Complete Boolean Algebra for Memristive and Spintronic Asymmetric Basis Logic Functions
Authors:
Vaibhav Vyas,
Joseph S. Friedman
Abstract:
The increasing advancement of emerging device technologies that provide alternative basis logic sets necessitates the exploration of innovative logic design automation methodologies. Specifically, emerging computing architectures based on the memristor and the bilayer avalanche spin-diode offer non-commutative or `asymmetric' operations, namely the inverted-input AND (IAND) and implication as basi…
▽ More
The increasing advancement of emerging device technologies that provide alternative basis logic sets necessitates the exploration of innovative logic design automation methodologies. Specifically, emerging computing architectures based on the memristor and the bilayer avalanche spin-diode offer non-commutative or `asymmetric' operations, namely the inverted-input AND (IAND) and implication as basis logic gates. Existing logic design techniques inadequately leverage the unique characteristics of asymmetric logic functions resulting in insufficiently optimized logic circuits. This paper presents a complete Boolean algebraic framework specifically tailored to asymmetric logic functions, introducing fundamental identities, theorems and canonical normal forms that lay the groundwork for efficient synthesis and minimization of such logic circuits without relying on conventional Boolean algebra. Further, this paper establishes a logical relationship between implication and IAND operations. A previously proposed modified Karnaugh map method based on a subset of the presented algebraic principles demonstrated a 28% reduction in computational steps for an algorithmically designed memristive full adder; the presently-proposed algebraic framework lays the foundation for much greater future improvements.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
Learn-to-Race Challenge 2022: Benchmarking Safe Learning and Cross-domain Generalisation in Autonomous Racing
Authors:
Jonathan Francis,
Bingqing Chen,
Siddha Ganju,
Sidharth Kathpal,
Jyotish Poonganam,
Ayush Shivani,
Vrushank Vyas,
Sahika Genc,
Ivan Zhukov,
Max Kumskoy,
Anirudh Koul,
Jean Oh,
Eric Nyberg
Abstract:
We present the results of our autonomous racing virtual challenge, based on the newly-released Learn-to-Race (L2R) simulation framework, which seeks to encourage interdisciplinary research in autonomous driving and to help advance the state of the art on a realistic benchmark. Analogous to racing being used to test cutting-edge vehicles, we envision autonomous racing to serve as a particularly cha…
▽ More
We present the results of our autonomous racing virtual challenge, based on the newly-released Learn-to-Race (L2R) simulation framework, which seeks to encourage interdisciplinary research in autonomous driving and to help advance the state of the art on a realistic benchmark. Analogous to racing being used to test cutting-edge vehicles, we envision autonomous racing to serve as a particularly challenging proving ground for autonomous agents as: (i) they need to make sub-second, safety-critical decisions in a complex, fast-changing environment; and (ii) both perception and control must be robust to distribution shifts, novel road features, and unseen obstacles. Thus, the main goal of the challenge is to evaluate the joint safety, performance, and generalisation capabilities of reinforcement learning agents on multi-modal perception, through a two-stage process. In the first stage of the challenge, we evaluate an autonomous agent's ability to drive as fast as possible, while adhering to safety constraints. In the second stage, we additionally require the agent to adapt to an unseen racetrack through safe exploration. In this paper, we describe the new L2R Task 2.0 benchmark, with refined metrics and baseline approaches. We also provide an overview of deployment, evaluation, and rankings for the inaugural instance of the L2R Autonomous Racing Virtual Challenge (supported by Carnegie Mellon University, Arrival Ltd., AICrowd, Amazon Web Services, and Honda Research), which officially used the new L2R Task 2.0 benchmark and received over 20,100 views, 437 active participants, 46 teams, and 733 model submissions -- from 88+ unique institutions, in 58+ different countries. Finally, we release leaderboard results from the challenge and provide description of the two top-ranking approaches in cross-domain model transfer, across multiple sensor configurations and simulated races.
△ Less
Submitted 10 May, 2022; v1 submitted 5 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
Article citation study: Context enhanced citation sentiment detection
Authors:
Vishal Vyas,
Kumar Ravi,
Vadlamani Ravi,
V. Uma,
Srirangaraj Setlur,
Venu Govindaraju
Abstract:
Citation sentimet analysis is one of the little studied tasks for scientometric analysis. For citation analysis, we developed eight datasets comprising citation sentences, which are manually annotated by us into three sentiment polarities viz. positive, negative, and neutral. Among eight datasets, three were developed by considering the whole context of citations. Furthermore, we proposed an ensem…
▽ More
Citation sentimet analysis is one of the little studied tasks for scientometric analysis. For citation analysis, we developed eight datasets comprising citation sentences, which are manually annotated by us into three sentiment polarities viz. positive, negative, and neutral. Among eight datasets, three were developed by considering the whole context of citations. Furthermore, we proposed an ensembled feature engineering method comprising word embeddings obtained for texts, parts-of-speech tags, and dependency relationships together. Ensembled features were considered as input to deep learning based approaches for citation sentiment classification, which is in turn compared with Bag-of-Words approach. Experimental results demonstrate that deep learning is useful for higher number of samples, whereas support vector machine is the winner for smaller number of samples. Moreover, context-based samples are proved to be more effective than context-less samples for citation sentiment analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
