Context, Composition, Automation, and Communication -- The C2AC Roadmap for Modeling and Simulation
Authors:
Adelinde Uhrmacher,
Peter Frazier,
Reiner Hähnle,
Franziska Klügl,
Fabian Lorig,
Bertram Ludäscher,
Laura Nenzi,
Cristina Ruiz-Martin,
Bernhard Rumpe,
Claudia Szabo,
Gabriel A. Wainer,
Pia Wilsdorf
Abstract:
Simulation has become, in many application areas, a sine-qua-non. Most recently, COVID-19 has underlined the importance of simulation studies and limitations in current practices and methods. We identify four goals of methodological work for addressing these limitations. The first is to provide better support for capturing, representing, and evaluating the context of simulation studies, including…
▽ More
Simulation has become, in many application areas, a sine-qua-non. Most recently, COVID-19 has underlined the importance of simulation studies and limitations in current practices and methods. We identify four goals of methodological work for addressing these limitations. The first is to provide better support for capturing, representing, and evaluating the context of simulation studies, including research questions, assumptions, requirements, and activities contributing to a simulation study. In addition, the composition of simulation models and other simulation studies' products must be supported beyond syntactical coherence, including aspects of semantics and purpose, enabling their effective reuse. A higher degree of automating simulation studies will contribute to more systematic, standardized simulation studies and their efficiency. Finally, it is essential to invest increased effort into effectively communicating results and the processes involved in simulation studies to enable their use in research and decision-making. These goals are not pursued independently of each other, but they will benefit from and sometimes even rely on advances in other subfields. In the present paper, we explore the basis and interdependencies evident in current research and practice and delineate future research directions based on these considerations.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2024; v1 submitted 9 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
The DEVStone Metric: Performance Analysis of DEVS Simulation Engines
Authors:
Román Cárdenas,
Kevin Henares,
Patricia Arroba,
José L. Risco-Martín,
Gabriel A. Wainer
Abstract:
The DEVStone benchmark allows us to evaluate the performance of discrete-event simulators based on the DEVS formalism. It provides model sets with different characteristics, enabling the analysis of specific issues of simulation engines. However, this heterogeneity hinders the comparison of the results among studies, as the results obtained on each research work depend on the chosen subset of DEVS…
▽ More
The DEVStone benchmark allows us to evaluate the performance of discrete-event simulators based on the DEVS formalism. It provides model sets with different characteristics, enabling the analysis of specific issues of simulation engines. However, this heterogeneity hinders the comparison of the results among studies, as the results obtained on each research work depend on the chosen subset of DEVStone models. We define the DEVStone metric based on the DEVStone synthetic benchmark and provide a mechanism for specifying objective ratings for DEVS-based simulators. This metric corresponds to the average number of times that a simulator can execute a selection of 12 DEVStone models in one minute. The variety of the chosen models ensures we measure different particularities provided by DEVStone. The proposed metric allows us to compare various simulators and to assess the impact of new features on their performance. We use the DEVStone metric to compare some popular DEVS-based simulators.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
