-
Problems, proofs, and disproofs on the inversion number
Authors:
Guillaume Aubian,
Frédéric Havet,
Florian Hörsch,
Felix Klingelhoefer,
Nicolas Nisse,
Clément Rambaud,
Quentin Vermande
Abstract:
The {\it inversion} of a set $X$ of vertices in a digraph $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs of $D\langle X\rangle$. The {\it inversion number} of an oriented graph $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to transform $D$ into an acyclic oriented graph. In this paper, we study a number of problems involving the inversion number of oriented graphs…
▽ More
The {\it inversion} of a set $X$ of vertices in a digraph $D$ consists in reversing the direction of all arcs of $D\langle X\rangle$. The {\it inversion number} of an oriented graph $D$, denoted by ${\rm inv}(D)$, is the minimum number of inversions needed to transform $D$ into an acyclic oriented graph. In this paper, we study a number of problems involving the inversion number of oriented graphs. Firstly, we give bounds on ${\rm inv}(n)$, the maximum of the inversion numbers of the oriented graphs of order $n$. We show $n - \mathcal{O}(\sqrt{n\log n}) \ \leq \ {\rm inv}(n) \ \leq \ n - \lceil \log (n+1) \rceil$. Secondly, we disprove a conjecture of Bang-Jensen et al. asserting that, for every pair of oriented graphs $L$ and $R$, we have ${\rm inv}(L\Rightarrow R) ={\rm inv}(L) + {\rm inv}(R)$, where $L\Rightarrow R$ is the oriented graph obtained from the disjoint union of $L$ and $R$ by adding all arcs from $L$ to $R$. Finally, we investigate whether, for all pairs of positive integers $k_1,k_2$, there exists an integer $f(k_1,k_2)$ such that if $D$ is an oriented graph with ${\rm inv}(D) \geq f(k_1,k_2)$ then there is a partition $(V_1, V_2)$ of $V(D)$ such that ${\rm inv}(D\langle V_i\rangle) \geq k_i$ for $i=1,2$. We show that $f(1,k)$ exists and $f(1,k)\leq k+10$ for all positive integers $k$. Further, we show that $f(k_1,k_2)$ exists for all pairs of positive integers $k_1,k_2$ when the oriented graphs in consideration are restricted to be tournaments.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 18 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Various bounds on the minimum number of arcs in a $k$-dicritical digraph
Authors:
Pierre Aboulker,
Quentin Vermande
Abstract:
The dichromatic number $\vecχ(G)$ of a digraph $G$ is the least integer $k$ such that $G$ can be partitioned into $k$ acyclic digraphs. A digraph is $k$-dicritical if $\vecχ(G) = k$ and each proper subgraph $H$ of $G$ satisfies $\vecχ(H) \leq k-1$. %An oriented graph is a digraph with no cycle of length $2$. We prove various bounds on the minimum number of arcs in a $k$-dicritical digraph, a struc…
▽ More
The dichromatic number $\vecχ(G)$ of a digraph $G$ is the least integer $k$ such that $G$ can be partitioned into $k$ acyclic digraphs. A digraph is $k$-dicritical if $\vecχ(G) = k$ and each proper subgraph $H$ of $G$ satisfies $\vecχ(H) \leq k-1$. %An oriented graph is a digraph with no cycle of length $2$. We prove various bounds on the minimum number of arcs in a $k$-dicritical digraph, a structural result on $k$-dicritical digraphs and a result on list-dicolouring.
We characterise $3$-dicritical digraphs $G$ with $(k-1)|V(G)| + 1$ arcs. For $k \geq 4$, we characterise $k$-dicritical digraphs $G$ on at least $k+1$ vertices and with $(k-1)|V(G)| + k-3$ arcs, generalising a result of Dirac. We prove that, for $k \geq 5$, every $k$-dicritical digraph $G$ has at least $(k-1/2 - 1/(k-1)) |V(G)| - k(1/2 - 1/(k-1))$ arcs, which is the best known lower bound. We prove that the number of connected components induced by the vertices of degree $2(k-1)$ of a $k$-dicritical digraph is at most the number of connected components in the rest of the digraph, generalising a result of Stiebitz. Finally, we generalise a Theorem of Thomassen on list-chromatic number of undirected graphs to list-dichromatic number of digraphs.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2023; v1 submitted 3 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Maximizing Nash Social Welfare in 2-Value Instances: Delineating Tractability
Authors:
Hannaneh Akrami,
Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury,
Martin Hoefer,
Kurt Mehlhorn,
Marco Schmalhofer,
Golnoosh Shahkarami,
Giovanna Varricchio,
Quentin Vermande,
Ernest van Wijland
Abstract:
We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among a set of agents with \emph{2-value additive valuations}. In this setting, each good is valued either $1$ or $\sfrac{p}{q}$, for some fixed co-prime numbers $p,q\in \NN$ such that $1\leq q < p$. Our goal is to find an allocation maximizing the \emph{Nash social welfare} (\NSW), i.e., the geometric mean of the valuations of the agen…
▽ More
We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among a set of agents with \emph{2-value additive valuations}. In this setting, each good is valued either $1$ or $\sfrac{p}{q}$, for some fixed co-prime numbers $p,q\in \NN$ such that $1\leq q < p$. Our goal is to find an allocation maximizing the \emph{Nash social welfare} (\NSW), i.e., the geometric mean of the valuations of the agents. In this work, we give a complete characterization of polynomial-time tractability of \NSW\ maximization that solely depends on the values of $q$.
We start by providing a rather simple polynomial-time algorithm to find a maximum \NSW\ allocation when the valuation functions are \emph{integral}, that is, $q=1$. We then exploit more involved techniques to get an algorithm producing a maximum \NSW\ allocation for the \emph{half-integral} case, that is, $q=2$. Finally, we show it is \classNP-hard to compute an allocation with maximum \NSW\ whenever $q\geq3$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2024; v1 submitted 22 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Maximizing Nash Social Welfare in 2-Value Instances
Authors:
Hannaneh Akrami,
Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury,
Martin Hoefer,
Kurt Mehlhorn,
Marco Schmalhofer,
Golnoosh Shahkarami,
Giovanna Varricchio,
Quentin Vermande,
Ernest van Wijland
Abstract:
We consider the problem of maximizing the Nash social welfare when allocating a set $\mathcal{G}$ of indivisible goods to a set $\mathcal{N}$ of agents. We study instances, in which all agents have 2-value additive valuations: The value of every agent $i \in \mathcal{N}$ for every good $j \in \mathcal{G}$ is $v_{ij} \in \{p,q\}$, for $p,q \in \mathbb{N}$, $p \le q$. Maybe surprisingly, we design a…
▽ More
We consider the problem of maximizing the Nash social welfare when allocating a set $\mathcal{G}$ of indivisible goods to a set $\mathcal{N}$ of agents. We study instances, in which all agents have 2-value additive valuations: The value of every agent $i \in \mathcal{N}$ for every good $j \in \mathcal{G}$ is $v_{ij} \in \{p,q\}$, for $p,q \in \mathbb{N}$, $p \le q$. Maybe surprisingly, we design an algorithm to compute an optimal allocation in polynomial time if $p$ divides $q$, i.e., when $p=1$ and $q \in \mathbb{N}$ after appropriate scaling. The problem is \classNP-hard whenever $p$ and $q$ are coprime and $p \ge 3$.
In terms of approximation, we present positive and negative results for general $p$ and $q$. We show that our algorithm obtains an approximation ratio of at most 1.0345. Moreover, we prove that the problem is \classAPX-hard, with a lower bound of $1.000015$ achieved at $p/q = 4/5$.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2021; v1 submitted 19 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Nash Social Welfare for 2-value Instances
Authors:
Hannaneh Akrami,
Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury,
Kurt Mehlhorn,
Golnoosh Shahkarami,
Quentin Vermande
Abstract:
This paper is merged with arXiv:2107.08965v2. We refer the reader to the full and updated version.
We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among agents with 2-value additive valuations. Our goal is to find an allocation with maximum Nash social welfare, i.e., the geometric mean of the valuations of the agents. We give a polynomial-time algorithm to find a Nash social welfar…
▽ More
This paper is merged with arXiv:2107.08965v2. We refer the reader to the full and updated version.
We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible goods among agents with 2-value additive valuations. Our goal is to find an allocation with maximum Nash social welfare, i.e., the geometric mean of the valuations of the agents. We give a polynomial-time algorithm to find a Nash social welfare maximizing allocation when the valuation functions are integrally 2-valued, i.e., each agent has a value either $1$ or $p$ for each good, for some positive integer $p$. We then extend our algorithm to find a better approximation factor for general 2-value instances.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2021; v1 submitted 28 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Physarum-Inspired Multi-Commodity Flow Dynamics
Authors:
Vincenzo Bonifaci,
Enrico Facca,
Frederic Folz,
Andreas Karrenbauer,
Pavel Kolev,
Kurt Mehlhorn,
Giovanna Morigi,
Golnoosh Shahkarami,
Quentin Vermande
Abstract:
In wet-lab experiments, the slime mold Physarum polycephalum has demonstrated its ability to solve shortest path problems and to design efficient networks. For the shortest path problem, a mathematical model for the evolution of the slime is available and it has been shown in computer experiments and through mathematical analysis that the dynamics solves the shortest path problem. In this paper, w…
▽ More
In wet-lab experiments, the slime mold Physarum polycephalum has demonstrated its ability to solve shortest path problems and to design efficient networks. For the shortest path problem, a mathematical model for the evolution of the slime is available and it has been shown in computer experiments and through mathematical analysis that the dynamics solves the shortest path problem. In this paper, we introduce a dynamics for the network design problem. We formulate network design as the problem of constructing a network that efficiently supports a multi-commodity flow problem. We investigate the dynamics in computer simulations and analytically. The simulations show that the dynamics is able to construct efficient and elegant networks. In the theoretical part we show that the dynamics minimizes an objective combining the cost of the network and the cost of routing the demands through the network. We also give alternative characterization of the optimum solution.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2022; v1 submitted 3 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
