Emissions and Energy Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act
Authors:
John Bistline,
Geoffrey Blanford,
Maxwell Brown,
Dallas Burtraw,
Maya Domeshek,
Jamil Farbes,
Allen Fawcett,
Anne Hamilton,
Jesse Jenkins,
Ryan Jones,
Ben King,
Hannah Kolus,
John Larsen,
Amanda Levin,
Megan Mahajan,
Cara Marcy,
Erin Mayfield,
James McFarland,
Haewon McJeon,
Robbie Orvis,
Neha Patankar,
Kevin Rennert,
Christopher Roney,
Nicholas Roy,
Greg Schivley
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
If goals set under the Paris Agreement are met, the world may hold warming well below 2 C; however, parties are not on track to deliver these commitments, increasing focus on policy implementation to close the gap between ambition and action. Recently, the US government passed its most prominent piece of climate legislation to date, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), designed to invest in…
▽ More
If goals set under the Paris Agreement are met, the world may hold warming well below 2 C; however, parties are not on track to deliver these commitments, increasing focus on policy implementation to close the gap between ambition and action. Recently, the US government passed its most prominent piece of climate legislation to date, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), designed to invest in a wide range of programs that, among other provisions, incentivize clean energy and carbon management, encourage electrification and efficiency measures, reduce methane emissions, promote domestic supply chains, and address environmental justice concerns. IRA's scope and complexity make modeling important to understand impacts on emissions and energy systems. We leverage results from nine independent, state-of-the-art models to examine potential implications of key IRA provisions, showing economy wide emissions reductions between 43-48% below 2005 by 2035.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
On the social and cognitive dimensions of wicked environmental problems characterized by conceptual and solution uncertainty
Authors:
Felber Arroyave,
Oscar Yandy Romero Goyeneche,
Meredith Gore,
Gaston Heimeriks,
Jeffrey Jenkins,
Alexander Petersen
Abstract:
We develop a quantitative framework for understanding the class of wicked problems that emerge at the intersections of natural, social, and technological complex systems. Wicked problems reflect our incomplete understanding of interdependent global systems and the systemic risk they pose; such problems escape solutions because they are often ill-defined, and thus mis-identified and under-appreciat…
▽ More
We develop a quantitative framework for understanding the class of wicked problems that emerge at the intersections of natural, social, and technological complex systems. Wicked problems reflect our incomplete understanding of interdependent global systems and the systemic risk they pose; such problems escape solutions because they are often ill-defined, and thus mis-identified and under-appreciated by communities of problem-solvers. While there are well-documented benefits to tackling boundary-crossing problems from various viewpoints, the integration of diverse approaches can nevertheless contribute confusion around the collective understanding of the core concepts and feasible solutions. We explore this paradox by analyzing the development of both scholarly (social) and topical (cognitive) communities -- two facets of knowledge production studies here that contribute towards the evolution of knowledge in and around a problem, termed a knowledge trajectory -- associated with three wicked problems: deforestation, invasive species, and wildlife trade. We posit that saturation in the dynamics of social and cognitive diversity growth is an indicator of reduced uncertainty in the evolution of the comprehensive knowledge trajectory emerging around each wicked problem. Informed by comprehensive bibliometric data capturing both social and cognitive dimensions of each problem domain, we thereby develop a framework that assesses the stability of knowledge trajectory dynamics as an indicator of wickedness associated with conceptual and solution uncertainty. As such, our results identify wildlife trade as a wicked problem that may be difficult to address given recent instability in its knowledge trajectory.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2021; v1 submitted 20 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
