-
In Situ AI Prototy**: Infusing Multimodal Prompts into Mobile Settings with MobileMaker
Authors:
Savvas Petridis,
Michael Xieyang Liu,
Alexander J. Fiannaca,
Vivian Tsai,
Michael Terry,
Carrie J. Cai
Abstract:
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototy** AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-c…
▽ More
Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have lowered the barriers to rapidly prototy** AI-powered features via prompting, especially for mobile-intended use cases. Despite the value of situated user feedback, the process of soliciting early, mobile-situated user feedback on AI prototypes remains challenging. The broad scope and flexibility of LLMs means that, for a given use-case-specific prototype, there is a crucial need to understand the wide range of in-the-wild input likely to be provided by the user, as well as their in-context expectations of the AI's behavior. To explore the concept of in situ AI prototy** and testing, we created MobileMaker: an AI prototy** tool that enables designers to rapidly create mobile AI prototypes that can be tested on-device, and enables testers to make on-device, in-the-field revisions of the prototype through natural language. In an exploratory study with 16 users, we explored how user feedback on prototypes created with MobileMaker compares to that of existing prototy** tools (e.g., Figma, prompt editors). We found that MobileMaker prototypes enabled more serendipitous discovery of: model input edge cases, discrepancies between AI's and user's in-context interpretation of the task, and contextual signals missed by the AI. Furthermore, we learned that while the ability to make in-the-wild revisions led users to feel more fulfilled as active participants in the design process, it might also constrain their feedback to the subset of changes perceived as more actionable or implementable by the prototy** tool.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Code
Authors:
Sebastian Gehrmann,
Abhik Bhattacharjee,
Abinaya Mahendiran,
Alex Wang,
Alexandros Papangelis,
Aman Madaan,
Angelina McMillan-Major,
Anna Shvets,
Ashish Upadhyay,
Bingsheng Yao,
Bryan Wilie,
Chandra Bhagavatula,
Chaobin You,
Craig Thomson,
Cristina Garbacea,
Dakuo Wang,
Daniel Deutsch,
Deyi Xiong,
Di **,
Dimitra Gkatzia,
Dragomir Radev,
Elizabeth Clark,
Esin Durmus,
Faisal Ladhak,
Filip Ginter
, et al. (52 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Evaluation in machine learning is usually informed by past choices, for example which datasets or metrics to use. This standardization enables the comparison on equal footing using leaderboards, but the evaluation choices become sub-optimal as better alternatives arise. This problem is especially pertinent in natural language generation which requires ever-improving suites of datasets, metrics, an…
▽ More
Evaluation in machine learning is usually informed by past choices, for example which datasets or metrics to use. This standardization enables the comparison on equal footing using leaderboards, but the evaluation choices become sub-optimal as better alternatives arise. This problem is especially pertinent in natural language generation which requires ever-improving suites of datasets, metrics, and human evaluation to make definitive claims. To make following best model evaluation practices easier, we introduce GEMv2. The new version of the Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics Benchmark introduces a modular infrastructure for dataset, model, and metric developers to benefit from each others work. GEMv2 supports 40 documented datasets in 51 languages. Models for all datasets can be evaluated online and our interactive data card creation and rendering tools make it easier to add new datasets to the living benchmark.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2022; v1 submitted 22 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Contextual Semantic Parsing for Multilingual Task-Oriented Dialogues
Authors:
Mehrad Moradshahi,
Victoria Tsai,
Giovanni Campagna,
Monica S. Lam
Abstract:
Robust state tracking for task-oriented dialogue systems currently remains restricted to a few popular languages. This paper shows that given a large-scale dialogue data set in one language, we can automatically produce an effective semantic parser for other languages using machine translation. We propose automatic translation of dialogue datasets with alignment to ensure faithful translation of s…
▽ More
Robust state tracking for task-oriented dialogue systems currently remains restricted to a few popular languages. This paper shows that given a large-scale dialogue data set in one language, we can automatically produce an effective semantic parser for other languages using machine translation. We propose automatic translation of dialogue datasets with alignment to ensure faithful translation of slot values and eliminate costly human supervision used in previous benchmarks. We also propose a new contextual semantic parsing model, which encodes the formal slots and values, and only the last agent and user utterances. We show that the succinct representation reduces the compounding effect of translation errors, without harming the accuracy in practice.
We evaluate our approach on several dialogue state tracking benchmarks. On RiSAWOZ, CrossWOZ, CrossWOZ-EN, and MultiWOZ-ZH datasets we improve the state of the art by 11%, 17%, 20%, and 0.3% in joint goal accuracy. We present a comprehensive error analysis for all three datasets showing erroneous annotations can lead to misguided judgments on the quality of the model.
Finally, we present RiSAWOZ English and German datasets, created using our translation methodology. On these datasets, accuracy is within 11% of the original showing that high-accuracy multilingual dialogue datasets are possible without relying on expensive human annotations. We release our datasets and software open source.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2023; v1 submitted 3 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
