-
Manipulation of Belief Aggregation Rules
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique,
Takashi Hayashi
Abstract:
This paper studies manipulation of belief aggregation rules in the setting where the society first collects individual's probabilistic opinions and then solves a public portfolio choice problem with common utility based on the aggregate belief.
First, we show that belief reporting in Nash equilibrium under the linear opinion pool and log utility is identified as the profile of state-contingent w…
▽ More
This paper studies manipulation of belief aggregation rules in the setting where the society first collects individual's probabilistic opinions and then solves a public portfolio choice problem with common utility based on the aggregate belief.
First, we show that belief reporting in Nash equilibrium under the linear opinion pool and log utility is identified as the profile of state-contingent wealth shares in parimutuel equilibrium with risk-neutral preference.
Then we characterize belief aggregation rules which are Nash-implementable. We provide a necessary and essentially sufficient condition for implementability, which is independent of the common risk attitude.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Stable matching as transportation
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Joseph Root,
Fedor Sandomirskiy
Abstract:
We study matching markets with aligned preferences and establish a connection between common design objectives -- stability, efficiency, and fairness -- and the theory of optimal transport. Optimal transport gives new insights into the structural properties of matchings obtained from pursuing these objectives, and into the trade-offs between different objectives. Matching markets with aligned pref…
▽ More
We study matching markets with aligned preferences and establish a connection between common design objectives -- stability, efficiency, and fairness -- and the theory of optimal transport. Optimal transport gives new insights into the structural properties of matchings obtained from pursuing these objectives, and into the trade-offs between different objectives. Matching markets with aligned preferences provide a tractable stylized model capturing supply-demand imbalances in a range of settings such as partnership formation, school choice, organ donor exchange, and markets with transferable utility where bargaining over transfers happens after a match is formed.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
An Experimental Study of Decentralized Matching
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Alejandro Robinson-Cortés,
Leeat Yariv
Abstract:
We present an experimental study of decentralized two-sided matching markets with no transfers. Experimental participants are informed of everyone's preferences and can make arbitrary non-binding match offers that get finalized when a period of market inactivity has elapsed. Several insights emerge. First, stable outcomes are prevalent. Second, while centralized clearinghouses commonly aim at impl…
▽ More
We present an experimental study of decentralized two-sided matching markets with no transfers. Experimental participants are informed of everyone's preferences and can make arbitrary non-binding match offers that get finalized when a period of market inactivity has elapsed. Several insights emerge. First, stable outcomes are prevalent. Second, while centralized clearinghouses commonly aim at implementing extremal stable matchings, our decentralized markets most frequently culminate in the median stable matching. Third, preferences' cardinal representations impact the stable partners participants match with. Last, the dynamics underlying our results exhibit strategic sophistication, with agents successfully avoiding cycles of blocking pairs.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Individual and Collective Welfare in Risk Sharing with Many States
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Farzad Pourbabaee
Abstract:
We investigate the effects of a large (but finite) state space on models of efficient risk sharing. A group of risk-averse agents agree on a risk-sharing agreement in an economy without aggregate risk. The economy is subject to a perturbation, or shock, that prompts a renegotiation of the agreement. If agents insist on an $\ep$-utility improvement to accept a new agreement, then the probability of…
▽ More
We investigate the effects of a large (but finite) state space on models of efficient risk sharing. A group of risk-averse agents agree on a risk-sharing agreement in an economy without aggregate risk. The economy is subject to a perturbation, or shock, that prompts a renegotiation of the agreement. If agents insist on an $\ep$-utility improvement to accept a new agreement, then the probability of a post-shock acceptable agreement vanishes exponentially to zero as the number of states grows. We use similar arguments to consider a model where agents have multiple prior preferences, and show that the existence of an $\ep$-Pareto improving trade requires that some sets of priors have vanishingly small measure. Our results hinge on the "shape does not matter" message of high dimensional isoperimetric inequalities.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2024; v1 submitted 14 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Revealed preferences for dynamically inconsistent models
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Gerelt Tserenjigmid
Abstract:
We study the testable implications of models of dynamically inconsistent choices when planned choices are unobservable, and thus only "on path" data is available. First, we discuss the approach in Blow, Browning and Crawford (2021), who characterize first-order rationalizability of the model of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. We show that the first-order approach does not guarantee rationalizability…
▽ More
We study the testable implications of models of dynamically inconsistent choices when planned choices are unobservable, and thus only "on path" data is available. First, we discuss the approach in Blow, Browning and Crawford (2021), who characterize first-order rationalizability of the model of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. We show that the first-order approach does not guarantee rationalizability by means of the quasi-hyperbolic model. This motivates consideration of an abstract model of intertemporal choice, under which we provide a characterization of different behavioral models -- including the naive and sophisticated paradigms of dynamically inconsistent choice.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2023; v1 submitted 23 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Recovering utility
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique,
Nicolas S. Lambert
Abstract:
We provide sufficient conditions under which a utility function may be recovered from a finite choice experiment. Identification, as is commonly understood in decision theory, is not enough. We provide a general recoverability result that is widely applicable to modern theories of choice under uncertainty. Key is to allow for a monetary environment, in which an objective notion of monotonicity is…
▽ More
We provide sufficient conditions under which a utility function may be recovered from a finite choice experiment. Identification, as is commonly understood in decision theory, is not enough. We provide a general recoverability result that is widely applicable to modern theories of choice under uncertainty. Key is to allow for a monetary environment, in which an objective notion of monotonicity is meaningful. In such environments, we show that subjective expected utility, as well as variational preferences, and other parametrizations of utilities over uncertain acts are recoverable. We also consider utility recovery in a statistical model with noise and random deviations from utility maximization.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Binary Mechanisms under Privacy-Preserving Noise
Authors:
Farzad Pourbabaee,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We study mechanism design for public-good provision under a noisy privacy-preserving transformation of individual agents' reported preferences. The setting is a standard binary model with transfers and quasi-linear utility. Agents report their preferences for the public good, which are randomly ``flipped,'' so that any individual report may be explained away as the outcome of noise. We study the t…
▽ More
We study mechanism design for public-good provision under a noisy privacy-preserving transformation of individual agents' reported preferences. The setting is a standard binary model with transfers and quasi-linear utility. Agents report their preferences for the public good, which are randomly ``flipped,'' so that any individual report may be explained away as the outcome of noise. We study the tradeoffs between preserving the public decisions made in the presence of noise (noise sensitivity), pursuing efficiency, and mitigating the effect of noise on revenue.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2024; v1 submitted 17 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Rationally Inattentive Statistical Discrimination: Arrow Meets Phelps
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Anqi Li
Abstract:
When information acquisition is costly but flexible, a principal may rationally acquire information that favors "majorities" over "minorities." Majorities therefore face incentives to invest in becoming productive, whereas minorities are discouraged from such investments. The principal, in turn, rationally ignores minorities unless they surprise him with a genuinely outstanding outcome, precisely…
▽ More
When information acquisition is costly but flexible, a principal may rationally acquire information that favors "majorities" over "minorities." Majorities therefore face incentives to invest in becoming productive, whereas minorities are discouraged from such investments. The principal, in turn, rationally ignores minorities unless they surprise him with a genuinely outstanding outcome, precisely because they are less likely to invest. We give conditions under which the resulting discriminatory equilibrium is most preferred by the principal, despite that all groups are ex-ante identical. Our results add to the discussions of affirmative action, implicit bias, and occupational segregation and stereotypes.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2023; v1 submitted 15 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Price & Choose
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Matías Núñez
Abstract:
We describe a two-stage mechanism that fully implements the set of efficient outcomes in two-agent environments with quasi-linear utilities. The mechanism asks one agent to set prices for each outcome, and the other agent to make a choice, paying the corresponding price: Price \& Choose. We extend our implementation result in three main directions: an arbitrary number of players, non-quasi linear…
▽ More
We describe a two-stage mechanism that fully implements the set of efficient outcomes in two-agent environments with quasi-linear utilities. The mechanism asks one agent to set prices for each outcome, and the other agent to make a choice, paying the corresponding price: Price \& Choose. We extend our implementation result in three main directions: an arbitrary number of players, non-quasi linear utilities, and robustness to max-min behavior. Finally, we discuss how to reduce the payoff inequality between players while still achieving efficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2023; v1 submitted 11 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Efficiency in Random Resource Allocation and Social Choice
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Joseph Root,
Fedor Sandomirskiy
Abstract:
We study efficiency in general collective choice problems where agents have ordinal preferences and randomization is allowed. We explore the structure of preference profiles where ex-ante and ex-post efficiency coincide, offer a unifying perspective on the known results, and give several new characterizations. The results have implications for well-studied mechanisms including random serial dictat…
▽ More
We study efficiency in general collective choice problems where agents have ordinal preferences and randomization is allowed. We explore the structure of preference profiles where ex-ante and ex-post efficiency coincide, offer a unifying perspective on the known results, and give several new characterizations. The results have implications for well-studied mechanisms including random serial dictatorship and a number of specific environments, including the dichotomous, single-peaked, and social choice domains.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2022; v1 submitted 12 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Closure operators: Complexity and applications to classification and decision-making
Authors:
Hamed Hamze Bajgiran,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We study the complexity of closure operators, with applications to machine learning and decision theory. In machine learning, closure operators emerge naturally in data classification and clustering. In decision theory, they can model equivalence of choice menus, and therefore situations with a preference for flexibility. Our contribution is to formulate a notion of complexity of closure operators…
▽ More
We study the complexity of closure operators, with applications to machine learning and decision theory. In machine learning, closure operators emerge naturally in data classification and clustering. In decision theory, they can model equivalence of choice menus, and therefore situations with a preference for flexibility. Our contribution is to formulate a notion of complexity of closure operators, which translate into the complexity of a classifier in ML, or of a utility function in decision theory.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2022; v1 submitted 10 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Stable allocations in discrete exchange economies
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Sumit Goel,
SangMok Lee
Abstract:
We study stable allocations in an exchange economy with indivisible goods. The problem is well-known to be challenging, and rich enough to encode fundamentally unstable economies, such as the roommate problem. Our approach stems from generalizing the original study of an exchange economy with unit demand and unit endowments, the \emph{housing model}. Our first approach uses Scarf's theorem, and pr…
▽ More
We study stable allocations in an exchange economy with indivisible goods. The problem is well-known to be challenging, and rich enough to encode fundamentally unstable economies, such as the roommate problem. Our approach stems from generalizing the original study of an exchange economy with unit demand and unit endowments, the \emph{housing model}. Our first approach uses Scarf's theorem, and proposes sufficient conditions under which a ``convexify then round'' technique ensures that the core is nonempty. The upshot is that a core allocation exists in categorical economies with dichotomous preferences. Our second approach uses a generalization of the TTC: it works under general conditions, and finds a solution that is a version of the stable set.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2024; v1 submitted 9 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
On the meaning of the Critical Cost Efficiency Index
Authors:
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
This note provides a critical discussion of the \textit{Critical Cost-Efficiency Index} (CCEI) as used to assess deviations from utility-maximizing behavior. I argue that the CCEI is hard to interpret, and that it can disagree with other plausible measures of "irrational" behavior. The common interpretation of CCEI as wasted income is questionable. Moreover, I show that one agent may have more uns…
▽ More
This note provides a critical discussion of the \textit{Critical Cost-Efficiency Index} (CCEI) as used to assess deviations from utility-maximizing behavior. I argue that the CCEI is hard to interpret, and that it can disagree with other plausible measures of "irrational" behavior. The common interpretation of CCEI as wasted income is questionable. Moreover, I show that one agent may have more unstable preferences than another, but seem more rational according to the CCEI. This calls into question the (now common) use of CCEI as an ordinal and cardinal measure of degrees of rationality.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2022; v1 submitted 13 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Empirical Welfare Economics
Authors:
Christopher P Chambers,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
Welfare economics relies on access to agents' utility functions: we revisit classical questions in welfare economics, assuming access to data on agents' past choices instead of their utilities. Our main result considers the existence of utilities that render a given allocation Pareto optimal. We show that a candidate allocation is efficient for some utilities consistent with the choice data if and…
▽ More
Welfare economics relies on access to agents' utility functions: we revisit classical questions in welfare economics, assuming access to data on agents' past choices instead of their utilities. Our main result considers the existence of utilities that render a given allocation Pareto optimal. We show that a candidate allocation is efficient for some utilities consistent with the choice data if and only if it is efficient for an incomplete relation derived from the revealed preference relations and convexity. Similar ideas are used to make counterfactual choices for a single consumer, policy comparisons by the Kaldor criterion, and offer bounds on the degree of inefficiency in a Pareto suboptimal allocation.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2024; v1 submitted 6 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Screening $p$-Hackers: Dissemination Noise as Bait
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Kevin He
Abstract:
We show that adding noise before publishing data effectively screens $p$-hacked findings: spurious explanations produced by fitting many statistical models (data mining). Noise creates "baits" that affect two types of researchers differently. Uninformed $p$-hackers, who are fully ignorant of the true mechanism and engage in data mining, often fall for baits. Informed researchers, who start with an…
▽ More
We show that adding noise before publishing data effectively screens $p$-hacked findings: spurious explanations produced by fitting many statistical models (data mining). Noise creates "baits" that affect two types of researchers differently. Uninformed $p$-hackers, who are fully ignorant of the true mechanism and engage in data mining, often fall for baits. Informed researchers, who start with an ex-ante hypothesis, are minimally affected. We show that as the number of observations grows large, dissemination noise asymptotically achieves optimal screening. In a tractable special case where the informed researchers' theory can identify the true causal mechanism with very little data, we characterize the optimal level of dissemination noise and highlight the relevant trade-offs. Dissemination noise is a tool that statistical agencies currently use to protect privacy. We argue this existing practice can be repurposed to screen $p$-hackers and thus improve research credibility.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2024; v1 submitted 16 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Decreasing Impatience
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique,
Alan D. Miller
Abstract:
We characterize decreasing impatience, a common behavioral phenomenon in intertemporal choice. Discount factors that display decreasing impatience are characterized through a convexit y axiom for investments at fixed interest rates. Then we show that they are equivalent to a geometric average of generalized quasi-hype rbolic discount rates. Finally, they emerge through parimutuel preference aggreg…
▽ More
We characterize decreasing impatience, a common behavioral phenomenon in intertemporal choice. Discount factors that display decreasing impatience are characterized through a convexit y axiom for investments at fixed interest rates. Then we show that they are equivalent to a geometric average of generalized quasi-hype rbolic discount rates. Finally, they emerge through parimutuel preference aggregation of exponential discount factors.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2022; v1 submitted 4 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Approximate Expected Utility Rationalization
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Kota Saito,
Taisuke Imai
Abstract:
We propose a new measure of deviations from expected utility theory. For any positive number~$e$, we give a characterization of the datasets with a rationalization that is within~$e$ (in beliefs, utility, or perceived prices) of expected utility theory. The number~$e$ can then be used as a measure of how far the data is to expected utility theory. We apply our methodology to data from three large-…
▽ More
We propose a new measure of deviations from expected utility theory. For any positive number~$e$, we give a characterization of the datasets with a rationalization that is within~$e$ (in beliefs, utility, or perceived prices) of expected utility theory. The number~$e$ can then be used as a measure of how far the data is to expected utility theory. We apply our methodology to data from three large-scale experiments. Many subjects in those experiments are consistent with utility maximization, but not with expected utility maximization. Our measure of distance to expected utility is correlated with subjects' demographic characteristics.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Ordinal and cardinal solution concepts for two-sided matching
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Alfred Galichon
Abstract:
We characterize solutions for two-sided matching, both in the transferable and in the nontransferable-utility frameworks, using a cardinal formulation. Our approach makes the comparison of the matching models with and without transfers particularly transparent. We introduce the concept of a no-trade matching to study the role of transfers in matching. A no-trade matching is one in which the availa…
▽ More
We characterize solutions for two-sided matching, both in the transferable and in the nontransferable-utility frameworks, using a cardinal formulation. Our approach makes the comparison of the matching models with and without transfers particularly transparent. We introduce the concept of a no-trade matching to study the role of transfers in matching. A no-trade matching is one in which the availability of transfers do not affect the outcome.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2021; v1 submitted 8 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Twofold Multiprior Preferences and Failures of Contingent Reasoning
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Masaki Miyashita,
Yuta Nakamura,
Luciano Pomatto,
Jamie Vinson
Abstract:
We propose a model of incomplete \textit{twofold multiprior preferences}, in which an act $f$ is ranked above an act $g$ only when $f$ provides higher utility in a worst-case scenario than what $g$ provides in a best-case scenario. The model explains failures of contingent reasoning, captured through a weakening of the state-by-state monotonicity (or dominance) axiom. Our model gives rise to rich…
▽ More
We propose a model of incomplete \textit{twofold multiprior preferences}, in which an act $f$ is ranked above an act $g$ only when $f$ provides higher utility in a worst-case scenario than what $g$ provides in a best-case scenario. The model explains failures of contingent reasoning, captured through a weakening of the state-by-state monotonicity (or dominance) axiom. Our model gives rise to rich comparative statics results, as well as extension exercises, and connections to choice theory. We present an application to second-price auctions.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2022; v1 submitted 28 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Top of the Batch: Interviews and the Match
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Ruy Gonzalez,
Alistair Wilson,
Leeat Yariv
Abstract:
Most doctors in the NRMP are matched to one of their most-preferred internship programs. Since various surveys indicate similarities across doctors' preferences, this suggests a puzzle. How can nearly everyone get a position in a highly-desirable program when positions in each program are scarce? We provide one possible explanation for this puzzle. We show that the patterns observed in the NRMP da…
▽ More
Most doctors in the NRMP are matched to one of their most-preferred internship programs. Since various surveys indicate similarities across doctors' preferences, this suggests a puzzle. How can nearly everyone get a position in a highly-desirable program when positions in each program are scarce? We provide one possible explanation for this puzzle. We show that the patterns observed in the NRMP data may be an artifact of the interview process that precedes the match. Our analysis highlights the importance of interactions occurring outside of a matching clearinghouse for resulting outcomes, and casts doubts on analysis of clearinghouses that take reported preferences at face value.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2020; v1 submitted 12 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Decision Making under Uncertainty: An Experimental Study in Market Settings
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Taisuke Imai,
Kota Saito
Abstract:
We implement nonparametric revealed-preference tests of subjective expected utility theory and its generalizations. We find that a majority of subjects' choices are consistent with the maximization of some utility function. They respond to price changes in the direction subjective expected utility theory predicts, but not to a degree that makes them consistent with the theory. Maxmin expected util…
▽ More
We implement nonparametric revealed-preference tests of subjective expected utility theory and its generalizations. We find that a majority of subjects' choices are consistent with the maximization of some utility function. They respond to price changes in the direction subjective expected utility theory predicts, but not to a degree that makes them consistent with the theory. Maxmin expected utility a dds no explanatory power. The degree of deviations from the theory is uncorrelated with demographic characteristics. Our findings are essentially the same in laboratory data with a student population and in a panel survey with a general sample of the U.S. population.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2021; v1 submitted 3 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Constrained Pseudo-market Equilibrium
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Antonio Miralles,
Jun Zhang
Abstract:
We propose a pseudo-market solution to resource allocation problems subject to constraints. Our treatment of constraints is general: including bihierarchical constraints due to considerations of diversity in school choice, or scheduling in course allocation; and other forms of constraints needed to model, for example, the market for roommates, and combinatorial assignment problems. Constraints giv…
▽ More
We propose a pseudo-market solution to resource allocation problems subject to constraints. Our treatment of constraints is general: including bihierarchical constraints due to considerations of diversity in school choice, or scheduling in course allocation; and other forms of constraints needed to model, for example, the market for roommates, and combinatorial assignment problems. Constraints give rise to pecuniary externalities, which are internalized via prices. Agents pay to the extent that their purchases affect the value of relevant constraints at equilibrium prices. The result is a constrained efficient market equilibrium outcome. The outcome is fair whenever the constraints do not single out individual agents. Our result can be extended to economies with endowments, and address participation constraints.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2020; v1 submitted 12 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Recovering Preferences from Finite Data
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique,
Nicolas Lambert
Abstract:
We study preferences estimated from finite choice experiments and provide sufficient conditions for convergence to a unique underlying "true" preference. Our conditions are weak, and therefore valid in a wide range of economic environments. We develop applications to expected utility theory, choice over consumption bundles, menu choice and intertemporal consumption. Our framework unifies the revea…
▽ More
We study preferences estimated from finite choice experiments and provide sufficient conditions for convergence to a unique underlying "true" preference. Our conditions are weak, and therefore valid in a wide range of economic environments. We develop applications to expected utility theory, choice over consumption bundles, menu choice and intertemporal consumption. Our framework unifies the revealed preference tradition with models that allow for errors.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2020; v1 submitted 12 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
New developments in revealed preference theory: decisions under risk, uncertainty, and intertemporal choice
Authors:
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
This survey reviews recent developments in revealed preference theory. It discusses the testable implications of theories of choice that are germane to specific economic environments. The focus is on expected utility in risky environments; subjected expected utility and maxmin expected utility in the presence of uncertainty; and exponentially discounted utility for intertemporal choice. The testab…
▽ More
This survey reviews recent developments in revealed preference theory. It discusses the testable implications of theories of choice that are germane to specific economic environments. The focus is on expected utility in risky environments; subjected expected utility and maxmin expected utility in the presence of uncertainty; and exponentially discounted utility for intertemporal choice. The testable implications of these theories for data on choice from classical linear budget sets are described, and shown to follow a common thread. The theories all imply an inverse relation between prices and quantities, with different qualifications depending on the functional forms in the theory under consideration.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2019; v1 submitted 20 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Fairness and efficiency for probabilistic allocations with participation constraints
Authors:
Federico Echenique,
Antonio Miralles,
Jun Zhang
Abstract:
We propose a notion of fairness for allocation problems in which different agents may have different reservation utilities, stemming from different outside options, or property rights. Fairness is usually understood as the absence of envy, but this can be incompatible with reservation utilities. It is possible that Alice's envy of Bob's assignment cannot be remedied without violating Bob's partici…
▽ More
We propose a notion of fairness for allocation problems in which different agents may have different reservation utilities, stemming from different outside options, or property rights. Fairness is usually understood as the absence of envy, but this can be incompatible with reservation utilities. It is possible that Alice's envy of Bob's assignment cannot be remedied without violating Bob's participation constraint. Instead, we seek to rule out {\em justified envy}, defined as envy for which a remedy would not violate any agent's participation constraint. We show that fairness, meaning the absence of justified envy, can be achieved together with efficiency and individual rationality. We introduce a competitive equilibrium approach with price-dependent incomes obtaining the desired properties.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2020; v1 submitted 12 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Spherical Preferences
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We introduce and study the property of orthogonal independence, a restricted additivity axiom applying when alternatives are orthogonal. The axiom requires that the preference for one marginal change over another should be maintained after each marginal change has been shifted in a direction that is orthogonal to both.
We show that continuous preferences satisfy orthogonal independence if and on…
▽ More
We introduce and study the property of orthogonal independence, a restricted additivity axiom applying when alternatives are orthogonal. The axiom requires that the preference for one marginal change over another should be maintained after each marginal change has been shifted in a direction that is orthogonal to both.
We show that continuous preferences satisfy orthogonal independence if and only if they are spherical: their indifference curves are spheres with the same center, with preference being "monotone" either away or towards the center. Spherical preferences include linear preferences as a special (limiting) case. We discuss different applications to economic and political environments. Our result delivers Euclidean preferences in models of spatial voting, quadratic welfare aggregation in social choice, and expected utility in models of choice under uncertainty.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2020; v1 submitted 8 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
A characterization of "Phelpsian" statistical discrimination
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique
Abstract:
We establish that statistical discrimination is possible if and only if it is impossible to uniquely identify the signal structure observed by an employer from a realized empirical distribution of skills. The impossibility of statistical discrimination is shown to be equivalent to the existence of a fair, skill-dependent, remuneration for workers. Finally, we connect the statistical discrimination…
▽ More
We establish that statistical discrimination is possible if and only if it is impossible to uniquely identify the signal structure observed by an employer from a realized empirical distribution of skills. The impossibility of statistical discrimination is shown to be equivalent to the existence of a fair, skill-dependent, remuneration for workers. Finally, we connect the statistical discrimination literature to Bayesian persuasion, establishing that if discrimination is absent, then the optimal signaling problem results in a linear payoff function (as well as a kind of converse).
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Preference Identification
Authors:
Christopher P. Chambers,
Federico Echenique,
Nicolas S. Lambert
Abstract:
An experimenter seeks to learn a subject's preference relation. The experimenter produces pairs of alternatives. For each pair, the subject is asked to choose. We argue that, in general, large but finite data do not give close approximations of the subject's preference, even when the limiting (countably infinite) data are enough to infer the preference perfectly. We provide sufficient conditions o…
▽ More
An experimenter seeks to learn a subject's preference relation. The experimenter produces pairs of alternatives. For each pair, the subject is asked to choose. We argue that, in general, large but finite data do not give close approximations of the subject's preference, even when the limiting (countably infinite) data are enough to infer the preference perfectly. We provide sufficient conditions on the set of alternatives, preferences, and sequences of pairs so that the observation of finitely many choices allows the experimenter to learn the subject's preference with arbitrary precision. While preferences can be identified under our sufficient conditions, we show that it is harder to identify utility functions. We illustrate our results with several examples, including consumer choice, expected utility, and preferences in the Anscombe-Aumann model.
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.