The Cost of Software-Based Memory Management Without Virtual Memory
Authors:
Drew Zagieboylo,
G. Edward Suh,
Andrew C. Myers
Abstract:
Virtual memory has been a standard hardware feature for more than three decades. At the price of increased hardware complexity, it has simplified software and promised strong isolation among colocated processes. In modern computing systems, however, the costs of virtual memory have increased significantly. With large memory workloads, virtualized environments, data center computing, and chips with…
▽ More
Virtual memory has been a standard hardware feature for more than three decades. At the price of increased hardware complexity, it has simplified software and promised strong isolation among colocated processes. In modern computing systems, however, the costs of virtual memory have increased significantly. With large memory workloads, virtualized environments, data center computing, and chips with multiple DMA devices, virtual memory can degrade performance and increase power usage. We therefore explore the implications of building applications and operating systems without relying on hardware support for address translation. Primarily, we investigate the implications of removing the abstraction of large contiguous memory segments. Our experiments show that the overhead to remove this reliance is surprisingly small for real programs. We expect this small overhead to be worth the benefit of reducing the complexity and energy usage of address translation. In fact, in some cases, performance can even improve when address translation is avoided.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
To Centralize or Not to Centralize: A Tale of Swarm Coordination
Authors:
Justin Hu,
Ariana Bruno,
Drew Zagieboylo,
Mark Zhao,
Brian Ritchken,
Brendon Jackson,
Joo Yeon Chae,
Francois Mertil,
Mateo Espinosa,
Christina Delimitrou
Abstract:
Large swarms of autonomous devices are increasing in size and importance. When it comes to controlling the devices of large-scale swarms there are two main lines of thought. Centralized control, where all decisions - and often compute - happen in a centralized back-end cloud system, and distributed control, where edge devices are responsible for selecting and executing tasks with minimal or zero h…
▽ More
Large swarms of autonomous devices are increasing in size and importance. When it comes to controlling the devices of large-scale swarms there are two main lines of thought. Centralized control, where all decisions - and often compute - happen in a centralized back-end cloud system, and distributed control, where edge devices are responsible for selecting and executing tasks with minimal or zero help from a centralized entity. In this work we aim to quantify the trade-offs between the two approaches with respect to task assignment quality, latency, and reliability. We do so first on a local swarm of 12 programmable drones with a 10-server cluster as the backend cloud, and then using a validated simulator to study the tail at scale effects of swarm coordination control. We conclude that although centralized control almost always outperforms distributed in the quality of its decisions, it faces significant scalability limitations, and we provide a list of system challenges that need to be addressed for centralized control to scale.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
