-
Adversarial Slee** Bandit Problems with Multiple Plays: Algorithm and Ranking Application
Authors:
Jianjun Yuan,
Wei Lee Woon,
Ludovik Coba
Abstract:
This paper presents an efficient algorithm to solve the slee** bandit with multiple plays problem in the context of an online recommendation system. The problem involves bounded, adversarial loss and unknown i.i.d. distributions for arm availability. The proposed algorithm extends the slee** bandit algorithm for single arm selection and is guaranteed to achieve theoretical performance with reg…
▽ More
This paper presents an efficient algorithm to solve the slee** bandit with multiple plays problem in the context of an online recommendation system. The problem involves bounded, adversarial loss and unknown i.i.d. distributions for arm availability. The proposed algorithm extends the slee** bandit algorithm for single arm selection and is guaranteed to achieve theoretical performance with regret upper bounded by $\bigO(kN^2\sqrt{T\log T})$, where $k$ is the number of arms selected per time step, $N$ is the total number of arms, and $T$ is the time horizon.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Explainable AI as a Social Microscope: A Case Study on Academic Performance
Authors:
Anahit Sargsyan,
Areg Karapetyan,
Wei Lee Woon,
Aamena Alshamsi
Abstract:
Academic performance is perceived as a product of complex interactions between students' overall experience, personal characteristics and upbringing. Data science techniques, most commonly involving regression analysis and related approaches, serve as a viable means to explore this interplay. However, these tend to extract factors with wide-ranging impact, while overlooking variations specific to…
▽ More
Academic performance is perceived as a product of complex interactions between students' overall experience, personal characteristics and upbringing. Data science techniques, most commonly involving regression analysis and related approaches, serve as a viable means to explore this interplay. However, these tend to extract factors with wide-ranging impact, while overlooking variations specific to individual students. Focusing on each student's peculiarities is generally impossible with thousands or even hundreds of subjects, yet data mining methods might prove effective in devising more targeted approaches. For instance, subjects with shared characteristics can be assigned to clusters, which can then be examined separately with machine learning algorithms, thereby providing a more nuanced view of the factors affecting individuals in a particular group. In this context, we introduce a data science workflow allowing for fine-grained analysis of academic performance correlates that captures the subtle differences in students' sensitivities to these factors. Leveraging the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithm from the toolbox of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques, the proposed pipeline yields groups of students having similar academic attainment indicators, rather than similar features (e.g. familial background) as typically practiced in prior studies. As a proof-of-concept case study, a rich longitudinal dataset is selected to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach versus a standard regression model.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2020; v1 submitted 7 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
The Preeminence of Ethnic Diversity in Scientific Collaboration
Authors:
Bedoor K AlShebli,
Talal Rahwan,
Wei Lee Woon
Abstract:
Inspired by the social and economic benefits of diversity, we analyze over 9 million papers and 6 million scientists to study the relationship between research impact and five classes of diversity: ethnicity, discipline, gender, affiliation, and academic age. Using randomized baseline models, we establish the presence of homophily in ethnicity, gender and affiliation. We then study the effect of d…
▽ More
Inspired by the social and economic benefits of diversity, we analyze over 9 million papers and 6 million scientists to study the relationship between research impact and five classes of diversity: ethnicity, discipline, gender, affiliation, and academic age. Using randomized baseline models, we establish the presence of homophily in ethnicity, gender and affiliation. We then study the effect of diversity on scientific impact, as reflected in citations. Remarkably, of the classes considered, ethnic diversity had the strongest correlation with scientific impact. To further isolate the effects of ethnic diversity, we used randomized baseline models and again found a clear link between diversity and impact. To further support these findings, we use coarsened exact matching to compare the scientific impact of ethnically diverse papers and scientists with closely-matched control groups. Here, we find that ethnic diversity resulted in an impact gain of 10.63% for papers, and 47.67% for scientists.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2020; v1 submitted 6 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
