-
The Semantic Reader Project: Augmenting Scholarly Documents through AI-Powered Interactive Reading Interfaces
Authors:
Kyle Lo,
Joseph Chee Chang,
Andrew Head,
Jonathan Bragg,
Amy X. Zhang,
Cassidy Trier,
Chloe Anastasiades,
Tal August,
Russell Authur,
Danielle Bragg,
Erin Bransom,
Isabel Cachola,
Stefan Candra,
Yoganand Chandrasekhar,
Yen-Sung Chen,
Evie Yu-Yen Cheng,
Yvonne Chou,
Doug Downey,
Rob Evans,
Raymond Fok,
Fangzhou Hu,
Regan Huff,
Dongyeop Kang,
Tae Soo Kim,
Rodney Kinney
, et al. (30 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scholarly publications are key to the transfer of knowledge from scholars to others. However, research papers are information-dense, and as the volume of the scientific literature grows, the need for new technology to support the reading process grows. In contrast to the process of finding papers, which has been transformed by Internet technology, the experience of reading research papers has chan…
▽ More
Scholarly publications are key to the transfer of knowledge from scholars to others. However, research papers are information-dense, and as the volume of the scientific literature grows, the need for new technology to support the reading process grows. In contrast to the process of finding papers, which has been transformed by Internet technology, the experience of reading research papers has changed little in decades. The PDF format for sharing research papers is widely used due to its portability, but it has significant downsides including: static content, poor accessibility for low-vision readers, and difficulty reading on mobile devices. This paper explores the question "Can recent advances in AI and HCI power intelligent, interactive, and accessible reading interfaces -- even for legacy PDFs?" We describe the Semantic Reader Project, a collaborative effort across multiple institutions to explore automatic creation of dynamic reading interfaces for research papers. Through this project, we've developed ten research prototype interfaces and conducted usability studies with more than 300 participants and real-world users showing improved reading experiences for scholars. We've also released a production reading interface for research papers that will incorporate the best features as they mature. We structure this paper around challenges scholars and the public face when reading research papers -- Discovery, Efficiency, Comprehension, Synthesis, and Accessibility -- and present an overview of our progress and remaining open challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2023; v1 submitted 24 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform
Authors:
Rodney Kinney,
Chloe Anastasiades,
Russell Authur,
Iz Beltagy,
Jonathan Bragg,
Alexandra Buraczynski,
Isabel Cachola,
Stefan Candra,
Yoganand Chandrasekhar,
Arman Cohan,
Miles Crawford,
Doug Downey,
Jason Dunkelberger,
Oren Etzioni,
Rob Evans,
Sergey Feldman,
Joseph Gorney,
David Graham,
Fangzhou Hu,
Regan Huff,
Daniel King,
Sebastian Kohlmeier,
Bailey Kuehl,
Michael Langan,
Daniel Lin
, et al. (23 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The volume of scientific output is creating an urgent need for automated tools to help scientists keep up with developments in their field. Semantic Scholar (S2) is an open data platform and website aimed at accelerating science by hel** scholars discover and understand scientific literature. We combine public and proprietary data sources using state-of-the-art techniques for scholarly PDF conte…
▽ More
The volume of scientific output is creating an urgent need for automated tools to help scientists keep up with developments in their field. Semantic Scholar (S2) is an open data platform and website aimed at accelerating science by hel** scholars discover and understand scientific literature. We combine public and proprietary data sources using state-of-the-art techniques for scholarly PDF content extraction and automatic knowledge graph construction to build the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph, the largest open scientific literature graph to-date, with 200M+ papers, 80M+ authors, 550M+ paper-authorship edges, and 2.4B+ citation edges. The graph includes advanced semantic features such as structurally parsed text, natural language summaries, and vector embeddings. In this paper, we describe the components of the S2 data processing pipeline and the associated APIs offered by the platform. We will update this living document to reflect changes as we add new data offerings and improve existing services.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Improving the Accessibility of Scientific Documents: Current State, User Needs, and a System Solution to Enhance Scientific PDF Accessibility for Blind and Low Vision Users
Authors:
Lucy Lu Wang,
Isabel Cachola,
Jonathan Bragg,
Evie Yu-Yen Cheng,
Chelsea Haupt,
Matt Latzke,
Bailey Kuehl,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Linda Wagner,
Daniel S. Weld
Abstract:
The majority of scientific papers are distributed in PDF, which pose challenges for accessibility, especially for blind and low vision (BLV) readers. We characterize the scope of this problem by assessing the accessibility of 11,397 PDFs published 2010--2019 sampled across various fields of study, finding that only 2.4% of these PDFs satisfy all of our defined accessibility criteria. We introduce…
▽ More
The majority of scientific papers are distributed in PDF, which pose challenges for accessibility, especially for blind and low vision (BLV) readers. We characterize the scope of this problem by assessing the accessibility of 11,397 PDFs published 2010--2019 sampled across various fields of study, finding that only 2.4% of these PDFs satisfy all of our defined accessibility criteria. We introduce the SciA11y system to offset some of the issues around inaccessibility. SciA11y incorporates several machine learning models to extract the content of scientific PDFs and render this content as accessible HTML, with added novel navigational features to support screen reader users. An intrinsic evaluation of extraction quality indicates that the majority of HTML renders (87%) produced by our system have no or only some readability issues. We perform a qualitative user study to understand the needs of BLV researchers when reading papers, and to assess whether the SciA11y system could address these needs. We summarize our user study findings into a set of five design recommendations for accessible scientific reader systems. User response to SciA11y was positive, with all users saying they would be likely to use the system in the future, and some stating that the system, if available, would become their primary workflow. We successfully produce HTML renders for over 12M papers, of which an open access subset of 1.5M are available for browsing at https://scia11y.org/
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
MS2: Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studies
Authors:
Jay DeYoung,
Iz Beltagy,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Bailey Kuehl,
Lucy Lu Wang
Abstract:
To assess the effectiveness of any medical intervention, researchers must conduct a time-intensive and highly manual literature review. NLP systems can help to automate or assist in parts of this expensive process. In support of this goal, we release MS^2 (Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studies), a dataset of over 470k documents and 20k summaries derived from the scientific literature. Th…
▽ More
To assess the effectiveness of any medical intervention, researchers must conduct a time-intensive and highly manual literature review. NLP systems can help to automate or assist in parts of this expensive process. In support of this goal, we release MS^2 (Multi-Document Summarization of Medical Studies), a dataset of over 470k documents and 20k summaries derived from the scientific literature. This dataset facilitates the development of systems that can assess and aggregate contradictory evidence across multiple studies, and is the first large-scale, publicly available multi-document summarization dataset in the biomedical domain. We experiment with a summarization system based on BART, with promising early results. We formulate our summarization inputs and targets in both free text and structured forms and modify a recently proposed metric to assess the quality of our system's generated summaries. Data and models are available at https://github.com/allenai/ms2
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2021; v1 submitted 13 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
MedICaT: A Dataset of Medical Images, Captions, and Textual References
Authors:
Sanjay Subramanian,
Lucy Lu Wang,
Sachin Mehta,
Ben Bogin,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Sravanthi Parasa,
Sameer Singh,
Matt Gardner,
Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Abstract:
Understanding the relationship between figures and text is key to scientific document understanding. Medical figures in particular are quite complex, often consisting of several subfigures (75% of figures in our dataset), with detailed text describing their content. Previous work studying figures in scientific papers focused on classifying figure content rather than understanding how images relate…
▽ More
Understanding the relationship between figures and text is key to scientific document understanding. Medical figures in particular are quite complex, often consisting of several subfigures (75% of figures in our dataset), with detailed text describing their content. Previous work studying figures in scientific papers focused on classifying figure content rather than understanding how images relate to the text. To address challenges in figure retrieval and figure-to-text alignment, we introduce MedICaT, a dataset of medical images in context. MedICaT consists of 217K images from 131K open access biomedical papers, and includes captions, inline references for 74% of figures, and manually annotated subfigures and subcaptions for a subset of figures. Using MedICaT, we introduce the task of subfigure to subcaption alignment in compound figures and demonstrate the utility of inline references in image-text matching. Our data and code can be accessed at https://github.com/allenai/medicat.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Extracting a Knowledge Base of Mechanisms from COVID-19 Papers
Authors:
Tom Hope,
Aida Amini,
David Wadden,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Sravanthi Parasa,
Eric Horvitz,
Daniel Weld,
Roy Schwartz,
Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has spawned a diverse body of scientific literature that is challenging to navigate, stimulating interest in automated tools to help find useful knowledge. We pursue the construction of a knowledge base (KB) of mechanisms -- a fundamental concept across the sciences encompassing activities, functions and causal relations, ranging from cellular processes to economic impacts. W…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic has spawned a diverse body of scientific literature that is challenging to navigate, stimulating interest in automated tools to help find useful knowledge. We pursue the construction of a knowledge base (KB) of mechanisms -- a fundamental concept across the sciences encompassing activities, functions and causal relations, ranging from cellular processes to economic impacts. We extract this information from the natural language of scientific papers by develo** a broad, unified schema that strikes a balance between relevance and breadth. We annotate a dataset of mechanisms with our schema and train a model to extract mechanism relations from papers. Our experiments demonstrate the utility of our KB in supporting interdisciplinary scientific search over COVID-19 literature, outperforming the prominent PubMed search in a study with clinical experts.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2021; v1 submitted 8 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
SciREX: A Challenge Dataset for Document-Level Information Extraction
Authors:
Sarthak Jain,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Hannaneh Hajishirzi,
Iz Beltagy
Abstract:
Extracting information from full documents is an important problem in many domains, but most previous work focus on identifying relationships within a sentence or a paragraph. It is challenging to create a large-scale information extraction (IE) dataset at the document level since it requires an understanding of the whole document to annotate entities and their document-level relationships that us…
▽ More
Extracting information from full documents is an important problem in many domains, but most previous work focus on identifying relationships within a sentence or a paragraph. It is challenging to create a large-scale information extraction (IE) dataset at the document level since it requires an understanding of the whole document to annotate entities and their document-level relationships that usually span beyond sentences or even sections. In this paper, we introduce SciREX, a document level IE dataset that encompasses multiple IE tasks, including salient entity identification and document level $N$-ary relation identification from scientific articles. We annotate our dataset by integrating automatic and human annotations, leveraging existing scientific knowledge resources. We develop a neural model as a strong baseline that extends previous state-of-the-art IE models to document-level IE. Analyzing the model performance shows a significant gap between human performance and current baselines, inviting the community to use our dataset as a challenge to develop document-level IE models. Our data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/allenai/SciREX
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims
Authors:
David Wadden,
Shanchuan Lin,
Kyle Lo,
Lucy Lu Wang,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Arman Cohan,
Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Abstract:
We introduce scientific claim verification, a new task to select abstracts from the research literature containing evidence that SUPPORTS or REFUTES a given scientific claim, and to identify rationales justifying each decision. To study this task, we construct SciFact, a dataset of 1.4K expert-written scientific claims paired with evidence-containing abstracts annotated with labels and rationales.…
▽ More
We introduce scientific claim verification, a new task to select abstracts from the research literature containing evidence that SUPPORTS or REFUTES a given scientific claim, and to identify rationales justifying each decision. To study this task, we construct SciFact, a dataset of 1.4K expert-written scientific claims paired with evidence-containing abstracts annotated with labels and rationales. We develop baseline models for SciFact, and demonstrate that simple domain adaptation techniques substantially improve performance compared to models trained on Wikipedia or political news. We show that our system is able to verify claims related to COVID-19 by identifying evidence from the CORD-19 corpus. Our experiments indicate that SciFact will provide a challenging testbed for the development of new systems designed to retrieve and reason over corpora containing specialized domain knowledge. Data and code for this new task are publicly available at https://github.com/allenai/scifact. A leaderboard and COVID-19 fact-checking demo are available at https://scifact.apps.allenai.org.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2020; v1 submitted 30 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publications
Authors:
Arman Cohan,
Waleed Ammar,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Field Cady
Abstract:
Identifying the intent of a citation in scientific papers (e.g., background information, use of methods, comparing results) is critical for machine reading of individual publications and automated analysis of the scientific literature. We propose structural scaffolds, a multitask model to incorporate structural information of scientific papers into citations for effective classification of citatio…
▽ More
Identifying the intent of a citation in scientific papers (e.g., background information, use of methods, comparing results) is critical for machine reading of individual publications and automated analysis of the scientific literature. We propose structural scaffolds, a multitask model to incorporate structural information of scientific papers into citations for effective classification of citation intents. Our model achieves a new state-of-the-art on an existing ACL anthology dataset (ACL-ARC) with a 13.3% absolute increase in F1 score, without relying on external linguistic resources or hand-engineered features as done in existing methods. In addition, we introduce a new dataset of citation intents (SciCite) which is more than five times larger and covers multiple scientific domains compared with existing datasets. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/allenai/scicite.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2019; v1 submitted 2 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholar
Authors:
Waleed Ammar,
Dirk Groeneveld,
Chandra Bhagavatula,
Iz Beltagy,
Miles Crawford,
Doug Downey,
Jason Dunkelberger,
Ahmed Elgohary,
Sergey Feldman,
Vu Ha,
Rodney Kinney,
Sebastian Kohlmeier,
Kyle Lo,
Tyler Murray,
Hsu-Han Ooi,
Matthew Peters,
Joanna Power,
Sam Skjonsberg,
Lucy Lu Wang,
Chris Wilhelm,
Zheng Yuan,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Oren Etzioni
Abstract:
We describe a deployed scalable system for organizing published scientific literature into a heterogeneous graph to facilitate algorithmic manipulation and discovery. The resulting literature graph consists of more than 280M nodes, representing papers, authors, entities and various interactions between them (e.g., authorships, citations, entity mentions). We reduce literature graph construction in…
▽ More
We describe a deployed scalable system for organizing published scientific literature into a heterogeneous graph to facilitate algorithmic manipulation and discovery. The resulting literature graph consists of more than 280M nodes, representing papers, authors, entities and various interactions between them (e.g., authorships, citations, entity mentions). We reduce literature graph construction into familiar NLP tasks (e.g., entity extraction and linking), point out research challenges due to differences from standard formulations of these tasks, and report empirical results for each task. The methods described in this paper are used to enable semantic features in www.semanticscholar.org
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applications
Authors:
Dongyeop Kang,
Waleed Ammar,
Bhavana Dalvi,
Madeleine van Zuylen,
Sebastian Kohlmeier,
Eduard Hovy,
Roy Schwartz
Abstract:
Peer reviewing is a central component in the scientific publishing process. We present the first public dataset of scientific peer reviews available for research purposes (PeerRead v1) providing an opportunity to study this important artifact. The dataset consists of 14.7K paper drafts and the corresponding accept/reject decisions in top-tier venues including ACL, NIPS and ICLR. The dataset also i…
▽ More
Peer reviewing is a central component in the scientific publishing process. We present the first public dataset of scientific peer reviews available for research purposes (PeerRead v1) providing an opportunity to study this important artifact. The dataset consists of 14.7K paper drafts and the corresponding accept/reject decisions in top-tier venues including ACL, NIPS and ICLR. The dataset also includes 10.7K textual peer reviews written by experts for a subset of the papers. We describe the data collection process and report interesting observed phenomena in the peer reviews. We also propose two novel NLP tasks based on this dataset and provide simple baseline models. In the first task, we show that simple models can predict whether a paper is accepted with up to 21% error reduction compared to the majority baseline. In the second task, we predict the numerical scores of review aspects and show that simple models can outperform the mean baseline for aspects with high variance such as 'originality' and 'impact'.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
