-
Towards a theory of how the structure of language is acquired by deep neural networks
Authors:
Francesco Cagnetta,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
How much data is required to learn the structure of a language via next-token prediction? We study this question for synthetic datasets generated via a Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar (PCFG) -- a hierarchical generative model that captures the tree-like structure of natural languages. We determine token-token correlations analytically in our model and show that they can be used to build a repre…
▽ More
How much data is required to learn the structure of a language via next-token prediction? We study this question for synthetic datasets generated via a Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar (PCFG) -- a hierarchical generative model that captures the tree-like structure of natural languages. We determine token-token correlations analytically in our model and show that they can be used to build a representation of the grammar's hidden variables, the longer the range the deeper the variable. In addition, a finite training set limits the resolution of correlations to an effective range, whose size grows with that of the training set. As a result, a Language Model trained with increasingly many examples can build a deeper representation of the grammar's structure, thus reaching good performance despite the high dimensionality of the problem. We conjecture that the relationship between training set size and effective range of correlations holds beyond our synthetic datasets. In particular, our conjecture predicts how the scaling law for the test loss behaviour with training set size depends on the length of the context window, which we confirm empirically for a collection of lines from Shakespeare's plays.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
How Deep Networks Learn Sparse and Hierarchical Data: the Sparse Random Hierarchy Model
Authors:
Umberto Tomasini,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Understanding what makes high-dimensional data learnable is a fundamental question in machine learning. On the one hand, it is believed that the success of deep learning lies in its ability to build a hierarchy of representations that become increasingly more abstract with depth, going from simple features like edges to more complex concepts. On the other hand, learning to be insensitive to invari…
▽ More
Understanding what makes high-dimensional data learnable is a fundamental question in machine learning. On the one hand, it is believed that the success of deep learning lies in its ability to build a hierarchy of representations that become increasingly more abstract with depth, going from simple features like edges to more complex concepts. On the other hand, learning to be insensitive to invariances of the task, such as smooth transformations for image datasets, has been argued to be important for deep networks and it strongly correlates with their performance. In this work, we aim to explain this correlation and unify these two viewpoints. We show that by introducing sparsity to generative hierarchical models of data, the task acquires insensitivity to spatial transformations that are discrete versions of smooth transformations. In particular, we introduce the Sparse Random Hierarchy Model (SRHM), where we observe and rationalize that a hierarchical representation mirroring the hierarchical model is learnt precisely when such insensitivity is learnt, thereby explaining the strong correlation between the latter and performance. Moreover, we quantify how the sample complexity of CNNs learning the SRHM depends on both the sparsity and hierarchical structure of the task.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2024; v1 submitted 16 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
A Phase Transition in Diffusion Models Reveals the Hierarchical Nature of Data
Authors:
Antonio Sclocchi,
Alessandro Favero,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Understanding the structure of real data is paramount in advancing modern deep-learning methodologies. Natural data such as images are believed to be composed of features organised in a hierarchical and combinatorial manner, which neural networks capture during learning. Recent advancements show that diffusion models can generate high-quality images, hinting at their ability to capture this underl…
▽ More
Understanding the structure of real data is paramount in advancing modern deep-learning methodologies. Natural data such as images are believed to be composed of features organised in a hierarchical and combinatorial manner, which neural networks capture during learning. Recent advancements show that diffusion models can generate high-quality images, hinting at their ability to capture this underlying structure. We study this phenomenon in a hierarchical generative model of data. We find that the backward diffusion process acting after a time $t$ is governed by a phase transition at some threshold time, where the probability of reconstructing high-level features, like the class of an image, suddenly drops. Instead, the reconstruction of low-level features, such as specific details of an image, evolves smoothly across the whole diffusion process. This result implies that at times beyond the transition, the class has changed but the generated sample may still be composed of low-level elements of the initial image. We validate these theoretical insights through numerical experiments on class-unconditional ImageNet diffusion models. Our analysis characterises the relationship between time and scale in diffusion models and puts forward generative models as powerful tools to model combinatorial data properties.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024; v1 submitted 26 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
On the different regimes of Stochastic Gradient Descent
Authors:
Antonio Sclocchi,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Modern deep networks are trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) whose key hyperparameters are the number of data considered at each step or batch size $B$, and the step size or learning rate $η$. For small $B$ and large $η$, SGD corresponds to a stochastic evolution of the parameters, whose noise amplitude is governed by the ''temperature'' $T\equiv η/B$. Yet this description is observed t…
▽ More
Modern deep networks are trained with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) whose key hyperparameters are the number of data considered at each step or batch size $B$, and the step size or learning rate $η$. For small $B$ and large $η$, SGD corresponds to a stochastic evolution of the parameters, whose noise amplitude is governed by the ''temperature'' $T\equiv η/B$. Yet this description is observed to break down for sufficiently large batches $B\geq B^*$, or simplifies to gradient descent (GD) when the temperature is sufficiently small. Understanding where these cross-overs take place remains a central challenge. Here, we resolve these questions for a teacher-student perceptron classification model and show empirically that our key predictions still apply to deep networks. Specifically, we obtain a phase diagram in the $B$-$η$ plane that separates three dynamical phases: (i) a noise-dominated SGD governed by temperature, (ii) a large-first-step-dominated SGD and (iii) GD. These different phases also correspond to different regimes of generalization error. Remarkably, our analysis reveals that the batch size $B^*$ separating regimes (i) and (ii) scale with the size $P$ of the training set, with an exponent that characterizes the hardness of the classification problem.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2024; v1 submitted 19 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
How Deep Neural Networks Learn Compositional Data: The Random Hierarchy Model
Authors:
Francesco Cagnetta,
Leonardo Petrini,
Umberto M. Tomasini,
Alessandro Favero,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Deep learning algorithms demonstrate a surprising ability to learn high-dimensional tasks from limited examples. This is commonly attributed to the depth of neural networks, enabling them to build a hierarchy of abstract, low-dimensional data representations. However, how many training examples are required to learn such representations remains unknown. To quantitatively study this question, we in…
▽ More
Deep learning algorithms demonstrate a surprising ability to learn high-dimensional tasks from limited examples. This is commonly attributed to the depth of neural networks, enabling them to build a hierarchy of abstract, low-dimensional data representations. However, how many training examples are required to learn such representations remains unknown. To quantitatively study this question, we introduce the Random Hierarchy Model: a family of synthetic tasks inspired by the hierarchical structure of language and images. The model is a classification task where each class corresponds to a group of high-level features, chosen among several equivalent groups associated with the same class. In turn, each feature corresponds to a group of sub-features chosen among several equivalent ones and so on, following a hierarchy of composition rules. We find that deep networks learn the task by develo** internal representations invariant to exchanging equivalent groups. Moreover, the number of data required corresponds to the point where correlations between low-level features and classes become detectable. Overall, our results indicate how deep networks overcome the curse of dimensionality by building invariant representations, and provide an estimate of the number of data required to learn a hierarchical task.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2024; v1 submitted 5 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Dissecting the Effects of SGD Noise in Distinct Regimes of Deep Learning
Authors:
Antonio Sclocchi,
Mario Geiger,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Understanding when the noise in stochastic gradient descent (SGD) affects generalization of deep neural networks remains a challenge, complicated by the fact that networks can operate in distinct training regimes. Here we study how the magnitude of this noise $T$ affects performance as the size of the training set $P$ and the scale of initialization $α$ are varied. For gradient descent, $α$ is a k…
▽ More
Understanding when the noise in stochastic gradient descent (SGD) affects generalization of deep neural networks remains a challenge, complicated by the fact that networks can operate in distinct training regimes. Here we study how the magnitude of this noise $T$ affects performance as the size of the training set $P$ and the scale of initialization $α$ are varied. For gradient descent, $α$ is a key parameter that controls if the network is `lazy'($α\gg1$) or instead learns features ($α\ll1$). For classification of MNIST and CIFAR10 images, our central results are: (i) obtaining phase diagrams for performance in the $(α,T)$ plane. They show that SGD noise can be detrimental or instead useful depending on the training regime. Moreover, although increasing $T$ or decreasing $α$ both allow the net to escape the lazy regime, these changes can have opposite effects on performance. (ii) Most importantly, we find that the characteristic temperature $T_c$ where the noise of SGD starts affecting the trained model (and eventually performance) is a power law of $P$. We relate this finding with the observation that key dynamical quantities, such as the total variation of weights during training, depend on both $T$ and $P$ as power laws. These results indicate that a key effect of SGD noise occurs late in training by affecting the stop** process whereby all data are fitted. Indeed, we argue that due to SGD noise, nets must develop a stronger `signal', i.e. larger informative weights, to fit the data, leading to a longer training time. A stronger signal and a longer training time are also required when the size of the training set $P$ increases. We confirm these views in the perceptron model, where signal and noise can be precisely measured. Interestingly, exponents characterizing the effect of SGD depend on the density of data near the decision boundary, as we explain.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2023; v1 submitted 31 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
How deep convolutional neural networks lose spatial information with training
Authors:
Umberto M. Tomasini,
Leonardo Petrini,
Francesco Cagnetta,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
A central question of machine learning is how deep nets manage to learn tasks in high dimensions. An appealing hypothesis is that they achieve this feat by building a representation of the data where information irrelevant to the task is lost. For image datasets, this view is supported by the observation that after (and not before) training, the neural representation becomes less and less sensitiv…
▽ More
A central question of machine learning is how deep nets manage to learn tasks in high dimensions. An appealing hypothesis is that they achieve this feat by building a representation of the data where information irrelevant to the task is lost. For image datasets, this view is supported by the observation that after (and not before) training, the neural representation becomes less and less sensitive to diffeomorphisms acting on images as the signal propagates through the net. This loss of sensitivity correlates with performance, and surprisingly correlates with a gain of sensitivity to white noise acquired during training. These facts are unexplained, and as we demonstrate still hold when white noise is added to the images of the training set. Here, we (i) show empirically for various architectures that stability to image diffeomorphisms is achieved by both spatial and channel pooling, (ii) introduce a model scale-detection task which reproduces our empirical observations on spatial pooling and (iii) compute analitically how the sensitivity to diffeomorphisms and noise scales with depth due to spatial pooling. The scalings are found to depend on the presence of strides in the net architecture. We find that the increased sensitivity to noise is due to the perturbing noise piling up during pooling, after being rectified by ReLU units.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2022; v1 submitted 4 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
What Can Be Learnt With Wide Convolutional Neural Networks?
Authors:
Francesco Cagnetta,
Alessandro Favero,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Understanding how convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can efficiently learn high-dimensional functions remains a fundamental challenge. A popular belief is that these models harness the local and hierarchical structure of natural data such as images. Yet, we lack a quantitative understanding of how such structure affects performance, e.g., the rate of decay of the generalisation error with the nu…
▽ More
Understanding how convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can efficiently learn high-dimensional functions remains a fundamental challenge. A popular belief is that these models harness the local and hierarchical structure of natural data such as images. Yet, we lack a quantitative understanding of how such structure affects performance, e.g., the rate of decay of the generalisation error with the number of training samples. In this paper, we study infinitely-wide deep CNNs in the kernel regime. First, we show that the spectrum of the corresponding kernel inherits the hierarchical structure of the network, and we characterise its asymptotics. Then, we use this result together with generalisation bounds to prove that deep CNNs adapt to the spatial scale of the target function. In particular, we find that if the target function depends on low-dimensional subsets of adjacent input variables, then the decay of the error is controlled by the effective dimensionality of these subsets. Conversely, if the target function depends on the full set of input variables, then the error decay is controlled by the input dimension. We conclude by computing the generalisation error of a deep CNN trained on the output of another deep CNN with randomly-initialised parameters. Interestingly, we find that, despite their hierarchical structure, the functions generated by infinitely-wide deep CNNs are too rich to be efficiently learnable in high dimension.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2023; v1 submitted 1 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Learning sparse features can lead to overfitting in neural networks
Authors:
Leonardo Petrini,
Francesco Cagnetta,
Eric Vanden-Eijnden,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
It is widely believed that the success of deep networks lies in their ability to learn a meaningful representation of the features of the data. Yet, understanding when and how this feature learning improves performance remains a challenge: for example, it is beneficial for modern architectures trained to classify images, whereas it is detrimental for fully-connected networks trained for the same t…
▽ More
It is widely believed that the success of deep networks lies in their ability to learn a meaningful representation of the features of the data. Yet, understanding when and how this feature learning improves performance remains a challenge: for example, it is beneficial for modern architectures trained to classify images, whereas it is detrimental for fully-connected networks trained for the same task on the same data. Here we propose an explanation for this puzzle, by showing that feature learning can perform worse than lazy training (via random feature kernel or the NTK) as the former can lead to a sparser neural representation. Although sparsity is known to be essential for learning anisotropic data, it is detrimental when the target function is constant or smooth along certain directions of input space. We illustrate this phenomenon in two settings: (i) regression of Gaussian random functions on the d-dimensional unit sphere and (ii) classification of benchmark datasets of images. For (i), we compute the scaling of the generalization error with number of training points, and show that methods that do not learn features generalize better, even when the dimension of the input space is large. For (ii), we show empirically that learning features can indeed lead to sparse and thereby less smooth representations of the image predictors. This fact is plausibly responsible for deteriorating the performance, which is known to be correlated with smoothness along diffeomorphisms.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2022; v1 submitted 24 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Failure and success of the spectral bias prediction for Kernel Ridge Regression: the case of low-dimensional data
Authors:
Umberto M. Tomasini,
Antonio Sclocchi,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Recently, several theories including the replica method made predictions for the generalization error of Kernel Ridge Regression. In some regimes, they predict that the method has a `spectral bias': decomposing the true function $f^*$ on the eigenbasis of the kernel, it fits well the coefficients associated with the O(P) largest eigenvalues, where $P$ is the size of the training set. This predicti…
▽ More
Recently, several theories including the replica method made predictions for the generalization error of Kernel Ridge Regression. In some regimes, they predict that the method has a `spectral bias': decomposing the true function $f^*$ on the eigenbasis of the kernel, it fits well the coefficients associated with the O(P) largest eigenvalues, where $P$ is the size of the training set. This prediction works very well on benchmark data sets such as images, yet the assumptions these approaches make on the data are never satisfied in practice. To clarify when the spectral bias prediction holds, we first focus on a one-dimensional model where rigorous results are obtained and then use scaling arguments to generalize and test our findings in higher dimensions. Our predictions include the classification case $f(x)=$sign$(x_1)$ with a data distribution that vanishes at the decision boundary $p(x)\sim x_1^χ$. For $χ>0$ and a Laplace kernel, we find that (i) there exists a cross-over ridge $λ^*_{d,χ}(P)\sim P^{-\frac{1}{d+χ}}$ such that for $λ\gg λ^*_{d,χ}(P)$, the replica method applies, but not for $λ\llλ^*_{d,χ}(P)$, (ii) in the ridge-less case, spectral bias predicts the correct training curve exponent only in the limit $d\rightarrow\infty$.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022; v1 submitted 7 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
How memory architecture affects learning in a simple POMDP: the two-hypothesis testing problem
Authors:
Mario Geiger,
Christophe Eloy,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Reinforcement learning is generally difficult for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs), which occurs when the agent's observation is partial or noisy. To seek good performance in POMDPs, one strategy is to endow the agent with a finite memory, whose update is governed by the policy. However, policy optimization is non-convex in that case and can lead to poor training performance…
▽ More
Reinforcement learning is generally difficult for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs), which occurs when the agent's observation is partial or noisy. To seek good performance in POMDPs, one strategy is to endow the agent with a finite memory, whose update is governed by the policy. However, policy optimization is non-convex in that case and can lead to poor training performance for random initialization. The performance can be empirically improved by constraining the memory architecture, then sacrificing optimality to facilitate training. Here we study this trade-off in a two-hypothesis testing problem, akin to the two-arm bandit problem. We compare two extreme cases: (i) the random access memory where any transitions between $M$ memory states are allowed and (ii) a fixed memory where the agent can access its last $m$ actions and rewards. For (i), the probability $q$ to play the worst arm is known to be exponentially small in $M$ for the optimal policy. Our main result is to show that similar performance can be reached for (ii) as well, despite the simplicity of the memory architecture: using a conjecture on Gray-ordered binary necklaces, we find policies for which $q$ is exponentially small in $2^m$, i.e. $q\simα^{2^m}$ with $α< 1$. In addition, we observe empirically that training from random initialization leads to very poor results for (i), and significantly better results for (ii) thanks to the constraints on the memory architecture.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2021; v1 submitted 16 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Locality defeats the curse of dimensionality in convolutional teacher-student scenarios
Authors:
Alessandro Favero,
Francesco Cagnetta,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Convolutional neural networks perform a local and translationally-invariant treatment of the data: quantifying which of these two aspects is central to their success remains a challenge. We study this problem within a teacher-student framework for kernel regression, using `convolutional' kernels inspired by the neural tangent kernel of simple convolutional architectures of given filter size. Using…
▽ More
Convolutional neural networks perform a local and translationally-invariant treatment of the data: quantifying which of these two aspects is central to their success remains a challenge. We study this problem within a teacher-student framework for kernel regression, using `convolutional' kernels inspired by the neural tangent kernel of simple convolutional architectures of given filter size. Using heuristic methods from physics, we find in the ridgeless case that locality is key in determining the learning curve exponent $β$ (that relates the test error $ε_t\sim P^{-β}$ to the size of the training set $P$), whereas translational invariance is not. In particular, if the filter size of the teacher $t$ is smaller than that of the student $s$, $β$ is a function of $s$ only and does not depend on the input dimension. We confirm our predictions on $β$ empirically. We conclude by proving, using a natural universality assumption, that performing kernel regression with a ridge that decreases with the size of the training set leads to similar learning curve exponents to those we obtain in the ridgeless case.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2021; v1 submitted 16 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Relative stability toward diffeomorphisms indicates performance in deep nets
Authors:
Leonardo Petrini,
Alessandro Favero,
Mario Geiger,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Understanding why deep nets can classify data in large dimensions remains a challenge. It has been proposed that they do so by becoming stable to diffeomorphisms, yet existing empirical measurements support that it is often not the case. We revisit this question by defining a maximum-entropy distribution on diffeomorphisms, that allows to study typical diffeomorphisms of a given norm. We confirm t…
▽ More
Understanding why deep nets can classify data in large dimensions remains a challenge. It has been proposed that they do so by becoming stable to diffeomorphisms, yet existing empirical measurements support that it is often not the case. We revisit this question by defining a maximum-entropy distribution on diffeomorphisms, that allows to study typical diffeomorphisms of a given norm. We confirm that stability toward diffeomorphisms does not strongly correlate to performance on benchmark data sets of images. By contrast, we find that the stability toward diffeomorphisms relative to that of generic transformations $R_f$ correlates remarkably with the test error $ε_t$. It is of order unity at initialization but decreases by several decades during training for state-of-the-art architectures. For CIFAR10 and 15 known architectures, we find $ε_t\approx 0.2\sqrt{R_f}$, suggesting that obtaining a small $R_f$ is important to achieve good performance. We study how $R_f$ depends on the size of the training set and compare it to a simple model of invariant learning.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2021; v1 submitted 6 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Perspective: A Phase Diagram for Deep Learning unifying Jamming, Feature Learning and Lazy Training
Authors:
Mario Geiger,
Leonardo Petrini,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Deep learning algorithms are responsible for a technological revolution in a variety of tasks including image recognition or Go playing. Yet, why they work is not understood. Ultimately, they manage to classify data lying in high dimension -- a feat generically impossible due to the geometry of high dimensional space and the associated curse of dimensionality. Understanding what kind of structure,…
▽ More
Deep learning algorithms are responsible for a technological revolution in a variety of tasks including image recognition or Go playing. Yet, why they work is not understood. Ultimately, they manage to classify data lying in high dimension -- a feat generically impossible due to the geometry of high dimensional space and the associated curse of dimensionality. Understanding what kind of structure, symmetry or invariance makes data such as images learnable is a fundamental challenge. Other puzzles include that (i) learning corresponds to minimizing a loss in high dimension, which is in general not convex and could well get stuck bad minima. (ii) Deep learning predicting power increases with the number of fitting parameters, even in a regime where data are perfectly fitted. In this manuscript, we review recent results elucidating (i,ii) and the perspective they offer on the (still unexplained) curse of dimensionality paradox. We base our theoretical discussion on the $(h,α)$ plane where $h$ is the network width and $α$ the scale of the output of the network at initialization, and provide new systematic measures of performance in that plane for MNIST and CIFAR 10. We argue that different learning regimes can be organized into a phase diagram. A line of critical points sharply delimits an under-parametrised phase from an over-parametrized one. In over-parametrized nets, learning can operate in two regimes separated by a smooth cross-over. At large initialization, it corresponds to a kernel method, whereas for small initializations features can be learnt, together with invariants in the data. We review the properties of these different phases, of the transition separating them and some open questions. Our treatment emphasizes analogies with physical systems, scaling arguments and the development of numerical observables to quantitatively test these results empirically.
△ Less
Submitted 30 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Geometric compression of invariant manifolds in neural nets
Authors:
Jonas Paccolat,
Leonardo Petrini,
Mario Geiger,
Kevin Tyloo,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
We study how neural networks compress uninformative input space in models where data lie in $d$ dimensions, but whose label only vary within a linear manifold of dimension $d_\parallel < d$. We show that for a one-hidden layer network initialized with infinitesimal weights (i.e. in the feature learning regime) trained with gradient descent, the first layer of weights evolve to become nearly insens…
▽ More
We study how neural networks compress uninformative input space in models where data lie in $d$ dimensions, but whose label only vary within a linear manifold of dimension $d_\parallel < d$. We show that for a one-hidden layer network initialized with infinitesimal weights (i.e. in the feature learning regime) trained with gradient descent, the first layer of weights evolve to become nearly insensitive to the $d_\perp=d-d_\parallel$ uninformative directions. These are effectively compressed by a factor $λ\sim \sqrt{p}$, where $p$ is the size of the training set. We quantify the benefit of such a compression on the test error $ε$. For large initialization of the weights (the lazy training regime), no compression occurs and for regular boundaries separating labels we find that $ε\sim p^{-β}$, with $β_\text{Lazy} = d / (3d-2)$. Compression improves the learning curves so that $β_\text{Feature} = (2d-1)/(3d-2)$ if $d_\parallel = 1$ and $β_\text{Feature} = (d + d_\perp/2)/(3d-2)$ if $d_\parallel > 1$. We test these predictions for a stripe model where boundaries are parallel interfaces ($d_\parallel=1$) as well as for a cylindrical boundary ($d_\parallel=2$). Next we show that compression shapes the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) evolution in time, so that its top eigenvectors become more informative and display a larger projection on the labels. Consequently, kernel learning with the frozen NTK at the end of training outperforms the initial NTK. We confirm these predictions both for a one-hidden layer FC network trained on the stripe model and for a 16-layers CNN trained on MNIST, for which we also find $β_\text{Feature}>β_\text{Lazy}$.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2021; v1 submitted 22 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
How isotropic kernels perform on simple invariants
Authors:
Jonas Paccolat,
Stefano Spigler,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
We investigate how the training curve of isotropic kernel methods depends on the symmetry of the task to be learned, in several settings. (i) We consider a regression task, where the target function is a Gaussian random field that depends only on $d_\parallel$ variables, fewer than the input dimension $d$. We compute the expected test error $ε$ that follows $ε\sim p^{-β}$ where $p$ is the size of…
▽ More
We investigate how the training curve of isotropic kernel methods depends on the symmetry of the task to be learned, in several settings. (i) We consider a regression task, where the target function is a Gaussian random field that depends only on $d_\parallel$ variables, fewer than the input dimension $d$. We compute the expected test error $ε$ that follows $ε\sim p^{-β}$ where $p$ is the size of the training set. We find that $β\sim 1/d$ independently of $d_\parallel$, supporting previous findings that the presence of invariants does not resolve the curse of dimensionality for kernel regression. (ii) Next we consider support-vector binary classification and introduce the stripe model where the data label depends on a single coordinate $y(\underline{x}) = y(x_1)$, corresponding to parallel decision boundaries separating labels of different signs, and consider that there is no margin at these interfaces. We argue and confirm numerically that for large bandwidth, $β= \frac{d-1+ξ}{3d-3+ξ}$, where $ξ\in (0,2)$ is the exponent characterizing the singularity of the kernel at the origin. This estimation improves classical bounds obtainable from Rademacher complexity. In this setting there is no curse of dimensionality since $β\rightarrow 1 / 3$ as $d\rightarrow\infty$. (iii) We confirm these findings for the spherical model for which $y(\underline{x}) = y(|\underline{x}|)$. (iv) In the stripe model, we show that if the data are compressed along their invariants by some factor $λ$ (an operation believed to take place in deep networks), the test error is reduced by a factor $λ^{-\frac{2(d-1)}{3d-3+ξ}}$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2020; v1 submitted 17 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Disentangling feature and lazy training in deep neural networks
Authors:
Mario Geiger,
Stefano Spigler,
Arthur Jacot,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Two distinct limits for deep learning have been derived as the network width $h\rightarrow \infty$, depending on how the weights of the last layer scale with $h$. In the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) limit, the dynamics becomes linear in the weights and is described by a frozen kernel $Θ$. By contrast, in the Mean-Field limit, the dynamics can be expressed in terms of the distribution of the paramet…
▽ More
Two distinct limits for deep learning have been derived as the network width $h\rightarrow \infty$, depending on how the weights of the last layer scale with $h$. In the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) limit, the dynamics becomes linear in the weights and is described by a frozen kernel $Θ$. By contrast, in the Mean-Field limit, the dynamics can be expressed in terms of the distribution of the parameters associated with a neuron, that follows a partial differential equation. In this work we consider deep networks where the weights in the last layer scale as $αh^{-1/2}$ at initialization. By varying $α$ and $h$, we probe the crossover between the two limits. We observe the previously identified regimes of lazy training and feature training. In the lazy-training regime, the dynamics is almost linear and the NTK barely changes after initialization. The feature-training regime includes the mean-field formulation as a limiting case and is characterized by a kernel that evolves in time, and learns some features. We perform numerical experiments on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, EMNIST and CIFAR10 and consider various architectures. We find that (i) The two regimes are separated by an $α^*$ that scales as $h^{-1/2}$. (ii) Network architecture and data structure play an important role in determining which regime is better: in our tests, fully-connected networks perform generally better in the lazy-training regime, unlike convolutional networks. (iii) In both regimes, the fluctuations $δF$ induced on the learned function by initial conditions decay as $δF\sim 1/\sqrt{h}$, leading to a performance that increases with $h$. The same improvement can also be obtained at an intermediate width by ensemble-averaging several networks. (iv) In the feature-training regime we identify a time scale $t_1\sim\sqrt{h}α$, such that for $t\ll t_1$ the dynamics is linear.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2020; v1 submitted 19 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Asymptotic learning curves of kernel methods: empirical data v.s. Teacher-Student paradigm
Authors:
Stefano Spigler,
Mario Geiger,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
How many training data are needed to learn a supervised task? It is often observed that the generalization error decreases as $n^{-β}$ where $n$ is the number of training examples and $β$ an exponent that depends on both data and algorithm. In this work we measure $β$ when applying kernel methods to real datasets. For MNIST we find $β\approx 0.4$ and for CIFAR10 $β\approx 0.1$, for both regression…
▽ More
How many training data are needed to learn a supervised task? It is often observed that the generalization error decreases as $n^{-β}$ where $n$ is the number of training examples and $β$ an exponent that depends on both data and algorithm. In this work we measure $β$ when applying kernel methods to real datasets. For MNIST we find $β\approx 0.4$ and for CIFAR10 $β\approx 0.1$, for both regression and classification tasks, and for Gaussian or Laplace kernels. To rationalize the existence of non-trivial exponents that can be independent of the specific kernel used, we study the Teacher-Student framework for kernels. In this scheme, a Teacher generates data according to a Gaussian random field, and a Student learns them via kernel regression. With a simplifying assumption -- namely that the data are sampled from a regular lattice -- we derive analytically $β$ for translation invariant kernels, using previous results from the kriging literature. Provided that the Student is not too sensitive to high frequencies, $β$ depends only on the smoothness and dimension of the training data. We confirm numerically that these predictions hold when the training points are sampled at random on a hypersphere. Overall, the test error is found to be controlled by the magnitude of the projection of the true function on the kernel eigenvectors whose rank is larger than $n$. Using this idea we predict relate the exponent $β$ to an exponent $a$ describing how the coefficients of the true function in the eigenbasis of the kernel decay with rank. We extract $a$ from real data by performing kernel PCA, leading to $β\approx0.36$ for MNIST and $β\approx0.07$ for CIFAR10, in good agreement with observations. We argue that these rather large exponents are possible due to the small effective dimension of the data.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2020; v1 submitted 26 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning
Authors:
Mario Geiger,
Arthur Jacot,
Stefano Spigler,
Franck Gabriel,
Levent Sagun,
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Giulio Biroli,
Clément Hongler,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Supervised deep learning involves the training of neural networks with a large number $N$ of parameters. For large enough $N$, in the so-called over-parametrized regime, one can essentially fit the training data points. Sparsity-based arguments would suggest that the generalization error increases as $N$ grows past a certain threshold $N^{*}$. Instead, empirical studies have shown that in the over…
▽ More
Supervised deep learning involves the training of neural networks with a large number $N$ of parameters. For large enough $N$, in the so-called over-parametrized regime, one can essentially fit the training data points. Sparsity-based arguments would suggest that the generalization error increases as $N$ grows past a certain threshold $N^{*}$. Instead, empirical studies have shown that in the over-parametrized regime, generalization error keeps decreasing with $N$. We resolve this paradox through a new framework. We rely on the so-called Neural Tangent Kernel, which connects large neural nets to kernel methods, to show that the initialization causes finite-size random fluctuations $\|f_{N}-\bar{f}_{N}\|\sim N^{-1/4}$ of the neural net output function $f_{N}$ around its expectation $\bar{f}_{N}$. These affect the generalization error $ε_{N}$ for classification: under natural assumptions, it decays to a plateau value $ε_{\infty}$ in a power-law fashion $\sim N^{-1/2}$. This description breaks down at a so-called jamming transition $N=N^{*}$. At this threshold, we argue that $\|f_{N}\|$ diverges. This result leads to a plausible explanation for the cusp in test error known to occur at $N^{*}$. Our results are confirmed by extensive empirical observations on the MNIST and CIFAR image datasets. Our analysis finally suggests that, given a computational envelope, the smallest generalization error is obtained using several networks of intermediate sizes, just beyond $N^{*}$, and averaging their outputs.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2019; v1 submitted 6 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalization
Authors:
Stefano Spigler,
Mario Geiger,
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Levent Sagun,
Giulio Biroli,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
We argue that in fully-connected networks a phase transition delimits the over- and under-parametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. Under some general conditions, we show that this transition is sharp for the hinge loss. In the whole over-parametrized regime, poor minima of the loss are not encountered during training since the number of constraints to satisfy is too small to h…
▽ More
We argue that in fully-connected networks a phase transition delimits the over- and under-parametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. Under some general conditions, we show that this transition is sharp for the hinge loss. In the whole over-parametrized regime, poor minima of the loss are not encountered during training since the number of constraints to satisfy is too small to hamper minimization. Our findings support a link between this transition and the generalization properties of the network: as we increase the number of parameters of a given model, starting from an under-parametrized network, we observe that the generalization error displays three phases: (i) initial decay, (ii) increase until the transition point --- where it displays a cusp --- and (iii) slow decay toward a constant for the rest of the over-parametrized regime. Thereby we identify the region where the classical phenomenon of over-fitting takes place, and the region where the model keeps improving, in line with previous empirical observations for modern neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2019; v1 submitted 22 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networks
Authors:
Mario Geiger,
Stefano Spigler,
Stéphane d'Ascoli,
Levent Sagun,
Marco Baity-Jesi,
Giulio Biroli,
Matthieu Wyart
Abstract:
Deep learning has been immensely successful at a variety of tasks, ranging from classification to AI. Learning corresponds to fitting training data, which is implemented by descending a very high-dimensional loss function. Understanding under which conditions neural networks do not get stuck in poor minima of the loss, and how the landscape of that loss evolves as depth is increased remains a chal…
▽ More
Deep learning has been immensely successful at a variety of tasks, ranging from classification to AI. Learning corresponds to fitting training data, which is implemented by descending a very high-dimensional loss function. Understanding under which conditions neural networks do not get stuck in poor minima of the loss, and how the landscape of that loss evolves as depth is increased remains a challenge. Here we predict, and test empirically, an analogy between this landscape and the energy landscape of repulsive ellipses. We argue that in FC networks a phase transition delimits the over- and under-parametrized regimes where fitting can or cannot be achieved. In the vicinity of this transition, properties of the curvature of the minima of the loss are critical. This transition shares direct similarities with the jamming transition by which particles form a disordered solid as the density is increased, which also occurs in certain classes of computational optimization and learning problems such as the perceptron. Our analysis gives a simple explanation as to why poor minima of the loss cannot be encountered in the overparametrized regime, and puts forward the surprising result that the ability of fully connected networks to fit random data is independent of their depth. Our observations suggests that this independence also holds for real data. We also study a quantity $Δ$ which characterizes how well ($Δ<0$) or badly ($Δ>0$) a datum is learned. At the critical point it is power-law distributed, $P_+(Δ)\simΔ^θ$ for $Δ>0$ and $P_-(Δ)\sim(-Δ)^{-γ}$ for $Δ<0$, with $θ\approx0.3$ and $γ\approx0.2$. This observation suggests that near the transition the loss landscape has a hierarchical structure and that the learning dynamics is prone to avalanche-like dynamics, with abrupt changes in the set of patterns that are learned.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2019; v1 submitted 25 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Comparing Dynamics: Deep Neural Networks versus Glassy Systems
Authors:
M. Baity-Jesi,
L. Sagun,
M. Geiger,
S. Spigler,
G. Ben Arous,
C. Cammarota,
Y. LeCun,
M. Wyart,
G. Biroli
Abstract:
We analyze numerically the training dynamics of deep neural networks (DNN) by using methods developed in statistical physics of glassy systems. The two main issues we address are (1) the complexity of the loss landscape and of the dynamics within it, and (2) to what extent DNNs share similarities with glassy systems. Our findings, obtained for different architectures and datasets, suggest that dur…
▽ More
We analyze numerically the training dynamics of deep neural networks (DNN) by using methods developed in statistical physics of glassy systems. The two main issues we address are (1) the complexity of the loss landscape and of the dynamics within it, and (2) to what extent DNNs share similarities with glassy systems. Our findings, obtained for different architectures and datasets, suggest that during the training process the dynamics slows down because of an increasingly large number of flat directions. At large times, when the loss is approaching zero, the system diffuses at the bottom of the landscape. Despite some similarities with the dynamics of mean-field glassy systems, in particular, the absence of barrier crossing, we find distinctive dynamical behaviors in the two cases, showing that the statistical properties of the corresponding loss and energy landscapes are different. In contrast, when the network is under-parametrized we observe a typical glassy behavior, thus suggesting the existence of different phases depending on whether the network is under-parametrized or over-parametrized.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2018; v1 submitted 19 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
