-
NFT Wash Trading: Direct vs. Indirect Estimation
Authors:
Brett Hemenway Falk,
Gerry Tsoukalas,
Niuniu Zhang
Abstract:
Recent studies estimate around 70% of traded value on off-chain crypto exchanges like Binance is wash trading. This paper turns to NFT markets, where the on-chain nature of transactions-a key tenet of Web3 innovation-enables more direct estimation methods to be applied. Focusing on three of the largest NFT marketplaces, we find 30-40% of NFT volume and 25-95% of traded value involve wash trading.…
▽ More
Recent studies estimate around 70% of traded value on off-chain crypto exchanges like Binance is wash trading. This paper turns to NFT markets, where the on-chain nature of transactions-a key tenet of Web3 innovation-enables more direct estimation methods to be applied. Focusing on three of the largest NFT marketplaces, we find 30-40% of NFT volume and 25-95% of traded value involve wash trading. We leverage this direct approach to critically evaluate recent indirect estimation methods suggested in the literature, revealing major differences in effectiveness, with some failing altogether. Trade-roundedness filters, as suggested in Cong et al. (2023), emerge as the most accurate indirect estimation method. In fact, we show how direct and indirect approaches can be closely aligned via hyper-parameter fine-tuning. Our findings underscore the crucial role of technological innovation in detecting and regulating financial misconduct in digital finance.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024; v1 submitted 30 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Economics of NFTs: The Value of Creator Royalties
Authors:
Brett Hemenway Falk,
Gerry Tsoukalas,
Niuniu Zhang
Abstract:
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) promise to revolutionize how content creators (e.g., artists) price and sell their work. One core feature of NFTs is the option to embed creator royalties which earmark a percentage of future sale proceeds to creators, each time their NFTs change hands. As popular as this feature is in practice, its utility is often questioned because buyers, the argument goes, simply ``…
▽ More
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) promise to revolutionize how content creators (e.g., artists) price and sell their work. One core feature of NFTs is the option to embed creator royalties which earmark a percentage of future sale proceeds to creators, each time their NFTs change hands. As popular as this feature is in practice, its utility is often questioned because buyers, the argument goes, simply ``price it in at the time of purchase''. As intuitive as this argument sounds, it is incomplete. We find royalties can add value to creators in at least three distinct ways. (i) Risk sharing: when creators and buyers are risk sensitive, royalties can improve trade by splitting the risks associated with future price volatility; (ii) Dynamic pricing: in the presence of information asymmetry, royalties can extract more revenues from better-informed speculators over time, mimicking the benefits of ``dynamic pricing''; (iii) Price discrimination: when creators sell multi-unit NFT collections, royalties can better capture value from heterogeneous buyers. Our results suggest creator royalties play an important and sometimes overlooked role in the economics of NFTs.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Scaling Blockchains: Can Committee-Based Consensus Help?
Authors:
Alon Benhaim,
Brett Hemenway Falk,
Gerry Tsoukalas
Abstract:
In the high-stakes race to develop more scalable blockchains, some platforms (Binance, Cosmos, EOS, TRON, etc.) have adopted committee-based consensus (CBC) protocols, whereby the blockchain's record-kee** rights are entrusted to a committee of elected block producers. In theory, the smaller the committee, the faster the blockchain can reach consensus and the more it can scale. What's less clear…
▽ More
In the high-stakes race to develop more scalable blockchains, some platforms (Binance, Cosmos, EOS, TRON, etc.) have adopted committee-based consensus (CBC) protocols, whereby the blockchain's record-kee** rights are entrusted to a committee of elected block producers. In theory, the smaller the committee, the faster the blockchain can reach consensus and the more it can scale. What's less clear, is whether such protocols ensure that honest committees can be consistently elected, given blockchain users typically have limited information on who to vote for. We show that the approval voting mechanism underlying most CBC protocols is complex and can lead to intractable optimal voting strategies. We empirically characterize some simpler intuitive voting strategies that users tend to resort to in practice and prove that these nonetheless converge to optimality exponentially quickly in the number of voters. Exponential convergence ensures that despite its complexity, CBC exhibits robustness and has some efficiency advantages over more popular staked-weighted lottery protocols currently underlying many prominent blockchains such as Ethereum.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022; v1 submitted 16 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
