-
Active Learning for Control-Oriented Identification of Nonlinear Systems
Authors:
Bruce D. Lee,
Ingvar Ziemann,
George J. Pappas,
Nikolai Matni
Abstract:
Model-based reinforcement learning is an effective approach for controlling an unknown system. It is based on a longstanding pipeline familiar to the control community in which one performs experiments on the environment to collect a dataset, uses the resulting dataset to identify a model of the system, and finally performs control synthesis using the identified model. As interacting with the syst…
▽ More
Model-based reinforcement learning is an effective approach for controlling an unknown system. It is based on a longstanding pipeline familiar to the control community in which one performs experiments on the environment to collect a dataset, uses the resulting dataset to identify a model of the system, and finally performs control synthesis using the identified model. As interacting with the system may be costly and time consuming, targeted exploration is crucial for develo** an effective control-oriented model with minimal experimentation. Motivated by this challenge, recent work has begun to study finite sample data requirements and sample efficient algorithms for the problem of optimal exploration in model-based reinforcement learning. However, existing theory and algorithms are limited to model classes which are linear in the parameters. Our work instead focuses on models with nonlinear parameter dependencies, and presents the first finite sample analysis of an active learning algorithm suitable for a general class of nonlinear dynamics. In certain settings, the excess control cost of our algorithm achieves the optimal rate, up to logarithmic factors. We validate our approach in simulation, showcasing the advantage of active, control-oriented exploration for controlling nonlinear systems.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Rate-Optimal Non-Asymptotics for the Quadratic Prediction Error Method
Authors:
Charis Stamouli,
Ingvar Ziemann,
George J. Pappas
Abstract:
We study the quadratic prediction error method -- i.e., nonlinear least squares -- for a class of time-varying parametric predictor models satisfying a certain identifiability condition. While this method is known to asymptotically achieve the optimal rate for a wide range of problems, there have been no non-asymptotic results matching these optimal rates outside of a select few, typically linear,…
▽ More
We study the quadratic prediction error method -- i.e., nonlinear least squares -- for a class of time-varying parametric predictor models satisfying a certain identifiability condition. While this method is known to asymptotically achieve the optimal rate for a wide range of problems, there have been no non-asymptotic results matching these optimal rates outside of a select few, typically linear, model classes. By leveraging modern tools from learning with dependent data, we provide the first rate-optimal non-asymptotic analysis of this method for our more general setting of nonlinearly parametrized model classes. Moreover, we show that our results can be applied to a particular class of identifiable AutoRegressive Moving Average (ARMA) models, resulting in the first optimal non-asymptotic rates for identification of ARMA models.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 11 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Sharp Rates in Dependent Learning Theory: Avoiding Sample Size Deflation for the Square Loss
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Stephen Tu,
George J. Pappas,
Nikolai Matni
Abstract:
In this work, we study statistical learning with dependent ($β$-mixing) data and square loss in a hypothesis class $\mathscr{F}\subset L_{Ψ_p}$ where $Ψ_p$ is the norm $\|f\|_{Ψ_p} \triangleq \sup_{m\geq 1} m^{-1/p} \|f\|_{L^m} $ for some $p\in [2,\infty]$. Our inquiry is motivated by the search for a sharp noise interaction term, or variance proxy, in learning with dependent data. Absent any real…
▽ More
In this work, we study statistical learning with dependent ($β$-mixing) data and square loss in a hypothesis class $\mathscr{F}\subset L_{Ψ_p}$ where $Ψ_p$ is the norm $\|f\|_{Ψ_p} \triangleq \sup_{m\geq 1} m^{-1/p} \|f\|_{L^m} $ for some $p\in [2,\infty]$. Our inquiry is motivated by the search for a sharp noise interaction term, or variance proxy, in learning with dependent data. Absent any realizability assumption, typical non-asymptotic results exhibit variance proxies that are deflated multiplicatively by the mixing time of the underlying covariates process. We show that whenever the topologies of $L^2$ and $Ψ_p$ are comparable on our hypothesis class $\mathscr{F}$ -- that is, $\mathscr{F}$ is a weakly sub-Gaussian class: $\|f\|_{Ψ_p} \lesssim \|f\|_{L^2}^η$ for some $η\in (0,1]$ -- the empirical risk minimizer achieves a rate that only depends on the complexity of the class and second order statistics in its leading term. Our result holds whether the problem is realizable or not and we refer to this as a \emph{near mixing-free rate}, since direct dependence on mixing is relegated to an additive higher order term. We arrive at our result by combining the above notion of a weakly sub-Gaussian class with mixed tail generic chaining. This combination allows us to compute sharp, instance-optimal rates for a wide range of problems. Examples that satisfy our framework include sub-Gaussian linear regression, more general smoothly parameterized function classes, finite hypothesis classes, and bounded smoothness classes.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2024; v1 submitted 8 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
A Tutorial on the Non-Asymptotic Theory of System Identification
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Anastasios Tsiamis,
Bruce Lee,
Yassir Jedra,
Nikolai Matni,
George J. Pappas
Abstract:
This tutorial serves as an introduction to recently developed non-asymptotic methods in the theory of -- mainly linear -- system identification. We emphasize tools we deem particularly useful for a range of problems in this domain, such as the covering technique, the Hanson-Wright Inequality and the method of self-normalized martingales. We then employ these tools to give streamlined proofs of the…
▽ More
This tutorial serves as an introduction to recently developed non-asymptotic methods in the theory of -- mainly linear -- system identification. We emphasize tools we deem particularly useful for a range of problems in this domain, such as the covering technique, the Hanson-Wright Inequality and the method of self-normalized martingales. We then employ these tools to give streamlined proofs of the performance of various least-squares based estimators for identifying the parameters in autoregressive models. We conclude by sketching out how the ideas presented herein can be extended to certain nonlinear identification problems.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2024; v1 submitted 7 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
The noise level in linear regression with dependent data
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Stephen Tu,
George J. Pappas,
Nikolai Matni
Abstract:
We derive upper bounds for random design linear regression with dependent ($β$-mixing) data absent any realizability assumptions. In contrast to the strictly realizable martingale noise regime, no sharp instance-optimal non-asymptotics are available in the literature. Up to constant factors, our analysis correctly recovers the variance term predicted by the Central Limit Theorem -- the noise level…
▽ More
We derive upper bounds for random design linear regression with dependent ($β$-mixing) data absent any realizability assumptions. In contrast to the strictly realizable martingale noise regime, no sharp instance-optimal non-asymptotics are available in the literature. Up to constant factors, our analysis correctly recovers the variance term predicted by the Central Limit Theorem -- the noise level of the problem -- and thus exhibits graceful degradation as we introduce misspecification. Past a burn-in, our result is sharp in the moderate deviations regime, and in particular does not inflate the leading order term by mixing time factors.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2023; v1 submitted 18 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
A note on the smallest eigenvalue of the empirical covariance of causal Gaussian processes
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann
Abstract:
We present a simple proof for bounding the smallest eigenvalue of the empirical covariance in a causal Gaussian process. Along the way, we establish a one-sided tail inequality for Gaussian quadratic forms using a causal decomposition. Our proof only uses elementary facts about the Gaussian distribution and the union bound. We conclude with an example in which we provide a performance guarantee fo…
▽ More
We present a simple proof for bounding the smallest eigenvalue of the empirical covariance in a causal Gaussian process. Along the way, we establish a one-sided tail inequality for Gaussian quadratic forms using a causal decomposition. Our proof only uses elementary facts about the Gaussian distribution and the union bound. We conclude with an example in which we provide a performance guarantee for least squares identification of a vector autoregression.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2023; v1 submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Statistical Learning Theory for Control: A Finite Sample Perspective
Authors:
Anastasios Tsiamis,
Ingvar Ziemann,
Nikolai Matni,
George J. Pappas
Abstract:
This tutorial survey provides an overview of recent non-asymptotic advances in statistical learning theory as relevant to control and system identification. While there has been substantial progress across all areas of control, the theory is most well-developed when it comes to linear system identification and learning for the linear quadratic regulator, which are the focus of this manuscript. Fro…
▽ More
This tutorial survey provides an overview of recent non-asymptotic advances in statistical learning theory as relevant to control and system identification. While there has been substantial progress across all areas of control, the theory is most well-developed when it comes to linear system identification and learning for the linear quadratic regulator, which are the focus of this manuscript. From a theoretical perspective, much of the labor underlying these advances has been in adapting tools from modern high-dimensional statistics and learning theory. While highly relevant to control theorists interested in integrating tools from machine learning, the foundational material has not always been easily accessible. To remedy this, we provide a self-contained presentation of the relevant material, outlining all the key ideas and the technical machinery that underpin recent results. We also present a number of open problems and future directions.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2023; v1 submitted 12 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Learning with little mixing
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Stephen Tu
Abstract:
We study square loss in a realizable time-series framework with martingale difference noise. Our main result is a fast rate excess risk bound which shows that whenever a trajectory hypercontractivity condition holds, the risk of the least-squares estimator on dependent data matches the iid rate order-wise after a burn-in time. In comparison, many existing results in learning from dependent data ha…
▽ More
We study square loss in a realizable time-series framework with martingale difference noise. Our main result is a fast rate excess risk bound which shows that whenever a trajectory hypercontractivity condition holds, the risk of the least-squares estimator on dependent data matches the iid rate order-wise after a burn-in time. In comparison, many existing results in learning from dependent data have rates where the effective sample size is deflated by a factor of the mixing-time of the underlying process, even after the burn-in time. Furthermore, our results allow the covariate process to exhibit long range correlations which are substantially weaker than geometric ergodicity. We call this phenomenon learning with little mixing, and present several examples for when it occurs: bounded function classes for which the $L^2$ and $L^{2+ε}$ norms are equivalent, ergodic finite state Markov chains, various parametric models, and a broad family of infinite dimensional $\ell^2(\mathbb{N})$ ellipsoids. By instantiating our main result to system identification of nonlinear dynamics with generalized linear model transitions, we obtain a nearly minimax optimal excess risk bound after only a polynomial burn-in time.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2024; v1 submitted 16 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
How are policy gradient methods affected by the limits of control?
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Anastasios Tsiamis,
Henrik Sandberg,
Nikolai Matni
Abstract:
We study stochastic policy gradient methods from the perspective of control-theoretic limitations. Our main result is that ill-conditioned linear systems in the sense of Doyle inevitably lead to noisy gradient estimates. We also give an example of a class of stable systems in which policy gradient methods suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Our results apply to both state feedback and partial…
▽ More
We study stochastic policy gradient methods from the perspective of control-theoretic limitations. Our main result is that ill-conditioned linear systems in the sense of Doyle inevitably lead to noisy gradient estimates. We also give an example of a class of stable systems in which policy gradient methods suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Our results apply to both state feedback and partially observed systems.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hard
Authors:
Anastasios Tsiamis,
Ingvar Ziemann,
Manfred Morari,
Nikolai Matni,
George J. Pappas
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the statistical difficulty of learning to control linear systems. We focus on two standard benchmarks, the sample complexity of stabilization, and the regret of the online learning of the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). Prior results state that the statistical difficulty for both benchmarks scales polynomially with the system state dimension up to system-theoretic quantit…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the statistical difficulty of learning to control linear systems. We focus on two standard benchmarks, the sample complexity of stabilization, and the regret of the online learning of the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). Prior results state that the statistical difficulty for both benchmarks scales polynomially with the system state dimension up to system-theoretic quantities. However, this does not reveal the whole picture. By utilizing minimax lower bounds for both benchmarks, we prove that there exist non-trivial classes of systems for which learning complexity scales dramatically, i.e. exponentially, with the system dimension. This situation arises in the case of underactuated systems, i.e. systems with fewer inputs than states. Such systems are structurally difficult to control and their system theoretic quantities can scale exponentially with the system dimension dominating learning complexity. Under some additional structural assumptions (bounding systems away from uncontrollability), we provide qualitatively matching upper bounds. We prove that learning complexity can be at most exponential with the controllability index of the system, that is the degree of underactuation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Single Trajectory Nonparametric Learning of Nonlinear Dynamics
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Henrik Sandberg,
Nikolai Matni
Abstract:
Given a single trajectory of a dynamical system, we analyze the performance of the nonparametric least squares estimator (LSE). More precisely, we give nonasymptotic expected $l^2$-distance bounds between the LSE and the true regression function, where expectation is evaluated on a fresh, counterfactual, trajectory. We leverage recently developed information-theoretic methods to establish the opti…
▽ More
Given a single trajectory of a dynamical system, we analyze the performance of the nonparametric least squares estimator (LSE). More precisely, we give nonasymptotic expected $l^2$-distance bounds between the LSE and the true regression function, where expectation is evaluated on a fresh, counterfactual, trajectory. We leverage recently developed information-theoretic methods to establish the optimality of the LSE for nonparametric hypotheses classes in terms of supremum norm metric entropy and a subgaussian parameter. Next, we relate this subgaussian parameter to the stability of the underlying process using notions from dynamical systems theory. When combined, these developments lead to rate-optimal error bounds that scale as $T^{-1/(2+q)}$ for suitably stable processes and hypothesis classes with metric entropy growth of order $δ^{-q}$. Here, $T$ is the length of the observed trajectory, $δ\in \mathbb{R}_+$ is the packing granularity and $q\in (0,2)$ is a complexity term. Finally, we specialize our results to a number of scenarios of practical interest, such as Lipschitz dynamics, generalized linear models, and dynamics described by functions in certain classes of Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS).
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2022; v1 submitted 16 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systems
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Henrik Sandberg
Abstract:
TWe establish regret lower bounds for adaptively controlling an unknown linear Gaussian system with quadratic costs. We combine ideas from experiment design, estimation theory and a perturbation bound of certain information matrices to derive regret lower bounds exhibiting scaling on the order of magnitude $\sqrt{T}$ in the time horizon $T$. Our bounds accurately capture the role of control-theore…
▽ More
TWe establish regret lower bounds for adaptively controlling an unknown linear Gaussian system with quadratic costs. We combine ideas from experiment design, estimation theory and a perturbation bound of certain information matrices to derive regret lower bounds exhibiting scaling on the order of magnitude $\sqrt{T}$ in the time horizon $T$. Our bounds accurately capture the role of control-theoretic parameters and we are able to show that systems that are hard to control are also hard to learn to control; when instantiated to state feedback systems we recover the dimensional dependency of earlier work but with improved scaling with system-theoretic constants such as system costs and Gramians. Furthermore, we extend our results to a class of partially observed systems and demonstrate that systems with poor observability structure also are hard to learn to control.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2024; v1 submitted 5 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
On Uninformative Optimal Policies in Adaptive LQR with Unknown B-Matrix
Authors:
Ingvar Ziemann,
Henrik Sandberg
Abstract:
This paper presents local asymptotic minimax regret lower bounds for adaptive Linear Quadratic Regulators (LQR). We consider affinely parametrized $B$-matrices and known $A$-matrices and aim to understand when logarithmic regret is impossible even in the presence of structural side information. After defining the intrinsic notion of an uninformative optimal policy in terms of a singularity conditi…
▽ More
This paper presents local asymptotic minimax regret lower bounds for adaptive Linear Quadratic Regulators (LQR). We consider affinely parametrized $B$-matrices and known $A$-matrices and aim to understand when logarithmic regret is impossible even in the presence of structural side information. After defining the intrinsic notion of an uninformative optimal policy in terms of a singularity condition for Fisher information we obtain local minimax regret lower bounds for such uninformative instances of LQR by appealing to van Trees' inequality (Bayesian Cramér-Rao) and a representation of regret in terms of a quadratic form (Bellman error). It is shown that if the parametrization induces an uninformative optimal policy, logarithmic regret is impossible and the rate is at least order square root in the time horizon. We explicitly characterize the notion of an uninformative optimal policy in terms of the nullspaces of system-theoretic quantities and the particular instance parametrization.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2021; v1 submitted 18 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
