Distributed Parallelization of xPU Stencil Computations in Julia
Authors:
Samuel Omlin,
Ludovic Räss,
Ivan Utkin
Abstract:
We present a straightforward approach for distributed parallelization of stencil-based xPU applications on a regular staggered grid, which is instantiated in the package ImplicitGlobalGrid.jl. The approach allows to leverage remote direct memory access and enables close to ideal weak scaling of real-world applications on thousands of GPUs. The communication costs can be easily hidden behind comput…
▽ More
We present a straightforward approach for distributed parallelization of stencil-based xPU applications on a regular staggered grid, which is instantiated in the package ImplicitGlobalGrid.jl. The approach allows to leverage remote direct memory access and enables close to ideal weak scaling of real-world applications on thousands of GPUs. The communication costs can be easily hidden behind computation.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
Evaluating the Impact of Source Code Parsers on ML4SE Models
Authors:
Ilya Utkin,
Egor Spirin,
Egor Bogomolov,
Timofey Bryksin
Abstract:
As researchers and practitioners apply Machine Learning to increasingly more software engineering problems, the approaches they use become more sophisticated. A lot of modern approaches utilize internal code structure in the form of an abstract syntax tree (AST) or its extensions: path-based representation, complex graph combining AST with additional edges. Even though the process of extracting AS…
▽ More
As researchers and practitioners apply Machine Learning to increasingly more software engineering problems, the approaches they use become more sophisticated. A lot of modern approaches utilize internal code structure in the form of an abstract syntax tree (AST) or its extensions: path-based representation, complex graph combining AST with additional edges. Even though the process of extracting ASTs from code can be done with different parsers, the impact of choosing a parser on the final model quality remains unstudied. Moreover, researchers often omit the exact details of extracting particular code representations.
In this work, we evaluate two models, namely Code2Seq and TreeLSTM, in the method name prediction task backed by eight different parsers for the Java language. To unify the process of data preparation with different parsers, we develop SuperParser, a multi-language parser-agnostic library based on PathMiner. SuperParser facilitates the end-to-end creation of datasets suitable for training and evaluation of ML models that work with structural information from source code. Our results demonstrate that trees built by different parsers vary in their structure and content. We then analyze how this diversity affects the models' quality and show that the quality gap between the most and least suitable parsers for both models turns out to be significant. Finally, we discuss other features of the parsers that researchers and practitioners should take into account when selecting a parser along with the impact on the models' quality.
The code of SuperParser is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6366591. We also publish Java-norm, the dataset we use to evaluate the models: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6366599.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
