-
You are what you eat? Feeding foundation models a regionally diverse food dataset of World Wide Dishes
Authors:
Jabez Magomere,
Shu Ishida,
Tejumade Afonja,
Aya Salama,
Daniel Kochin,
Foutse Yuehgoh,
Imane Hamzaoui,
Raesetje Sefala,
Aisha Alaagib,
Elizaveta Semenova,
Lauren Crais,
Siobhan Mackenzie Hall
Abstract:
Foundation models are increasingly ubiquitous in our daily lives, used in everyday tasks such as text-image searches, interactions with chatbots, and content generation. As use increases, so does concern over the disparities in performance and fairness of these models for different people in different parts of the world. To assess these growing regional disparities, we present World Wide Dishes, a…
▽ More
Foundation models are increasingly ubiquitous in our daily lives, used in everyday tasks such as text-image searches, interactions with chatbots, and content generation. As use increases, so does concern over the disparities in performance and fairness of these models for different people in different parts of the world. To assess these growing regional disparities, we present World Wide Dishes, a mixed text and image dataset consisting of 765 dishes, with dish names collected in 131 local languages. World Wide Dishes has been collected purely through human contribution and decentralised means, by creating a website widely distributed through social networks. Using the dataset, we demonstrate a novel means of operationalising capability and representational biases in foundation models such as language models and text-to-image generative models. We enrich these studies with a pilot community review to understand, from a first-person perspective, how these models generate images for people in five African countries and the United States.
We find that these models generally do not produce quality text and image outputs of dishes specific to different regions. This is true even for the US, which is typically considered to be more well-resourced in training data - though the generation of US dishes does outperform that of the investigated African countries. The models demonstrate a propensity to produce outputs that are inaccurate as well as culturally misrepresentative, flattening, and insensitive. These failures in capability and representational bias have the potential to further reinforce stereotypes and disproportionately contribute to erasure based on region. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/oxai/world-wide-dishes/.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
IrokoBench: A New Benchmark for African Languages in the Age of Large Language Models
Authors:
David Ifeoluwa Adelani,
Jessica Ojo,
Israel Abebe Azime,
Jian Yun Zhuang,
Jesujoba O. Alabi,
Xuanli He,
Millicent Ochieng,
Sara Hooker,
Andiswa Bukula,
En-Shiun Annie Lee,
Chiamaka Chukwuneke,
Happy Buzaaba,
Blessing Sibanda,
Godson Kalipe,
Jonathan Mukiibi,
Salomon Kabongo,
Foutse Yuehgoh,
Mmasibidi Setaka,
Lolwethu Ndolela,
Nkiruka Odu,
Rooweither Mabuya,
Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad,
Salomey Osei,
Sokhar Samb,
Tadesse Kebede Guge
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Despite the widespread adoption of Large language models (LLMs), their remarkable capabilities remain limited to a few high-resource languages. Additionally, many low-resource languages (e.g. African languages) are often evaluated only on basic text classification tasks due to the lack of appropriate or comprehensive benchmarks outside of high-resource languages. In this paper, we introduce IrokoB…
▽ More
Despite the widespread adoption of Large language models (LLMs), their remarkable capabilities remain limited to a few high-resource languages. Additionally, many low-resource languages (e.g. African languages) are often evaluated only on basic text classification tasks due to the lack of appropriate or comprehensive benchmarks outside of high-resource languages. In this paper, we introduce IrokoBench -- a human-translated benchmark dataset for 16 typologically-diverse low-resource African languages covering three tasks: natural language inference~(AfriXNLI), mathematical reasoning~(AfriMGSM), and multi-choice knowledge-based QA~(AfriMMLU). We use IrokoBench to evaluate zero-shot, few-shot, and translate-test settings~(where test sets are translated into English) across 10 open and four proprietary LLMs. Our evaluation reveals a significant performance gap between high-resource languages~(such as English and French) and low-resource African languages. We observe a significant performance gap between open and proprietary models, with the highest performing open model, Aya-101 only at 58\% of the best-performing proprietary model GPT-4o performance. Machine translating the test set to English before evaluation helped to close the gap for larger models that are English-centric, like LLaMa 3 70B. These findings suggest that more efforts are needed to develop and adapt LLMs for African languages.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
AfriMTE and AfriCOMET: Enhancing COMET to Embrace Under-resourced African Languages
Authors:
Jiayi Wang,
David Ifeoluwa Adelani,
Sweta Agrawal,
Marek Masiak,
Ricardo Rei,
Eleftheria Briakou,
Marine Carpuat,
Xuanli He,
Sofia Bourhim,
Andiswa Bukula,
Muhidin Mohamed,
Temitayo Olatoye,
Tosin Adewumi,
Hamam Mokayed,
Christine Mwase,
Wangui Kimotho,
Foutse Yuehgoh,
Anuoluwapo Aremu,
Jessica Ojo,
Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad,
Salomey Osei,
Abdul-Hakeem Omotayo,
Chiamaka Chukwuneke,
Perez Ogayo,
Oumaima Hourrane
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Despite the recent progress on scaling multilingual machine translation (MT) to several under-resourced African languages, accurately measuring this progress remains challenging, since evaluation is often performed on n-gram matching metrics such as BLEU, which typically show a weaker correlation with human judgments. Learned metrics such as COMET have higher correlation; however, the lack of eval…
▽ More
Despite the recent progress on scaling multilingual machine translation (MT) to several under-resourced African languages, accurately measuring this progress remains challenging, since evaluation is often performed on n-gram matching metrics such as BLEU, which typically show a weaker correlation with human judgments. Learned metrics such as COMET have higher correlation; however, the lack of evaluation data with human ratings for under-resourced languages, complexity of annotation guidelines like Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM), and limited language coverage of multilingual encoders have hampered their applicability to African languages. In this paper, we address these challenges by creating high-quality human evaluation data with simplified MQM guidelines for error detection and direct assessment (DA) scoring for 13 typologically diverse African languages. Furthermore, we develop AfriCOMET: COMET evaluation metrics for African languages by leveraging DA data from well-resourced languages and an African-centric multilingual encoder (AfroXLM-R) to create the state-of-the-art MT evaluation metrics for African languages with respect to Spearman-rank correlation with human judgments (0.441).
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2024; v1 submitted 16 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.