-
A Security and Trust Framework for Decentralized 5G Marketplaces
Authors:
José María Jorquera Valero,
Manuel Gil Pérez,
Gregorio Martínez Pérez
Abstract:
5G networks intend to cover user demands through multi-party collaborations in a secure and trustworthy manner. To this end, marketplaces play a pivotal role as enablers for network service consumers and infrastructure providers to offer, negotiate, and purchase 5G resources and services. Nevertheless, marketplaces often do not ensure trustworthy networking by analyzing the security and trust of t…
▽ More
5G networks intend to cover user demands through multi-party collaborations in a secure and trustworthy manner. To this end, marketplaces play a pivotal role as enablers for network service consumers and infrastructure providers to offer, negotiate, and purchase 5G resources and services. Nevertheless, marketplaces often do not ensure trustworthy networking by analyzing the security and trust of their members and offers. This paper presents a security and trust framework to enable the selection of reliable third-party providers based on their history and reputation. In addition, it also introduces a reward and punishment mechanism to continuously update trust scores according to security events. Finally, we showcase a real use case in which the security and trust framework is being applied.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Trust-as-a-Service: A reputation-enabled trust framework for 5G networks
Authors:
José María Jorquera Valero,
Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez,
Manuel Gil Pérez,
Alberto Huertas Celdrán,
Gregorio Martínez Pérez
Abstract:
Trust, security, and privacy are three of the major pillars to assemble the fifth generation network and beyond. Despite such pillars are principally interconnected, they arise a multitude of challenges to be addressed separately. 5G ought to offer flexible and pervasive computing capabilities across multiple domains according to user demands and assuring trustworthy network providers. Distributed…
▽ More
Trust, security, and privacy are three of the major pillars to assemble the fifth generation network and beyond. Despite such pillars are principally interconnected, they arise a multitude of challenges to be addressed separately. 5G ought to offer flexible and pervasive computing capabilities across multiple domains according to user demands and assuring trustworthy network providers. Distributed marketplaces expect to boost the trading of heterogeneous resources so as to enable the establishment of pervasive service chains between cross-domains. Nevertheless, the need for reliable parties as ``marketplace operators'' plays a pivotal role to achieving a trustworthy ecosystem. One of the principal blockages in managing foreseeable networks is the need of adapting previous trust models to accomplish the new network and business requirements. In this regard, this article is centered on trust management of 5G multi-party networks. The design of a reputation-based trust framework is proposed as a Trust-as-a-Service (TaaS) solution for any distributed multi-stakeholder environment where zero trust and zero-touch principles should be met. Besides, a literature review is also conducted to recognize the network and business requirements currently envisaged. Finally, the validation of the proposed trust framework is performed in a real research environment, the 5GBarcelona testbed, leveraging 12% of a 2.1GHz CPU with 20 cores and 2% of the 30GiB memory. In this regard, these outcomes reveal the feasibility of the TaaS solution in the context of determining reliable network operators.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
LwHBench: A low-level hardware component benchmark and dataset for Single Board Computers
Authors:
Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez,
José María Jorquera Valero,
Alberto Huertas Celdrán,
Gérôme Bovet,
Manuel Gil Pérez,
Gregorio Martínez Pérez
Abstract:
In today's computing environment, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) and data processing are moving toward the Internet of Things (IoT) and Edge computing paradigms, benchmarking resource-constrained devices is a critical task to evaluate their suitability and performance. Between the employed devices, Single-Board Computers arise as multi-purpose and affordable systems. The literature has explore…
▽ More
In today's computing environment, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) and data processing are moving toward the Internet of Things (IoT) and Edge computing paradigms, benchmarking resource-constrained devices is a critical task to evaluate their suitability and performance. Between the employed devices, Single-Board Computers arise as multi-purpose and affordable systems. The literature has explored Single-Board Computers performance when running high-level benchmarks specialized in particular application scenarios, such as AI or medical applications. However, lower-level benchmarking applications and datasets are needed to enable new Edge-based AI solutions for network, system and service management based on device and component performance, such as individual device identification. Thus, this paper presents LwHBench, a low-level hardware benchmarking application for Single-Board Computers that measures the performance of CPU, GPU, Memory and Storage taking into account the component constraints in these types of devices. LwHBench has been implemented for Raspberry Pi devices and run for 100 days on a set of 45 devices to generate an extensive dataset that allows the usage of AI techniques in scenarios where performance data can help in the device management process. Besides, to demonstrate the inter-scenario capability of the dataset, a series of AI-enabled use cases about device identification and context impact on performance are presented as exploration of the published data. Finally, the benchmark application has been adapted and applied to an agriculture-focused scenario where three RockPro64 devices are present.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2022; v1 submitted 18 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
A methodology to identify identical single-board computers based on hardware behavior fingerprinting
Authors:
Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez,
José María Jorquera Valero,
Alberto Huertas Celdrán,
Gérôme Bovet,
Manuel Gil Pérez,
Gregorio Martínez Pérez
Abstract:
The connectivity and resource-constrained nature of single-board devices open the door to cybersecurity concerns affecting Internet of Things (IoT) scenarios. One of the most important issues is the presence of unauthorized IoT devices that want to impersonate legitimate ones by using identical hardware and software specifications. This situation can provoke sensitive information leakages, data po…
▽ More
The connectivity and resource-constrained nature of single-board devices open the door to cybersecurity concerns affecting Internet of Things (IoT) scenarios. One of the most important issues is the presence of unauthorized IoT devices that want to impersonate legitimate ones by using identical hardware and software specifications. This situation can provoke sensitive information leakages, data poisoning, or privilege escalation in IoT scenarios. Combining behavioral fingerprinting and Machine/Deep Learning (ML/DL) techniques is a promising approach to identify these malicious spoofing devices by detecting minor performance differences generated by imperfections in manufacturing. However, existing solutions are not suitable for single-board devices since they do not consider their hardware and software limitations, underestimate critical aspects such as fingerprint stability or context changes, and do not explore the potential of ML/DL techniques. To improve it, this work first identifies the essential properties for single-board device identification: uniqueness, stability, diversity, scalability, efficiency, robustness, and security. Then, a novel methodology relies on behavioral fingerprinting to identify identical single-board devices and meet the previous properties. The methodology leverages the different built-in components of the system and ML/DL techniques, comparing the device internal behavior with each other to detect manufacturing variations. The methodology validation has been performed in a real environment composed of 15 identical Raspberry Pi 4 B and 10 Raspberry Pi 3 B+ devices, obtaining a 91.9% average TPR and identifying all devices by setting a 50% threshold in the evaluation process. Finally, a discussion compares the proposed solution with related work, highlighting the fingerprint properties not met, and provides important lessons learned and limitations.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2022; v1 submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
A Survey on Device Behavior Fingerprinting: Data Sources, Techniques, Application Scenarios, and Datasets
Authors:
Pedro Miguel Sánchez Sánchez,
Jose María Jorquera Valero,
Alberto Huertas Celdrán,
Gérôme Bovet,
Manuel Gil Pérez,
Gregorio Martínez Pérez
Abstract:
In the current network-based computing world, where the number of interconnected devices grows exponentially, their diversity, malfunctions, and cybersecurity threats are increasing at the same rate. To guarantee the correct functioning and performance of novel environments such as Smart Cities, Industry 4.0, or crowdsensing, it is crucial to identify the capabilities of their devices (e.g., senso…
▽ More
In the current network-based computing world, where the number of interconnected devices grows exponentially, their diversity, malfunctions, and cybersecurity threats are increasing at the same rate. To guarantee the correct functioning and performance of novel environments such as Smart Cities, Industry 4.0, or crowdsensing, it is crucial to identify the capabilities of their devices (e.g., sensors, actuators) and detect potential misbehavior that may arise due to cyberattacks, system faults, or misconfigurations. With this goal in mind, a promising research field emerged focusing on creating and managing fingerprints that model the behavior of both the device actions and its components. The article at hand studies the recent growth of the device behavior fingerprinting field in terms of application scenarios, behavioral sources, and processing and evaluation techniques. First, it performs a comprehensive review of the device types, behavioral data, and processing and evaluation techniques used by the most recent and representative research works dealing with two major scenarios: device identification and device misbehavior detection. After that, each work is deeply analyzed and compared, emphasizing its characteristics, advantages, and limitations. This article also provides researchers with a review of the most relevant characteristics of existing datasets as most of the novel processing techniques are based on machine learning and deep learning. Finally, it studies the evolution of these two scenarios in recent years, providing lessons learned, current trends, and future research challenges to guide new solutions in the area.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2021; v1 submitted 7 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
