-
A General Approach to Approximate Multistage Subgraph Problems
Authors:
Markus Chimani,
Niklas Troost,
Tilo Wiedera
Abstract:
In a Subgraph Problem we are given some graph and want to find a feasible subgraph that optimizes some measure. We consider Multistage Subgraph Problems (MSPs), where we are given a sequence of graph instances (stages) and are asked to find a sequence of subgraphs, one for each stage, such that each is optimal for its respective stage and the subgraphs for subsequent stages are as similar as possi…
▽ More
In a Subgraph Problem we are given some graph and want to find a feasible subgraph that optimizes some measure. We consider Multistage Subgraph Problems (MSPs), where we are given a sequence of graph instances (stages) and are asked to find a sequence of subgraphs, one for each stage, such that each is optimal for its respective stage and the subgraphs for subsequent stages are as similar as possible. We present a framework that provides a $(1/\sqrt{2χ})$-approximation algorithm for the $2$-stage restriction of an MSP if the similarity of subsequent solutions is measured as the intersection cardinality and said MSP is preficient, i.e., we can efficiently find a single-stage solution that prefers some given subset. The approximation factor is dependent on the instance's intertwinement $χ$, a similarity measure for multistage graphs. We also show that for any MSP, independent of similarity measure and preficiency, given an exact or approximation algorithm for a constant number of stages, we can approximate the MSP for an unrestricted number of stages. Finally, we combine and apply these results and show that the above restrictions describe a very rich class of MSPs and that proving membership for this class is mostly straightforward. As examples, we explicitly state these proofs for natural multistage versions of Perfect Matching, Shortest s-t-Path, Minimum s-t-Cut and further classical problems on bipartite or planar graphs, namely Maximum Cut, Vertex Cover, Independent Set, and Biclique.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2023; v1 submitted 6 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
What is Multimodality?
Authors:
Letitia Parcalabescu,
Nils Trost,
Anette Frank
Abstract:
The last years have shown rapid developments in the field of multimodal machine learning, combining e.g., vision, text or speech. In this position paper we explain how the field uses outdated definitions of multimodality that prove unfit for the machine learning era. We propose a new task-relative definition of (multi)modality in the context of multimodal machine learning that focuses on represent…
▽ More
The last years have shown rapid developments in the field of multimodal machine learning, combining e.g., vision, text or speech. In this position paper we explain how the field uses outdated definitions of multimodality that prove unfit for the machine learning era. We propose a new task-relative definition of (multi)modality in the context of multimodal machine learning that focuses on representations and information that are relevant for a given machine learning task. With our new definition of multimodality we aim to provide a missing foundation for multimodal research, an important component of language grounding and a crucial milestone towards NLU.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2021; v1 submitted 10 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Approximating Multistage Matching Problems
Authors:
Markus Chimani,
Niklas Troost,
Tilo Wiedera
Abstract:
In multistage perfect matching problems we are given a sequence of graphs on the same vertex set and asked to find a sequence of perfect matchings, corresponding to the sequence of graphs, such that consecutive matchings are as similar as possible. More precisely, we aim to maximize the intersections, or minimize the unions between consecutive matchings. We show that these problems are NP-hard eve…
▽ More
In multistage perfect matching problems we are given a sequence of graphs on the same vertex set and asked to find a sequence of perfect matchings, corresponding to the sequence of graphs, such that consecutive matchings are as similar as possible. More precisely, we aim to maximize the intersections, or minimize the unions between consecutive matchings. We show that these problems are NP-hard even in very restricted scenarios. We propose new approximation algorithms and present methods to transfer results between different problem variants without loosing approximation guarantees.
△ Less
Submitted 10 May, 2021; v1 submitted 17 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
