-
Criminal organizations exhibit hysteresis, resilience, and robustness by balancing security and efficiency
Authors:
Casper van Elteren,
Vítor V. Vasconcelos,
Mike Lees
Abstract:
The interplay between criminal organizations and law enforcement disruption strategies is crucial in criminology. Criminal enterprises, like legitimate businesses, balance visibility and security to thrive. This study uses evolutionary game theory to analyze criminal networks' dynamics, resilience to interventions, and responses to external conditions. We find strong hysteresis effects, challengin…
▽ More
The interplay between criminal organizations and law enforcement disruption strategies is crucial in criminology. Criminal enterprises, like legitimate businesses, balance visibility and security to thrive. This study uses evolutionary game theory to analyze criminal networks' dynamics, resilience to interventions, and responses to external conditions. We find strong hysteresis effects, challenging traditional deterrence-focused strategies. Optimal thresholds for organization formation or dissolution are defined by these effects. Stricter punishment doesn't always deter organized crime linearly. Network structure, particularly link density and skill assortativity, significantly influences organization formation and stability. These insights advocate for adaptive policy-making and strategic law enforcement to effectively disrupt criminal networks.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2024; v1 submitted 6 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Cascades towards noise-induced transitions on networks revealed using information flows
Authors:
Casper van Elteren,
Rick Quax,
Peter Sloot
Abstract:
Abrupt, system-wide transitions can be endogenously generated by seemingly stable networks of interacting dynamical units, such as mode switching in neuronal networks or public opinion changes in social systems. However, it remains poorly understood how such `noise-induced transitions' emerge from the interplay of network structure and dynamics on the network. Here, we report on two key roles that…
▽ More
Abrupt, system-wide transitions can be endogenously generated by seemingly stable networks of interacting dynamical units, such as mode switching in neuronal networks or public opinion changes in social systems. However, it remains poorly understood how such `noise-induced transitions' emerge from the interplay of network structure and dynamics on the network. Here, we report on two key roles that nodes can play in the progression towards noise-induced tip** points. The models used are dynamical networks where the nodes are governed by the Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution, but the concept is easily generalized. First, so-called `initiator nodes' absorb and then transmit short-lived fluctuations to neighboring nodes, making them temporarily more dynamic. These neighbor nodes can then in turn transmit fluctuations to their neighbors, and so on, leading to a domino-effect where the more stable a node is (i.e., high average free energy barrier), the more neighbors are needed that have become temporarily dynamic. Interestingly, towards the tip** point we identify so-called `stabilizer nodes' whose state information becomes part of the long-term memory of the system, after which the domino-effect is reversed and settles the node in their new stable attractor. We validate these roles by targeted interventions that make tip** points more (or less) likely to begin or lead to systemic change. This opens up possibilities for understanding and controlling endogenously generated metastable behavior.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024; v1 submitted 28 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
The dynamic importance of nodes is poorly predicted by static network features
Authors:
Casper van Elteren,
Rick Quax,
Peter Sloot
Abstract:
One of the most central questions in network science is: which nodes are most important? Often this question is answered using structural properties such as high connectedness or centrality in the network. However, static structural connectedness does not necessarily translate to dynamical importance. To demonstrate this, we simulate the kinetic Ising spin model on generated networks and one real-…
▽ More
One of the most central questions in network science is: which nodes are most important? Often this question is answered using structural properties such as high connectedness or centrality in the network. However, static structural connectedness does not necessarily translate to dynamical importance. To demonstrate this, we simulate the kinetic Ising spin model on generated networks and one real-world weighted network. The dynamic impact of nodes is assessed by causally intervening on node state probabilities and measuring the effect on the systemic dynamics. The results show that structural features such as network centrality or connectedness are actually poor predictors of the dynamical impact of a node on the rest of the network. A solution is offered in the form of an information theoretical measure named integrated mutual information. The metric is able to accurately predict the dynamically most important node ('driver' node) in networks based on observational data of non-intervened dynamics. We conclude that the driver node(s) in networks are not necessarily the most well-connected or central nodes. Indeed, the common assumption of network structural features being proportional to dynamical importance is false. Consequently, great care should be taken when deriving dynamical importance from network data alone. These results highlight the need for novel inference methods that take both structure and dynamics into account.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2021; v1 submitted 14 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
