-
Stretching Demi-Bits and Nondeterministic-Secure Pseudorandomness
Authors:
Iddo Tzameret,
Lu-Ming Zhang
Abstract:
We develop the theory of cryptographic nondeterministic-secure pseudorandomness beyond the point reached by Rudich's original work (Rudich 1997), and apply it to draw new consequences in average-case complexity and proof complexity. Specifically, we show the following:
*Demi-bit stretch*: Super-bits and demi-bits are variants of cryptographic pseudorandom generators which are secure against nond…
▽ More
We develop the theory of cryptographic nondeterministic-secure pseudorandomness beyond the point reached by Rudich's original work (Rudich 1997), and apply it to draw new consequences in average-case complexity and proof complexity. Specifically, we show the following:
*Demi-bit stretch*: Super-bits and demi-bits are variants of cryptographic pseudorandom generators which are secure against nondeterministic statistical tests (Rudich 1997). They were introduced to rule out certain approaches to proving strong complexity lower bounds beyond the limitations set out by the Natural Proofs barrier (Rudich and Razborov 1997). Whether demi-bits are stretchable at all had been an open problem since their introduction. We answer this question affirmatively by showing that: every demi-bit $b:\{0,1\}^n\to \{0,1\}^{n+1}$ can be stretched into sublinear many demi-bits $b':\{0,1\}^{n}\to \{0,1\}^{n+n^{c}}$, for every constant $0<c<1$.
>>> see rest of abstract in paper.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Simple Hard Instances for Low-Depth Algebraic Proofs
Authors:
Nashlen Govindasamy,
Tuomas Hakoniemi,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We prove super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of propositional proof systems operating with constant-depth algebraic circuits over fields of zero characteristic. Specifically, we show that the subset-sum variant $\sum_{i,j,k,\ell\in[n]} z_{ijk\ell}x_ix_j x_k x_\ell - β=0$, for Boolean variables, does not have polynomial-size IPS refutations where the refutations are multilinear and written as…
▽ More
We prove super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of propositional proof systems operating with constant-depth algebraic circuits over fields of zero characteristic. Specifically, we show that the subset-sum variant $\sum_{i,j,k,\ell\in[n]} z_{ijk\ell}x_ix_j x_k x_\ell - β=0$, for Boolean variables, does not have polynomial-size IPS refutations where the refutations are multilinear and written as constant-depth circuits.
Andrews and Forbes (STOC'22) established recently a constant-depth IPS lower bound, but their hard instance does not have itself small constant-depth circuits, while our instance is computable already with small depth-2 circuits.
Our argument relies on extending the recent breakthrough lower bounds against constant-depth algebraic circuits by Limaye, Srinivasan and Tavenas (FOCS'21) to the functional lower bound framework of Forbes, Shpilka, Tzameret and Wigderson (ToC'21), and may be of independent interest. Specifically, we construct a polynomial $f$ computable with small-size constant-depth circuits, such that the multilinear polynomial computing $1/f$ over Boolean values and its appropriate set-multilinear projection are hard for constant-depth circuits.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
First-Order Reasoning and Efficient Semi-Algebraic Proofs
Authors:
Fedor Part,
Neil Thapen,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
Semi-algebraic proof systems such as sum-of-squares (SoS) have attracted a lot of attention recently due to their relation to approximation algorithms: constant degree semi-algebraic proofs lead to conjecturally optimal polynomial-time approximation algorithms for important NP-hard optimization problems. Motivated by the need to allow a more streamlined and uniform framework for working with SoS p…
▽ More
Semi-algebraic proof systems such as sum-of-squares (SoS) have attracted a lot of attention recently due to their relation to approximation algorithms: constant degree semi-algebraic proofs lead to conjecturally optimal polynomial-time approximation algorithms for important NP-hard optimization problems. Motivated by the need to allow a more streamlined and uniform framework for working with SoS proofs than the restrictive propositional level, we initiate a systematic first-order logical investigation into the kinds of reasoning possible in algebraic and semi-algebraic proof systems. Specifically, we develop first-order theories that capture in a precise manner constant degree algebraic and semi-algebraic proof systems: every statement of a certain form that is provable in our theories translates into a family of constant degree polynomial calculus or SoS refutations, respectively; and using a reflection principle, the converse also holds.
This places algebraic and semi-algebraic proof systems in the established framework of bounded arithmetic, while providing theories corresponding to systems that vary quite substantially from the usual propositional-logic ones.
We give examples of how our semi-algebraic theory proves statements such as the pigeonhole principle, we provide a separation between algebraic and semi-algebraic theories, and we describe initial attempts to go beyond these theories by introducing extensions that use the inequality symbol, identifying along the way which extensions lead outside the scope of constant degree SoS. Moreover, we prove new results for propositional proofs, and specifically extend Berkholz's dynamic-by-static simulation of polynomial calculus (PC) by SoS to PC with the radical rule.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2021; v1 submitted 16 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Semi-Algebraic Proofs, IPS Lower Bounds and the $τ$-Conjecture: Can a Natural Number be Negative?
Authors:
Yaroslav Alekseev,
Dima Grigoriev,
Edward A. Hirsch,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We introduce the binary value principle which is a simple subset-sum instance expressing that a natural number written in binary cannot be negative, relating it to central problems in proof and algebraic complexity. We prove conditional superpolynomial lower bounds on the Ideal Proof System (IPS) refutation size of this instance, based on a well-known hypothesis by Shub and Smale about the hardnes…
▽ More
We introduce the binary value principle which is a simple subset-sum instance expressing that a natural number written in binary cannot be negative, relating it to central problems in proof and algebraic complexity. We prove conditional superpolynomial lower bounds on the Ideal Proof System (IPS) refutation size of this instance, based on a well-known hypothesis by Shub and Smale about the hardness of computing factorials, where IPS is the strong algebraic proof system introduced by Grochow and Pitassi (2018). Conversely, we show that short IPS refutations of this instance bridge the gap between sufficiently strong algebraic and semi-algebraic proof systems. Our results extend to full-fledged IPS the paradigm introduced in Forbes et al. (2016), whereby lower bounds against subsystems of IPS were obtained using restricted algebraic circuit lower bounds, and demonstrate that the binary value principle captures the advantage of semi-algebraic over algebraic reasoning, for sufficiently strong systems. Specifically, we show the following: (abstract continues in document.)
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Uniform, Integral and Feasible Proofs for the Determinant Identities
Authors:
Iddo Tzameret,
Stephen A. Cook
Abstract:
Aiming to provide weak as possible axiomatic assumptions in which one can develop basic linear algebra, we give a uniform and integral version of the short propositional proofs for the determinant identities demonstrated over $GF(2)$ in Hrubes-Tzameret [SICOMP'15]. Specifically, we show that the multiplicativity of the determinant function and the Cayley-Hamilton theorem over the integers are prov…
▽ More
Aiming to provide weak as possible axiomatic assumptions in which one can develop basic linear algebra, we give a uniform and integral version of the short propositional proofs for the determinant identities demonstrated over $GF(2)$ in Hrubes-Tzameret [SICOMP'15]. Specifically, we show that the multiplicativity of the determinant function and the Cayley-Hamilton theorem over the integers are provable in the bounded arithmetic theory $\mathbf{VNC}^2$; the latter is a first-order theory corresponding to the complexity class $\mathbf{NC}^2$ consisting of problems solvable by uniform families of polynomial-size circuits and $O(\log ^2 n)$-depth. This also establishes the existence of uniform polynomial-size $\mathbf{NC}^2$-Frege proofs of the basic determinant identities over the integers (previous propositional proofs hold only over the two element field).
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Resolution with Counting: Dag-Like Lower Bounds and Different Moduli
Authors:
Fedor Part,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
Resolution over linear equations is a natural extension of the popular resolution refutation system, augmented with the ability to carry out basic counting. Denoted Res(lin_R), this refutation system operates with disjunctions of linear equations with boolean variables over a ring R, to refute unsatisfiable sets of such disjunctions. Beginning in the work of [RT08], through the work of [IS14] whic…
▽ More
Resolution over linear equations is a natural extension of the popular resolution refutation system, augmented with the ability to carry out basic counting. Denoted Res(lin_R), this refutation system operates with disjunctions of linear equations with boolean variables over a ring R, to refute unsatisfiable sets of such disjunctions. Beginning in the work of [RT08], through the work of [IS14] which focused on tree-like lower bounds, this refutation system was shown to be fairly strong. Subsequent work (cf.[Kra17, IS14, KO18, GK18]) made it evident that establishing lower bounds against general Res(lin_R) refutations is a challenging and interesting task since the system captures a 'minimal' extension of resolution with counting gates for which no super-polynomial lower bounds are known to date.
We provide the first super-polynomial size lower bounds on general (dag-like) resolution over linear equations refutations in the large characteristic regime. In particular we prove that the subset-sum principle 1+x1+...+2^n xn=0 requires refutations of exponential size over Q. Our proof technique is nontrivial and novel: roughly speaking, we show that under certain conditions every refutation of a subset-sum instance f=0 must pass through a fat clause containing an equation f=alpha for each alpha in the image of f under boolean assignments. We develop a somewhat different approach to prove exponential lower bounds against tree-like refutations of any subset-sum instance that depends on n variables, hence also separating tree-like from dag-like refutations over the rationals. (Abstract continued in the full paper.)
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2019; v1 submitted 25 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Algebraic Proof Complexity: Progress, Frontiers and Challenges
Authors:
Tonnian Pitassi,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We survey recent progress in the proof complexity of strong proof systems and its connection to algebraic circuit complexity, showing how the synergy between the two gives rise to new approaches to fundamental open questions, solutions to old problems, and new directions of research. In particular, we focus on tight connections between proof complexity lower bounds (namely, lower bounds on the siz…
▽ More
We survey recent progress in the proof complexity of strong proof systems and its connection to algebraic circuit complexity, showing how the synergy between the two gives rise to new approaches to fundamental open questions, solutions to old problems, and new directions of research. In particular, we focus on tight connections between proof complexity lower bounds (namely, lower bounds on the size of proofs of certain tautologies), algebraic circuit lower bounds, and the Polynomial Identity Testing problem from derandomization theory.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Proof Complexity Lower Bounds from Algebraic Circuit Complexity
Authors:
Michael A. Forbes,
Amir Shpilka,
Iddo Tzameret,
Avi Wigderson
Abstract:
We give upper and lower bounds on the power of subsystems of the Ideal Proof System (IPS), the algebraic proof system recently proposed by Grochow and Pitassi, where the circuits comprising the proof come from various restricted algebraic circuit classes. This mimics an established research direction in the boolean setting for subsystems of Extended Frege proofs, where proof-lines are circuits fro…
▽ More
We give upper and lower bounds on the power of subsystems of the Ideal Proof System (IPS), the algebraic proof system recently proposed by Grochow and Pitassi, where the circuits comprising the proof come from various restricted algebraic circuit classes. This mimics an established research direction in the boolean setting for subsystems of Extended Frege proofs, where proof-lines are circuits from restricted boolean circuit classes. Except one, all of the subsystems considered in this paper can simulate the well-studied Nullstellensatz proof system, and prior to this work there were no known lower bounds when measuring proof size by the algebraic complexity of the polynomials (except with respect to degree, or to sparsity).
We give two general methods of converting certain algebraic lower bounds into proof complexity ones. Our methods require stronger notions of lower bounds, which lower bound a polynomial as well as an entire family of polynomials it defines. Our techniques are reminiscent of existing methods for converting boolean circuit lower bounds into related proof complexity results, such as feasible interpolation. We obtain the relevant types of lower bounds for a variety of classes (sparse polynomials, depth-3 powering formulas, read-once oblivious algebraic branching programs, and multilinear formulas), and infer the relevant proof complexity results. We complement our lower bounds by giving short refutations of the previously-studied subset-sum axiom using IPS subsystems, allowing us to conclude strict separations between some of these subsystems.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Characterizing Propositional Proofs as Non-Commutative Formulas
Authors:
Fu Li,
Iddo Tzameret,
Zhengyu Wang
Abstract:
Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is a proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a set of fixed sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, a…
▽ More
Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is a proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a set of fixed sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [Nis91] who used a particularly transparent argument.
In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies $T$ to non-commutative polynomials $p$, such that: if $T$ has a polynomial-size Frege proof then $p$ has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when $T$ is a DNF, if $p$ has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over $GF(2)$ then $T$ has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2015; v1 submitted 30 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Generating Matrix Identities and Proof Complexity
Authors:
Fu Li,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
Motivated by the fundamental lower bounds questions in proof complexity, we initiate the study of matrix identities as hard instances for strong proof systems. A matrix identity of $d \times d$ matrices over a field $\mathbb{F}$, is a non-commutative polynomial $f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ over $\mathbb{F}$ such that $f$ vanishes on every $d \times d$ matrix assignment to its variables.
We focus on arith…
▽ More
Motivated by the fundamental lower bounds questions in proof complexity, we initiate the study of matrix identities as hard instances for strong proof systems. A matrix identity of $d \times d$ matrices over a field $\mathbb{F}$, is a non-commutative polynomial $f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ over $\mathbb{F}$ such that $f$ vanishes on every $d \times d$ matrix assignment to its variables.
We focus on arithmetic proofs, which are proofs of polynomial identities operating with arithmetic circuits and whose axioms are the polynomial-ring axioms (these proofs serve as an algebraic analogue of the Extended Frege propositional proof system; and over $GF(2)$ they constitute formally a sub-system of Extended Frege [HT12]). We introduce a decreasing in strength hierarchy of proof systems within arithmetic proofs, in which the $d$th level is a sound and complete proof system for proving $d \times d$ matrix identities (over a given field). For each level $d>2$ in the hierarchy, we establish a proof-size lower bound in terms of the number of variables in the matrix identity proved: we show the existence of a family of matrix identities $f_n$ with $n$ variables, such that any proof of $f_n=0$ requires $Ω(n^{2d})$ number of lines. The lower bound argument uses fundamental results from the theory of algebras with polynomial identities together with a generalization of the arguments in [Hru11].
We then set out to study matrix identities as hard instances for (full) arithmetic proofs. We present two conjectures, one about non-commutative arithmetic circuit complexity and the other about proof complexity, under which up to exponential-size lower bounds on arithmetic proofs (in terms of the arithmetic circuit size of the identities proved) hold. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our approach to strong propositional proof systems such as Extended Frege.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2014; v1 submitted 21 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Sparser Random 3SAT Refutation Algorithms and the Interpolation Problem
Authors:
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We formalize a combinatorial principle, called the 3XOR principle, due to Feige, Kim and Ofek (2006), as a family of unsatisfiable propositional formulas for which refutations of small size in any propositional proof system that possesses the feasible interpolation property imply an efficient deterministic refutation algorithm for random 3SAT with n variables and Ω(n^{1.4}) clauses. Such small siz…
▽ More
We formalize a combinatorial principle, called the 3XOR principle, due to Feige, Kim and Ofek (2006), as a family of unsatisfiable propositional formulas for which refutations of small size in any propositional proof system that possesses the feasible interpolation property imply an efficient deterministic refutation algorithm for random 3SAT with n variables and Ω(n^{1.4}) clauses. Such small size refutations would improve the state-of-the-art (with respect to the clause density) efficient refutation algorithm, which works only for Ω(n^{1.5}) many clauses (Feige and Ofek (2007)).
We demonstrate polynomial-size refutations of the 3XOR principle in resolution operating with disjunctions of quadratic equations with small integer coefficients, denoted R(quad); this is a weak extension of cutting planes with small coefficients. We show that R(quad) is weakly automatizable iff R(lin) is weakly automatizable, where R(lin) is similar to R(quad) but with linear instead of quadratic equations (introduced in Raz and Tzameret (2008)). This reduces the problem of refuting random 3CNF with n variables and Ω(n^{1.4}) clauses to the interpolation problem of R(quad) and to the weak automatizability of R(lin).
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2014; v1 submitted 4 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
Short Proofs for the Determinant Identities
Authors:
Pavel Hrubes,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We study arithmetic proof systems P_c(F) and P_f(F) operating with arithmetic circuits and arithmetic formulas, respectively, that prove polynomial identities over a field F. We establish a series of structural theorems about these proof systems, the main one stating that P_c(F) proofs can be balanced: if a polynomial identity of syntactic degree d and depth k has a P_c(F) proof of size s, then it…
▽ More
We study arithmetic proof systems P_c(F) and P_f(F) operating with arithmetic circuits and arithmetic formulas, respectively, that prove polynomial identities over a field F. We establish a series of structural theorems about these proof systems, the main one stating that P_c(F) proofs can be balanced: if a polynomial identity of syntactic degree d and depth k has a P_c(F) proof of size s, then it also has a P_c(F) proof of size poly(s,d) and depth O(k+\log^2 d + \log d\cd \log s). As a corollary, we obtain a quasipolynomial simulation of P_c(F) by P_f(F), for identities of a polynomial syntactic degree.
Using these results we obtain the following: consider the identities det(XY) = det(X)det(Y) and det(Z)= z_{11}... z_{nn}, where X,Y and Z are nxn square matrices and Z is a triangular matrix with z_{11},..., z_{nn} on the diagonal (and det is the determinant polynomial). Then we can construct a polynomial-size arithmetic circuit det such that the above identities have P_c(F) proofs of polynomial-size and O(\log^2 n) depth. Moreover, there exists an arithmetic formula det of size n^{O(\log n)} such that the above identities have P_f(F) proofs of size n^{O(\log n)}.
This yields a solution to a basic open problem in propositional proof complexity, namely, whether there are polynomial-size NC^2-Frege proofs for the determinant identities and the hard matrix identities, as considered, e.g., in Soltys and Cook (2004) (cf., Beame and Pitassi (1998)). We show that matrix identities like AB=I {\to} BA=I (for matrices over the two element field) as well as basic properties of the determinant have polynomial-size NC^2-Frege proofs, and quasipolynomial-size Frege proofs.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2013; v1 submitted 29 December, 2011;
originally announced December 2011.
-
Short Propositional Refutations for Dense Random 3CNF Formulas
Authors:
Sebastian Müller,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
Random 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notably are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with $Ω(n^{1.5-ε}) $ clauses [Chvatal and Szemeredi (1988), Ben-Sasson and Wigderson…
▽ More
Random 3CNF formulas constitute an important distribution for measuring the average-case behavior of propositional proof systems. Lower bounds for random 3CNF refutations in many propositional proof systems are known. Most notably are the exponential-size resolution refutation lower bounds for random 3CNF formulas with $Ω(n^{1.5-ε}) $ clauses [Chvatal and Szemeredi (1988), Ben-Sasson and Wigderson (2001)]. On the other hand, the only known non-trivial upper bound on the size of random 3CNF refutations in a non-abstract propositional proof system is for resolution with $Ω(n^{2}/\log n) $ clauses, shown by Beame et al. (2002). In this paper we show that already standard propositional proof systems, within the hierarchy of Frege proofs, admit short refutations for random 3CNF formulas, for sufficiently large clause-to-variable ratio. Specifically, we demonstrate polynomial-size propositional refutations whose lines are $TC^0$ formulas (i.e., $TC^0$-Frege proofs) for random 3CNF formulas with $ n $ variables and $ Ω(n^{1.4}) $ clauses.
The idea is based on demonstrating efficient propositional correctness proofs of the random 3CNF unsatisfiability witnesses given by Feige, Kim and Ofek (2006). Since the soundness of these witnesses is verified using spectral techniques, we develop an appropriate way to reason about eigenvectors in propositional systems. To carry out the full argument we work inside weak formal systems of arithmetic and use a general translation scheme to propositional proofs.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2011; v1 submitted 20 January, 2011;
originally announced January 2011.
-
Algebraic Proofs over Noncommutative Formulas
Authors:
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We study possible formulations of algebraic propositional proof systems operating with noncommutative formulas. We observe that a simple formulation gives rise to systems at least as strong as Frege---yielding a semantic way to define a Cook-Reckhow (i.e., polynomially verifiable) algebraic analog of Frege proofs, different from that given in [BIKPRS96,GH03]. We then turn to an apparently weaker s…
▽ More
We study possible formulations of algebraic propositional proof systems operating with noncommutative formulas. We observe that a simple formulation gives rise to systems at least as strong as Frege---yielding a semantic way to define a Cook-Reckhow (i.e., polynomially verifiable) algebraic analog of Frege proofs, different from that given in [BIKPRS96,GH03]. We then turn to an apparently weaker system, namely, polynomial calculus (PC) where polynomials are written as ordered formulas (PC over ordered formulas, for short): an ordered polynomial is a noncommutative polynomial in which the order of products in every monomial respects a fixed linear order on variables; an algebraic formula is ordered if the polynomial computed by each of its subformulas is ordered. We show that PC over ordered formulas is strictly stronger than resolution, polynomial calculus and polynomial calculus with resolution (PCR) and admits polynomial-size refutations for the pigeonhole principle and the Tseitin's formulas. We conclude by proposing an approach for establishing lower bounds on PC over ordered formulas proofs, and related systems, based on properties of lower bounds on noncommutative formulas.
The motivation behind this work is develo** techniques incorporating rank arguments (similar to those used in algebraic circuit complexity) for establishing lower bounds on propositional proofs.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2010; v1 submitted 13 April, 2010;
originally announced April 2010.
-
Resolution over Linear Equations and Multilinear Proofs
Authors:
Ran Raz,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We develop and study the complexity of propositional proof systems of varying strength extending resolution by allowing it to operate with disjunctions of linear equations instead of clauses. We demonstrate polynomial-size refutations for hard tautologies like the pigeonhole principle, Tseitin graph tautologies and the clique-coloring tautologies in these proof systems. Using the (monotone) inte…
▽ More
We develop and study the complexity of propositional proof systems of varying strength extending resolution by allowing it to operate with disjunctions of linear equations instead of clauses. We demonstrate polynomial-size refutations for hard tautologies like the pigeonhole principle, Tseitin graph tautologies and the clique-coloring tautologies in these proof systems. Using the (monotone) interpolation by a communication game technique we establish an exponential-size lower bound on refutations in a certain, considerably strong, fragment of resolution over linear equations, as well as a general polynomial upper bound on (non-monotone) interpolants in this fragment.
We then apply these results to extend and improve previous results on multilinear proofs (over fields of characteristic 0), as studied in [RazTzameret06]. Specifically, we show the following:
1. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas polynomially simulate a certain, considerably strong, fragment of resolution over linear equations.
2. Proofs operating with depth-3 multilinear formulas admit polynomial-size refutations of the pigeonhole principle and Tseitin graph tautologies. The former improve over a previous result that established small multilinear proofs only for the \emph{functional} pigeonhole principle. The latter are different than previous proofs, and apply to multilinear proofs of Tseitin mod p graph tautologies over any field of characteristic 0.
We conclude by connecting resolution over linear equations with extensions of the cutting planes proof system.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2007;
originally announced August 2007.
-
Complexity of Propositional Proofs under a Promise
Authors:
Nachum Dershowitz,
Iddo Tzameret
Abstract:
We study -- within the framework of propositional proof complexity -- the problem of certifying unsatisfiability of CNF formulas under the promise that any satisfiable formula has many satisfying assignments, where ``many'' stands for an explicitly specified function $\Lam$ in the number of variables $n$. To this end, we develop propositional proof systems under different measures of promises (t…
▽ More
We study -- within the framework of propositional proof complexity -- the problem of certifying unsatisfiability of CNF formulas under the promise that any satisfiable formula has many satisfying assignments, where ``many'' stands for an explicitly specified function $\Lam$ in the number of variables $n$. To this end, we develop propositional proof systems under different measures of promises (that is, different $\Lam$) as extensions of resolution. This is done by augmenting resolution with axioms that, roughly, can eliminate sets of truth assignments defined by Boolean circuits. We then investigate the complexity of such systems, obtaining an exponential separation in the average-case between resolution under different size promises:
1. Resolution has polynomial-size refutations for all unsatisfiable 3CNF formulas when the promise is $\eps\cd2^n$, for any constant $0<\eps<1$.
2. There are no sub-exponential size resolution refutations for random 3CNF formulas, when the promise is $2^{δn}$ (and the number of clauses is $o(n^{3/2})$), for any constant $0<δ<1$.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2007;
originally announced July 2007.
