Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Volckaert, S

Garmr: Defending the gates of PKU-based sandboxing

Authors: Alexios Voulimeneas, Jonas Vinck, Ruben Mechelinck, Stijn Volckaert

Abstract: Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU) is a recent hardware feature that allows programs to assign virtual memory pages to protection domains, and to change domain access permissions using inexpensive, unprivileged instructions. Several in-process memory isolation approaches leverage this feature to prevent untrusted code from accessing sensitive program state and data. Typically, PKU-based is… ▽ More Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU) is a recent hardware feature that allows programs to assign virtual memory pages to protection domains, and to change domain access permissions using inexpensive, unprivileged instructions. Several in-process memory isolation approaches leverage this feature to prevent untrusted code from accessing sensitive program state and data. Typically, PKU-based isolation schemes need to be used in conjunction with mitigations such as CFI because untrusted code, when compromised, can otherwise bypass the PKU access permissions using unprivileged instructions or operating system APIs. Recently, researchers proposed fully self-contained PKUbased memory isolation schemes that do not rely on other mitigations. These systems use exploit-proof call gates to transfer control between trusted and untrusted code, as well as a sandbox that prevents tampering with the PKU infrastructure from untrusted code. In this paper, we show that these solutions are not complete. We first develop two proof-of-concept attacks against a state-of-the-art PKU-based memory isolation scheme. We then present Garmr, a PKU-based sandboxing framework that can overcome limitations of existing sandboxes. We apply Garmr to several memory isolation schemes and show that it is practical, efficient and secure. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

dMVX: Secure and Efficient Multi-Variant Execution in a Distributed Setting

Authors: Alexios Voulimeneas, Dokyung Song, Per Larsen, Michael Franz, Stijn Volckaert

Abstract: Multi-variant execution (MVX) systems amplify the effectiveness of software diversity techniques. The key idea is to run multiple diversified program variants in lockstep while providing them with the same input and monitoring their run-time behavior for divergences. Thus, adversaries have to compromise all program variants simultaneously to mount an attack successfully. Recent work proposed distr… ▽ More Multi-variant execution (MVX) systems amplify the effectiveness of software diversity techniques. The key idea is to run multiple diversified program variants in lockstep while providing them with the same input and monitoring their run-time behavior for divergences. Thus, adversaries have to compromise all program variants simultaneously to mount an attack successfully. Recent work proposed distributed, heterogeneous MVX systems that leverage different ABIs and ISAs to increase the diversity between program variants further. However, existing distributed MVX system designs suffer from high performance overhead due to time-consuming network transactions for the MVX system's operations. This paper presents dMVX, a novel hybrid distributed MVX design, which incorporates new techniques that significantly reduce the overhead of MVX systems in a distributed setting. Our key insight is that we can intelligently reduce the MVX operations that use expensive network transfers. First, we can limit the monitoring of system calls that are not security-critical. Second, we observe that, in many circumstances, we can also safely cache or avoid replication operations needed for I/O related system calls. Our evaluation shows that dMVX reduces the performance degradation from over 50% to 3.1% for realistic server benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

DMON: A Distributed Heterogeneous N-Variant System

Authors: Alexios Voulimeneas, Dokyung Song, Fabian Parzefall, Yeoul Na, Per Larsen, Michael Franz, Stijn Volckaert

Abstract: N-Variant Execution (NVX) systems utilize software diversity techniques for enhancing software security. The general idea is to run multiple different variants of the same program alongside each other while monitoring their run-time behavior. If the internal disparity between the running variants causes observable differences in response to malicious inputs, the monitor can detect such divergences… ▽ More N-Variant Execution (NVX) systems utilize software diversity techniques for enhancing software security. The general idea is to run multiple different variants of the same program alongside each other while monitoring their run-time behavior. If the internal disparity between the running variants causes observable differences in response to malicious inputs, the monitor can detect such divergences in execution and then raise an alert and/or terminate execution. Existing NVX systems execute multiple, artificially diversified program variants on a single host. This paper presents a novel, distributed NVX design that executes program variants across multiple heterogeneous host computers; our prototype implementation combines an x86-64 host with an ARMv8 host. Our approach greatly increases the level of "internal different-ness" between the simultaneously running variants that can be supported, encompassing different instruction sets, endianness, calling conventions, system call interfaces, and potentially also differences in hardware security features. A major challenge to building such a heterogeneous distributed NVX system is performance. We present solutions to some of the main performance challenges. We evaluate our prototype system implementing these ideas to show that it can provide reasonable performance on a wide range of realistic workloads. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

SoK: Sanitizing for Security

Authors: Dokyung Song, Julian Lettner, Prabhu Rajasekaran, Yeoul Na, Stijn Volckaert, Per Larsen, Michael Franz

Abstract: The C and C++ programming languages are notoriously insecure yet remain indispensable. Developers therefore resort to a multi-pronged approach to find security issues before adversaries. These include manual, static, and dynamic program analysis. Dynamic bug finding tools --- henceforth "sanitizers" --- can find bugs that elude other types of analysis because they observe the actual execution of a… ▽ More The C and C++ programming languages are notoriously insecure yet remain indispensable. Developers therefore resort to a multi-pronged approach to find security issues before adversaries. These include manual, static, and dynamic program analysis. Dynamic bug finding tools --- henceforth "sanitizers" --- can find bugs that elude other types of analysis because they observe the actual execution of a program, and can therefore directly observe incorrect program behavior as it happens. A vast number of sanitizers have been prototyped by academics and refined by practitioners. We provide a systematic overview of sanitizers with an emphasis on their role in finding security issues. Specifically, we taxonomize the available tools and the security vulnerabilities they cover, describe their performance and compatibility properties, and highlight various trade-offs. △ Less

Submitted 12 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

PartiSan: Fast and Flexible Sanitization via Run-time Partitioning

Authors: Julian Lettner, Dokyung Song, Taemin Park, Stijn Volckaert, Per Larsen, Michael Franz

Abstract: Sanitizers can detect security vulnerabilities in C/C++ code that elude static analysis. Current practice is to continuously fuzz and sanitize internal pre-release builds. Sanitization-enabled builds are rarely released publicly. This is in large part due to the high memory and processing requirements of sanitizers. We present PartiSan, a run-time partitioning technique that speeds up sanitizers… ▽ More Sanitizers can detect security vulnerabilities in C/C++ code that elude static analysis. Current practice is to continuously fuzz and sanitize internal pre-release builds. Sanitization-enabled builds are rarely released publicly. This is in large part due to the high memory and processing requirements of sanitizers. We present PartiSan, a run-time partitioning technique that speeds up sanitizers and allows them to be used in a more flexible manner. Our core idea is to partition the execution into sanitized slices that incur a run-time overhead, and unsanitized slices running at full speed. With PartiSan, sanitization is no longer an all-or-nothing proposition. A single build can be distributed to every user regardless of their willingness to enable sanitization and the capabilities of their host system. PartiSan can automatically adjust the amount of sanitization to fit within a performance budget or disable sanitization if the host lacks sufficient resources. The flexibility afforded by run-time partitioning also means that we can alternate between different types of sanitizers dynamically; today, developers have to pick a single type of sanitizer ahead of time. Finally, we show that run-time partitioning can speed up fuzzing by running the sanitized partition only when the fuzzer discovers an input that causes a crash or uncovers new execution paths. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2018; v1 submitted 21 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Multi-Variant Execution of Parallel Programs

Authors: Stijn Volckaert, Bjorn De Sutter, Koen De Bosschere, Per Larsen

Abstract: Multi-Variant Execution Environments (MVEEs) are a promising technique to protect software against memory corruption attacks. They transparently execute multiple, diversified variants (often referred to as replicae) of the software receiving the same inputs. By enforcing and monitoring the lock-step execution of the replicae's system calls, and by deploying diversity techniques that prevent an att… ▽ More Multi-Variant Execution Environments (MVEEs) are a promising technique to protect software against memory corruption attacks. They transparently execute multiple, diversified variants (often referred to as replicae) of the software receiving the same inputs. By enforcing and monitoring the lock-step execution of the replicae's system calls, and by deploying diversity techniques that prevent an attacker from simultaneously compromising multiple replicae, MVEEs can block attacks before they succeed. Existing MVEEs cannot handle non-trivial multi-threaded programs because their undeterministic behavior introduces benign system call inconsistencies in the replicae, which trigger false positive detections and deadlocks in the MVEEs. This paper for the first time extends the generality of MVEEs to protect multi-threaded software by means of secure and efficient synchronization replication agents. On the PARSEC 2.1 parallel benchmarks running with four worker threads, our prototype MVEE incurs a run-time overhead of only 1.32x. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.