Showing 1–50 of 56 results for author: Wolpert, D

Implications of computer science theory for the simulation hypothesis

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: The simulation hypothesis has recently excited renewed interest, especially in the physics and philosophy communities. However, the hypothesis specifically concerns \textit{computers} that simulate physical universes, which means that to formally investigate it we need to couple computer science theory with physics. Here I couple those fields with the physical Church-Turing thesis. I then exploit… ▽ More The simulation hypothesis has recently excited renewed interest, especially in the physics and philosophy communities. However, the hypothesis specifically concerns \textit{computers} that simulate physical universes, which means that to formally investigate it we need to couple computer science theory with physics. Here I couple those fields with the physical Church-Turing thesis. I then exploit that coupling to investigate of some of the computer science theory aspects of the simulation hypothesis. In particular, I use Kleene's second recursion theorem to prove that it is mathematically possible for us to be a simulation that is being run on a computer - by us. In such a self-simulation, there would be two identical instances of us; the question of which of those is ``really us'' is meaningless. I also show how Rice's theorem provides some interesting impossibility results concerning simulation and self-simulation; briefly describe the philosophical implications of fully homomorphic encryption for (self-)simulation; and briefly investigate the graphical structure of universes simulating universes simulating universes ..., among other issues. I end by describing some of the possible avenues for future research. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2024; v1 submitted 9 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 44 pages of text, 5 pages of references, 10 pages of appendices

ACM Class: F.1; F.m

Is stochastic thermodynamics the key to understanding the energy costs of computation?

Authors: David Wolpert, Jan Korbel, Christopher Lynn, Farita Tasnim, Joshua Grochow, Gülce Kardeş, James Aimone, Vijay Balasubramanian, Eric de Giuli, David Doty, Nahuel Freitas, Matteo Marsili, Thomas E. Ouldridge, Andrea Richa, Paul Riechers, Édgar Roldán, Brenda Rubenstein, Zoltan Toroczkai, Joseph Paradiso

Abstract: The relationship between the thermodynamic and computational characteristics of dynamical physical systems has been a major theoretical interest since at least the 19th century, and has been of increasing practical importance as the energetic cost of digital devices has exploded over the last half century. One of the most important thermodynamic features of real-world computers is that they operat… ▽ More The relationship between the thermodynamic and computational characteristics of dynamical physical systems has been a major theoretical interest since at least the 19th century, and has been of increasing practical importance as the energetic cost of digital devices has exploded over the last half century. One of the most important thermodynamic features of real-world computers is that they operate very far from thermal equilibrium, in finite time, with many quickly (co-)evolving degrees of freedom. Such computers also must almost always obey multiple physical constraints on how they work. For example, all modern digital computers are periodic processes, governed by a global clock. Another example is that many computers are modular, hierarchical systems, with strong restrictions on the connectivity of their subsystems. This properties hold both for naturally occurring computers, like brains or Eukaryotic cells, as well as digital systems. These features of real-world computers are absent in 20th century analyses of the thermodynamics of computational processes, which focused on quasi-statically slow processes. However, the field of stochastic thermodynamics has been developed in the last few decades - and it provides the formal tools for analyzing systems that have exactly these features of real-world computers. We argue here that these tools, together with other tools currently being developed in stochastic thermodynamics, may help us understand at a far deeper level just how the fundamental physical properties of dynamic systems are related to the computation that they perform. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2023; v1 submitted 28 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Typo fix

Game Manipulators -- the Strategic Implications of Binding Contracts

Authors: Maria Alejandra Ramirez, Yoav Kolumbus, Rosemarie Nagel, David Wolpert, Jürgen Jost

Abstract: Commitment devices are powerful tools that can influence and incentivise certain behaviours by linking them to rewards or punishments. These devices are particularly useful in decision-making, as they can steer individuals towards specific choices. In the field of game theory, commitment devices can alter a player's payoff matrix, ultimately changing the game's Nash equilibria. Interestingly, agen… ▽ More Commitment devices are powerful tools that can influence and incentivise certain behaviours by linking them to rewards or punishments. These devices are particularly useful in decision-making, as they can steer individuals towards specific choices. In the field of game theory, commitment devices can alter a player's payoff matrix, ultimately changing the game's Nash equilibria. Interestingly, agents, whom we term game manipulators and who can be external to the original game, can leverage such devices to extract fees from players by making them contingent offers that modify the payoffs of their actions. This can result in a different Nash equilibrium with potentially lower payoffs for the players compared to the original game. For this scheme to work, it is required that all commitments be binding, meaning that once an offer is made, it cannot be revoked. Consequently, we analyse binding contracts as the commitment mechanism that enables game manipulation scenarios. The main focus of this study is to formulate the logic of this setting, expand its scope to encompass more intricate schemes, and analyse the behaviour of regret-minimizing agents in scenarios involving game manipulation. △ Less

Submitted 8 December, 2023; v1 submitted 17 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Entropy production in communication channels

Authors: Farita Tasnim, Nahuel Freitas, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: In many complex systems, whether biological or artificial, the thermodynamic costs of communication among their components are large. These systems also tend to split information transmitted between any two components across multiple channels. A common hypothesis is that such inverse multiplexing strategies reduce total thermodynamic costs. So far, however, there have been no physics-based results… ▽ More In many complex systems, whether biological or artificial, the thermodynamic costs of communication among their components are large. These systems also tend to split information transmitted between any two components across multiple channels. A common hypothesis is that such inverse multiplexing strategies reduce total thermodynamic costs. So far, however, there have been no physics-based results supporting this hypothesis. This gap existed partially because we have lacked a theoretical framework that addresses the interplay of thermodynamics and information in off-equilibrium systems. Here we present the first study that rigorously combines such a framework, stochastic thermodynamics, with Shannon information theory. We develop a minimal model that captures the fundamental features common to a wide variety of communication systems, and study the relationship between the entropy production of the communication process and the channel capacity, the canonical measure of the communication capability of a channel. In contrast to what is assumed in previous works not based on first principles, we show that the entropy production is not always a convex and monotonically increasing function of the channel capacity. However, those two properties are recovered for sufficiently high channel capacity. These results clarify when and how to split a single communication stream across multiple channels. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2024; v1 submitted 8 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 15 pages, 3 figures

What can we know about that which we cannot even imagine?

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: In this essay I will consider a sequence of questions. The first questions concern the biological function of intelligence in general, and cognitive prostheses of human intelligence in particular. These will lead into questions concerning human language, perhaps the most important cognitive prosthesis humanity has ever developed. While it is traditional to rhapsodize about the cognitive power enca… ▽ More In this essay I will consider a sequence of questions. The first questions concern the biological function of intelligence in general, and cognitive prostheses of human intelligence in particular. These will lead into questions concerning human language, perhaps the most important cognitive prosthesis humanity has ever developed. While it is traditional to rhapsodize about the cognitive power encapsulated in human language, I will emphasize how horribly limited human language is - and therefore how limited our cognitive abilities are, despite their being augmented with language. This will lead to questions of whether human mathematics, being ultimately formulated in terms of human language, is also deeply limited. I will then combine these questions to pose a partial, sort-of, sideways answer to the guiding concern of this essay: what we can ever discern about that we cannot even conceive? △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2024; v1 submitted 7 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 39 pages, 10 pages of which are references

The Past as a Stochastic Process

Authors: David H. Wolpert, Michael H. Price, Stefani A. Crabtree, Timothy A. Kohler, Jurgen Jost, James Evans, Peter F. Stadler, Hajime Shimao, Manfred D. Laubichler

Abstract: Historical processes manifest remarkable diversity. Nevertheless, scholars have long attempted to identify patterns and categorize historical actors and influences with some success. A stochastic process framework provides a structured approach for the analysis of large historical datasets that allows for detection of sometimes surprising patterns, identification of relevant causal actors both end… ▽ More Historical processes manifest remarkable diversity. Nevertheless, scholars have long attempted to identify patterns and categorize historical actors and influences with some success. A stochastic process framework provides a structured approach for the analysis of large historical datasets that allows for detection of sometimes surprising patterns, identification of relevant causal actors both endogenous and exogenous to the process, and comparison between different historical cases. The combination of data, analytical tools and the organizing theoretical framework of stochastic processes complements traditional narrative approaches in history and archaeology. △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures

The Implications of the No-Free-Lunch Theorems for Meta-induction

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: The important recent book by G. Schurz appreciates that the no-free-lunch theorems (NFL) have major implications for the problem of (meta) induction. Here I review the NFL theorems, emphasizing that they do not only concern the case where there is a uniform prior -- they prove that there are "as many priors" (loosely speaking) for which any induction algorithm $A$ out-generalizes some induction al… ▽ More The important recent book by G. Schurz appreciates that the no-free-lunch theorems (NFL) have major implications for the problem of (meta) induction. Here I review the NFL theorems, emphasizing that they do not only concern the case where there is a uniform prior -- they prove that there are "as many priors" (loosely speaking) for which any induction algorithm $A$ out-generalizes some induction algorithm $B$ as vice-versa. Importantly though, in addition to the NFL theorems, there are many {free lunch} theorems. In particular, the NFL theorems can only be used to compare the {marginal} expected performance of an induction algorithm $A$ with the marginal expected performance of an induction algorithm $B$. There is a rich set of free lunches which instead concern the statistical correlations among the generalization errors of induction algorithms. As I describe, the meta-induction algorithms that Schurz advocate as a "solution to Hume's problem" are just an example of such a free lunch based on correlations among the generalization errors of induction algorithms. I end by pointing out that the prior that Schurz advocates, which is uniform over bit frequencies rather than bit patterns, is contradicted by thousands of experiments in statistical physics and by the great success of the maximum entropy procedure in inductive inference. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2022; v1 submitted 22 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: 14 pages

Dependence of integrated, instantaneous, and fluctuating entropy production on the initial state in quantum and classical processes

Authors: Artemy Kolchinsky, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: We consider the additional entropy production (EP) incurred by a fixed quantum or classical process on some initial state $ρ$, above the minimum EP incurred by the same process on any initial state. We show that this additional EP, which we term the "mismatch cost of $ρ$", has a universal information-theoretic form: it is given by the contraction of the relative entropy between $ρ$ and the least-d… ▽ More We consider the additional entropy production (EP) incurred by a fixed quantum or classical process on some initial state $ρ$, above the minimum EP incurred by the same process on any initial state. We show that this additional EP, which we term the "mismatch cost of $ρ$", has a universal information-theoretic form: it is given by the contraction of the relative entropy between $ρ$ and the least-dissipative initial state $\varphi$ over time. We derive versions of this result for integrated EP incurred over the course of a process, for trajectory-level fluctuating EP, and for instantaneous EP rate. We also show that mismatch cost for fluctuating EP obeys an integral fluctuation theorem. Our results demonstrate a fundamental relationship between "thermodynamic irreversibility" (generation of EP) and "logical irreversibility" (inability to know the initial state corresponding to a given final state). We use this relationship to derive quantitative bounds on the thermodynamics of quantum error correction and to propose a thermodynamically-operationalized measure of the logical irreversibility of a quantum channel. Our results hold for both finite and infinite dimensional systems, and generalize beyond EP to many other thermodynamic costs, including nonadiabatic EP, free energy loss, and entropy gain. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2022; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: Fix some line breaking issues in the appendix

Journal ref: Physical Review E, 2021

Noisy Deductive Reasoning: How Humans Construct Math, and How Math Constructs Universes

Authors: David H. Wolpert, David Kinney

Abstract: We present a computational model of mathematical reasoning according to which mathematics is a fundamentally stochastic process. That is, on our model, whether or not a given formula is deemed a theorem in some axiomatic system is not a matter of certainty, but is instead governed by a probability distribution. We then show that this framework gives a compelling account of several aspects of mathe… ▽ More We present a computational model of mathematical reasoning according to which mathematics is a fundamentally stochastic process. That is, on our model, whether or not a given formula is deemed a theorem in some axiomatic system is not a matter of certainty, but is instead governed by a probability distribution. We then show that this framework gives a compelling account of several aspects of mathematical practice. These include: 1) the way in which mathematicians generate research programs, 2) the applicability of Bayesian models of mathematical heuristics, 3) the role of abductive reasoning in mathematics, 4) the way in which multiple proofs of a proposition can strengthen our degree of belief in that proposition, and 5) the nature of the hypothesis that there are multiple formal systems that are isomorphic to physically possible universes. Thus, by embracing a model of mathematics as not perfectly predictable, we generate a new and fruitful perspective on the epistemology and practice of mathematics. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: Forthcoming in Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability. Springer. Ed. Anthony Aguirre, Zeeya Merali, and David Sloan. (Collection of winning essays from FQXi's 2020 Essay Context)

Work, entropy production, and thermodynamics of information under protocol constraints

Authors: Artemy Kolchinsky, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: In many real-world situations, there are constraints on the ways in which a physical system can be manipulated. We investigate the entropy production (EP) and extractable work involved in bringing a system from some initial distribution $p$ to some final distribution $p'$, given that the set of master equations available to the driving protocol obeys some constraints. We first derive general bound… ▽ More In many real-world situations, there are constraints on the ways in which a physical system can be manipulated. We investigate the entropy production (EP) and extractable work involved in bringing a system from some initial distribution $p$ to some final distribution $p'$, given that the set of master equations available to the driving protocol obeys some constraints. We first derive general bounds on EP and extractable work, as well as a decomposition of the nonequilibrium free energy into an "accessible free energy" (which can be extracted as work, given a set of constraints) and an "inaccessible free energy" (which must be dissipated as EP). In a similar vein, we consider the thermodynamics of information in the presence of constraints, and decompose the information acquired in a measurement into "accessible" and "inaccessible" components. This decomposition allows us to consider the thermodynamic efficiency of different measurements of the same system, given a set of constraints. We use our framework to analyze protocols subject to symmetry, modularity, and coarse-grained constraints, and consider various examples including the Szilard box, the 2D Ising model, and a multi-particle flashing ratchet. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2021; v1 submitted 24 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Journal ref: Physical Review X, 2021

What is important about the No Free Lunch theorems?

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: The No Free Lunch theorems prove that under a uniform distribution over induction problems (search problems or learning problems), all induction algorithms perform equally. As I discuss in this chapter, the importance of the theorems arises by using them to analyze scenarios involving {non-uniform} distributions, and to compare different algorithms, without any assumption about the distribution ov… ▽ More The No Free Lunch theorems prove that under a uniform distribution over induction problems (search problems or learning problems), all induction algorithms perform equally. As I discuss in this chapter, the importance of the theorems arises by using them to analyze scenarios involving {non-uniform} distributions, and to compare different algorithms, without any assumption about the distribution over problems at all. In particular, the theorems prove that {anti}-cross-validation (choosing among a set of candidate algorithms based on which has {worst} out-of-sample behavior) performs as well as cross-validation, unless one makes an assumption -- which has never been formalized -- about how the distribution over induction problems, on the one hand, is related to the set of algorithms one is choosing among using (anti-)cross validation, on the other. In addition, they establish strong caveats concerning the significance of the many results in the literature which establish the strength of a particular algorithm without assuming a particular distribution. They also motivate a ``dictionary'' between supervised learning and improve blackbox optimization, which allows one to ``translate'' techniques from supervised learning into the domain of blackbox optimization, thereby strengthening blackbox optimization algorithms. In addition to these topics, I also briefly discuss their implications for philosophy of science. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: 15 pages, 11 of main text, to be published in "Black Box Optimization, Machine Learning and No-Free Lunch Theorems", P. Pardalos, V. Rasskazova, M.N. Vrahatis, Ed., Springer

Minimal entropy production due to constraints on rate matrix dependencies in multipartite processes

Authors: David H Wolpert

Abstract: I consider multipartite processes in which there are constraints on each subsystem's rate matrix, restricting which other subsystems can directly affect its dynamics. I derive a strictly nonzero lower bound on the minimal achievable entropy production rate of the process in terms of these constraints on the rate matrices of its subsystems. The bound is based on constructing counterfactual rate mat… ▽ More I consider multipartite processes in which there are constraints on each subsystem's rate matrix, restricting which other subsystems can directly affect its dynamics. I derive a strictly nonzero lower bound on the minimal achievable entropy production rate of the process in terms of these constraints on the rate matrices of its subsystems. The bound is based on constructing counterfactual rate matrices, in which some subsystems are held fixed while the others are allowed to evolve. This bound is related to the "learning rate" of stationary bipartite systems, and more generally to the "information flow" in bipartite systems. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2020; v1 submitted 7 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: 11 pages, 1 figure

Thermodynamic costs of Turing Machines

Authors: Artemy Kolchinsky, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: Turing Machines (TMs) are the canonical model of computation in computer science and physics. We combine techniques from algorithmic information theory and stochastic thermodynamics to analyze the thermodynamic costs of TMs. We consider two different ways of realizing a given TM with a physical process. The first realization is designed to be thermodynamically reversible when fed with random input… ▽ More Turing Machines (TMs) are the canonical model of computation in computer science and physics. We combine techniques from algorithmic information theory and stochastic thermodynamics to analyze the thermodynamic costs of TMs. We consider two different ways of realizing a given TM with a physical process. The first realization is designed to be thermodynamically reversible when fed with random input bits. The second realization is designed to generate less heat, up to an additive constant, than any realization that is computable (i.e., consistent with the physical Church-Turing thesis). We consider three different thermodynamic costs: the heat generated when the TM is run on each input (which we refer to as the "heat function"), the minimum heat generated when a TM is run with an input that results in some desired output (which we refer to as the "thermodynamic complexity" of the output, in analogy to the Kolmogorov complexity), and the expected heat on the input distribution that minimizes entropy production. For universal TMs, we show for both realizations that the thermodynamic complexity of any desired output is bounded by a constant (unlike the conventional Kolmogorov complexity), while the expected amount of generated heat is infinite. We also show that any computable realization faces a fundamental tradeoff between heat generation, the Kolmogorov complexity of its heat function, and the Kolmogorov complexity of its input-output map. We demonstrate this tradeoff by analyzing the thermodynamics of erasing a long string. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2020; v1 submitted 10 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: Physical Review Research, 2020

Journal ref: Physical Review Research, 2020

Uncertainty relations and fluctuation theorems for Bayes nets

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: Recent research has considered the stochastic thermodynamics of multiple interacting systems, representing the overall system as a Bayes net. I derive fluctuation theorems governing the entropy production (EP)of arbitrary sets of the systems in such a Bayes net. I also derive ``conditional'' fluctuation theorems, governing the distribution of EP in one set of systems conditioned on the EP of a dif… ▽ More Recent research has considered the stochastic thermodynamics of multiple interacting systems, representing the overall system as a Bayes net. I derive fluctuation theorems governing the entropy production (EP)of arbitrary sets of the systems in such a Bayes net. I also derive ``conditional'' fluctuation theorems, governing the distribution of EP in one set of systems conditioned on the EP of a different set of systems. I then derive thermodynamic uncertainty relations relating the EP of the overall system to the precisions of probability currents within the individual systems. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2020; v1 submitted 6 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: 5 pages main text, 10 pages appendices, 1 figure - typos fixed from earlier version

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 200602 (2020)

Thermodynamic Computing

Authors: Tom Conte, Erik DeBenedictis, Natesh Ganesh, Todd Hylton, John Paul Strachan, R. Stanley Williams, Alexander Alemi, Lee Altenberg, Gavin Crooks, James Crutchfield, Lidia del Rio, Josh Deutsch, Michael DeWeese, Khari Douglas, Massimiliano Esposito, Michael Frank, Robert Fry, Peter Harsha, Mark Hill, Christopher Kello, Jeff Krichmar, Suhas Kumar, Shih-Chii Liu, Seth Lloyd, Matteo Marsili , et al. (14 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The hardware and software foundations laid in the first half of the 20th Century enabled the computing technologies that have transformed the world, but these foundations are now under siege. The current computing paradigm, which is the foundation of much of the current standards of living that we now enjoy, faces fundamental limitations that are evident from several perspectives. In terms of hard… ▽ More The hardware and software foundations laid in the first half of the 20th Century enabled the computing technologies that have transformed the world, but these foundations are now under siege. The current computing paradigm, which is the foundation of much of the current standards of living that we now enjoy, faces fundamental limitations that are evident from several perspectives. In terms of hardware, devices have become so small that we are struggling to eliminate the effects of thermodynamic fluctuations, which are unavoidable at the nanometer scale. In terms of software, our ability to imagine and program effective computational abstractions and implementations are clearly challenged in complex domains. In terms of systems, currently five percent of the power generated in the US is used to run computing systems - this astonishing figure is neither ecologically sustainable nor economically scalable. Economically, the cost of building next-generation semiconductor fabrication plants has soared past $10 billion. All of these difficulties - device scaling, software complexity, adaptability, energy consumption, and fabrication economics - indicate that the current computing paradigm has matured and that continued improvements along this path will be limited. If technological progress is to continue and corresponding social and economic benefits are to continue to accrue, computing must become much more capable, energy efficient, and affordable. We propose that progress in computing can continue under a united, physically grounded, computational paradigm centered on thermodynamics. Herein we propose a research agenda to extend these thermodynamic foundations into complex, non-equilibrium, self-organizing systems and apply them holistically to future computing systems that will harness nature's innate computational capacity. We call this type of computing "Thermodynamic Computing" or TC. △ Less

Submitted 14 November, 2019; v1 submitted 5 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: A Computing Community Consortium (CCC) workshop report, 36 pages

Report number: ccc2019report_6

Stochastic thermodynamics of computation

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: One of the major resource requirements of computers - ranging from biological cells to human brains to high-performance (engineered) computers - is the energy used to run them. Those costs of performing a computation have long been a focus of research in physics, going back to the early work of Landauer. One of the most prominent aspects of computers is that they are inherently nonequilibrium syst… ▽ More One of the major resource requirements of computers - ranging from biological cells to human brains to high-performance (engineered) computers - is the energy used to run them. Those costs of performing a computation have long been a focus of research in physics, going back to the early work of Landauer. One of the most prominent aspects of computers is that they are inherently nonequilibrium systems. However, the early research was done when nonequilibrium statistical physics was in its infancy, which meant the work was formulated in terms of equilibrium statistical physics. Since then there have been major breakthroughs in nonequilibrium statistical physics, which are allowing us to investigate the myriad aspects of the relationship between statistical physics and computation, extending well beyond the issue of how much work is required to erase a bit. In this paper I review some of this recent work on the `stochastic thermodynamics of computation'. After reviewing the salient parts of information theory, computer science theory, and stochastic thermodynamics, I summarize what has been learned about the entropic costs of performing a broad range of computations, extending from bit erasure to loop-free circuits to logically reversible circuits to information ratchets to Turing machines. These results reveal new, challenging engineering problems for how to design computers to have minimal thermodynamic costs. They also allow us to start to combine computer science theory and stochastic thermodynamics at a foundational level, thereby expanding both. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2023; v1 submitted 14 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 113 pages, no figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1901.00386

Journal ref: Invited article for special issue, "Shannon's information theory: 70 years on", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 2019

Thermodynamics of computing with circuits

Authors: David Hilton Wolpert, Artemy Kolchinsky

Abstract: Digital computers implement computations using circuits, as do many naturally occurring systems (e.g., gene regulatory networks). The topology of any such circuit restricts which variables may be physically coupled during the operation of a circuit. We investigate how such restrictions on the physical coupling affects the thermodynamic costs of running the circuit. To do this we first calculate th… ▽ More Digital computers implement computations using circuits, as do many naturally occurring systems (e.g., gene regulatory networks). The topology of any such circuit restricts which variables may be physically coupled during the operation of a circuit. We investigate how such restrictions on the physical coupling affects the thermodynamic costs of running the circuit. To do this we first calculate the minimal additional entropy production that arises when we run a given gate in a circuit. We then build on this calculation, to analyze how the thermodynamic costs of implementing a computation with a full circuit, comprising multiple connected gates, depends on the topology of that circuit. This analysis provides a rich new set of optimization problems that must be addressed by any designer of a circuit, if they wish to minimize thermodynamic costs. △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2023; v1 submitted 11 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: 26 pages (6 of appendices), 5 figures

MSC Class: 03D15 ACM Class: F.1; F.2.3

Constraints on physical reality arising from a formalization of knowledge

Authors: David Wolpert

Abstract: There are (at least) four ways that an agent can acquire information concerning the state of the universe: via observation, control, prediction, or via retrodiction, i.e., memory. Each of these four ways of acquiring information seems to rely on a different kind of physical device (resp., an observation device, a control device, etc.). However it turns out that certain mathematical structure is co… ▽ More There are (at least) four ways that an agent can acquire information concerning the state of the universe: via observation, control, prediction, or via retrodiction, i.e., memory. Each of these four ways of acquiring information seems to rely on a different kind of physical device (resp., an observation device, a control device, etc.). However it turns out that certain mathematical structure is common to those four types of device. Any device that possesses a certain subset of that structure is known as an "inference device" (ID). Here I review some of the properties of IDs, including their relation with Turing machines, and (more loosely) quantum mechanics. I also review the bounds of the joint abilities of any set of IDs to know facts about the physical universe that contains them. These bounds constrain the possible properties of any universe that contains agents who can acquire information concerning that universe. I then extend this previous work on IDs, by adding to the definition of IDs some of the other mathematical structure that is common to the four ways of acquiring information about the universe but is not captured in the (minimal) definition of IDs. I discuss these extensions of IDs in the context of epistemic logic (especially possible worlds formalisms like Kripke structures and Aumann structures). In particular, I show that these extensions of IDs are not subject to the problem of logical omniscience that plagues many previously studied forms of epistemic logic. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2018; v1 submitted 9 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: 24 pages, 7 figures

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Event-Driven Multi-Agent Decision Processes

Authors: Kunal Menda, Yi-Chun Chen, Justin Grana, James W. Bono, Brendan D. Tracey, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, David Wolpert

Abstract: The incorporation of macro-actions (temporally extended actions) into multi-agent decision problems has the potential to address the curse of dimensionality associated with such decision problems. Since macro-actions last for stochastic durations, multiple agents executing decentralized policies in cooperative environments must act asynchronously. We present an algorithm that modifies generalized… ▽ More The incorporation of macro-actions (temporally extended actions) into multi-agent decision problems has the potential to address the curse of dimensionality associated with such decision problems. Since macro-actions last for stochastic durations, multiple agents executing decentralized policies in cooperative environments must act asynchronously. We present an algorithm that modifies generalized advantage estimation for temporally extended actions, allowing a state-of-the-art policy optimization algorithm to optimize policies in Dec-POMDPs in which agents act asynchronously. We show that our algorithm is capable of learning optimal policies in two cooperative domains, one involving real-time bus holding control and one involving wildfire fighting with unmanned aircraft. Our algorithm works by framing problems as "event-driven decision processes," which are scenarios in which the sequence and timing of actions and events are random and governed by an underlying stochastic process. In addition to optimizing policies with continuous state and action spaces, our algorithm also facilitates the use of event-driven simulators, which do not require time to be discretized into time-steps. We demonstrate the benefit of using event-driven simulation in the context of multiple agents taking asynchronous actions. We show that fixed time-step simulation risks obfuscating the sequence in which closely separated events occur, adversely affecting the policies learned. In addition, we show that arbitrarily shrinking the time-step scales poorly with the number of agents. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2019; v1 submitted 19 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Comments: Published in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (Volume: 20, Issue: 4, April 2019). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8419722

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1259-1268, April 2019

Number of hidden states needed to physically implement a given conditional distribution

Authors: Jeremy A. Owen, Artemy Kolchinsky, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: We consider the problem of how to construct a physical process over a finite state space $X$ that applies some desired conditional distribution $P$ to initial states to produce final states. This problem arises often in the thermodynamics of computation and nonequilibrium statistical physics more generally (e.g., when designing processes to implement some desired computation, feedback controller,… ▽ More We consider the problem of how to construct a physical process over a finite state space $X$ that applies some desired conditional distribution $P$ to initial states to produce final states. This problem arises often in the thermodynamics of computation and nonequilibrium statistical physics more generally (e.g., when designing processes to implement some desired computation, feedback controller, or Maxwell demon). It was previously known that some conditional distributions cannot be implemented using any master equation that involves just the states in $X$. However, here we show that any conditional distribution $P$ can in fact be implemented---if additional "hidden" states not in $X$ are available. Moreover, we show that it is always possible to implement $P$ in a thermodynamically reversible manner. We then investigate a novel cost of the physical resources needed to implement a given distribution $P$: the minimal number of hidden states needed to do so. We calculate this cost exactly for the special case where $P$ represents a single-valued function, and provide an upper bound for the general case, in terms of the nonnegative rank of $P$. These results show that having access to one extra binary degree of freedom, thus doubling the total number of states, is sufficient to implement any $P$ with a master equation in a thermodynamically reversible way, if there are no constraints on the allowed form of the master equation. (Such constraints can greatly increase the minimal needed number of hidden states.) Our results also imply that for certain $P$ that can be implemented without hidden states, having hidden states permits an implementation that generates less heat. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2019; v1 submitted 3 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures

Journal ref: New J. Phys. 21 013022, 2019

A space-time tradeoff for implementing a function with master equation dynamics

Authors: David H. Wolpert, Artemy Kolchinsky, Jeremy A. Owen

Abstract: Master equations are commonly used to model the dynamics of physical systems, including systems that implement single-valued functions like a computer's update step. However, many such functions cannot be implemented by any master equation, even approximately, which raises the question of how they can occur in the real world. Here we show how any function over some "visible" states can be implemen… ▽ More Master equations are commonly used to model the dynamics of physical systems, including systems that implement single-valued functions like a computer's update step. However, many such functions cannot be implemented by any master equation, even approximately, which raises the question of how they can occur in the real world. Here we show how any function over some "visible" states can be implemented with master equation dynamics--if the dynamics exploits additional, "hidden" states at intermediate times. We also show that any master equation implementing a function can be decomposed into a sequence of "hidden" timesteps, demarcated by changes in what state-to-state transitions have nonzero probability. In many real-world situations there is a cost both for more hidden states and for more hidden timesteps. Accordingly, we derive a "space-time" tradeoff between the number of hidden states and the number of hidden timesteps needed to implement any given function. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2019; v1 submitted 28 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures

Journal ref: Nature Communications, 10(1):1727, 2019

Nonlinear Information Bottleneck

Authors: Artemy Kolchinsky, Brendan D. Tracey, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: Information bottleneck (IB) is a technique for extracting information in one random variable $X$ that is relevant for predicting another random variable $Y$. IB works by encoding $X$ in a compressed "bottleneck" random variable $M$ from which $Y$ can be accurately decoded. However, finding the optimal bottleneck variable involves a difficult optimization problem, which until recently has been cons… ▽ More Information bottleneck (IB) is a technique for extracting information in one random variable $X$ that is relevant for predicting another random variable $Y$. IB works by encoding $X$ in a compressed "bottleneck" random variable $M$ from which $Y$ can be accurately decoded. However, finding the optimal bottleneck variable involves a difficult optimization problem, which until recently has been considered for only two limited cases: discrete $X$ and $Y$ with small state spaces, and continuous $X$ and $Y$ with a Gaussian joint distribution (in which case optimal encoding and decoding maps are linear). We propose a method for performing IB on arbitrarily-distributed discrete and/or continuous $X$ and $Y$, while allowing for nonlinear encoding and decoding maps. Our approach relies on a novel non-parametric upper bound for mutual information. We describe how to implement our method using neural networks. We then show that it achieves better performance than the recently-proposed "variational IB" method on several real-world datasets. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2019; v1 submitted 5 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Journal ref: Entropy, 2019

Modeling Social Organizations as Communication Networks

Authors: David Wolpert, Justin Grana, Brendan Tracey, Tim Kohler, Artemy Kolchinsky

Abstract: We identify the "organization" of a human social group as the communication network(s) within that group. We then introduce three theoretical approaches to analyzing what determines the structures of human organizations. All three approaches adopt a group-selection perspective, so that the group's network structure is (approximately) optimal, given the information-processing limitations of agents… ▽ More We identify the "organization" of a human social group as the communication network(s) within that group. We then introduce three theoretical approaches to analyzing what determines the structures of human organizations. All three approaches adopt a group-selection perspective, so that the group's network structure is (approximately) optimal, given the information-processing limitations of agents within the social group, and the exogenous welfare function of the overall group. In the first approach we use a new sub-field of telecommunications theory called network coding, and focus on a welfare function that involves the ability of the organization to convey information among the agents. In the second approach we focus on a scenario where agents within the organization must allocate their future communication resources when the state of the future environment is uncertain. We show how this formulation can be solved with a linear program. In the third approach, we introduce an information synthesis problem in which agents within an organization receive information from various sources and must decide how to transform such information and transmit the results to other agents in the organization. We propose leveraging the computational power of neural networks to solve such problems. These three approaches formalize and synthesize work in fields including anthropology, archeology, economics and psychology that deal with organization structure, theory of the firm, span of control and cognitive limits on communication. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Coarse-graining and the Blackwell order

Authors: Johannes Rauh, Pradeep Kr. Banerjee, Eckehard Olbrich, Jürgen Jost, Nils Bertschinger, David Wolpert

Abstract: Suppose we have a pair of information channels, $κ_{1},κ_{2}$, with a common input. The Blackwell order is a partial order over channels that compares $κ_{1}$ and $κ_{2}$ by the maximal expected utility an agent can obtain when decisions are based on the channel outputs. Equivalently, $κ_{1}$ is said to be Blackwell-inferior to $κ_{2}$ if and only if $κ_{1}$ can be constructed by garbling the outp… ▽ More Suppose we have a pair of information channels, $κ_{1},κ_{2}$, with a common input. The Blackwell order is a partial order over channels that compares $κ_{1}$ and $κ_{2}$ by the maximal expected utility an agent can obtain when decisions are based on the channel outputs. Equivalently, $κ_{1}$ is said to be Blackwell-inferior to $κ_{2}$ if and only if $κ_{1}$ can be constructed by garbling the output of $κ_{2}$. A related partial order stipulates that $κ_{2}$ is more capable than $κ_{1}$ if the mutual information between the input and output is larger for $κ_{2}$ than for $κ_{1}$ for any distribution over inputs. A Blackwell-inferior channel is necessarily less capable. However, examples are known where $κ_{1}$ is less capable than $κ_{2}$ but not Blackwell-inferior. We show that this may even happen when $κ_{1}$ is constructed by coarse-graining the inputs of $κ_{2}$. Such a coarse-graining is a special kind of "pre-garbling" of the channel inputs. This example directly establishes that the expected value of the shared utility function for the coarse-grained channel is larger than it is for the non-coarse-grained channel. This contradicts the intuition that coarse-graining can only destroy information and lead to inferior channels. We also discuss our results in the context of information decompositions. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2017; v1 submitted 26 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 12 pages, 1 figure, journal version

MSC Class: 62B15; 94A15; 94A17

Journal ref: Entropy 2017, 19(10), 527

A Likelihood Ratio Detector for Identifying Within-Perimeter Computer Network Attacks

Authors: Justin Grana, David Wolpert, Joshua Neil, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Russel Bent

Abstract: The rapid detection of attackers within firewalls of enterprise computer net- works is of paramount importance. Anomaly detectors address this problem by quantifying deviations from baseline statistical models of normal network behav- ior and signaling an intrusion when the observed data deviates significantly from the baseline model. However, many anomaly detectors do not take into account plausi… ▽ More The rapid detection of attackers within firewalls of enterprise computer net- works is of paramount importance. Anomaly detectors address this problem by quantifying deviations from baseline statistical models of normal network behav- ior and signaling an intrusion when the observed data deviates significantly from the baseline model. However, many anomaly detectors do not take into account plausible attacker behavior. As a result, anomaly detectors are prone to a large number of false positives due to unusual but benign activity. This paper first in- troduces a stochastic model of attacker behavior which is motivated by real world attacker traversal. Then, we develop a likelihood ratio detector that compares the probability of observed network behavior under normal conditions against the case when an attacker has possibly compromised a subset of hosts within the network. Since the likelihood ratio detector requires integrating over the time each host be- comes compromised, we illustrate how to use Monte Carlo methods to compute the requisite integral. We then present Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for various network parameterizations that show for any rate of true posi- tives, the rate of false positives for the likelihood ratio detector is no higher than that of a simple anomaly detector and is often lower. We conclude by demon- strating the superiority of the proposed likelihood ratio detector when the network topologies and parameterizations are extracted from real-world networks. △ Less

Submitted 1 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Dependence of dissipation on the initial distribution over states

Authors: Artemy Kolchinsky, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: We analyze how the amount of work dissipated by a fixed nonequilibrium process depends on the initial distribution over states. Specifically, we compare the amount of dissipation when the process is used with some specified initial distribution to the minimal amount of dissipation possible for any initial distribution. We show that the difference between those two amounts of dissipation is given b… ▽ More We analyze how the amount of work dissipated by a fixed nonequilibrium process depends on the initial distribution over states. Specifically, we compare the amount of dissipation when the process is used with some specified initial distribution to the minimal amount of dissipation possible for any initial distribution. We show that the difference between those two amounts of dissipation is given by a simple information-theoretic function that depends only on the initial and final state distributions. Crucially, this difference is independent of the details of the process relating those distributions. We then consider how dissipation depends on the initial distribution for a 'computer', i.e., a nonequilibrium process whose dynamics over coarse-grained macrostates implement some desired input-output map. We show that our results still apply when stated in terms of distributions over the computer's coarse-grained macrostates. This can be viewed as a novel thermodynamic cost of computation, reflecting changes in the distribution over inputs rather than the logical dynamics of the computation. △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2017; v1 submitted 4 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

MSC Class: 82C05

Journal ref: J. Stat. Mech, 2017

Optimal high-level descriptions of dynamical systems

Authors: David H. Wolpert, Joshua A. Grochow, Eric Libby, Simon DeDeo

Abstract: To analyze high-dimensional systems, many fields in science and engineering rely on high-level descriptions, sometimes called "macrostates," "coarse-grainings," or "effective theories". Examples of such descriptions include the thermodynamic properties of a large collection of point particles undergoing reversible dynamics, the variables in a macroeconomic model describing the individuals that par… ▽ More To analyze high-dimensional systems, many fields in science and engineering rely on high-level descriptions, sometimes called "macrostates," "coarse-grainings," or "effective theories". Examples of such descriptions include the thermodynamic properties of a large collection of point particles undergoing reversible dynamics, the variables in a macroeconomic model describing the individuals that participate in an economy, and the summary state of a cell composed of a large set of biochemical networks. Often these high-level descriptions are constructed without considering the ultimate reason for needing them in the first place. Here, we formalize and quantify one such purpose: the need to predict observables of interest concerning the high-dimensional system with as high accuracy as possible, while minimizing the computational cost of doing so. The resulting State Space Compression (SSC) framework provides a guide for how to solve for the {optimal} high-level description of a given dynamical system, rather than constructing it based on human intuition alone. In this preliminary report, we introduce SSC, and illustrate it with several information-theoretic quantifications of "accuracy", all with different implications for the optimal compression. We also discuss some other possible applications of SSC beyond the goal of accurate prediction. These include SSC as a measure of the complexity of a dynamical system, and as a way to quantify information flow between the scales of a system. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2015; v1 submitted 25 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Comments: 33 pages. Updated discussion and references

Report number: SFI Working Paper #15-06-017

Predicting the behavior of interacting humans by fusing data from multiple sources

Authors: Erik J. Schlicht, Ritchie Lee, David H. Wolpert, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Brendan Tracey

Abstract: Multi-fidelity methods combine inexpensive low-fidelity simulations with costly but highfidelity simulations to produce an accurate model of a system of interest at minimal cost. They have proven useful in modeling physical systems and have been applied to engineering problems such as wing-design optimization. During human-in-the-loop experimentation, it has become increasingly common to use onlin… ▽ More Multi-fidelity methods combine inexpensive low-fidelity simulations with costly but highfidelity simulations to produce an accurate model of a system of interest at minimal cost. They have proven useful in modeling physical systems and have been applied to engineering problems such as wing-design optimization. During human-in-the-loop experimentation, it has become increasingly common to use online platforms, like Mechanical Turk, to run low-fidelity experiments to gather human performance data in an efficient manner. One concern with these experiments is that the results obtained from the online environment generalize poorly to the actual domain of interest. To address this limitation, we extend traditional multi-fidelity approaches to allow us to combine fewer data points from high-fidelity human-in-the-loop experiments with plentiful but less accurate data from low-fidelity experiments to produce accurate models of how humans interact. We present both model-based and model-free methods, and summarize the predictive performance of each method under dierent conditions. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2014; originally announced August 2014.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2012)

Report number: UAI-P-2012-PG-756-765

Value of information in noncooperative games

Authors: Nils Bertschinger, David H. Wolpert, Eckehard Olbrich, Juergen Jost

Abstract: In some games, additional information hurts a player, e.g., in games with first-mover advantage, the second-mover is hurt by seeing the first-mover's move. What properties of a game determine whether it has such negative "value of information" for a particular player? Can a game have negative value of information for all players? To answer such questions, we generalize the definition of marginal u… ▽ More In some games, additional information hurts a player, e.g., in games with first-mover advantage, the second-mover is hurt by seeing the first-mover's move. What properties of a game determine whether it has such negative "value of information" for a particular player? Can a game have negative value of information for all players? To answer such questions, we generalize the definition of marginal utility of a good to define the marginal utility of a parameter vector specifying a game. So rather than analyze the global structure of the relationship between a game's parameter vector and player behavior, as in previous work, we focus on the local structure of that relationship. This allows us to prove that generically, every game can have negative marginal value of information, unless one imposes a priori constraints on allowed changes to the game's parameter vector. We demonstrate these and related results numerically, and discuss their implications. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2015; v1 submitted 27 December, 2013; originally announced January 2014.

Comments: Shortened and simplified text, in particular no knowledge of differential geometry is assumed any more. Accordingly the title has been changed from "Information Geometry of noncooperative games" to "Value of information in noncooperative games"

Cyber-Physical Security: A Game Theory Model of Humans Interacting over Control Systems

Authors: Scott Backhaus, Russell Bent, James Bono, Ritchie Lee, Brendan Tracey, David Wolpert, Yildiray Yildiz

Abstract: Recent years have seen increased interest in the design and deployment of smart grid devices and control algorithms. Each of these smart communicating devices represents a potential access point for an intruder spurring research into intruder prevention and detection. However, no security measures are complete, and intruding attackers will compromise smart grid devices leading to the attacker and… ▽ More Recent years have seen increased interest in the design and deployment of smart grid devices and control algorithms. Each of these smart communicating devices represents a potential access point for an intruder spurring research into intruder prevention and detection. However, no security measures are complete, and intruding attackers will compromise smart grid devices leading to the attacker and the system operator interacting via the grid and its control systems. The outcome of these machine-mediated human-human interactions will depend on the design of the physical and control systems mediating the interactions. If these outcomes can be predicted via simulation, they can be used as a tool for designing attack-resilient grids and control systems. However, accurate predictions require good models of not just the physical and control systems, but also of the human decision making. In this manuscript, we present an approach to develop such tools, i.e. models of the decisions of the cyber-physical intruder who is attacking the systems and the system operator who is defending it, and demonstrate its usefulness for design. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: 8 pages, 7 figures, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grids pending

Counter-Factual Reinforcement Learning: How to Model Decision-Makers That Anticipate The Future

Authors: Ritchie Lee, David H. Wolpert, James Bono, Scott Backhaus, Russell Bent, Brendan Tracey

Abstract: This paper introduces a novel framework for modeling interacting humans in a multi-stage game. This "iterated semi network-form game" framework has the following desirable characteristics: (1) Bounded rational players, (2) strategic players (i.e., players account for one another's reward functions when predicting one another's behavior), and (3) computational tractability even on real-world system… ▽ More This paper introduces a novel framework for modeling interacting humans in a multi-stage game. This "iterated semi network-form game" framework has the following desirable characteristics: (1) Bounded rational players, (2) strategic players (i.e., players account for one another's reward functions when predicting one another's behavior), and (3) computational tractability even on real-world systems. We achieve these benefits by combining concepts from game theory and reinforcement learning. To be precise, we extend the bounded rational "level-K reasoning" model to apply to games over multiple stages. Our extension allows the decomposition of the overall modeling problem into a series of smaller ones, each of which can be solved by standard reinforcement learning algorithms. We call this hybrid approach "level-K reinforcement learning". We investigate these ideas in a cyber battle scenario over a smart power grid and discuss the relationship between the behavior predicted by our model and what one might expect of real human defenders and attackers. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2012; originally announced July 2012.

Comments: Decision Making with Multiple Imperfect Decision Makers; Springer. 29 Pages, 6 Figures

Predicting the behavior of interacting humans by fusing data from multiple sources

Authors: Erik J. Schlicht, Ritchie Lee, David H. Wolpert, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Brendan Tracey

Abstract: Multi-fidelity methods combine inexpensive low-fidelity simulations with costly but high-fidelity simulations to produce an accurate model of a system of interest at minimal cost. They have proven useful in modeling physical systems and have been applied to engineering problems such as wing-design optimization. During human-in-the-loop experimentation, it has become increasingly common to use onli… ▽ More Multi-fidelity methods combine inexpensive low-fidelity simulations with costly but high-fidelity simulations to produce an accurate model of a system of interest at minimal cost. They have proven useful in modeling physical systems and have been applied to engineering problems such as wing-design optimization. During human-in-the-loop experimentation, it has become increasingly common to use online platforms, like Mechanical Turk, to run low-fidelity experiments to gather human performance data in an efficient manner. One concern with these experiments is that the results obtained from the online environment generalize poorly to the actual domain of interest. To address this limitation, we extend traditional multi-fidelity approaches to allow us to combine fewer data points from high-fidelity human-in-the-loop experiments with plentiful but less accurate data from low-fidelity experiments to produce accurate models of how humans interact. We present both model-based and model-free methods, and summarize the predictive performance of each method under different conditions. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI2012)

Using Supervised Learning to Improve Monte Carlo Integral Estimation

Authors: Brendan Tracey, David Wolpert, Juan J. Alonso

Abstract: Monte Carlo (MC) techniques are often used to estimate integrals of a multivariate function using randomly generated samples of the function. In light of the increasing interest in uncertainty quantification and robust design applications in aerospace engineering, the calculation of expected values of such functions (e.g. performance measures) becomes important. However, MC techniques often suffer… ▽ More Monte Carlo (MC) techniques are often used to estimate integrals of a multivariate function using randomly generated samples of the function. In light of the increasing interest in uncertainty quantification and robust design applications in aerospace engineering, the calculation of expected values of such functions (e.g. performance measures) becomes important. However, MC techniques often suffer from high variance and slow convergence as the number of samples increases. In this paper we present Stacked Monte Carlo (StackMC), a new method for post-processing an existing set of MC samples to improve the associated integral estimate. StackMC is based on the supervised learning techniques of fitting functions and cross validation. It should reduce the variance of any type of Monte Carlo integral estimate (simple sampling, importance sampling, quasi-Monte Carlo, MCMC, etc.) without adding bias. We report on an extensive set of experiments confirming that the StackMC estimate of an integral is more accurate than both the associated unprocessed Monte Carlo estimate and an estimate based on a functional fit to the MC samples. These experiments run over a wide variety of integration spaces, numbers of sample points, dimensions, and fitting functions. In particular, we apply StackMC in estimating the expected value of the fuel burn metric of future commercial aircraft and in estimating sonic boom loudness measures. We compare the efficiency of StackMC with that of more standard methods and show that for negligible additional computational cost significant increases in accuracy are gained. △ Less

Submitted 24 August, 2011; originally announced August 2011.

Comments: 18 pages, 10 figures, originally published by AIAA at the 13th Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference

Journal ref: 13th AIAA Non-Deterministic Approaches Conference, Denver, CO, April 2011, AIAA Paper 2011-1843

Collective Intelligence, Data Routing and Braess' Paradox

Authors: K. Tumer, D. H. Wolpert

Abstract: We consider the problem of designing the the utility functions of the utility-maximizing agents in a multi-agent system so that they work synergistically to maximize a global utility. The particular problem domain we explore is the control of network routing by placing agents on all the routers in the network. Conventional approaches to this task have the agents all use the Ideal S… ▽ More We consider the problem of designing the the utility functions of the utility-maximizing agents in a multi-agent system so that they work synergistically to maximize a global utility. The particular problem domain we explore is the control of network routing by placing agents on all the routers in the network. Conventional approaches to this task have the agents all use the Ideal Shortest Path routing Algorithm (ISPA). We demonstrate that in many cases, due to the side-effects of one agent's actions on another agent's performance, having agents use ISPA's is suboptimal as far as global aggregate cost is concerned, even when they are only used to route infinitesimally small amounts of traffic. The utility functions of the individual agents are not "aligned" with the global utility, intuitively speaking. As a particular example of this we present an instance of Braess' paradox in which adding new links to a network whose agents all use the ISPA results in a decrease in overall throughput. We also demonstrate that load-balancing, in which the agents' decisions are collectively made to optimize the global cost incurred by all traffic currently being routed, is suboptimal as far as global cost averaged across time is concerned. This is also due to 'side-effects', in this case of current routing decision on future traffic. The mathematics of Collective Intelligence (COIN) is concerned precisely with the issue of avoiding such deleterious side-effects in multi-agent systems, both over time and space. We present key concepts from that mathematics and use them to derive an algorithm whose ideal version should have better performance than that of having all agents use the ISPA, even in the infinitesimal limit. We present experiments verifying this, and also showing that a machine-learning-based version of this COIN algorithm in which costs are only imprecisely estimated via empirical means (a version potentially applicable in the real world) also outperforms the ISPA, despite having access to less information than does the ISPA. In particular, this COIN algorithm almost always avoids Braess' paradox. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2011; originally announced June 2011.

Journal ref: Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research, Volume 16, pages 359-387, 2002

Game theoretic modeling of pilot behavior during mid-air encounters

Authors: Ritchie Lee, David H. Wolpert

Abstract: We show how to combine Bayes nets and game theory to predict the behavior of hybrid systems involving both humans and automated components. We call this novel framework "Semi Network-Form Games," and illustrate it by predicting aircraft pilot behavior in potential near mid-air collisions. At present, at the beginning of such potential collisions, a collision avoidance system in the aircraft cockpi… ▽ More We show how to combine Bayes nets and game theory to predict the behavior of hybrid systems involving both humans and automated components. We call this novel framework "Semi Network-Form Games," and illustrate it by predicting aircraft pilot behavior in potential near mid-air collisions. At present, at the beginning of such potential collisions, a collision avoidance system in the aircraft cockpit advises the pilots what to do to avoid the collision. However studies of mid-air encounters have found wide variability in pilot responses to avoidance system advisories. In particular, pilots rarely perfectly execute the recommended maneuvers, despite the fact that the collision avoidance system's effectiveness relies on their doing so. Rather pilots decide their actions based on all information available to them (advisory, instrument readings, visual observations). We show how to build this aspect into a semi network-form game model of the encounter and then present computational simulations of the resultant model. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2011; v1 submitted 26 March, 2011; originally announced March 2011.

Comments: NIPS2010: Decision Making with Multiple Imperfect Decision Makers. 38 pages, 13 figures

Hysteresis effects of changing parameters of noncooperative games

Authors: David H. Wolpert, Michael Harre, Eckehard Olbrich, Nils Bertschinger, Juergen Jost

Abstract: We adapt the method used by Jaynes to derive the equilibria of statistical physics to instead derive equilibria of bounded rational game theory. We analyze the dependence of these equilibria on the parameters of the underlying game, focusing on hysteresis effects. In particular, we show that by gradually imposing individual-specific tax rates on the players of the game, and then gradually removing… ▽ More We adapt the method used by Jaynes to derive the equilibria of statistical physics to instead derive equilibria of bounded rational game theory. We analyze the dependence of these equilibria on the parameters of the underlying game, focusing on hysteresis effects. In particular, we show that by gradually imposing individual-specific tax rates on the players of the game, and then gradually removing those taxes, the players move from a poor equilibrium to one that is better for all of them. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures

What does Newcomb's paradox teach us?

Authors: David H. Wolpert, Gregory Benford

Abstract: In Newcomb's paradox you choose to receive either the contents of a particular closed box, or the contents of both that closed box and another one. Before you choose, a prediction algorithm deduces your choice, and fills the two boxes based on that deduction. Newcomb's paradox is that game theory appears to provide two conflicting recommendations for what choice you should make in this scenario. W… ▽ More In Newcomb's paradox you choose to receive either the contents of a particular closed box, or the contents of both that closed box and another one. Before you choose, a prediction algorithm deduces your choice, and fills the two boxes based on that deduction. Newcomb's paradox is that game theory appears to provide two conflicting recommendations for what choice you should make in this scenario. We analyze Newcomb's paradox using a recent extension of game theory in which the players set conditional probability distributions in a Bayes net. We show that the two game theory recommendations in Newcomb's scenario have different presumptions for what Bayes net relates your choice and the algorithm's prediction. We resolve the paradox by proving that these two Bayes nets are incompatible. We also show that the accuracy of the algorithm's prediction, the focus of much previous work, is irrelevant. In addition we show that Newcomb's scenario only provides a contradiction between game theory's expected utility and dominance principles if one is sloppy in specifying the underlying Bayes net. We also show that Newcomb's paradox is time-reversal invariant; both the paradox and its resolution are unchanged if the algorithm makes its `prediction' after you make your choice rather than before. △ Less

Submitted 5 March, 2010; originally announced March 2010.

Distributed Constrained Optimization with Semicoordinate Transformations

Authors: William Macready, David Wolpert

Abstract: Recent work has shown how information theory extends conventional full-rationality game theory to allow bounded rational agents. The associated mathematical framework can be used to solve constrained optimization problems. This is done by translating the problem into an iterated game, where each agent controls a different variable of the problem, so that the joint probability distribution across… ▽ More Recent work has shown how information theory extends conventional full-rationality game theory to allow bounded rational agents. The associated mathematical framework can be used to solve constrained optimization problems. This is done by translating the problem into an iterated game, where each agent controls a different variable of the problem, so that the joint probability distribution across the agents' moves gives an expected value of the objective function. The dynamics of the agents is designed to minimize a Lagrangian function of that joint distribution. Here we illustrate how the updating of the Lagrange parameters in the Lagrangian is a form of automated annealing, which focuses the joint distribution more and more tightly about the joint moves that optimize the objective function. We then investigate the use of ``semicoordinate'' variable transformations. These separate the joint state of the agents from the variables of the optimization problem, with the two connected by an onto map**. We present experiments illustrating the ability of such transformations to facilitate optimization. We focus on the special kind of transformation in which the statistically independent states of the agents induces a mixture distribution over the optimization variables. Computer experiment illustrate this for $k$-sat constraint satisfaction problems and for unconstrained minimization of $NK$ functions. △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2008; originally announced November 2008.

Bias-Variance Techniques for Monte Carlo Optimization: Cross-validation for the CE Method

Authors: Dev Rajnarayan, David Wolpert

Abstract: In this paper, we examine the CE method in the broad context of Monte Carlo Optimization (MCO) and Parametric Learning (PL), a type of machine learning. A well-known overarching principle used to improve the performance of many PL algorithms is the bias-variance tradeoff. This tradeoff has been used to improve PL algorithms ranging from Monte Carlo estimation of integrals, to linear estimation,… ▽ More In this paper, we examine the CE method in the broad context of Monte Carlo Optimization (MCO) and Parametric Learning (PL), a type of machine learning. A well-known overarching principle used to improve the performance of many PL algorithms is the bias-variance tradeoff. This tradeoff has been used to improve PL algorithms ranging from Monte Carlo estimation of integrals, to linear estimation, to general statistical estimation. Moreover, as described by, MCO is very closely related to PL. Owing to this similarity, the bias-variance tradeoff affects MCO performance, just as it does PL performance. In this article, we exploit the bias-variance tradeoff to enhance the performance of MCO algorithms. We use the technique of cross-validation, a technique based on the bias-variance tradeoff, to significantly improve the performance of the Cross Entropy (CE) method, which is an MCO algorithm. In previous work we have confirmed that other PL techniques improve the perfomance of other MCO algorithms. We conclude that the many techniques pioneered in PL could be investigated as ways to improve MCO algorithms in general, and the CE method in particular. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2008; originally announced October 2008.

Physical limits of inference

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: I show that physical devices that perform observation, prediction, or recollection share an underlying mathematical structure. I call devices with that structure "inference devices". I present a set of existence and impossibility results concerning inference devices. These results hold independent of the precise physical laws governing our universe. In a limited sense, the impossibility results… ▽ More I show that physical devices that perform observation, prediction, or recollection share an underlying mathematical structure. I call devices with that structure "inference devices". I present a set of existence and impossibility results concerning inference devices. These results hold independent of the precise physical laws governing our universe. In a limited sense, the impossibility results establish that Laplace was wrong to claim that even in a classical, non-chaotic universe the future can be unerringly predicted, given sufficient knowledge of the present. Alternatively, these impossibility results can be viewed as a non-quantum mechanical "uncertainty principle". Next I explore the close connections between the mathematics of inference devices and of Turing Machines. In particular, the impossibility results for inference devices are similar to the Halting theorem for TM's. Furthermore, one can define an analog of Universal TM's (UTM's) for inference devices. I call those analogs "strong inference devices". I use strong inference devices to define the "inference complexity" of an inference task, which is the analog of the Kolmogorov complexity of computing a string. However no universe can contain more than one strong inference device. So whereas the Kolmogorov complexity of a string is arbitrary up to specification of the UTM, there is no such arbitrariness in the inference complexity of an inference task. I end by discussing the philosophical implications of these results, e.g., for whether the universe "is" a computer. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2008; v1 submitted 9 August, 2007; originally announced August 2007.

Comments: 43 pages, updated version of Physica D version, which originally appeared in 2007 CNLS conference on unconventional computation

Journal ref: PhysicaD237:1257-1281,2008

Parametric Learning and Monte Carlo Optimization

Authors: David H. Wolpert, Dev G. Rajnarayan

Abstract: This paper uncovers and explores the close relationship between Monte Carlo Optimization of a parametrized integral (MCO), Parametric machine-Learning (PL), and `blackbox' or `oracle'-based optimization (BO). We make four contributions. First, we prove that MCO is mathematically identical to a broad class of PL problems. This identity potentially provides a new application domain for all broadly… ▽ More This paper uncovers and explores the close relationship between Monte Carlo Optimization of a parametrized integral (MCO), Parametric machine-Learning (PL), and `blackbox' or `oracle'-based optimization (BO). We make four contributions. First, we prove that MCO is mathematically identical to a broad class of PL problems. This identity potentially provides a new application domain for all broadly applicable PL techniques: MCO. Second, we introduce immediate sampling, a new version of the Probability Collectives (PC) algorithm for blackbox optimization. Immediate sampling transforms the original BO problem into an MCO problem. Accordingly, by combining these first two contributions, we can apply all PL techniques to BO. In our third contribution we validate this way of improving BO by demonstrating that cross-validation and bagging improve immediate sampling. Finally, conventional MC and MCO procedures ignore the relationship between the sample point locations and the associated values of the integrand; only the values of the integrand at those locations are considered. We demonstrate that one can exploit the sample location information using PL techniques, for example by forming a fit of the sample locations to the associated values of the integrand. This provides an additional way to apply PL techniques to improve MCO. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2007; originally announced April 2007.

A Predictive Theory of Games

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: Conventional noncooperative game theory hypothesizes that the joint strategy of a set of players in a game must satisfy an "equilibrium concept". All other joint strategies are considered impossible; the only issue is what equilibrium concept is "correct". This hypothesis violates the desiderata underlying probability theory. Indeed, probability theory renders moot the problem of what equilibriu… ▽ More Conventional noncooperative game theory hypothesizes that the joint strategy of a set of players in a game must satisfy an "equilibrium concept". All other joint strategies are considered impossible; the only issue is what equilibrium concept is "correct". This hypothesis violates the desiderata underlying probability theory. Indeed, probability theory renders moot the problem of what equilibrium concept is correct - every joint strategy can arise with non-zero probability. Rather than a first-principles derivation of an equilibrium concept, game theory requires a first-principles derivation of a distribution over joint (mixed) strategies. This paper shows how information theory can provide such a distribution over joint strategies. If a scientist external to the game wants to distill such a distribution to a point prediction, that prediction should be set by decision theory, using their (!) loss function. So the predicted joint strategy - the "equilibrium concept" - varies with the external scientist's loss function. It is shown here that in many games, having a probability distribution with support restricted to Nash equilibria - as stipulated by conventional game theory - is impossible. It is also show how to: i) Derive an information-theoretic quantification of a player's degree of rationality; ii) Derive bounded rationality as a cost of computation; iii) Elaborate the close formal relationship between game theory and statistical physics; iv) Use this relationship to extend game theory to allow stochastically varying numbers of players. △ Less

Submitted 7 December, 2005; originally announced December 2005.

Comments: 66 pages

Metrics for more than two points at once

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: The conventional definition of a topological metric over a space specifies properties that must be obeyed by any measure of "how separated" two points in that space are. Here it is shown how to extend that definition, and in particular the triangle inequality, to concern arbitrary numbers of points. Such a measure of how separated the points within a collection are can be bootstrapped, to measur… ▽ More The conventional definition of a topological metric over a space specifies properties that must be obeyed by any measure of "how separated" two points in that space are. Here it is shown how to extend that definition, and in particular the triangle inequality, to concern arbitrary numbers of points. Such a measure of how separated the points within a collection are can be bootstrapped, to measure "how separated" from each other are two (or more) collections. The measure presented here also allows fractional membership of an element in a collection. This means it directly concerns measures of ``how spread out" a probability distribution over a space is. When such a measure is bootstrapped to compare two collections, it allows us to measure how separated two probability distributions are, or more generally, how separated a distribution of distributions is. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2004; originally announced April 2004.

Comments: 8 pages

Distributed Control by Lagrangian Steepest Descent

Authors: David H. Wolpert, Stefan Bieniawski

Abstract: Often adaptive, distributed control can be viewed as an iterated game between independent players. The coupling between the players' mixed strategies, arising as the system evolves from one instant to the next, is determined by the system designer. Information theory tells us that the most likely joint strategy of the players, given a value of the expectation of the overall control objective fun… ▽ More Often adaptive, distributed control can be viewed as an iterated game between independent players. The coupling between the players' mixed strategies, arising as the system evolves from one instant to the next, is determined by the system designer. Information theory tells us that the most likely joint strategy of the players, given a value of the expectation of the overall control objective function, is the minimizer of a Lagrangian function of the joint strategy. So the goal of the system designer is to speed evolution of the joint strategy to that Lagrangian minimizing point, lower the expectated value of the control objective function, and repeat. Here we elaborate the theory of algorithms that do this using local descent procedures, and that thereby achieve efficient, adaptive, distributed control. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2004; originally announced March 2004.

Comments: 8 pages

ACM Class: J.6; J.7; G.m

Information Theory - The Bridge Connecting Bounded Rational Game Theory and Statistical Physics

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: A long-running difficulty with conventional game theory has been how to modify it to accommodate the bounded rationality of all real-world players. A recurring issue in statistical physics is how best to approximate joint probability distributions with decoupled (and therefore far more tractable) distributions. This paper shows that the same information theoretic mathematical structure, known as… ▽ More A long-running difficulty with conventional game theory has been how to modify it to accommodate the bounded rationality of all real-world players. A recurring issue in statistical physics is how best to approximate joint probability distributions with decoupled (and therefore far more tractable) distributions. This paper shows that the same information theoretic mathematical structure, known as Product Distribution (PD) theory, addresses both issues. In this, PD theory not only provides a principled formulation of bounded rationality and a set of new types of mean field theory in statistical physics. It also shows that those topics are fundamentally one and the same. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2004; originally announced February 2004.

Comments: 17 pages, no figures, accepted for publication

Product Distribution Field Theory

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: This paper presents a novel way to approximate a distribution governing a system of coupled particles with a product of independent distributions. The approach is an extension of mean field theory that allows the independent distributions to live in a different space from the system, and thereby capture statistical dependencies in that system. It also allows different Hamiltonians for each indep… ▽ More This paper presents a novel way to approximate a distribution governing a system of coupled particles with a product of independent distributions. The approach is an extension of mean field theory that allows the independent distributions to live in a different space from the system, and thereby capture statistical dependencies in that system. It also allows different Hamiltonians for each independent distribution, to facilitate Monte Carlo estimation of those distributions. The approach leads to a novel energy-minimization algorithm in which each coordinate Monte Carlo estimates an associated spectrum, and then independently sets its state by sampling a Boltzmann distribution across that spectrum. It can also be used for high-dimensional numerical integration, (constrained) combinatorial optimization, and adaptive distributed control. This approach also provides a simple, physics-based derivation of the powerful approximate energy-minimization algorithms semi-formally derived in \cite{wowh00, wotu02c, wolp03a}. In addition it suggests many improvements to those algorithms, and motivates a new (bounded rationality) game theory equilibrium concept. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2003; originally announced July 2003.

Comments: 4 pages, submitted

Improving Search Algorithms by Using Intelligent Coordinates

Authors: David Wolpert, Kagan Tumer, Esfandiar Bandari

Abstract: We consider the problem of designing a set of computational agents so that as they all pursue their self-interests a global function G of the collective system is optimized. Three factors govern the quality of such design. The first relates to conventional exploration-exploitation search algorithms for finding the maxima of such a global function, e.g., simulated annealing. Game-theoretic algori… ▽ More We consider the problem of designing a set of computational agents so that as they all pursue their self-interests a global function G of the collective system is optimized. Three factors govern the quality of such design. The first relates to conventional exploration-exploitation search algorithms for finding the maxima of such a global function, e.g., simulated annealing. Game-theoretic algorithms instead are related to the second of those factors, and the third is related to techniques from the field of machine learning. Here we demonstrate how to exploit all three factors by modifying the search algorithm's exploration stage so that rather than by random sampling, each coordinate of the underlying search space is controlled by an associated machine-learning-based ``player'' engaged in a non-cooperative game. Experiments demonstrate that this modification improves SA by up to an order of magnitude for bin-packing and for a model of an economic process run over an underlying network. These experiments also reveal novel small worlds phenomena. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2003; originally announced January 2003.

Collectives for the Optimal Combination of Imperfect Objects

Authors: Kagan Tumer, David Wolpert

Abstract: In this letter we summarize some recent theoretical work on the design of collectives, i.e., of systems containing many agents, each of which can be viewed as trying to maximize an associated private utility, where there is also a world utility rating the behavior of that overall system that the designer of the collective wishes to optimize. We then apply algorithms based on that work on a recen… ▽ More In this letter we summarize some recent theoretical work on the design of collectives, i.e., of systems containing many agents, each of which can be viewed as trying to maximize an associated private utility, where there is also a world utility rating the behavior of that overall system that the designer of the collective wishes to optimize. We then apply algorithms based on that work on a recently suggested testbed for such optimization problems (Challet & Johnson, PRL, vol 89, 028701 2002). This is the problem of finding the combination of imperfect nano-scale objects that results in the best aggregate object. We present experimental results showing that these algorithms outperform conventional methods by more than an order of magnitude in this domain. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2003; originally announced January 2003.

Comments: 4 pages

On the computational capabilities of physical systems part II: relationship with conventional computer science

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: In the first of this pair of papers, it was proven that that no physical computer can correctly carry out all computational tasks that can be posed to it. The generality of this result follows from its use of a novel definition of computation, ``physical computation''. This second paper of the pair elaborates the mathematical structure and impossibility results associated with physical computati… ▽ More In the first of this pair of papers, it was proven that that no physical computer can correctly carry out all computational tasks that can be posed to it. The generality of this result follows from its use of a novel definition of computation, ``physical computation''. This second paper of the pair elaborates the mathematical structure and impossibility results associated with physical computation. Analogues of Chomsky hierarcy results concerning universal Turing Machines and the Halting theorem are derived, as are results concerning the (im)possibility of certain kinds of error-correcting codes. In addition, an analogue of algorithmic information complexity, ``prediction complexity'', is elaborated. A task-independent bound is derived on how much the prediction complexity of a computational task can differ for two different universal physical computers used to solve that task, a bound similar to the ``encoding'' bound governing how much the algorithm information complexity of a Turing machine calculation can differ for two universal Turing machines. Finally, it is proven that either the Hamiltonian of our universe proscribes a certain type of computation, or prediction complexity is unique (unlike algorithmic information complexity). △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2000; originally announced May 2000.

Comments: 40 pages, no figures

On the computational capabilities of physical systems part I: the impossibility of infallible computation

Authors: David H. Wolpert

Abstract: In this first of two papers, strong limits on the accuracy of physical computation are established. First it is proven that there cannot be a physical computer C to which one can pose any and all computational tasks concerning the physical universe. Next it is proven that no physical computer C can correctly carry out any computational task in the subset of such tasks that can be posed to C. As… ▽ More In this first of two papers, strong limits on the accuracy of physical computation are established. First it is proven that there cannot be a physical computer C to which one can pose any and all computational tasks concerning the physical universe. Next it is proven that no physical computer C can correctly carry out any computational task in the subset of such tasks that can be posed to C. As a particular example, this means that there cannot be a physical computer that can, for any physical system external to that computer, take the specification of that external system's state as input and then correctly predict its future state before that future state actually occurs. The results also mean that there cannot exist an infallible, general-purpose observation apparatus, and that there cannot be an infallible, general-purpose control apparatus. These results do not rely on systems that are infinite, and/or non-classical, and/or obey chaotic dynamics. They also hold even if one uses an infinitely fast, infinitely dense computer, with computational powers greater than that of a Turing Machine. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2000; originally announced May 2000.

Comments: 38 pages, no figures