-
Do AI models produce better weather forecasts than physics-based models? A quantitative evaluation case study of Storm Ciarán
Authors:
Andrew J. Charlton-Perez,
Helen F. Dacre,
Simon Driscoll,
Suzanne L. Gray,
Ben Harvey,
Natalie J. Harvey,
Kieran M. R. Hunt,
Robert W. Lee,
Ran**i Swaminathan,
Remy Vandaele,
Ambrogio Volonté
Abstract:
There has been huge recent interest in the potential of making operational weather forecasts using machine learning techniques. As they become a part of the weather forecasting toolbox, there is a pressing need to understand how well current machine learning models can simulate high-impact weather events. We compare forecasts of Storm Ciarán, a European windstorm that caused sixteen deaths and ext…
▽ More
There has been huge recent interest in the potential of making operational weather forecasts using machine learning techniques. As they become a part of the weather forecasting toolbox, there is a pressing need to understand how well current machine learning models can simulate high-impact weather events. We compare forecasts of Storm Ciarán, a European windstorm that caused sixteen deaths and extensive damage in Northern Europe, made by machine learning and numerical weather prediction models. The four machine learning models considered (FourCastNet, Pangu-Weather, GraphCast and FourCastNet-v2) produce forecasts that accurately capture the synoptic-scale structure of the cyclone including the position of the cloud head, shape of the warm sector and location of warm conveyor belt jet, and the large-scale dynamical drivers important for the rapid storm development such as the position of the storm relative to the upper-level jet exit. However, their ability to resolve the more detailed structures important for issuing weather warnings is more mixed. All of the machine learning models underestimate the peak amplitude of winds associated with the storm, only some machine learning models resolve the warm core seclusion and none of the machine learning models capture the sharp bent-back warm frontal gradient. Our study shows there is a great deal about the performance and properties of machine learning weather forecasts that can be derived from case studies of high-impact weather events such as Storm Ciarán.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2024; v1 submitted 5 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Topologically Regularized Data Embeddings
Authors:
Edith Heiter,
Robin Vandaele,
Tijl De Bie,
Yvan Saeys,
Jefrey Lijffijt
Abstract:
Unsupervised representation learning methods are widely used for gaining insight into high-dimensional, unstructured, or structured data. In some cases, users may have prior topological knowledge about the data, such as a known cluster structure or the fact that the data is known to lie along a tree- or graph-structured topology. However, generic methods to ensure such structure is salient in the…
▽ More
Unsupervised representation learning methods are widely used for gaining insight into high-dimensional, unstructured, or structured data. In some cases, users may have prior topological knowledge about the data, such as a known cluster structure or the fact that the data is known to lie along a tree- or graph-structured topology. However, generic methods to ensure such structure is salient in the low-dimensional representations are lacking. This negatively impacts the interpretability of low-dimensional embeddings, and plausibly downstream learning tasks. To address this issue, we introduce topological regularization: a generic approach based on algebraic topology to incorporate topological prior knowledge into low-dimensional embeddings. We introduce a class of topological loss functions, and show that jointly optimizing an embedding loss with such a topological loss function as a regularizer yields embeddings that reflect not only local proximities but also the desired topological structure. We include a self-contained overview of the required foundational concepts in algebraic topology, and provide intuitive guidance on how to design topological loss functions for a variety of shapes, such as clusters, cycles, and bifurcations. We empirically evaluate the proposed approach on computational efficiency, robustness, and versatility in combination with linear and non-linear dimensionality reduction and graph embedding methods.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2023; v1 submitted 9 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Transfer Learning for Instance Segmentation of Waste Bottles using Mask R-CNN Algorithm
Authors:
Punitha Jaikumar,
Remy Vandaele,
Varun Ojha
Abstract:
This paper proposes a methodological approach with a transfer learning scheme for plastic waste bottle detection and instance segmentation using the \textit{mask region proposal convolutional neural network} (Mask R-CNN). Plastic bottles constitute one of the major pollutants posing a serious threat to the environment both in oceans and on land. The automated identification and segregation of bott…
▽ More
This paper proposes a methodological approach with a transfer learning scheme for plastic waste bottle detection and instance segmentation using the \textit{mask region proposal convolutional neural network} (Mask R-CNN). Plastic bottles constitute one of the major pollutants posing a serious threat to the environment both in oceans and on land. The automated identification and segregation of bottles can facilitate plastic waste recycling. We prepare a custom-made dataset of 192 bottle images with pixel-by pixel-polygon annotation for the automatic segmentation task. The proposed transfer learning scheme makes use of a Mask R-CNN model pre-trained on the Microsoft COCO dataset. We present a comprehensive scheme for fine-tuning the base pre-trained Mask-RCNN model on our custom dataset. Our final fine-tuned model has achieved 59.4 \textit{mean average precision} (mAP), which corresponds to the MS COCO metric. The results indicate a promising application of deep learning for detecting waste bottles.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Topologically Regularized Data Embeddings
Authors:
Robin Vandaele,
Bo Kang,
Jefrey Lijffijt,
Tijl De Bie,
Yvan Saeys
Abstract:
Unsupervised feature learning often finds low-dimensional embeddings that capture the structure of complex data. For tasks for which prior expert topological knowledge is available, incorporating this into the learned representation may lead to higher quality embeddings. For example, this may help one to embed the data into a given number of clusters, or to accommodate for noise that prevents one…
▽ More
Unsupervised feature learning often finds low-dimensional embeddings that capture the structure of complex data. For tasks for which prior expert topological knowledge is available, incorporating this into the learned representation may lead to higher quality embeddings. For example, this may help one to embed the data into a given number of clusters, or to accommodate for noise that prevents one from deriving the distribution of the data over the model directly, which can then be learned more effectively. However, a general tool for integrating different prior topological knowledge into embeddings is lacking. Although differentiable topology layers have been recently developed that can (re)shape embeddings into prespecified topological models, they have two important limitations for representation learning, which we address in this paper. First, the currently suggested topological losses fail to represent simple models such as clusters and flares in a natural manner. Second, these losses neglect all original structural (such as neighborhood) information in the data that is useful for learning. We overcome these limitations by introducing a new set of topological losses, and proposing their usage as a way for topologically regularizing data embeddings to naturally represent a prespecified model. We include thorough experiments on synthetic and real data that highlight the usefulness and versatility of this approach, with applications ranging from modeling high-dimensional single-cell data, to graph embedding.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2022; v1 submitted 18 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
The Curse Revisited: When are Distances Informative for the Ground Truth in Noisy High-Dimensional Data?
Authors:
Robin Vandaele,
Bo Kang,
Tijl De Bie,
Yvan Saeys
Abstract:
Distances between data points are widely used in machine learning applications. Yet, when corrupted by noise, these distances -- and thus the models based upon them -- may lose their usefulness in high dimensions. Indeed, the small marginal effects of the noise may then accumulate quickly, shifting empirical closest and furthest neighbors away from the ground truth. In this paper, we exactly chara…
▽ More
Distances between data points are widely used in machine learning applications. Yet, when corrupted by noise, these distances -- and thus the models based upon them -- may lose their usefulness in high dimensions. Indeed, the small marginal effects of the noise may then accumulate quickly, shifting empirical closest and furthest neighbors away from the ground truth. In this paper, we exactly characterize such effects in noisy high-dimensional data using an asymptotic probabilistic expression. Previously, it has been argued that neighborhood queries become meaningless and unstable when distance concentration occurs, which means that there is a poor relative discrimination between the furthest and closest neighbors in the data. However, we conclude that this is not necessarily the case when we decompose the data in a ground truth -- which we aim to recover -- and noise component. More specifically, we derive that under particular conditions, empirical neighborhood relations affected by noise are still likely to be truthful even when distance concentration occurs. We also include thorough empirical verification of our results, as well as interesting experiments in which our derived 'phase shift' where neighbors become random or not turns out to be identical to the phase shift where common dimensionality reduction methods perform poorly or well for recovering low-dimensional reconstructions of high-dimensional data with dense noise.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2022; v1 submitted 22 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
