Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Biopsies using Deep Learning
Authors:
Wouter Bulten,
Hans Pinckaers,
Hester van Boven,
Robert Vink,
Thomas de Bel,
Bram van Ginneken,
Jeroen van der Laak,
Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa,
Geert Litjens
Abstract:
The Gleason score is the most important prognostic marker for prostate cancer patients but suffers from significant inter-observer variability. We developed a fully automated deep learning system to grade prostate biopsies. The system was developed using 5834 biopsies from 1243 patients. A semi-automatic labeling technique was used to circumvent the need for full manual annotation by pathologists.…
▽ More
The Gleason score is the most important prognostic marker for prostate cancer patients but suffers from significant inter-observer variability. We developed a fully automated deep learning system to grade prostate biopsies. The system was developed using 5834 biopsies from 1243 patients. A semi-automatic labeling technique was used to circumvent the need for full manual annotation by pathologists. The developed system achieved a high agreement with the reference standard. In a separate observer experiment, the deep learning system outperformed 10 out of 15 pathologists. The system has the potential to improve prostate cancer prognostics by acting as a first or second reader.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge
Authors:
Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio,
Alberto Traverso,
Thomas de Bel,
Moira S. N. Berens,
Cas van den Bogaard,
Piergiorgio Cerello,
Hao Chen,
Qi Dou,
Maria Evelina Fantacci,
Bram Geurts,
Robbert van der Gugten,
Pheng Ann Heng,
Bart Jansen,
Michael M. J. de Kaste,
Valentin Kotov,
Jack Yu-Hung Lin,
Jeroen T. M. C. Manders,
Alexander Sónora-Mengana,
Juan Carlos García-Naranjo,
Evgenia Papavasileiou,
Mathias Prokop,
Marco Saletta,
Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop,
Ernst T. Scholten,
Luuk Scholten
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans has been an active area of research for the last two decades. However, there have only been few studies that provide a comparative performance evaluation of different systems on a common database. We have therefore set up the LUNA16 challenge, an objective evaluation framework for automatic nodule detection algorit…
▽ More
Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans has been an active area of research for the last two decades. However, there have only been few studies that provide a comparative performance evaluation of different systems on a common database. We have therefore set up the LUNA16 challenge, an objective evaluation framework for automatic nodule detection algorithms using the largest publicly available reference database of chest CT scans, the LIDC-IDRI data set. In LUNA16, participants develop their algorithm and upload their predictions on 888 CT scans in one of the two tracks: 1) the complete nodule detection track where a complete CAD system should be developed, or 2) the false positive reduction track where a provided set of nodule candidates should be classified. This paper describes the setup of LUNA16 and presents the results of the challenge so far. Moreover, the impact of combining individual systems on the detection performance was also investigated. It was observed that the leading solutions employed convolutional networks and used the provided set of nodule candidates. The combination of these solutions achieved an excellent sensitivity of over 95% at fewer than 1.0 false positives per scan. This highlights the potential of combining algorithms to improve the detection performance. Our observer study with four expert readers has shown that the best system detects nodules that were missed by expert readers who originally annotated the LIDC-IDRI data. We released this set of additional nodules for further development of CAD systems.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2017; v1 submitted 23 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
