-
Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Masking
Authors:
Roland Stolz,
Hanna Krasowski,
Jakob Thumm,
Michael Eichelbeck,
Philipp Gassert,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Continuous action spaces in reinforcement learning (RL) are commonly defined as interval sets. While intervals usually reflect the action boundaries for tasks well, they can be challenging for learning because the typically large global action space leads to frequent exploration of irrelevant actions. Yet, little task knowledge can be sufficient to identify significantly smaller state-specific set…
▽ More
Continuous action spaces in reinforcement learning (RL) are commonly defined as interval sets. While intervals usually reflect the action boundaries for tasks well, they can be challenging for learning because the typically large global action space leads to frequent exploration of irrelevant actions. Yet, little task knowledge can be sufficient to identify significantly smaller state-specific sets of relevant actions. Focusing learning on these relevant actions can significantly improve training efficiency and effectiveness. In this paper, we propose to focus learning on the set of relevant actions and introduce three continuous action masking methods for exactly map** the action space to the state-dependent set of relevant actions. Thus, our methods ensure that only relevant actions are executed, enhancing the predictability of the RL agent and enabling its use in safety-critical applications. We further derive the implications of the proposed methods on the policy gradient. Using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), we evaluate our methods on three control tasks, where the relevant action set is computed based on the system dynamics and a relevant state set. Our experiments show that the three action masking methods achieve higher final rewards and converge faster than the baseline without action masking.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Human-Robot Gym: Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning in Human-Robot Collaboration
Authors:
Jakob Thumm,
Felix Trost,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promising results in robot motion planning with first attempts in human-robot collaboration (HRC). However, a fair comparison of RL approaches in HRC under the constraint of guaranteed safety is yet to be made. We, therefore, present human-robot gym, a benchmark suite for safe RL in HRC. Our benchmark suite provides eight challenging, realistic HRC tasks…
▽ More
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promising results in robot motion planning with first attempts in human-robot collaboration (HRC). However, a fair comparison of RL approaches in HRC under the constraint of guaranteed safety is yet to be made. We, therefore, present human-robot gym, a benchmark suite for safe RL in HRC. Our benchmark suite provides eight challenging, realistic HRC tasks in a modular simulation framework. Most importantly, human-robot gym includes a safety shield that provably guarantees human safety. We are, thereby, the first to provide a benchmark suite to train RL agents that adhere to the safety specifications of real-world HRC. This bridges a critical gap between theoretic RL research and its real-world deployment. Our evaluation of six tasks led to three key results: (a) the diverse nature of the tasks offered by human-robot gym creates a challenging benchmark for state-of-the-art RL methods, (b) incorporating expert knowledge in RL training in the form of an action-based reward can outperform the expert, and (c) our agents negligibly overfit to training data.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2024; v1 submitted 9 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Reducing Safety Interventions in Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Jakob Thumm,
Guillaume Pelat,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown promise in addressing complex robotic challenges. In real-world applications, RL is often accompanied by failsafe controllers as a last resort to avoid catastrophic events. While necessary for safety, these interventions can result in undesirable behaviors, such as abrupt braking or aggressive steering. This paper proposes two safety intervention reductio…
▽ More
Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown promise in addressing complex robotic challenges. In real-world applications, RL is often accompanied by failsafe controllers as a last resort to avoid catastrophic events. While necessary for safety, these interventions can result in undesirable behaviors, such as abrupt braking or aggressive steering. This paper proposes two safety intervention reduction methods: proactive replacement and proactive projection, which change the action of the agent if it leads to a potential failsafe intervention. These approaches are compared to state-of-the-art constrained RL on the OpenAI safety gym benchmark and a human-robot collaboration task. Our study demonstrates that the combination of our method with provably safe RL leads to high-performing policies with zero safety violations and a low number of failsafe interventions. Our versatile method can be applied to a wide range of real-world robotic tasks, while effectively improving safety without sacrificing task performance.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2023; v1 submitted 6 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning: Conceptual Analysis, Survey, and Benchmarking
Authors:
Hanna Krasowski,
Jakob Thumm,
Marlon Müller,
Lukas Schäfer,
Xiao Wang,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Ensuring the safety of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms is crucial to unlock their potential for many real-world tasks. However, vanilla RL and most safe RL approaches do not guarantee safety. In recent years, several methods have been proposed to provide hard safety guarantees for RL, which is essential for applications where unsafe actions could have disastrous consequences. Nevertheless,…
▽ More
Ensuring the safety of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms is crucial to unlock their potential for many real-world tasks. However, vanilla RL and most safe RL approaches do not guarantee safety. In recent years, several methods have been proposed to provide hard safety guarantees for RL, which is essential for applications where unsafe actions could have disastrous consequences. Nevertheless, there is no comprehensive comparison of these provably safe RL methods. Therefore, we introduce a categorization of existing provably safe RL methods, present the conceptual foundations for both continuous and discrete action spaces, and empirically benchmark existing methods. We categorize the methods based on how they adapt the action: action replacement, action projection, and action masking. Our experiments on an inverted pendulum and a quadrotor stabilization task indicate that action replacement is the best-performing approach for these applications despite its comparatively simple realization. Furthermore, adding a reward penalty, every time the safety verification is engaged, improved training performance in our experiments. Finally, we provide practical guidance on selecting provably safe RL approaches depending on the safety specification, RL algorithm, and type of action space.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2023; v1 submitted 13 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Provably Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation in Human Environments
Authors:
Jakob Thumm,
Matthias Althoff
Abstract:
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promising results in the motion planning of manipulators. However, no method guarantees the safety of highly dynamic obstacles, such as humans, in RL-based manipulator control. This lack of formal safety assurances prevents the application of RL for manipulators in real-world human environments. Therefore, we propose a shielding mechanism that ensures ISO…
▽ More
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promising results in the motion planning of manipulators. However, no method guarantees the safety of highly dynamic obstacles, such as humans, in RL-based manipulator control. This lack of formal safety assurances prevents the application of RL for manipulators in real-world human environments. Therefore, we propose a shielding mechanism that ensures ISO-verified human safety while training and deploying RL algorithms on manipulators. We utilize a fast reachability analysis of humans and manipulators to guarantee that the manipulator comes to a complete stop before a human is within its range. Our proposed method guarantees safety and significantly improves the RL performance by preventing episode-ending collisions. We demonstrate the performance of our proposed method in simulation using human motion capture data.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
