Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Vo, T L

Weighted Missing Linear Discriminant Analysis: An Explainable Approach for Classification with Missing Data

Authors: Tuan L. Vo, Uyen Dang, Thu Nguyen

Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are gradually being adopted in real-life applications, the explainability of the model used is critical, especially in high-stakes areas such as medicine, finance, etc. Among the commonly used models, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is a widely used classification tool that is also explainable thanks to its ability to model class distributions and maximize… ▽ More As Artificial Intelligence (AI) models are gradually being adopted in real-life applications, the explainability of the model used is critical, especially in high-stakes areas such as medicine, finance, etc. Among the commonly used models, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) is a widely used classification tool that is also explainable thanks to its ability to model class distributions and maximize class separation through linear feature combinations. Nevertheless, real-world data is frequently incomplete, presenting significant challenges for classification tasks and model explanations. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to LDA under missing data, termed \textbf{\textit{Weighted missing Linear Discriminant Analysis (WLDA)}}, to directly classify observations in data that contains missing values without imputation effectively by estimating the parameters directly on missing data and use a weight matrix for missing values to penalize missing entries during classification. Furthermore, we also analyze the theoretical properties and examine the explainability of the proposed technique in a comprehensive manner. Experimental results demonstrate that WLDA outperforms conventional methods by a significant margin, particularly in scenarios where missing values are present in both training and test sets. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Explainability of Machine Learning Models under Missing Data

Authors: Tuan L. Vo, Thu Nguyen, Hugo L. Hammer, Michael A. Riegler, Pal Halvorsen

Abstract: Missing data is a prevalent issue that can significantly impair model performance and interpretability. This paper briefly summarizes the development of the field of missing data with respect to Explainable Artificial Intelligence and experimentally investigates the effects of various imputation methods on the calculation of Shapley values, a popular technique for interpreting complex machine lear… ▽ More Missing data is a prevalent issue that can significantly impair model performance and interpretability. This paper briefly summarizes the development of the field of missing data with respect to Explainable Artificial Intelligence and experimentally investigates the effects of various imputation methods on the calculation of Shapley values, a popular technique for interpreting complex machine learning models. We compare different imputation strategies and assess their impact on feature importance and interaction as determined by Shapley values. Moreover, we also theoretically analyze the effects of missing values on Shapley values. Importantly, our findings reveal that the choice of imputation method can introduce biases that could lead to changes in the Shapley values, thereby affecting the interpretability of the model. Moreover, and that a lower test prediction mean square error (MSE) may not imply a lower MSE in Shapley values and vice versa. Also, while Xgboost is a method that could handle missing data directly, using Xgboost directly on missing data can seriously affect interpretability compared to imputing the data before training Xgboost. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of imputation methods in the context of model interpretation, offering practical guidance for selecting appropriate techniques based on dataset characteristics and analysis objectives. The results underscore the importance of considering imputation effects to ensure robust and reliable insights from machine learning models. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Imputation using training labels and classification via label imputation

Authors: Thu Nguyen, Tuan L. Vo, Pål Halvorsen, Michael A. Riegler

Abstract: Missing data is a common problem in practical settings. Various imputation methods have been developed to deal with missing data. However, even though the label is usually available in the training data, the common practice of imputation usually only relies on the input and ignores the label. In this work, we illustrate how stacking the label into the input can significantly improve the imputation… ▽ More Missing data is a common problem in practical settings. Various imputation methods have been developed to deal with missing data. However, even though the label is usually available in the training data, the common practice of imputation usually only relies on the input and ignores the label. In this work, we illustrate how stacking the label into the input can significantly improve the imputation of the input. In addition, we propose a classification strategy that initializes the predicted test label with missing values and stacks the label with the input for imputation. This allows imputing the label and the input at the same time. Also, the technique is capable of handling data training with missing labels without any prior imputation and is applicable to continuous, categorical, or mixed-type data. Experiments show promising results in terms of accuracy. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2024; v1 submitted 28 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Blockwise Principal Component Analysis for monotone missing data imputation and dimensionality reduction

Authors: Tu T. Do, Mai Anh Vu, Tuan L. Vo, Hoang Thien Ly, Thu Nguyen, Steven A. Hicks, Michael A. Riegler, Pål Halvorsen, Binh T. Nguyen

Abstract: Monotone missing data is a common problem in data analysis. However, imputation combined with dimensionality reduction can be computationally expensive, especially with the increasing size of datasets. To address this issue, we propose a Blockwise principal component analysis Imputation (BPI) framework for dimensionality reduction and imputation of monotone missing data. The framework conducts Pri… ▽ More Monotone missing data is a common problem in data analysis. However, imputation combined with dimensionality reduction can be computationally expensive, especially with the increasing size of datasets. To address this issue, we propose a Blockwise principal component analysis Imputation (BPI) framework for dimensionality reduction and imputation of monotone missing data. The framework conducts Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on the observed part of each monotone block of the data and then imputes on merging the obtained principal components using a chosen imputation technique. BPI can work with various imputation techniques and can significantly reduce imputation time compared to conducting dimensionality reduction after imputation. This makes it a practical and efficient approach for large datasets with monotone missing data. Our experiments validate the improvement in speed. In addition, our experiments also show that while applying MICE imputation directly on missing data may not yield convergence, applying BPI with MICE for the data may lead to convergence. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2024; v1 submitted 10 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.