Showing 1–13 of 13 results for author: Vihrovs, J

Quantum algorithms for Hopcroft's problem

Authors: Vladimirs Andrejevs, Aleksandrs Belovs, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: In this work we study quantum algorithms for Hopcroft's problem which is a fundamental problem in computational geometry. Given $n$ points and $n$ lines in the plane, the task is to determine whether there is a point-line incidence. The classical complexity of this problem is well-studied, with the best known algorithm running in $O(n^{4/3})$ time, with matching lower bounds in some restricted set… ▽ More In this work we study quantum algorithms for Hopcroft's problem which is a fundamental problem in computational geometry. Given $n$ points and $n$ lines in the plane, the task is to determine whether there is a point-line incidence. The classical complexity of this problem is well-studied, with the best known algorithm running in $O(n^{4/3})$ time, with matching lower bounds in some restricted settings. Our results are two different quantum algorithms with time complexity $\widetilde O(n^{5/6})$. The first algorithm is based on partition trees and the quantum backtracking algorithm. The second algorithm uses a quantum walk together with a history-independent dynamic data structure for storing line arrangement which supports efficient point location queries. In the setting where the number of points and lines differ, the quantum walk-based algorithm is asymptotically faster. The quantum speedups for the aforementioned data structures may be useful for other geometric problems. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Quantum speedups for treewidth

Authors: Vladislavs Kļevickis, Krišjānis Prūsis, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: In this paper, we study quantum algorithms for computing the exact value of the treewidth of a graph. Our algorithms are based on the classical algorithm by Fomin and Villanger (Combinatorica 32, 2012) that uses $O(2.616^n)$ time and polynomial space. We show three quantum algorithms with the following complexity, using QRAM in both exponential space algorithms: $\bullet$ $O(1.618^n)$ time and pol… ▽ More In this paper, we study quantum algorithms for computing the exact value of the treewidth of a graph. Our algorithms are based on the classical algorithm by Fomin and Villanger (Combinatorica 32, 2012) that uses $O(2.616^n)$ time and polynomial space. We show three quantum algorithms with the following complexity, using QRAM in both exponential space algorithms: $\bullet$ $O(1.618^n)$ time and polynomial space; $\bullet$ $O(1.554^n)$ time and $O(1.452^n)$ space; $\bullet$ $O(1.538^n)$ time and space. In contrast, the fastest known classical algorithm for treewidth uses $O(1.755^n)$ time and space. The first two speed-ups are obtained in a fairly straightforward way. The first version uses additionally only Grover's search and provides a quadratic speedup. The second speedup is more time-efficient and uses both Grover's search and the quantum exponential dynamic programming by Ambainis et al. (SODA '19). The third version uses the specific properties of the classical algorithm and treewidth, with a modified version of the quantum dynamic programming on the hypercube. Lastly, as a small side result, we also give a new classical time-space tradeoff for computing treewidth in $O^*(2^n)$ time and $O^*(\sqrt{2^n})$ space. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Quantum speedups for dynamic programming on $n$-dimensional lattice graphs

Authors: Adam Glos, Martins Kokainis, Ryuhei Mori, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: Motivated by the quantum speedup for dynamic programming on the Boolean hypercube by Ambainis et al. (2019), we investigate which graphs admit a similar quantum advantage. In this paper, we examine a generalization of the Boolean hypercube graph, the $n$-dimensional lattice graph $Q(D,n)$ with vertices in $\{0,1,\ldots,D\}^n$. We study the complexity of the following problem: given a subgraph $G$… ▽ More Motivated by the quantum speedup for dynamic programming on the Boolean hypercube by Ambainis et al. (2019), we investigate which graphs admit a similar quantum advantage. In this paper, we examine a generalization of the Boolean hypercube graph, the $n$-dimensional lattice graph $Q(D,n)$ with vertices in $\{0,1,\ldots,D\}^n$. We study the complexity of the following problem: given a subgraph $G$ of $Q(D,n)$ via query access to the edges, determine whether there is a path from $0^n$ to $D^n$. While the classical query complexity is $\widetildeΘ((D+1)^n)$, we show a quantum algorithm with complexity $\widetilde O(T_D^n)$, where $T_D < D+1$. The first few values of $T_D$ are $T_1 \approx 1.817$, $T_2 \approx 2.660$, $T_3 \approx 3.529$, $T_4 \approx 4.421$, $T_5 \approx 5.332$. We also prove that $T_D \geq \frac{D+1}{\mathrm e}$, thus for general $D$, this algorithm does not provide, for example, a speedup, polynomial in the size of the lattice. While the presented quantum algorithm is a natural generalization of the known quantum algorithm for $D=1$ by Ambainis et al., the analysis of complexity is rather complicated. For the precise analysis, we use the saddle-point method, which is a common tool in analytic combinatorics, but has not been widely used in this field. We then show an implementation of this algorithm with time complexity $\text{poly}(n)^{\log n} T_D^n$, and apply it to the Set Multicover problem. In this problem, $m$ subsets of $[n]$ are given, and the task is to find the smallest number of these subsets that cover each element of $[n]$ at least $D$ times. While the time complexity of the best known classical algorithm is $O(m(D+1)^n)$, the time complexity of our quantum algorithm is $\text{poly}(m,n)^{\log n} T_D^n$. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2021; v1 submitted 29 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Quantum Lower and Upper Bounds for 2D-Grid and Dyck Language

Authors: Andris Ambainis, Kaspars Balodis, Jānis Iraids, Kamil Khadiev, Vladislavs Kļevickis, Krišjānis Prūsis, Yixin Shen, Juris Smotrovs, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: We study the quantum query complexity of two problems. First, we consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is a properly balanced one (a Dyck word), with a depth of at most $k$. We call this the $Dyck_{k,n}$ problem. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(c^k \sqrt{n})$, showing that the complexity of this problem increases exponentially in $k$. Here $n$ is the length of the word. W… ▽ More We study the quantum query complexity of two problems. First, we consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is a properly balanced one (a Dyck word), with a depth of at most $k$. We call this the $Dyck_{k,n}$ problem. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(c^k \sqrt{n})$, showing that the complexity of this problem increases exponentially in $k$. Here $n$ is the length of the word. When $k$ is a constant, this is interesting as a representative example of star-free languages for which a surprising $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ query quantum algorithm was recently constructed by Aaronson et al. Their proof does not give rise to a general algorithm. When $k$ is not a constant, $Dyck_{k,n}$ is not context-free. We give an algorithm with $O\left(\sqrt{n}(\log{n})^{0.5k}\right)$ quantum queries for $Dyck_{k,n}$ for all $k$. This is better than the trival upper bound $n$ for $k=o\left(\frac{\log(n)}{\log\log n}\right)$. Second, we consider connectivity problems on grid graphs in 2 dimensions, if some of the edges of the grid may be missing. By embedding the "balanced parentheses" problem into the grid, we show a lower bound of $Ω(n^{1.5-ε})$ for the directed 2D grid and $Ω(n^{2-ε})$ for the undirected 2D grid. The directed problem is interesting as a black-box model for a class of classical dynamic programming strategies including the one that is usually used for the well-known edit distance problem. We also show a generalization of this result to more than 2 dimensions. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2020; v1 submitted 6 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1911.12638

On the Inner Product Predicate and a Generalization of Matching Vector Families

Authors: Balthazar Bauer, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs, Hoeteck Wee

Abstract: Motivated by cryptographic applications such as predicate encryption, we consider the problem of representing an arbitrary predicate as the inner product predicate on two vectors. Concretely, fix a Boolean function $P$ and some modulus $q$. We are interested in encoding $x$ to $\vec x$ and $y$ to $\vec y$ so that $$P(x,y) = 1 \Longleftrightarrow \langle\vec x,\vec y\rangle= 0 \bmod q,$$ where the… ▽ More Motivated by cryptographic applications such as predicate encryption, we consider the problem of representing an arbitrary predicate as the inner product predicate on two vectors. Concretely, fix a Boolean function $P$ and some modulus $q$. We are interested in encoding $x$ to $\vec x$ and $y$ to $\vec y$ so that $$P(x,y) = 1 \Longleftrightarrow \langle\vec x,\vec y\rangle= 0 \bmod q,$$ where the vectors should be as short as possible. This problem can also be viewed as a generalization of matching vector families, which corresponds to the equality predicate. Matching vector families have been used in the constructions of Ramsey graphs, private information retrieval (PIR) protocols, and more recently, secret sharing. Our main result is a simple lower bound that allows us to show that known encodings for many predicates considered in the cryptographic literature such as greater than and threshold are essentially optimal for prime modulus $q$. Using this approach, we also prove lower bounds on encodings for composite $q$, and then show tight upper bounds for such predicates as greater than, index and disjointness. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

On Block Sensitivity and Fractional Block Sensitivity

Authors: Andris Ambainis, Krišjānis Prūsis, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: We investigate the relation between the block sensitivity $\text{bs}(f)$ and fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$ complexity measures of Boolean functions. While it is known that $\text{fbs}(f) = O(\text{bs}(f)^2)$, the best known separation achieves $\text{fbs}(f) = \left(\frac{1}{3\sqrt2} +o(1)\right) \text{bs(f)}^{3/2}$. We improve the constant factor and show a family of functions that… ▽ More We investigate the relation between the block sensitivity $\text{bs}(f)$ and fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$ complexity measures of Boolean functions. While it is known that $\text{fbs}(f) = O(\text{bs}(f)^2)$, the best known separation achieves $\text{fbs}(f) = \left(\frac{1}{3\sqrt2} +o(1)\right) \text{bs(f)}^{3/2}$. We improve the constant factor and show a family of functions that give $\text{fbs}(f) = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt6}-o(1)\right) \text{bs}(f)^{3/2}.$ △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Quantum Speedups for Exponential-Time Dynamic Programming Algorithms

Authors: Andris Ambainis, Kaspars Balodis, Jānis Iraids, Martins Kokainis, Krišjānis Prūsis, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: In this paper we study quantum algorithms for NP-complete problems whose best classical algorithm is an exponential time application of dynamic programming. We introduce the path in the hypercube problem that models many of these dynamic programming algorithms. In this problem we are asked whether there is a path from $0^n$ to $1^n$ in a given subgraph of the Boolean hypercube, where the edges are… ▽ More In this paper we study quantum algorithms for NP-complete problems whose best classical algorithm is an exponential time application of dynamic programming. We introduce the path in the hypercube problem that models many of these dynamic programming algorithms. In this problem we are asked whether there is a path from $0^n$ to $1^n$ in a given subgraph of the Boolean hypercube, where the edges are all directed from smaller to larger Hamming weight. We give a quantum algorithm that solves path in the hypercube in time $O^*(1.817^n)$. The technique combines Grover's search with computing a partial dynamic programming table. We use this approach to solve a variety of vertex ordering problems on graphs in the same time $O^*(1.817^n)$, and graph bandwidth in time $O^*(2.946^n)$. Then we use similar ideas to solve the travelling salesman problem and minimum set cover in time $O^*(1.728^n)$. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

All Classical Adversary Methods are Equivalent for Total Functions

Authors: Andris Ambainis, Martins Kokainis, Krišjānis Prūsis, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs, Aleksejs Zajakins

Abstract: We show that all known classical adversary lower bounds on randomized query complexity are equivalent for total functions, and are equal to the fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$. That includes the Kolmogorov complexity bound of Laplante and Magniez and the earlier relational adversary bound of Aaronson. This equivalence also implies that for total functions, the relational adversary is… ▽ More We show that all known classical adversary lower bounds on randomized query complexity are equivalent for total functions, and are equal to the fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$. That includes the Kolmogorov complexity bound of Laplante and Magniez and the earlier relational adversary bound of Aaronson. This equivalence also implies that for total functions, the relational adversary is equivalent to a simpler lower bound, which we call rank-1 relational adversary. For partial functions, we show unbounded separations between $\text{fbs}(f)$ and other adversary bounds, as well as between the adversary bounds themselves. We also show that, for partial functions, fractional block sensitivity cannot give lower bounds larger than $\sqrt{n \cdot \text{bs}(f)}$, where $n$ is the number of variables and $\text{bs}(f)$ is the block sensitivity. Then we exhibit a partial function $f$ that matches this upper bound, $\text{fbs}(f) = Ω(\sqrt{n \cdot \text{bs}(f)})$. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2018; v1 submitted 26 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Quadratically Tight Relations for Randomized Query Complexity

Authors: Dmitry Gavinsky, Rahul Jain, Hartmut Klauck, Srijita Kundu, Troy Lee, Miklos Santha, Swagato Sanyal, Jevgenijs Vihrovs

Abstract: Let $f:\{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ be a Boolean function. The certificate complexity $C(f)$ is a complexity measure that is quadratically tight for the zero-error randomized query complexity $R_0(f)$: $C(f) \leq R_0(f) \leq C(f)^2$. In this paper we study a new complexity measure that we call expectational certificate complexity $EC(f)$, which is also a quadratically tight bound on $R_0(f)$:… ▽ More Let $f:\{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ be a Boolean function. The certificate complexity $C(f)$ is a complexity measure that is quadratically tight for the zero-error randomized query complexity $R_0(f)$: $C(f) \leq R_0(f) \leq C(f)^2$. In this paper we study a new complexity measure that we call expectational certificate complexity $EC(f)$, which is also a quadratically tight bound on $R_0(f)$: $EC(f) \leq R_0(f) = O(EC(f)^2)$. We prove that $EC(f) \leq C(f) \leq EC(f)^2$ and show that there is a quadratic separation between the two, thus $EC(f)$ gives a tighter upper bound for $R_0(f)$. The measure is also related to the fractional certificate complexity $FC(f)$ as follows: $FC(f) \leq EC(f) = O(FC(f)^{3/2})$. This also connects to an open question by Aaronson whether $FC(f)$ is a quadratically tight bound for $R_0(f)$, as $EC(f)$ is in fact a relaxation of $FC(f)$. In the second part of the work, we upper bound the distributed query complexity $D^μ_ε(f)$ for product distributions $μ$ by the square of the query corruption bound ($\mathrm{corr}_ε(f)$) which improves upon a result of Harsha, Jain and Radhakrishnan [2015]. A similar statement for communication complexity is open. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Comments: 14 pages

Zero-Error Affine, Unitary, and Probabilistic OBDDs

Authors: Rishat Ibrahimov, Kamil Khadiev, Krisjanis Prusis, Jevgenijs Vihrovs, Abuzer Yakaryilmaz

Abstract: We introduce the affine OBDD model and show that zero-error affine OBDDs can be exponentially narrower than bounded-error unitary and probabilistic OBDDs on certain problems. Moreover, we show that Las Vegas unitary and probabilistic OBDDs can be quadratically narrower than deterministic OBDDs. We also obtain the same results by considering the automata versions of these models. We introduce the affine OBDD model and show that zero-error affine OBDDs can be exponentially narrower than bounded-error unitary and probabilistic OBDDs on certain problems. Moreover, we show that Las Vegas unitary and probabilistic OBDDs can be quadratically narrower than deterministic OBDDs. We also obtain the same results by considering the automata versions of these models. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2017; v1 submitted 21 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: subitted to FCT 2017

Exact Affine Counter Automata

Authors: Masaki Nakanishi, Kamil Khadiev, Krišjānis Prūsis, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs, Abuzer Yakaryılmaz

Abstract: We introduce an affine generalization of counter automata, and analyze their ability as well as affine finite automata. Our contributions are as follows. We show that there is a language that can be recognized by exact realtime affine counter automata but by neither 1-way deterministic pushdown automata nor realtime deterministic k-counter automata. We also show that a certain promise problem, whi… ▽ More We introduce an affine generalization of counter automata, and analyze their ability as well as affine finite automata. Our contributions are as follows. We show that there is a language that can be recognized by exact realtime affine counter automata but by neither 1-way deterministic pushdown automata nor realtime deterministic k-counter automata. We also show that a certain promise problem, which is conjectured not to be solved by two-way quantum finite automata in polynomial time, can be solved by Las Vegas affine finite automata. Lastly, we show that how a counter helps for affine finite automata by showing that the language MANYTWINS, which is conjectured not to be recognized by affine, quantum or classical finite state models in polynomial time, can be recognized by affine counter automata with one-sided bounded-error in realtime. △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2017; v1 submitted 13 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: In Proceedings AFL 2017, arXiv:1708.06226

Journal ref: EPTCS 252, 2017, pp. 205-218

Sensitivity versus Certificate Complexity of Boolean Functions

Authors: Andris Ambainis, Krišjānis Prūsis, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: Sensitivity, block sensitivity and certificate complexity are basic complexity measures of Boolean functions. The famous sensitivity conjecture claims that sensitivity is polynomially related to block sensitivity. However, it has been notoriously hard to obtain even exponential bounds. Since block sensitivity is known to be polynomially related to certificate complexity, an equivalent of proving t… ▽ More Sensitivity, block sensitivity and certificate complexity are basic complexity measures of Boolean functions. The famous sensitivity conjecture claims that sensitivity is polynomially related to block sensitivity. However, it has been notoriously hard to obtain even exponential bounds. Since block sensitivity is known to be polynomially related to certificate complexity, an equivalent of proving this conjecture would be showing that certificate complexity is polynomially related to sensitivity. Previously, it has been shown that $bs(f) \leq C(f) \leq 2^{s(f)-1} s(f) - (s(f)-1)$. In this work, we give a better upper bound of $bs(f) \leq C(f) \leq \max\left(2^{s(f)-1}\left(s(f)-\frac 1 3\right), s(f)\right)$ using a recent theorem limiting the structure of function graphs. We also examine relations between these measures for functions with small 1-sensitivity $s_1(f)$ and arbitrary 0-sensitivity $s_0(f)$. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2015; v1 submitted 26 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Size of Sets with Small Sensitivity: a Generalization of Simon's Lemma

Authors: Andris Ambainis, Jevgēnijs Vihrovs

Abstract: We study the structure of sets $S\subseteq\{0, 1\}^n$ with small sensitivity. The well-known Simon's lemma says that any $S\subseteq\{0, 1\}^n$ of sensitivity $s$ must be of size at least $2^{n-s}$. This result has been useful for proving lower bounds on sensitivity of Boolean functions, with applications to the theory of parallel computing and the "sensitivity vs. block sensitivity" conjecture.… ▽ More We study the structure of sets $S\subseteq\{0, 1\}^n$ with small sensitivity. The well-known Simon's lemma says that any $S\subseteq\{0, 1\}^n$ of sensitivity $s$ must be of size at least $2^{n-s}$. This result has been useful for proving lower bounds on sensitivity of Boolean functions, with applications to the theory of parallel computing and the "sensitivity vs. block sensitivity" conjecture. In this paper, we take a deeper look at the size of such sets and their structure. We show an unexpected "gap theorem": if $S\subseteq\{0, 1\}^n$ has sensitivity $s$, then we either have $|S|=2^{n-s}$ or $|S|\geq \frac{3}{2} 2^{n-s}$. This is shown via classifying such sets into sets that can be constructed from low-sensitivity subsets of $\{0, 1\}^{n'}$ for $n'<n$ and irreducible sets which cannot be constructed in such a way and then proving a lower bound on the size of irreducible sets. This provides new insights into the structure of low sensitivity subsets of the Boolean hypercube $\{0, 1\}^n$. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2016; v1 submitted 31 May, 2014; originally announced June 2014.