-
On Guarding Orthogonal Polygons with Sliding Cameras
Authors:
Therese Biedl,
Timothy M. Chan,
Stephanie Lee,
Saeed Mehrabi,
Fabrizio Montecchiani,
Hamideh Vosoughpour
Abstract:
A sliding camera inside an orthogonal polygon $P$ is a point guard that travels back and forth along an orthogonal line segment $γ$ in $P$. The sliding camera $g$ can see a point $p$ in $P$ if the perpendicular from $p$ onto $γ$ is inside $P$. In this paper, we give the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for the problem of guarding $P$ with the minimum number of sliding cameras. Next, w…
▽ More
A sliding camera inside an orthogonal polygon $P$ is a point guard that travels back and forth along an orthogonal line segment $γ$ in $P$. The sliding camera $g$ can see a point $p$ in $P$ if the perpendicular from $p$ onto $γ$ is inside $P$. In this paper, we give the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for the problem of guarding $P$ with the minimum number of sliding cameras. Next, we show that the sliding guards problem is linear-time solvable if the (suitably defined) dual graph of the polygon has bounded treewidth. Finally, we study art gallery theorems for sliding cameras, thus, give upper and lower bounds in terms of the number of guards needed relative to the number of vertices $n$.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Visibility Graphs, Dismantlability, and the Cops and Robbers Game
Authors:
Anna Lubiw,
Jack Snoeyink,
Hamideh Vosoughpour
Abstract:
We study versions of cop and robber pursuit-evasion games on the visibility graphs of polygons, and inside polygons with straight and curved sides. Each player has full information about the other player's location, players take turns, and the robber is captured when the cop arrives at the same point as the robber. In visibility graphs we show the cop can always win because visibility graphs are d…
▽ More
We study versions of cop and robber pursuit-evasion games on the visibility graphs of polygons, and inside polygons with straight and curved sides. Each player has full information about the other player's location, players take turns, and the robber is captured when the cop arrives at the same point as the robber. In visibility graphs we show the cop can always win because visibility graphs are dismantlable, which is interesting as one of the few results relating visibility graphs to other known graph classes. We extend this to show that the cop wins games in which players move along straight line segments inside any polygon and, more generally, inside any simply connected planar region with a reasonable boundary. Essentially, our problem is a type of pursuit-evasion using the link metric rather than the Euclidean metric, and our result provides an interesting class of infinite cop-win graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
Dihedral angles and orthogonal polyhedra
Authors:
Therese Biedl,
Martin Derka,
Stephen Kiazyk,
Anna Lubiw,
Hamide Vosoughpour
Abstract:
Consider an orthogonal polyhedron, i.e., a polyhedron where (at least after a suitable rotation) all faces are perpendicular to a coordinate axis, and hence all edges are parallel to a coordinate axis. Clearly, any facial angle and any dihedral angle is a multiple of $π/2$.
In this note we explore the converse: if the facial and/or dihedral angles are all multiples of $π/2$, is the polyhedron ne…
▽ More
Consider an orthogonal polyhedron, i.e., a polyhedron where (at least after a suitable rotation) all faces are perpendicular to a coordinate axis, and hence all edges are parallel to a coordinate axis. Clearly, any facial angle and any dihedral angle is a multiple of $π/2$.
In this note we explore the converse: if the facial and/or dihedral angles are all multiples of $π/2$, is the polyhedron necessarily orthogonal? The case of facial angles was answered previously. In this note we show that if both the facial and dihedral angles are multiples of $π/2$ then the polyhedron is orthogonal (presuming connectivity), and we give examples to show that the condition for dihedral angles alone does not suffice.
△ Less
Submitted 24 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
