Skip to main content

Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Yagafarov, M

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2402.14633  [pdf, other

    cs.DS

    Time Efficient Implementation for Online $k$-server Problem on Trees

    Authors: Kamil Khadiev, Maxim Yagafarov

    Abstract: We consider online algorithms for the $k$-server problem on trees of size $n$. Chrobak and Larmore proposed a $k$-competitive algorithm for this problem that has the optimal competitive ratio. However, the existing implementations have $O\left(k^2 + k\cdot \log n\right)$ or $O\left(k(\log n)^2\right)$ time complexity for processing a query, where $n$ is the number of nodes. We propose a new time-e… ▽ More

    Submitted 22 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

    Comments: TAMC 2024. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2008.00270

    Journal ref: TAMC 2024, LNCS 14637

  2. arXiv:2008.00270  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.DS quant-ph

    Fast Classical and Quantum Algorithms for Online $k$-server Problem on Trees

    Authors: Ruslan Kapralov, Kamil Khadiev, Joshua Mokut, Yixin Shen, Maxim Yagafarov

    Abstract: We consider online algorithms for the $k$-server problem on trees. Chrobak and Larmore proposed a $k$-competitive algorithm for this problem that has the optimal competitive ratio. However, a naive implementation of their algorithm has $O(n)$ time complexity for processing each query, where $n$ is the number of nodes in the tree. We propose a new time-efficient implementation of this algorithm tha… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 July, 2021; v1 submitted 1 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

    Comments: ICTCS2021

  3. arXiv:2006.00605  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.DS

    A Fast Algorithm for Online k-servers Problem on Trees

    Authors: Kamil Khadiev, Maxim Yagafarov

    Abstract: We consider online algorithms for the $k$-server problem on trees. There is a $k$-competitive algorithm for this problem, and it is the best competitive ratio. M. Chrobak and L. Larmore provided it. At the same time, the existing implementation has $O(n)$ time complexity for processing a query and $O(n)$ for prepossessing, where $n$ is the number of nodes in a tree. Another implementation of the a… ▽ More

    Submitted 29 April, 2022; v1 submitted 31 May, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

    Comments: CSR2022