Showing 1–13 of 13 results for author: Venkit, P N

Race and Privacy in Broadcast Police Communications

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Christopher Graziul, Miranda Ardith Goodman, Samantha Nicole Kenny, Shomir Wilson

Abstract: Radios are essential for the operations of modern police departments, and they function as both a collaborative communication technology and a sociotechnical system. However, little prior research has examined their usage or their connections to individual privacy and the role of race in policing, two growing topics of concern in the US. As a case study, we examine the Chicago Police Department's… ▽ More Radios are essential for the operations of modern police departments, and they function as both a collaborative communication technology and a sociotechnical system. However, little prior research has examined their usage or their connections to individual privacy and the role of race in policing, two growing topics of concern in the US. As a case study, we examine the Chicago Police Department's (CPD's) use of broadcast police communications (BPC) to coordinate the activity of law enforcement officers (LEOs) in the city. From a recently assembled archive of 80,775 hours of BPC associated with CPD operations, we analyze text transcripts of radio transmissions broadcast 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM on August 10th, 2018 in one majority Black, one majority white, and one majority Hispanic area of the city (24 hours of audio) to explore three research questions: (1) Do BPC reflect reported racial disparities in policing? (2) How and when is gender, race/ethnicity, and age mentioned in BPC? (3) To what extent do BPC include sensitive information, and who is put at most risk by this practice? (4) To what extent can large language models (LLMs) heighten this risk? We explore the vocabulary and speech acts used by police in BPC, comparing mentions of personal characteristics to local demographics, the personal information shared over BPC, and the privacy concerns that it poses. Analysis indicates (a) policing professionals in the city of Chicago exhibit disproportionate attention to Black members of the public regardless of context, (b) sociodemographic characteristics like gender, race/ethnicity, and age are primarily mentioned in BPC about event information, and (c) disproportionate attention introduces disproportionate privacy risks for Black members of the public. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: Accepted in the 27th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '24)

LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing

Authors: Jiangshu Du, Yibo Wang, Wenting Zhao, Zhongfen Deng, Shuaiqi Liu, Renze Lou, Henry Peng Zou, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Nan Zhang, Mukund Srinath, Haoran Ranran Zhang, Vipul Gupta, Yinghui Li, Tao Li, Fei Wang, Qin Liu, Tianlin Liu, Pengzhi Gao, Congying Xia, Chen Xing, Jiayang Cheng, Zhaowei Wang, Ying Su, Raj Sanjay Shah, Ruohao Guo , et al. (15 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This work is motivated by two key trends. On one hand, large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable versatility in various generative tasks such as writing, drawing, and question answering, significantly reducing the time required for many routine tasks. On the other hand, researchers, whose work is not only time-consuming but also highly expertise-demanding, face increasing challenges as th… ▽ More This work is motivated by two key trends. On one hand, large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable versatility in various generative tasks such as writing, drawing, and question answering, significantly reducing the time required for many routine tasks. On the other hand, researchers, whose work is not only time-consuming but also highly expertise-demanding, face increasing challenges as they have to spend more time reading, writing, and reviewing papers. This raises the question: how can LLMs potentially assist researchers in alleviating their heavy workload? This study focuses on the topic of LLMs assist NLP Researchers, particularly examining the effectiveness of LLM in assisting paper (meta-)reviewing and its recognizability. To address this, we constructed the ReviewCritique dataset, which includes two types of information: (i) NLP papers (initial submissions rather than camera-ready) with both human-written and LLM-generated reviews, and (ii) each review comes with "deficiency" labels and corresponding explanations for individual segments, annotated by experts. Using ReviewCritique, this study explores two threads of research questions: (i) "LLMs as Reviewers", how do reviews generated by LLMs compare with those written by humans in terms of quality and distinguishability? (ii) "LLMs as Metareviewers", how effectively can LLMs identify potential issues, such as Deficient or unprofessional review segments, within individual paper reviews? To our knowledge, this is the first work to provide such a comprehensive analysis. △ Less

Submitted 25 June, 2024; v1 submitted 23 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

The Unappreciated Role of Intent in Algorithmic Moderation of Social Media Content

Authors: Xinyu Wang, Sai Koneru, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Brett Frischmann, Sarah Rajtmajer

Abstract: As social media has become a predominant mode of communication globally, the rise of abusive content threatens to undermine civil discourse. Recognizing the critical nature of this issue, a significant body of research has been dedicated to develo** language models that can detect various types of online abuse, e.g., hate speech, cyberbullying. However, there exists a notable disconnect between… ▽ More As social media has become a predominant mode of communication globally, the rise of abusive content threatens to undermine civil discourse. Recognizing the critical nature of this issue, a significant body of research has been dedicated to develo** language models that can detect various types of online abuse, e.g., hate speech, cyberbullying. However, there exists a notable disconnect between platform policies, which often consider the author's intention as a criterion for content moderation, and the current capabilities of detection models, which typically lack efforts to capture intent. This paper examines the role of intent in content moderation systems. We review state of the art detection models and benchmark training datasets for online abuse to assess their awareness and ability to capture intent. We propose strategic changes to the design and development of automated detection and moderation systems to improve alignment with ethical and policy conceptualizations of abuse. △ Less

Submitted 17 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

"Confidently Nonsensical?'': A Critical Survey on the Perspectives and Challenges of 'Hallucinations' in NLP

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Tatiana Chakravorti, Vipul Gupta, Heidi Biggs, Mukund Srinath, Koustava Goswami, Sarah Rajtmajer, Shomir Wilson

Abstract: We investigate how hallucination in large language models (LLM) is characterized in peer-reviewed literature using a critical examination of 103 publications across NLP research. Through a comprehensive review of sociological and technological literature, we identify a lack of agreement with the term `hallucination.' Additionally, we conduct a survey with 171 practitioners from the field of NLP an… ▽ More We investigate how hallucination in large language models (LLM) is characterized in peer-reviewed literature using a critical examination of 103 publications across NLP research. Through a comprehensive review of sociological and technological literature, we identify a lack of agreement with the term `hallucination.' Additionally, we conduct a survey with 171 practitioners from the field of NLP and AI to capture varying perspectives on hallucination. Our analysis underscores the necessity for explicit definitions and frameworks outlining hallucination within NLP, highlighting potential challenges, and our survey inputs provide a thematic understanding of the influence and ramifications of hallucination in society. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

From Melting Pots to Misrepresentations: Exploring Harms in Generative AI

Authors: Sanjana Gautam, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Sourojit Ghosh

Abstract: With the widespread adoption of advanced generative models such as Gemini and GPT, there has been a notable increase in the incorporation of such models into sociotechnical systems, categorized under AI-as-a-Service (AIaaS). Despite their versatility across diverse sectors, concerns persist regarding discriminatory tendencies within these models, particularly favoring selected `majority' demograph… ▽ More With the widespread adoption of advanced generative models such as Gemini and GPT, there has been a notable increase in the incorporation of such models into sociotechnical systems, categorized under AI-as-a-Service (AIaaS). Despite their versatility across diverse sectors, concerns persist regarding discriminatory tendencies within these models, particularly favoring selected `majority' demographics across various sociodemographic dimensions. Despite widespread calls for diversification of media representations, marginalized racial and ethnic groups continue to face persistent distortion, stereoty**, and neglect within the AIaaS context. In this work, we provide a critical summary of the state of research in the context of social harms to lead the conversation to focus on their implications. We also present open-ended research questions, guided by our discussion, to help define future research pathways. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: In CHI 2024: Generative AI and HCI workshop (GenAICHI 24)

The Sentiment Problem: A Critical Survey towards Deconstructing Sentiment Analysis

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Mukund Srinath, Sanjana Gautam, Saranya Venkatraman, Vipul Gupta, Rebecca J. Passonneau, Shomir Wilson

Abstract: We conduct an inquiry into the sociotechnical aspects of sentiment analysis (SA) by critically examining 189 peer-reviewed papers on their applications, models, and datasets. Our investigation stems from the recognition that SA has become an integral component of diverse sociotechnical systems, exerting influence on both social and technical users. By delving into sociological and technological li… ▽ More We conduct an inquiry into the sociotechnical aspects of sentiment analysis (SA) by critically examining 189 peer-reviewed papers on their applications, models, and datasets. Our investigation stems from the recognition that SA has become an integral component of diverse sociotechnical systems, exerting influence on both social and technical users. By delving into sociological and technological literature on sentiment, we unveil distinct conceptualizations of this term in domains such as finance, government, and medicine. Our study exposes a lack of explicit definitions and frameworks for characterizing sentiment, resulting in potential challenges and biases. To tackle this issue, we propose an ethics sheet encompassing critical inquiries to guide practitioners in ensuring equitable utilization of SA. Our findings underscore the significance of adopting an interdisciplinary approach to defining sentiment in SA and offer a pragmatic solution for its implementation. △ Less

Submitted 18 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: This paper has been accepted and will appear at the EMNLP 2023 Main Conference

Towards a Holistic Approach: Understanding Sociodemographic Biases in NLP Models using an Interdisciplinary Lens

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit

Abstract: The rapid growth in the usage and applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in various sociotechnical solutions has highlighted the need for a comprehensive understanding of bias and its impact on society. While research on bias in NLP has expanded, several challenges persist that require attention. These include the limited focus on sociodemographic biases beyond race and gender, the narr… ▽ More The rapid growth in the usage and applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in various sociotechnical solutions has highlighted the need for a comprehensive understanding of bias and its impact on society. While research on bias in NLP has expanded, several challenges persist that require attention. These include the limited focus on sociodemographic biases beyond race and gender, the narrow scope of analysis predominantly centered on models, and the technocentric implementation approaches. This paper addresses these challenges and advocates for a more interdisciplinary approach to understanding bias in NLP. The work is structured into three facets, each exploring a specific aspect of bias in NLP. △ Less

Submitted 24 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

CALM : A Multi-task Benchmark for Comprehensive Assessment of Language Model Bias

Authors: Vipul Gupta, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Hugo Laurençon, Shomir Wilson, Rebecca J. Passonneau

Abstract: As language models (LMs) become increasingly powerful and widely used, it is important to quantify them for sociodemographic bias with potential for harm. Prior measures of bias are sensitive to perturbations in the templates designed to compare performance across social groups, due to factors such as low diversity or limited number of templates. Also, most previous work considers only one NLP tas… ▽ More As language models (LMs) become increasingly powerful and widely used, it is important to quantify them for sociodemographic bias with potential for harm. Prior measures of bias are sensitive to perturbations in the templates designed to compare performance across social groups, due to factors such as low diversity or limited number of templates. Also, most previous work considers only one NLP task. We introduce Comprehensive Assessment of Language Models (CALM) for robust measurement of two types of universally relevant sociodemographic bias, gender and race. CALM integrates sixteen datasets for question-answering, sentiment analysis and natural language inference. Examples from each dataset are filtered to produce 224 templates with high diversity (e.g., length, vocabulary). We assemble 50 highly frequent person names for each of seven distinct demographic groups to generate 78,400 prompts covering the three NLP tasks. Our empirical evaluation shows that CALM bias scores are more robust and far less sensitive than previous bias measurements to perturbations in the templates, such as synonym substitution, or to random subset selection of templates. We apply CALM to 20 large language models, and find that for 2 language model series, larger parameter models tend to be more biased than smaller ones. The T0 series is the least biased model families, of the 20 LLMs investigated here. The code is available at https://github.com/vipulgupta1011/CALM. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2024; v1 submitted 23 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Unmasking Nationality Bias: A Study of Human Perception of Nationalities in AI-Generated Articles

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Sanjana Gautam, Ruchi Panchanadikar, Ting-Hao `Kenneth' Huang, Shomir Wilson

Abstract: We investigate the potential for nationality biases in natural language processing (NLP) models using human evaluation methods. Biased NLP models can perpetuate stereotypes and lead to algorithmic discrimination, posing a significant challenge to the fairness and justice of AI systems. Our study employs a two-step mixed-methods approach that includes both quantitative and qualitative analysis to i… ▽ More We investigate the potential for nationality biases in natural language processing (NLP) models using human evaluation methods. Biased NLP models can perpetuate stereotypes and lead to algorithmic discrimination, posing a significant challenge to the fairness and justice of AI systems. Our study employs a two-step mixed-methods approach that includes both quantitative and qualitative analysis to identify and understand the impact of nationality bias in a text generation model. Through our human-centered quantitative analysis, we measure the extent of nationality bias in articles generated by AI sources. We then conduct open-ended interviews with participants, performing qualitative coding and thematic analysis to understand the implications of these biases on human readers. Our findings reveal that biased NLP models tend to replicate and amplify existing societal biases, which can translate to harm if used in a sociotechnical setting. The qualitative analysis from our interviews offers insights into the experience readers have when encountering such articles, highlighting the potential to shift a reader's perception of a country. These findings emphasize the critical role of public perception in sha** AI's impact on society and the need to correct biases in AI systems. △ Less

Submitted 8 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Automated Ableism: An Exploration of Explicit Disability Biases in Sentiment and Toxicity Analysis Models

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Mukund Srinath, Shomir Wilson

Abstract: We analyze sentiment analysis and toxicity detection models to detect the presence of explicit bias against people with disability (PWD). We employ the bias identification framework of Perturbation Sensitivity Analysis to examine conversations related to PWD on social media platforms, specifically Twitter and Reddit, in order to gain insight into how disability bias is disseminated in real-world s… ▽ More We analyze sentiment analysis and toxicity detection models to detect the presence of explicit bias against people with disability (PWD). We employ the bias identification framework of Perturbation Sensitivity Analysis to examine conversations related to PWD on social media platforms, specifically Twitter and Reddit, in order to gain insight into how disability bias is disseminated in real-world social settings. We then create the \textit{Bias Identification Test in Sentiment} (BITS) corpus to quantify explicit disability bias in any sentiment analysis and toxicity detection models. Our study utilizes BITS to uncover significant biases in four open AIaaS (AI as a Service) sentiment analysis tools, namely TextBlob, VADER, Google Cloud Natural Language API, DistilBERT and two toxicity detection models, namely two versions of Toxic-BERT. Our findings indicate that all of these models exhibit statistically significant explicit bias against PWD. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: TrustNLP at ACL 2023

Journal ref: Proceedings at The Third Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing collocated at the 61st Annual Meeting Of The Association For Computational Linguistics. 2023

Sociodemographic Bias in Language Models: A Survey and Forward Path

Authors: Vipul Gupta, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Shomir Wilson, Rebecca J. Passonneau

Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive survey of work on sociodemographic bias in language models (LMs). Sociodemographic biases embedded within language models can have harmful effects when deployed in real-world settings. We systematically organize the existing literature into three main areas: types of bias, quantifying bias, and debiasing techniques. We also track the evolution of investigations… ▽ More This paper presents a comprehensive survey of work on sociodemographic bias in language models (LMs). Sociodemographic biases embedded within language models can have harmful effects when deployed in real-world settings. We systematically organize the existing literature into three main areas: types of bias, quantifying bias, and debiasing techniques. We also track the evolution of investigations of LM bias over the past decade. We identify current trends, limitations, and potential future directions in bias research. To guide future research towards more effective and reliable solutions, we present a checklist of open questions. We also recommend using interdisciplinary approaches to combine works on LM bias with an understanding of the potential harms. △ Less

Submitted 1 March, 2024; v1 submitted 13 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 23 pages, 3 figure

Nationality Bias in Text Generation

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Sanjana Gautam, Ruchi Panchanadikar, Ting-Hao 'Kenneth' Huang, Shomir Wilson

Abstract: Little attention is placed on analyzing nationality bias in language models, especially when nationality is highly used as a factor in increasing the performance of social NLP models. This paper examines how a text generation model, GPT-2, accentuates pre-existing societal biases about country-based demonyms. We generate stories using GPT-2 for various nationalities and use sensitivity analysis to… ▽ More Little attention is placed on analyzing nationality bias in language models, especially when nationality is highly used as a factor in increasing the performance of social NLP models. This paper examines how a text generation model, GPT-2, accentuates pre-existing societal biases about country-based demonyms. We generate stories using GPT-2 for various nationalities and use sensitivity analysis to explore how the number of internet users and the country's economic status impacts the sentiment of the stories. To reduce the propagation of biases through large language models (LLM), we explore the debiasing method of adversarial triggering. Our results show that GPT-2 demonstrates significant bias against countries with lower internet users, and adversarial triggering effectively reduces the same. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2023; v1 submitted 5 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: Paper accepted in the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL2023)

Identification of Bias Against People with Disabilities in Sentiment Analysis and Toxicity Detection Models

Authors: Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Shomir Wilson

Abstract: Sociodemographic biases are a common problem for natural language processing, affecting the fairness and integrity of its applications. Within sentiment analysis, these biases may undermine sentiment predictions for texts that mention personal attributes that unbiased human readers would consider neutral. Such discrimination can have great consequences in the applications of sentiment analysis bot… ▽ More Sociodemographic biases are a common problem for natural language processing, affecting the fairness and integrity of its applications. Within sentiment analysis, these biases may undermine sentiment predictions for texts that mention personal attributes that unbiased human readers would consider neutral. Such discrimination can have great consequences in the applications of sentiment analysis both in the public and private sectors. For example, incorrect inferences in applications like online abuse and opinion analysis in social media platforms can lead to unwanted ramifications, such as wrongful censoring, towards certain populations. In this paper, we address the discrimination against people with disabilities, PWD, done by sentiment analysis and toxicity classification models. We provide an examination of sentiment and toxicity analysis models to understand in detail how they discriminate PWD. We present the Bias Identification Test in Sentiments (BITS), a corpus of 1,126 sentences designed to probe sentiment analysis models for biases in disability. We use this corpus to demonstrate statistically significant biases in four widely used sentiment analysis tools (TextBlob, VADER, Google Cloud Natural Language API and DistilBERT) and two toxicity analysis models trained to predict toxic comments on Jigsaw challenges (Toxic comment classification and Unintended Bias in Toxic comments). The results show that all exhibit strong negative biases on sentences that mention disability. We publicly release BITS Corpus for others to identify potential biases against disability in any sentiment analysis tools and also to update the corpus to be used as a test for other sociodemographic variables as well. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.