood as instances of local priority mechanisms. Other mechanisms, including the Boston mechanism, are not local priority mechanisms. We give sufficient conditions for a local priority mechanism to be group strategy-proof. We also provide conditions which enable welfare comparisons across local priority mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2024; v1 submitted 7 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
A Topological Proof of The Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem
Authors:
Yuliy Baryshnikov,
Joseph Root
Abstract:
We give a new proof of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem. We construct two topological spaces: one for the space of preference profiles and another for the space of outcomes. We show that social choice functions induce continuous map**s between the two spaces. By studying the properties of this map**, we prove the theorem.
We give a new proof of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem. We construct two topological spaces: one for the space of preference profiles and another for the space of outcomes. We show that social choice functions induce continuous map**s between the two spaces. By studying the properties of this map**, we prove the theorem.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Royal Processions: Incentives, Efficiency and Fairness in Two-sided Matching
Authors:
Sophie Bade,
Joseph Root
Abstract:
We study the set of incentive compatible and efficient two-sided matching mechanisms. We classify all such mechanisms under an additional assumption -- "gender-neutrality" -- which guarantees that the two sides be treated symmetrically. All group strategy-proof, efficient and gender-neutral mechanisms are recursive and the outcome is decided in a sequence of rounds. In each round, two agents are s…
▽ More
We study the set of incentive compatible and efficient two-sided matching mechanisms. We classify all such mechanisms under an additional assumption -- "gender-neutrality" -- which guarantees that the two sides be treated symmetrically. All group strategy-proof, efficient and gender-neutral mechanisms are recursive and the outcome is decided in a sequence of rounds. In each round, two agents are selected, one from each side. These agents are either "matched-by-default" or "unmatched-by-default." In the former case either of the selected agents can unilaterally force the other to match with them while in the latter case they may only match together if both agree. In either case, if this pair of agents is not matched together, each gets their top choice among the set of remaining agents. As an important step in the characterization, we first show that in one-sided matching all group strategy-proof and efficient mechanisms are sequential dictatorships. An immediate corollary is that there are no individually rational, group strategy-proof and efficient one-sided matching mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Efficiency in Random Resource Allocation and Social Choice
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Joseph Root,
Fedor Sandomirskiy
Abstract:
We study efficiency in general collective choice problems where agents have ordinal preferences and randomization is allowed. We explore the structure of preference profiles where ex-ante and ex-post efficiency coincide, offer a unifying perspective on the known results, and give several new characterizations. The results have implications for well-studied mechanisms including random serial dictat…
▽ More
We study efficiency in general collective choice problems where agents have ordinal preferences and randomization is allowed. We explore the structure of preference profiles where ex-ante and ex-post efficiency coincide, offer a unifying perspective on the known results, and give several new characterizations. The results have implications for well-studied mechanisms including random serial dictatorship and a number of specific environments, including the dichotomous, single-peaked, and social choice domains.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2022; v1 submitted 12 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Incentives and Efficiency in Constrained Allocation Mechanisms
Authors:
Joseph Root,
David S. Ahn
Abstract:
We study private-good allocation under general constraints. Several prominent examples are special cases, including house allocation, roommate matching, social choice, and multiple assignment. Every individually strategy-proof and Pareto efficient two-agent mechanism is an "adapted local dictatorship." Every group strategy-proof N-agent mechanism has two-agent marginal mechanisms that are adapted…
▽ More
We study private-good allocation under general constraints. Several prominent examples are special cases, including house allocation, roommate matching, social choice, and multiple assignment. Every individually strategy-proof and Pareto efficient two-agent mechanism is an "adapted local dictatorship." Every group strategy-proof N-agent mechanism has two-agent marginal mechanisms that are adapted local dictatorships. These results yield new characterizations and unifying insights for known characterizations. We find all group strategy-proof and Pareto efficient mechanisms for the roommates problem. We give a related result for multiple assignment. We prove the Gibbard--Satterthwaite Theorem and give a partial converse.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2023; v1 submitted 11 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
